RE: female Supremecy

Join Our Community

Collarchat.com

Home Login Search

RE: female Supremecy

View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Ask a Mistress >> RE: female Supremecy

Page: << < prev 5 6 7 8 [9]

Message

<< Older Topic Newer Topic >>

RE: female Supremecy - 1/4/2010 3:59:34 AM

SweetDommes

Posts: 3313
Joined: 10/5/2004
Status: offline

Jumping in way late, here, but I actually watched a thing on TruTV the other day about women and agression - and in the study, women showed just as much (and in some cases more) agression towards certain situations than the men in the study did. It involved being irritated/angered/frustrated by people the participants in the study weren't face to face with, but how many times are leaders irritated by people that they aren't face to face with? I don't see that choosing someone to lead simply because of a superfical quality would help at all - you need to choose the leader based on who they are, not what they are.

To the topic - to say that women are superior to men simply because of their body parts is just as silly as saying that whites are superior to blacks, or people with brown hair are superior to people with red hair, or people with blue eyes are superior to people with green eyes ... or anything else that is completely beyond the control of the person in question. In some areas, a specific group may have advantages over another group, but that other group will have advantages in other areas - so how can you determine that one is superior to another? And anyway, within each group, you have individuals, and just because one could be considered superior to someone else doesn't mean that they all can be (not by a long shot).

_____________________________

Miss Karen and Miss Holly

Earth is the insane asylum for the universe.

Friends are God's apology for relatives

(in reply to subinchico)

Profile

Post #: 161

RE: female Supremecy - 1/4/2010 1:21:30 PM

XYisInferior

Posts: 166
Joined: 2/17/2009
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: SweetDommes

Jumping in way late, here, but I actually watched a thing on TruTV the other day about women and agression - and in the study, women showed just as much (and in some cases more) agression towards certain situations than the men in the study did.

That's interesting. It would be nice to see a link to that study and its findings. Of course, "certain situations" seems the dubious phrase here, and I'd like to know what "aggression" means in context to the report. Additionally, how was it mitigated (or not) by the test subjects? Needless to say, if Women react and act the same as men regarding aggression, that should be evident enough in violence statistics, I'd posit.

quote:

ORIGINAL: SweetDommesTo the topic - to say that women are superior to men simply because of their body parts is just as silly as saying that whites are superior to blacks, or people with brown hair are superior to people with red hair, or people with blue eyes are superior to people with green eyes.

I understand the overall gist of your point of view, but how does eye, skin or hair color compare to structural differences between male and Female brains?

_____________________________

S a h a r a h E v e . c o m

Do your own homework. Write your own stuff.

(in reply to SweetDommes)

Profile

Post #: 162

RE: female Supremecy - 1/5/2010 6:50:58 AM

SweetDommes

Posts: 3313
Joined: 10/5/2004
Status: offline

It's still something that is beyond the control of the person and is inherent to what they are, rather than who they are. And yet again, I point out that structural differences does NOT mean structural superiority (or any other kind of superiority).

ETA - I did specify that it was agression towards people they were not face to face with, did I not?

< Message edited by SweetDommes -- 1/5/2010 6:51:59 AM >

_____________________________

Miss Karen and Miss Holly

Earth is the insane asylum for the universe.

Friends are God's apology for relatives

(in reply to XYisInferior)

Profile

Post #: 163

RE: female Supremecy - 1/5/2010 8:11:16 AM

XYisInferior

Posts: 166
Joined: 2/17/2009
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: SweetDommes

It's still something that is beyond the control of the person and is inherent to what they are, rather than who they are. And yet again, I point out that structural differences does NOT mean structural superiority (or any other kind of superiority).

Really? In my mind, structural difference certainly makes a difference. If it didn't there would be no difference in any comparative metric. I can't help but consider that who we are is related to what we are, especially in social aggregate. Further, we can commute your line of thinking to the architectural and engineering world and clearly disprove the notion that structural differences have no bearing on any form of superiority.

quote:

ORIGINAL: SweetDommes

I did specify that it was agression towards people they were not face to face with, did I not?

I thought there may have been more to the report's findings than "irritation", and I still don't know what the exact test methods involved. I also find it worth pointing out that irritation and frustration is not entirely synonymous with outward aggression.

_____________________________

S a h a r a h E v e . c o m

Do your own homework. Write your own stuff.

(in reply to SweetDommes)

Profile

Post #: 164