Collarchat.com

Join Our Community
Collarchat.com

Home  Login  Search 

RE: Lame posts: "No, I'm not into that. Sorry" Why bother?


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Ask a Mistress >> RE: Lame posts: "No, I'm not into that. Sorry" Why bother? Page: <<   < prev  2 3 [4] 5 6   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Lame posts: "No, I'm not into that. Sorry&quo... - 1/23/2010 3:43:17 PM   
AAkasha


Posts: 4429
Joined: 11/27/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: hardbodysub

I'm going to go against the tide here. I expect to get flamed, but so be it. I'd rather speak the truth, tell it like it is, and catch hell for it if that's the result.

The concept that when dommes spout off about not being into a sub's expressed interest, they're doing the guy a favor and educating him, that's nothing more than a rationalization allowing them to bitch and moan about not getting what they want. I'm not saying that it's intentional. A lot of women actually believe that they're helping when they do this. But they're not. What they're doing is dominating the thread with unnecessary negatives, and discouraging positive responses from people who actually might consider responding affirmatively.

What they don't seem to get is that silence is a very good negative response. If a guy asks how many femdoms are into X, Y, or Z, and nobody responds, that answers his question just fine, without the self-centered, self-righteous explanations of why someone doesn't like it.

If someone asks "How do people feel about X?", then it's appropriate for anyone to respond about whether, how, and why they like or dislike it. If the questions is "Who likes X, and why?", then there's really no good reason for hordes of dislikers to chime in and disparage X. If you think you're providing an educational service, you're just being self-delusioinal.


I think femdoms could do a better job (myself included) of not bringing past baggage into a thread when a new sub posts what appears to be a selfish question, a request for wanking material, or a gleeful disregard for reality.  I think subs still do underestimate just how much, how often and how intensely femdoms are objectified - daily - by men who think this is ok.  As a result, we may come off as heavy handed when a man comes strongly from a position of fantasy-land (his own).

Or, we're just impatient, fed up, and it was the 10th message like it we've read that day (remember, a lot of us are reading a dozen emails a day that are much more objectifying and rude).

I do think women should respond and tell subs "No, that's not what I am into," but I think we could make a better attempt to show an alternate POV of when we *may* be into that kind of scenario and how it works, so the sub gets an idea of the reality vs. the fantasy.   I think a lot of us are discouraged at the idea of taking that much time and effort, because many of us have done that one-on-one with a guy, only to have him still turn around and use us as a sex object, or just give a virtual blank stare and contact us again a week later with the same come-on.

Akasha


_____________________________

Akasha's Web - All original Femdom content since 1995
Don't email me here, email me at [email protected]

(in reply to hardbodysub)
Profile   Post #: 61
RE: Lame posts: "No, I'm not into that. Sorry&quo... - 1/23/2010 4:22:17 PM   
LadyAngelika


Posts: 8070
Joined: 7/4/2004
Status: offline
Excellent points Akasha. I don't think many are cognizant of what Dommes go through.

Example from Thursday. I respond to this thread. 2 minutes later, the OP private messages me: "would u  have any  use   for  a  tranny slut  maid  like  me".

Nothing about this is flattering. It leaves one feeling objectified, not something I'm fond of. But for these wankers, who cares what the Domme wants. It's what they want, even if they violate pur space with their words.

I get this 25-30 times a week. And I suspect I get less than US-based Dommes.

Are you boys starting to get the picture?

- LA

< Message edited by LadyAngelika -- 1/23/2010 4:23:27 PM >


_____________________________

Une main de fer dans un gant de velours ~ An iron hand in a velvet glove

(in reply to AAkasha)
Profile   Post #: 62
RE: Lame posts: "No, I'm not into that. Sorry&quo... - 1/23/2010 7:12:54 PM   
SolangeRichards


Posts: 170
Joined: 5/8/2005
Status: offline
No offense LA, but it seems like every time I post on these forums, I get a rash of emails from men who wish to be masculinized...

They cry, they scream, they implore...Solange, butch me up!

Just teasing a little LA....

(in reply to LadyAngelika)
Profile   Post #: 63
RE: Lame posts: "No, I'm not into that. Sorry&quo... - 1/23/2010 8:05:15 PM   
pyroaquatic


Posts: 1535
Joined: 12/4/2006
From: Pyroaquatica
Status: offline
A manly tip... don't wear deodorant for a few days. Or shower.

Hey!!! I just noticed that I don't get any random cmails from creepy pictureless gay guys. Or spam. How fortuitous.

I'm definitely not  into spam and definitely into attractive women.


_____________________________

You are what your deep, driving desire is.
As your desire is, so is your will.
As your will is, so is your deed.
As your deed is, so is your destiny.
-Brihadaranyaka Upanishad IV.4.5

(in reply to SolangeRichards)
Profile   Post #: 64
RE: Lame posts: "No, I'm not into that. Sorry&quo... - 1/23/2010 8:47:42 PM   
hardbodysub


Posts: 1654
Joined: 8/7/2005
Status: offline
(1)
quote:

You're essentially silencing the women and their opinions.

I've done nothing of the sort. I've merely suggested that people could better spend their time responding to posts which are relevant to their interests, rather than sniping on virtually every OP that has an affinity toward something else.

(2)
quote:

What exactly makes an opinion a "self-righteous" opinion in your mind? Aren't all opinions based around a person's self-interest making it "self-centered"? How else does a femdom say, "No, that kink turns me off for x, y, z reasons" without you being offended and striking back with "self-righteousness" and "self-centerdness" accusations against her?

Obviously opinions come from the self, and are are therefore somewhat "self-centered", but you know very well that wasn't what I was talking about. Anyone who reads these forums regularly, and even those who haven't, should know very well what I was referring to. What makes the typical sniping replies "self-righteous" and "self-centered" is evident in the manner in which those opinions are delivered, particularly when an OP clearly states an interest and clearly is looking for responses from others who share that interest, not for disparaging remarks from people who don't. When someone makes a general statement with which you disagree, it makes perfect sense to respond as you like. However, when somebody writes about play piercing, and asks for information about what others like about it, methods for doing it, etc., it would be counterproductive for me to respond that I find it repulsive. I'm not in that interest group, so I'm not really invited to that party. My opinion isn't relevant to that discussion, and by pissing in their soup, I'm being "self-centered" and not considering other people's kinks as valid as mine. I'm not even saying that I never do it, but I've at least realized that it's actually pretty inconsiderate, and I try to recognize those situations instead of submitting to the knee-jerk reaction.

quote:

Femdoms have every right to express their dislike or disgust in something even if some people are too sensitive to handle their expression.

Oh, and the rest of us don't?

quote:

I wonder if you carry a chip on your shoulder such that no matter what a femdom says, you won't be able to receive their comments without negativity and judgment.

Lol, it looks like the "sensitivity" and "chip on the shoulder" aren't mine. Of course people have the right to express whatever they like, whether they're femdoms or not, but being a "femdom" doesn't give you carte blanche to act like a jerk and expect everyone to smile and say how awesome you are. What I'm saying is that, given the right to express their opinions, people can do it a lot more effectively and reasonably by reserving their negative comments for threads where it makes sense to do so. In case you didn't notice, I'm not spewing "negativity and judgment", but merely reacting to them, by suggesting that the discourse would be much better if they weren't so ubiquitous. It's pretty funny that you chose to project "chip on your shoulder" toward me, when that's exactly what the targets of my comments appear to have.

(in reply to MsHValentine)
Profile   Post #: 65
RE: Lame posts: "No, I'm not into that. Sorry&quo... - 1/23/2010 8:48:43 PM   
hardbodysub


Posts: 1654
Joined: 8/7/2005
Status: offline
quote:

Excellent points Akasha. I don't think many are cognizant of what Dommes go through.


Holy crap, they must never read anything on CM. That's what 90% of all the posts are about.

(in reply to LadyAngelika)
Profile   Post #: 66
RE: Lame posts: "No, I'm not into that. Sorry&quo... - 1/23/2010 9:14:08 PM   
hardbodysub


Posts: 1654
Joined: 8/7/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: AAkasha

quote:

ORIGINAL: hardbodysub

I'm going to go against the tide here. I expect to get flamed, but so be it. I'd rather speak the truth, tell it like it is, and catch hell for it if that's the result.

The concept that when dommes spout off about not being into a sub's expressed interest, they're doing the guy a favor and educating him, that's nothing more than a rationalization allowing them to bitch and moan about not getting what they want. I'm not saying that it's intentional. A lot of women actually believe that they're helping when they do this. But they're not. What they're doing is dominating the thread with unnecessary negatives, and discouraging positive responses from people who actually might consider responding affirmatively.

What they don't seem to get is that silence is a very good negative response. If a guy asks how many femdoms are into X, Y, or Z, and nobody responds, that answers his question just fine, without the self-centered, self-righteous explanations of why someone doesn't like it.

If someone asks "How do people feel about X?", then it's appropriate for anyone to respond about whether, how, and why they like or dislike it. If the questions is "Who likes X, and why?", then there's really no good reason for hordes of dislikers to chime in and disparage X. If you think you're providing an educational service, you're just being self-delusioinal.


I think femdoms could do a better job (myself included) of not bringing past baggage into a thread when a new sub posts what appears to be a selfish question, a request for wanking material, or a gleeful disregard for reality.  I think subs still do underestimate just how much, how often and how intensely femdoms are objectified - daily - by men who think this is ok.  As a result, we may come off as heavy handed when a man comes strongly from a position of fantasy-land (his own).

Or, we're just impatient, fed up, and it was the 10th message like it we've read that day (remember, a lot of us are reading a dozen emails a day that are much more objectifying and rude).

I do think women should respond and tell subs "No, that's not what I am into," but I think we could make a better attempt to show an alternate POV of when we *may* be into that kind of scenario and how it works, so the sub gets an idea of the reality vs. the fantasy.   I think a lot of us are discouraged at the idea of taking that much time and effort, because many of us have done that one-on-one with a guy, only to have him still turn around and use us as a sex object, or just give a virtual blank stare and contact us again a week later with the same come-on.

Akasha



Thank you so much for understanding what I wrote and responding so eloquently. I don't object to retorts against foolish remarks, nor to voicing disagreement about just about anything. I also agree with you that giving alternatives and clarifying reality vs. fantasy can be productive, as long as we remember that realities as well as fantasies aren't the same for everyone. However, I think it's unnecessary, and often counterproductive, to reply negatively just because the OP is into something that you're not. You obviously get it, but evidently not everybody did.

Responding negatively just because your kink isn't their kink either clutters up a serious thread needlessly, or feeds a troll who was just trying to stir things up. No responses sends a pretty clear picture, IMO.


(in reply to AAkasha)
Profile   Post #: 67
RE: Lame posts: "No, I'm not into that. Sorry&quo... - 1/23/2010 9:16:59 PM   
hardbodysub


Posts: 1654
Joined: 8/7/2005
Status: offline
quote:

I think there is a huge difference between someone seeking to be educated on an intellectual level and someone who wants to discuss a certain topic because it stirs them up sexually.


I agree. If you like what they like, feel free to respond. If you don't, then don't respond, and you won't give them what they want. They probably enjoy stirring the pot and getting you pissed off more than getting no reply at all.

(in reply to LadyPact)
Profile   Post #: 68
RE: Lame posts: "No, I'm not into that. Sorry&quo... - 1/23/2010 9:22:58 PM   
hardbodysub


Posts: 1654
Joined: 8/7/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: SylvereApLeanan

quote:

ORIGINAL: hardbodysub
The concept that when dommes spout off about not being into a sub's expressed interest, they're doing the guy a favor and educating him, that's nothing more than a rationalization allowing them to bitch and moan about not getting what they want. I'm not saying that it's intentional. A lot of women actually believe that they're helping when they do this. But they're not. What they're doing is dominating the thread with unnecessary negatives, and discouraging positive responses from people who actually might consider responding affirmatively.


I'll give you guys a couple of days to figure out in just what way I find this exceptionally ironic and hilarious.


Because you only see things from one side?

(in reply to SylvereApLeanan)
Profile   Post #: 69
RE: Lame posts: "No, I'm not into that. Sorry&quo... - 1/23/2010 10:49:53 PM   
shallowdeep


Posts: 343
Joined: 9/1/2006
From: California
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: AAkasha
How else is he going to know if his fetish is one that is going to be realistically embraced by women he's trying to attract?

I think hardbodysub could have been more diplomatic, but he does have a point. Silence really is a very effective answer; there is no need to go further. If someone has an iota of intelligence, they'll quickly deduce what the crickets mean – there's no need to grab the clue-by-four. If they don't, trying to hammer the point home is likely already a lost cause. Not responding helps the thread die faster and avoids a potential cycle of rancorous recriminations that I doubt anyone really enjoys (but I'm not a sadist, so who knows… ).

I can understand wanting to vent when you see self-absorbed fantasy posts, but – while I don't take offense to it – I tend to agree that the notion it's "helping" is probably mostly wishful thinking. A simple, "No, that doesn't do it for me," message really isn't going to help anyone see why you don't like it, and honestly adds nothing more edifying than silence. If that's all someone plans to add, I tend to think it might be better if they could hold back.

Of course, and this perhaps got lost a bit in the thread, I think your point was that some lame posts might be salvaged with positive redirection: "Well, OP, if you had phrased things differently and removed the part about needing to balance a fishbowl on my head, I can see how I might find X interesting. Here's how you could have presented it and what I might like about it…" If you have the patience for that, and the post actually is close enough to something you enjoy that it lends itself to it, I would love to see more of that. Some of us actually are eager to understand what you women enjoy and why.

I think there is a tipping point for when trying to use this approach to salvage a thread is worth it though. If the post is a complete wreck, I would rather it be left to sink in silence. Instead, put the effort into starting something that you really would like to talk about – as an added bonus, the lame post will drop off the front page faster!

quote:

I think subs still do underestimate just how much, how often and how intensely femdoms are objectified - daily - by men who think this is ok. As a result, we may come off as heavy handed when a man comes strongly from a position of fantasy-land (his own).

This sucks, and you are probably right that it is difficult to understand fully for someone not inundated with it. But simply saying you don't like something and making people understand why aren't really the same thing. That takes a bit more effort than a repeated "Eww… no way!" Maybe posting a link to your story "The Bitch in High Heels" would be a more effective response to wanker threads? If someone can read that and not want to buy all the women who stick around here and try to make this place interesting some ice cream, I'd be surprised.

Then again, some people are denser than I give them credit for.

(in reply to AAkasha)
Profile   Post #: 70
RE: Lame posts: "No, I'm not into that. Sorry&quo... - 1/24/2010 9:02:41 AM   
LadyPact


Posts: 32566
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: hardbodysub

quote:

I think there is a huge difference between someone seeking to be educated on an intellectual level and someone who wants to discuss a certain topic because it stirs them up sexually.


I agree. If you like what they like, feel free to respond. If you don't, then don't respond, and you won't give them what they want. They probably enjoy stirring the pot and getting you pissed off more than getting no reply at all.

Oh, dear, they do nothing of the sort.  Granted, there are some things written on these boards that do piss Me off.  The 'do-me' posts don't get to that level.  That only happens when it is outright hate-speech against gays, the military, or people of different ethnic backgrounds. 


_____________________________

The crowned Diva of Destruction. ~ ExT

Beach Ball Sized Lady Nuts. ~ TWD

Happily dating a new submissive. It's official. I've named him engie.

Please do not send me email here. Unless I know you, I will delete the email unread

(in reply to hardbodysub)
Profile   Post #: 71
RE: Lame posts: "No, I'm not into that. Sorry&quo... - 1/24/2010 9:40:55 AM   
cloudboy


Posts: 7306
Joined: 12/14/2005
Status: offline

II

< Message edited by cloudboy -- 1/24/2010 9:42:38 AM >

(in reply to shallowdeep)
Profile   Post #: 72
RE: Lame posts: "No, I'm not into that. Sorry&quo... - 1/24/2010 11:04:07 AM   
SylvereApLeanan


Posts: 8275
Joined: 11/1/2007
From: Hell
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: hardbodysub


quote:

ORIGINAL: SylvereApLeanan

quote:

ORIGINAL: hardbodysub
The concept that when dommes spout off about not being into a sub's expressed interest, they're doing the guy a favor and educating him, that's nothing more than a rationalization allowing them to bitch and moan about not getting what they want. I'm not saying that it's intentional. A lot of women actually believe that they're helping when they do this. But they're not. What they're doing is dominating the thread with unnecessary negatives, and discouraging positive responses from people who actually might consider responding affirmatively.


I'll give you guys a couple of days to figure out in just what way I find this exceptionally ironic and hilarious.


Because you only see things from one side?


Again...both ironic and hilarious.  Take a few more days to figure out exactly why.  Take a couple of weeks...you'll need them.

_____________________________

Sylverë
Dark Muse
30 Fluffy Points
Grumpy Cat is my spirit animal.
Shadow Governess & Mean Girl
"There's something that doesn't make sense. Let's go and poke it with a stick."— The Doctor

(in reply to hardbodysub)
Profile   Post #: 73
RE: Lame posts: "No, I'm not into that. Sorry&quo... - 1/24/2010 12:31:48 PM   
PrincessDonna


Posts: 189
Joined: 7/7/2006
Status: offline
Maybe it's me but I got lost on the part about responding in a negative way was ok because "we go through it every day and subs dont take that into consideration"WOW no wonder ther are so many screwed up subs out there!Hardbody you have a great point,if an adult asks a question because they seek an honest answer,are we to decide what their motive is?As a Domme I know that there is a certain rep that comes with it,and if I'm not mature enough to handle those"wankers" well....good points hardbody and this should be a good place for Dommes and subs alike to come with questions and comments but we all know that CM has it's own rep as sleazy and game players,I wonder why......

(in reply to SylvereApLeanan)
Profile   Post #: 74
RE: Lame posts: "No, I'm not into that. Sorry&quo... - 1/24/2010 12:41:28 PM   
MsHValentine


Posts: 80
Joined: 1/6/2010
Status: offline
Do you also reprimand the men who come to this board and say negative things? Or is it just the women? If you visit this board you can't deny the bitter and hateful things which have been said by some male posters. For instance, a fellow poster named domiguy, who has on occasion come into this section and made derogatory remarks against over weight women. I wonder if you feel the need to correct him and other snarky male posters as well, and tell him if he has nothing nice to say about a subject, he should just keep quiet.

(in reply to hardbodysub)
Profile   Post #: 75
RE: Lame posts: "No, I'm not into that. Sorry&quo... - 1/24/2010 1:09:35 PM   
CdnExplorer


Posts: 227
Joined: 2/12/2007
Status: offline
The more people that pee in the pool, the fewer people that will want to swim in it.

(in reply to MsHValentine)
Profile   Post #: 76
RE: Lame posts: "No, I'm not into that. Sorry&quo... - 1/24/2010 1:16:56 PM   
SylvereApLeanan


Posts: 8275
Joined: 11/1/2007
From: Hell
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: AAkasha

I think femdoms could do a better job (myself included) of not bringing past baggage into a thread when a new sub posts what appears to be a selfish question, a request for wanking material, or a gleeful disregard for reality.


I think this begs the question of why should we feel obligated to to a "better job" or to bother to civilly address a post that is clearly out of touch with reality and/or based in a trollish desire for us to supply material for some random schmuck's masturbatory fantasies.  Why must we, as dominant women, go out of our way to placate these individuals, redirect them to a more realistic approach, or simply shut our mouths and ignore what is obviously a problem for many of us? 
 
Over on the Masters forum is a thread in which the OP came to the forum, ostensibly under the direction of "her" dominant, to inform the general public of her loyalty to her "master" and the details of their sex life plus a request for ideas for her master to try out on her.  The thread in question has reached five pages of people, dominant and submissive, male and female, essentially pissing all over her, her master, and the thread.  From my quick skim, there is absolutely no one taking exception to the caustic responses generated by the OP.  Not one single voice of dissent or anyone lamenting the cruel dominants who have to rain all over the poor sub's parade and why can't they all just STFU instead.
 
Because, you see, in the back of many minds, it's okay for a woman to get chastised for "bad" behavior, and it's okay for a woman to be told to sit down and shut the fuck up if she doesn't have something pleasant to say, but it's not okay for a woman to tell an equally ill-mannered and uncouth man the exact same thing.  I certainly don't see any of the people who are bitching about women's behavior in this forum running over there to stick up for her and her master or chastise the forum regulars for bad behavior -- Kevin, Hardbody, Cloudboy -- yes, I'm calling all of you on your bullshit double standard. 
 
I'm not suggesting that responses can't or shouldn't be diplomatic whenever possible.  However, that doesn't mean any of us should feel obligated to be diplomatic or remain silent because OH. MY. GAWD. someone's delicate sensibilities might be offended.  Ever hear the saying "if you're bored, then you're boring?"  If you're offended, perhaps it's because you were offensive.


_____________________________

Sylverë
Dark Muse
30 Fluffy Points
Grumpy Cat is my spirit animal.
Shadow Governess & Mean Girl
"There's something that doesn't make sense. Let's go and poke it with a stick."— The Doctor

(in reply to AAkasha)
Profile   Post #: 77
RE: Lame posts: "No, I'm not into that. Sorry&quo... - 1/24/2010 2:01:05 PM   
VaguelyCurious


Posts: 5264
Joined: 12/2/2009
From: United Kingdom
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: SylvereApLeanan

quote:

ORIGINAL: AAkasha

I think femdoms could do a better job (myself included) of not bringing past baggage into a thread when a new sub posts what appears to be a selfish question, a request for wanking material, or a gleeful disregard for reality.


I think this begs the question of why should we feel obligated to to a "better job" or to bother to civilly address a post that is clearly out of touch with reality and/or based in a trollish desire for us to supply material for some random schmuck's masturbatory fantasies.  Why must we, as dominant women, go out of our way to placate these individuals, redirect them to a more realistic approach, or simply shut our mouths and ignore what is obviously a problem for many of us? 
 
Over on the Masters forum is a thread in which the OP came to the forum, ostensibly under the direction of "her" dominant, to inform the general public of her loyalty to her "master" and the details of their sex life plus a request for ideas for her master to try out on her.  The thread in question has reached five pages of people, dominant and submissive, male and female, essentially pissing all over her, her master, and the thread.  From my quick skim, there is absolutely no one taking exception to the caustic responses generated by the OP.  Not one single voice of dissent or anyone lamenting the cruel dominants who have to rain all over the poor sub's parade and why can't they all just STFU instead.
 
Because, you see, in the back of many minds, it's okay for a woman to get chastised for "bad" behavior, and it's okay for a woman to be told to sit down and shut the fuck up if she doesn't have something pleasant to say, but it's not okay for a woman to tell an equally ill-mannered and uncouth man the exact same thing.  I certainly don't see any of the people who are bitching about women's behavior in this forum running over there to stick up for her and her master or chastise the forum regulars for bad behavior -- Kevin, Hardbody, Cloudboy -- yes, I'm calling all of you on your bullshit double standard. 
 
I'm not suggesting that responses can't or shouldn't be diplomatic whenever possible.  However, that doesn't mean any of us should feel obligated to be diplomatic or remain silent because OH. MY. GAWD. someone's delicate sensibilities might be offended.  Ever hear the saying "if you're bored, then you're boring?"  If you're offended, perhaps it's because you were offensive.



I get what you're saying but in this case it's not strictly true-there are a few people on that thread objecting to the flamers. I would say there are more posters complaining there than on some of the male-generated wanker threads I've read.


_____________________________

Sthetic on FetLife.




(in reply to SylvereApLeanan)
Profile   Post #: 78
RE: Lame posts: "No, I'm not into that. Sorry&quo... - 1/24/2010 2:25:34 PM   
hardbodysub


Posts: 1654
Joined: 8/7/2005
Status: offline
quote:

Again...both ironic and hilarious.  Take a few more days to figure out exactly why.  Take a couple of weeks...you'll need them.


Gee, honey, your inability to see your own shortcomings and project them onto others has no bounds, does it? How ironic and hilarious your snipes are. Think about it. You won't only need time, you'll need some help. Maybe professional.

(in reply to SylvereApLeanan)
Profile   Post #: 79
RE: Lame posts: "No, I'm not into that. Sorry&quo... - 1/24/2010 2:26:49 PM   
hardbodysub


Posts: 1654
Joined: 8/7/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: MsHValentine

Do you also reprimand the men who come to this board and say negative things? Or is it just the women? If you visit this board you can't deny the bitter and hateful things which have been said by some male posters. For instance, a fellow poster named domiguy, who has on occasion come into this section and made derogatory remarks against over weight women. I wonder if you feel the need to correct him and other snarky male posters as well, and tell him if he has nothing nice to say about a subject, he should just keep quiet.



When 10 zillion people have already jumped all over him, I don't feel that adding my one makes any difference.

(in reply to MsHValentine)
Profile   Post #: 80
Page:   <<   < prev  2 3 [4] 5 6   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Ask a Mistress >> RE: Lame posts: "No, I'm not into that. Sorry" Why bother? Page: <<   < prev  2 3 [4] 5 6   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2024
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.141