quote:

ORIGINAL: mc1234

I find myself agreeing with agirl ... it's getting quite distasteful 'round here.  Whatever happened to debating ideas, not shoes?  

quote:

ORIGINAL: Mercnbeth

quote:

BE THE TYPE OF DOMINANT A SUBMISSIVE WANTS.

 

as if "a submissive" is a carbon copy of all the rest---wanting the exact same things---yet there are different "types" of dominants.
 
wouldn't it make more sense to advise him to "Be the type of dominant that the type of submissive you desire to attract wants."?  seems like he is already doing that.
 
this slave thinks it is ironic and kinda funny that folks criticize osf for his One-True-Way, then go about insisting that their OWN One-True-Way is something he should adopt instead.

quote:

ORIGINAL: LonDom61

quote:

ORIGINAL: mc1234

I find myself agreeing with agirl ... it's getting quite distasteful 'round here.  Whatever happened to debating ideas, not shoes?  

I agree too.  He's slammed me again (I guess only fair since that seems to be what the thread's about).  But I'm gonna skip replying to any of that.

Why keep the bile wheel spinning?  My girl will be home soon.  A far better prospect than continuing to feed an online masochist.  Well, doesn't he seem to be loving the online abuse?

Have fun folks, I'm outtie (this thread for good, I hope)

quote:

ORIGINAL: wisdomtogive

Osf
keep your shoes and you goose, nothing wrong with them.

quote:

ORIGINAL: LonDom61


And to sexyred1, who said:

Quickly checks emails...goes through cock pics...nope, yours seems to be missing. Please resend immediately to www.normallyhatescockpicsbutinthiscasemakesexception.com.

Funny URL. (Checking Network Solutions to see if it's taken). Quick search? How do you index them? By date, girth, length, hairiness? Alphabetically by nic? Share your organizing secrets and other subs will adopt them & praise your name.

quote:

Hey LonDom61, never seen you before, but I like how you jumped right in there...:)

Re: the URL. Not sure if it is taken, I just made it up. Normally I hate getting faceless cock shots. I cannot relate to the little dudes, no communication skills whatsoever. I cannot look them in the eye and tell if they are twue Doms.

I was just sad that I missed out on Animus Rex's cock shot...he STILL has not answered this.

But no indexing shall go on. I prefer my cock shots to be more corporeal.

(in reply to LonDom61)

quote:

ORIGINAL: WinsomeDefiance

Below is what I posted in my journal about the prolific cock shots I was getting in my emails.

---

Here's the thing.  I like a man's little soldier as much as anyone.  However, when I'm getting to know a person I want to know what the person might look like if I were sitting across from them at say, a dinner table.  I don't really envision sitting across the table from a big dick...Ok, scratch that.  I really do have too great an imagination to not actually picture that. 

Back to my point, men who send pics of his little soldier in lieu of his face baffle me.  It doesn't offend me, it just sort of makes me go hmmm?

I can understand that it might be a good way to close the sale, but it really isn't a great marketing ploy.   Let's face it, even at full attention, and in all their patriotic glory, those little soldiers really aren't very attractive.  Whereas a nice smile, stunning gaze  or a charming peeking around the corner face shot is much more intriguing.  I really do appreciate the glimpse down under, but how about starting with a nice smile? 

---

Animusrex, on the other hand, would have to be an exception.  I, like sexyred, regret not getting HIS! 

aww well
maybe next time sexyred?
WinD

quote:

ORIGINAL: Jeffff

So what you're saying is, the Anteater is cool because the print hides my fabulous anteater cock?

no?


Jeff

quote:

ORIGINAL: Jeffff

To be honest, this pic came as is to me in an email. I laughed for about ten minutes. Out loud.  I like what it says about me.

Except for the part where I assume anteaters have tiny penises.


Jeff