RE: Why are liberals so condescending? (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


NorthernGent -> RE: Why are liberals so condescending? (2/6/2010 12:34:05 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Thadius

The arrogance exists on both sides, however the majority of the remarks regarding lack of intelligence seem to come from the left.

Just my opinion.



Possibly.

Liberalism is bound up with ideals which liberals believe are more worthy than say supporting military ventures - and can lead to a superiority complex (whether or not deserved is another matter). I suppose history is a factor - Liberalism was bound up with non-conformism and Conservativism with respecting the status quo (though it may be different in the US and the lines have blurred over here) - so there is a legacy of liberals viewing conservatives as people who follow rather than think (which isn't the case of course - simply placing this in some sort of context).

I think that reasonable people will appreciate an alternative point of view when a decent case is argued - but you have to put something decent out there rather than pontificate about freedom and in the next breath advocate invading someone's land.

For example - any liberal reading Edmund Burke (particularly his prediction of and the reasons for the 'Terrors' in the aftermath of the French revolution) would have to consider that conservatives have a point when warning of the danger of believing that a popular movement can give people freedom and equality and everything will fall into place.




thornhappy -> RE: Why are liberals so condescending? (2/6/2010 12:34:49 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: PeonForHer

If that's true, then it's probably got a lot to do with a belief in reason over 'instinct'.  Liberals (and socialists) favour rationalism.  Michael Oakeshott, the British conservative political philosopher, said:

"The general character and disposition of the Rationalist are, I think., difficult to identify. At bottom he stands (he always stands) for independence of mind on all occasions, for thought free from obligation to any authority save the authority of reason'. His circumstances in the modern world have made him contentious: he is the enemy of authority, of prejudice, of the merely traditional, customary or habitual. His mental attitude is at once sceptical and optimistic: sceptical, because there is no opinion, no habit, no belief, nothing so firmly rooted or so widely held that he hesitates to question it and to judge it by what he calls his 'reason' . . . .

For a liberal or a socialist, the appeal to reason is self-evident.  S/he can't understand that conservatives don't value reason in the same way.  As Oakeshott implies, conservatives place a higher value on authority, prejudice (a word that he, and other conservative philosphers, use in an approving way); the traditional, customary or habitual.

To put it simply: in an important sense of the word, it's fair to say that conservatives don't actually 'think' as much as liberals. Hence John Stuart Mill, a founding father of liberalism and arch rationalist, nicknamed the conservatives the Stupid Party:

Mill said,

I never meant to say that the Conservatives are generally stupid. I meant to say that stupid people are generally Conservative. I believe that is so obviously and universally admitted a principle that I hardly think any gentleman will deny it.
 
http://brothersjuddblog.com/archives/2004/05/in_the_words_of_a_great_conser_1.html

I'll personally dance with glee when liberals are no longer grouped with socialists, fascists (that's a real joke), communists, atheists, et al.




Jeffff -> RE: Why are liberals so condescending? (2/6/2010 12:36:22 PM)

Are you suggesting that Modern day conservatives have something in common with Burke?

In the States?




Thadius -> RE: Why are liberals so condescending? (2/6/2010 12:36:56 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: rulemylife

quote:

ORIGINAL: Thadius

The arrogance exists on both sides, however the majority of the remarks regarding lack of intelligence seem to come from the left.

Just my opinion.


Is that surprising?

Republicans have been pandering to the lowest common denominator since they elected Reagan.

You only have to listen to Sarah Palin or the Teabaggers to understand why the left makes remarks on lack of intelligence.

Which is not to denounce the whole right, or Republicans in general as lacking intelligence.  No one is saying that.

But when the face of the party becomes Pat Robertson and Rush Limbaugh spewing their nonsense about Haiti then something is wrong and it is not condescension to criticize that.




Rule,

Even in this response you refer to all of those going to the teaparties as teabaggers. You even suggest that they lack intelligence. Interesting generalization, and way to prove the point of the OP. As I stated, I believe it occurs on both sides of the fence, it just seems to be more vocal from the left.

For me, I have made some very good friends that are about as liberal as you can get, and discussions never fall into the spiral of disrespecting each others intelligence or even our beliefs. I believe that many of the ad hom attacks are emotionally based, which in my opinion suggests a lack of rational thinking or at least self control. Don't get me wrong, I am guilty of it, and probably will do so again in the future; yet, I do my best not to get involved in the name calling and such.

I do agree with your examples of Robertson and Limbaugh.




willbeurdaddy -> RE: Why are liberals so condescending? (2/6/2010 12:37:47 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Jeffff

quote:

ORIGINAL: willbeurdaddy


quote:

ORIGINAL: Jeffff

An odd statement coming from someone who refuses to document anything he posts.


Jeff


I document everything I post that isnt so ridiculously over-documented and over-discussed that asking for it is just a game.



wilbur?... you have never documented a damn thing.


Jeff


bullshit.




thornhappy -> RE: Why are liberals so condescending? (2/6/2010 12:39:21 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: MrMister
There are two basic kinds of people. There are those who are self owners, and are responsible for themselves. They have no interest in controlling the lives or property of others.

Then there are all the rest who, to various degrees, DO think they should control others and their property. They have various motives, the worst being "for your own good" or "for the children" - especially when they really, truly mean that.

Far as I'm concerned, that's it in a nutshell. The brain damaged controllers sneer because they don't own their own lives,  don't understand why they should... and can't accept that anyone else would even want to do so.

And you realize this behavior spans liberals and conservatives, right?




Lucylastic -> RE: Why are liberals so condescending? (2/6/2010 12:45:26 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: willbeurdaddy


quote:

ORIGINAL: Jeffff

quote:

ORIGINAL: willbeurdaddy


quote:

ORIGINAL: Jeffff

An odd statement coming from someone who refuses to document anything he posts.


Jeff


I document everything I post that isnt so ridiculously over-documented and over-discussed that asking for it is just a game.



wilbur?... you have never documented a damn thing.


Jeff


bullshit.


APART from that....




Brain -> RE: Why are liberals so condescending? (2/6/2010 1:04:44 PM)

This is what they call the pot calling the kettle black. Read,

Resurgent Right-Wing Militias
In March, a Spokane, Washington, man pleaded guilty to illegally possessing two grenade launchers, 54 grenades, 37 machine guns, eight silencers, and a variety of explosives in a storage unit. The man had an “End the Fed” bumper sticker on his vehicle. In May, another Washington resident was charged with keeping an illegal cache of weapons that included a machine gun, four silencers, and two guns made by a local gunsmith and inscribed “Christian warrior”
and “NObama.”

http://www.utne.com/Politics/Resurgent-Right-Wing-Militias.aspx?page=2




willbeurdaddy -> RE: Why are liberals so condescending? (2/6/2010 1:05:54 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: thornhappy

quote:

ORIGINAL: MrMister
There are two basic kinds of people. There are those who are self owners, and are responsible for themselves. They have no interest in controlling the lives or property of others.

Then there are all the rest who, to various degrees, DO think they should control others and their property. They have various motives, the worst being "for your own good" or "for the children" - especially when they really, truly mean that.

Far as I'm concerned, that's it in a nutshell. The brain damaged controllers sneer because they don't own their own lives,  don't understand why they should... and can't accept that anyone else would even want to do so.

And you realize this behavior spans liberals and conservatives, right?



Of course, as Churchill pointed out, conservatives have a basis for their condescension.




NorthernGent -> RE: Why are liberals so condescending? (2/6/2010 1:21:38 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Jeffff

Are you suggesting that Modern day conservatives have something in common with Burke?

In the States?



Certainly in England....

Do US conservatives believe that you shouldn't aim to slough off the past and reorder a society based on priori concepts and appeals to the abstract (e.g. liberty/equality) - which I suppose are left-wing methods and underpin countless left-wing revolutions? I'd imagine they do - certainly on this board - and so they most certainly have something in common with Burke. I suppose the US constitution is an established system/order that conservatives believe should not be meddled with? This pretty much echoes Burke. Liberalism and Conservatism may have evolved but there are come core principles that remain from the aftermath of Feudalism.

It seems you disagree?




NorthernGent -> RE: Why are liberals so condescending? (2/6/2010 1:23:23 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: willbeurdaddy

Of course, as Churchill pointed out, conservatives have a basis for their condescension.



The man who switched sides twice to further his career - hardly the basis for a basis.




philosophy -> RE: Why are liberals so condescending? (2/6/2010 1:28:50 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Thadius


The arrogance exists on both sides, however the majority of the remarks regarding lack of intelligence seem to come from the left.

Just my opinion.


“Whether they are defending the Soviet Union or bleating for Saddam Hussein, liberals are always against America. They are either traitors or idiots, and on the matter of America's self-preservation, the difference is irrelevant.”

“Usually the nonsense liberals spout is kind of cute, but in wartime their instinctive idiocy is life-threatening.”

“Liberal soccer moms are precisely as likely to receive anthrax in the mail as to develop a capacity for linear thinking.”

........i believe you may not have heard of the woman known as Ann Coulter.




NorthernGent -> RE: Why are liberals so condescending? (2/6/2010 1:29:30 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: thornhappy

I'll personally dance with glee when liberals are no longer grouped.......atheists, et al.



Ultimately the advance of Secularism is bound up with the advance of Liberalism and humanist beliefs. The two have gone hand in hand for centuries (not saying that some liberals aren't christians or some conservatives aren't atheists).




NorthernGent -> RE: Why are liberals so condescending? (2/6/2010 1:33:20 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: philosophy

“Usually the nonsense liberals spout is kind of cute, but in wartime their instinctive idiocy is life-threatening.”



What is quite interesting is that in war time - and I'm talking a large scale and protracted war such as WW1 or WW2 - liberals have fallen into line and forgotten their non-interventionist principles. Could mean many things - but interesting all the same.




Thadius -> RE: Why are liberals so condescending? (2/6/2010 1:37:57 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: philosophy


quote:

ORIGINAL: Thadius


The arrogance exists on both sides, however the majority of the remarks regarding lack of intelligence seem to come from the left.

Just my opinion.


“Whether they are defending the Soviet Union or bleating for Saddam Hussein, liberals are always against America. They are either traitors or idiots, and on the matter of America's self-preservation, the difference is irrelevant.”

“Usually the nonsense liberals spout is kind of cute, but in wartime their instinctive idiocy is life-threatening.”

“Liberal soccer moms are precisely as likely to receive anthrax in the mail as to develop a capacity for linear thinking.”

........i believe you may not have heard of the woman known as Ann Coulter.

Where did I suggest that there weren't folks on the right that spouted off in a condescending way?

Should I now go and grab quotes from Rachel Maddow? How about Harry Knox?

See where that whole debate goes? It goes nowhere but in a circle deeper and deeper into the mud.




Real0ne -> RE: Why are liberals so condescending? (2/6/2010 1:54:53 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: philosophy

“Whether they are defending the Soviet Union or bleating for Saddam Hussein, liberals are always against America. They are either traitors or idiots, and on the matter of America's self-preservation, the difference is irrelevant.”

“Usually the nonsense liberals spout is kind of cute, but in wartime their instinctive idiocy is life-threatening.”

“Liberal soccer moms are precisely as likely to receive anthrax in the mail as to develop a capacity for linear thinking.”

........i believe you may not have heard of the woman known as Ann Coulter.


traitors? because they dont fall in line to your expectataions?

You think saddam is dead?  After doing such a good job for us?  Kidding right?

Bhutta on the other hand you can bet is dead for squealing and letting the world know ossammy was dead before they US was finished using him for their war of fear against the people.

I am neither and frankly you leftee rightees are wheel spinning stuck in the mud loons who can tsee the forest because the trees are in the way  :)

cheers!




rulemylife -> RE: Why are liberals so condescending? (2/6/2010 2:04:25 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Thadius


Rule,

Even in this response you refer to all of those going to the teaparties as teabaggers. You even suggest that they lack intelligence. Interesting generalization, and way to prove the point of the OP. As I stated, I believe it occurs on both sides of the fence, it just seems to be more vocal from the left.

For me, I have made some very good friends that are about as liberal as you can get, and discussions never fall into the spiral of disrespecting each others intelligence or even our beliefs. I believe that many of the ad hom attacks are emotionally based, which in my opinion suggests a lack of rational thinking or at least self control. Don't get me wrong, I am guilty of it, and probably will do so again in the future; yet, I do my best not to get involved in the name calling and such.



Yes, I am most definitely disrespecting the Teabaggers intelligence.

That was what they called themselves initially until someone whispered in their ears what teabagging was.

Then they suddenly became the Tea Party.






Moonhead -> RE: Why are liberals so condescending? (2/6/2010 2:05:27 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Jeffff

Are you suggesting that Modern day conservatives have something in common with Burke?

In the States?

Depends which Burke you're talking about: they've got a lot in common with the graverobber...




FatDomDaddy -> RE: Why are liberals so condescending? (2/6/2010 2:36:14 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: DarkSteven

That's odd.  I find some liberals to be as described, and some conservatives (Rush, Palin) to also assume that they are right and everyone else is simply misled.


Wait a minute Steven..

Limbaugh is not condensending at all. He never dumb downs his message nor does he talk down to his audience.

Limbaugh does use satire and mockery, even sarcasim but if one listens, it is always clear that's what he is doing. In fact, he treats his audience as peers and assumes their intelligence is the equal of his.

But condesening he is not.




Politesub53 -> RE: Why are liberals so condescending? (2/6/2010 2:46:19 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: FatDomDaddy

Limbaugh is not condensending at all. He never dumb downs his message



As if he could !!




Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4 5   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875