LonDom61
Posts: 196
Joined: 9/12/2007
Status: offline
|
Oh goody. Now he's gotten around to me. Okay, I'll play.
But first: *Arms open to hug Aquatic Sub back*
And to sexyred1, who said:
Quickly checks emails...goes through cock pics...nope, yours seems to be missing. Please resend immediately to www.normallyhatescockpicsbutinthiscasemakesexception.com.
Funny URL. (Checking Network Solutions to see if it's taken). Quick search? How do you index them? By date, girth, length, hairiness? Alphabetically by nic? Share your organizing secrets and other subs will adopt them & praise your name.
quote:
ORIGINAL: osf
do i know you?
Do I need to send you my ID, send you a present, invite you out for a beer or whatever before I qualify to be one of the people whose abuse you're getting such a kick out of?
have i ever spit in your face?
Well, figuratively you have now. Proud of yourself?
did you bother to check before running your mouth?
Check what?
Whether I've got a brain? yes & yes
Whether I can "play nice with others"? yes and usually (when they deserve basic respect)
Your profile, before I dare to address you? Hadn't then; have now; yawn.
Do you read the profile of everyone whose posts you comment on? Does anyone? If we're impressed by a poster's comments we might follow the link. Or, as in this case, figure it'd be good for an additional laugh. I hadn't then, but I have now. About what I'd expected. Not impressed. I'll stack my profile (yes, very well considered, thanks) up against yours. My pic against yours.... My slave against your...uh, goose (or whoever you claim luvs yer domitude)
For your permission to speak? You're not (my) Dom.
My hat at the door?
"Running my mouth." Uh...that'd be putting in my 2c worth? Abusing an abuser? In a more liberated approach than you've got...and one more in accord with the accepted larger Community and with pretty much all of the posters here except you? Calling you on your BS?
and people who wear red shirts shouldn't stand in front of bulls, now i don't know what that has to do with anything but it makes about as much sense as anything you have said
...aaand the senseless generalities continue. "People who wear red shirts." Really?
Really? (osf: "Knowing that subs are more high maintenance than 'nilla women..." "subs can't teach me anything" etc. etc.) BTW, "learning from a sub" doesn't have to mean she has said "lemme teach you a thing or two about domming". You can learn by observing, loving, experiencing a sub. Er, I mean, some people could. You? Prolly not.
I like that red shirt. And, though this is an assertion much like yours about all the action you're getting and how the ladies love your no-nonsense manliness or your goose or whatever, it and the pic itself has prompted a number of contacts from subs (actual women who I've actually met).
We're making fun of your shoes (well, shoe...but presumably you've got another one) and the duck because, in an increasingly visual culture, that's the only visual clues you're giving about yourself. That says something in itself.
I, on the other hand, show my face, my form, my sense of style (at the moment the pic was taken it happened to include a red shirt), my bearing... I show them what they'll see when they meet me & let them judge.
You, otoh, are showing a (crappy old people) shoe and a goose. Again, may be fine for your work. But does it represent you such that it should be your chosen avatar here? Is that what a girl would see if she were to meet you? Does it communicate a sense of you to let her choose?
I guess you'd be the bull I'm standing in front of? Apt, since the product of a bull is...
yea, i wannabe king of the world,
Let me know when that happens. I'll move.
and thank you for you well considered remarks, o keeper of the flame of the one true way
Better considered than yours (not saying much). Not as well considered as they should have been. Made in uncharacteristic anger and frustration. And FAR from my usual self. Can you say the same of your remarks?
Hey, I'm not the guy who claims to know about "real d/s"...but is strangely unwilling to write more than a few lines about it. I know what works for me. I know a lot of people's general definitions of what works for them agrees on key points. I know it has worked for the women I've been with. And involves considering them as people rather than farm animals or just a warm place to stick my (or my buddy's) johnson, without an opinion worth considering or "taking personally"...
Your tags read "all around nice guy". Not here & not in your profile ("I will do all the things to you your mom wishes would never happen...[Pain unimaginable for my pleasure--paraphrased] yada yada. Did I mention? i'm dark.")
Creative misogynist? Well, you've proved the second part.
And the last line. What does it even mean? You won't expect us to act as adults (though we tried and have largely given up, so NOW we're just havin fun wit ya) if we don't expect you to act like a child. (which you seem to be: acting as a child, that is)
So does that mean if we DO expect you to act as a child, you'll expect us to act as adults? Actually, that works. Good summary. okay, I take it back. it does make sense of a sort.
|
RE: why does he want a submissive over a nilla woman - 
Profile
New Messages
No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages
Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages
Locked w/o New Messages
Post New Thread