RE: The Perils of Being Yourself (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion



Message


Mercnbeth -> RE: The Perils of Being Yourself (5/4/2010 1:57:48 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyPact
Yeah, but you still haven't said that you don't laugh about it now.  Go ahead.  Tell Me you don't.
Hell yeah - I laugh about it all the time; and "It's 10PM keep the 'orgy-noises' down!"; is now announced at every party!

quote:

I'll be in GA at minimum June 9-10. SELF is the weekend following. I'd certainly be back the weekend after that.
The 19/20th is 'Father's Day' weekend; so we'll shoot for the weekend of June 26th - First Full Moon of the Summer! beth will lead us in her traditional naked dance ritual!

I'll verify with Jeff and see if that works for him, but pencil in the day.

quote:

(You don't think we'll scare anyone with the whips and chains and stuff, do you?)


Isn't that the point!?




leadership527 -> RE: The Perils of Being Yourself (5/4/2010 2:01:24 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Mercnbeth
quote:

(You don't think we'll scare anyone with the whips and chains and stuff, do you?)

Isn't that the point!?
Carol and I can be the token vanilla people who'll be scared of all you whips & chains folks... we'll get over it *laughs*

EDITED TO ADD: Putting June 26th in our calendar




Mercnbeth -> RE: The Perils of Being Yourself (5/4/2010 2:21:39 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: heartcream
the nasty low blows delivered by Merc to domi here.

Totally out of character for me hc, I assure you. However, although I'll never toss the first bomb, I will always throw the next and never without escalating.

Feel free to review, there was a preemptive attack. My response was over the top and will continue to be anytime a similar situation arises; especially as it was in this case, where dg brought into the mix beth, and addressed beth as he did.

quote:

You may not like him and maybe there is truth in some of the things you say but it is still not cool.So the jokey back-slapping, in-crowd shit is just that--shit.
I don't invest the emotional consideration necessary to determine whether I 'like' or 'dislike' dg. He made the decision to post as he did - I took advantage and enjoyed the exchange. It's been FUN and a source of sadistic pleasure!

Take the other peoples comments for what you will. I'm happy to stand behind my posts and representation of my life with beth. People who've met us seem to enjoy our company. WyldHrt has said that some people have contacted her about us, and her response has been; "they are in person just like are on-line - only more so." I'll stand behind that representation.

We've made more friends here than we could count, and welcomed everyone who's asked to our home. Revisit some of the old time exchanges between me and 'Simply Michael'. Although he never reduced himself to the guttural attack and insult that dg used, we had some VERY heated exchanges about philosophy. We've since become close friends to the degree that this weekend he'll be staying in my house.

Were dg so inclined - I'd LOVE to meet him as well. As I said, agreement isn't a requirement for debate and discussion; it is also not a requirement for friendship. What I won't tolerate is attack and ignorance; although sometimes, as in this case, I'm required to use it myself in order to relate to the other person involved.

BTW - All of this is on-point to the OP. This is "myself"; I find no "peril" involved because enjoying myself as I am, anyone not liking it and saying so, isn't going to put me in peril of changing. They will however, get an appropriate response.

Appreciate your perspective - hope you appreciate mine and consider it if/when there is another similar incident.




Aynne88 -> RE: The Perils of Being Yourself (5/4/2010 2:23:47 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: divi

Once again sweet HC well said


Ditto that divi. How fucking old do you need to get before having the cliquey cool kid back pats anyway Merc? [:-]. Or anyone else for that matter?

Domi....yep. [;)].





Mercnbeth -> RE: The Perils of Being Yourself (5/4/2010 2:34:50 PM)

quote:

How fucking old do you need to get before having the cliquey cool kid back pats anyway Merc? .

Based upon my experience - 54. [;)]

[8|]However, since beth's involved, (and seriously without her - I doubt I'd get any pats on the back from sources without knifes!) we need to add her into the equation and divide - 48.

(At my age on matters like this - you round down!)[sm=cool.gif]




brainiacsub -> RE: The Perils of Being Yourself (5/4/2010 2:44:08 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: leadership527

You know I have to admit, I don't get this SB's sort of comment. I find lots of threads on collarme to be not particularly relevant to me or else distasteful. I just stop reading them.

Even more amazing to me is that there must be some segment of the submissive population that sees such behavior as "dominant". I look at posters like Domiguy and SailingBugm and that question is endlessly intriguing to me. Would this be the "need to be humiliated and abused" crowd?

I know I'm entering the lions den here, but let me take the contrarian position. I don't think the appeal of Domi and SailingBum has anything to do with dominance, although there may be some submissives who respond to their style. I have found their appeal crosses gender and proclivity boundaries. I don't want to make excuses for any bad behavior, but this issue of "tolerance" is a big red herring. The fact is, there is alot of mental health, personality disorders and just plain stupidity masquerading as kink or "lifestyle" in these forums. Where does one draw the line between tolerating and enabling? It's a tough call so most of us just ignore or dismiss it for the sake of tolerance. But these guys will unapologetically call people on their bullshit. Love them or hate them, despise their methods, but without them alot of people would be drinking the koolaid. This kind of honesty is needed, especially on a site like this. I see people reinforce each others delusions daily in the name of tolerance.

Please accept that I am speaking in generalities here, and not specifically about anything that was said in this thread. I don't condone personal insults and attacks, but I wanted to provide a different perspective to the "humiliated and abused" school of thought.





leadership527 -> RE: The Perils of Being Yourself (5/4/2010 2:50:25 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: brainiacsub
Please accept that I am speaking in generalities here, and not specifically about anything that was said in this thread. I don't condone personal insults and attacks, but I wanted to provide a different perspective to the "humiliated and abused" school of thought.
Thanks brainiac... It was (no matter how some might've perceived it) a real and genuine question. There's much about the "humiliated and abused" dynamic that I don't understand... in fact, all of it. I read profiles and I am utterly mystified. It kind of made sense that maybe it connected. And yes, I can certainly see the appeal of "call people on their bull shit". I just haven't really ever read their posts that way... even when filtering out the crudity and sarcasm. But, as always, everyone finds their own truths in someone else's words.

Although I may really be liking this thread. If I was included in the comments from aynne88 and divi, then I've not only gotten the "creepy deviant" tag, but also the collarme cool kids inner-clique tag. Not bad for the vanilla guy who's perennially the stranger in a strange land here *chuckles*.




heartcream -> RE: The Perils of Being Yourself (5/4/2010 3:07:28 PM)

Calling out people that wernt there into the picture as a way to bully is about as low a bomb as one can toss. I am not convinced it was deserved or a balanced response.





divi -> RE: The Perils of Being Yourself (5/4/2010 3:12:43 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: leadership527

quote:

ORIGINAL: brainiacsub
Please accept that I am speaking in generalities here, and not specifically about anything that was said in this thread. I don't condone personal insults and attacks, but I wanted to provide a different perspective to the "humiliated and abused" school of thought.
Thanks brainiac... It was (no matter how some might've perceived it) a real and genuine question. There's much about the "humiliated and abused" dynamic that I don't understand... in fact, all of it. I read profiles and I am utterly mystified. It kind of made sense that maybe it connected. And yes, I can certainly see the appeal of "call people on their bull shit". I just haven't really ever read their posts that way... even when filtering out the crudity and sarcasm. But, as always, everyone finds their own truths in someone else's words.

Although I may really be liking this thread. If I was included in the comments from aynne88 and divi, then I've not only gotten the "creepy deviant" tag, but also the collarme cool kids inner-clique tag. Not bad for the vanilla guy who's perennially the stranger in a strange land here *chuckles*.

awww Jeff your cool in my book. You may sit with me today at lunch lol.. I do agree with HC again throwing here say comments about someone else is pretty lame in my book.




leadership527 -> RE: The Perils of Being Yourself (5/4/2010 3:18:25 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: heartcream
Calling out people that wernt there into the picture as a way to bully is about as low a bomb as one can toss. I am not convinced it was deserved or a balanced response.
huh... wha...?? Did I get the names wrong? *scrolls back* Nope. I'm confused.... ditto with divi's response... If those were meant for me, I don't get it.

But at least I still get to sit with divi at lunch :)




divi -> RE: The Perils of Being Yourself (5/4/2010 3:26:49 PM)

OMG Jeff this is awkward I forgot my wallet in my Jordache jeans hehe




domiguy -> RE: The Perils of Being Yourself (5/4/2010 3:29:02 PM)

It was bad form on my part to bring beth into the fray. My sound apology goes out to beth.

Forget it, Jake, it's Chinatown.







heartcream -> RE: The Perils of Being Yourself (5/4/2010 3:33:37 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: leadership527

quote:

ORIGINAL: heartcream
Calling out people that wernt there into the picture as a way to bully is about as low a bomb as one can toss. I am not convinced it was deserved or a balanced response.
huh... wha...?? Did I get the names wrong? *scrolls back* Nope. I'm confused.... ditto with divi's response... If those were meant for me, I don't get it.

But at least I still get to sit with divi at lunch :)


Nope not you Jeff, I was addressing Merc.

Class, let us notice how domi came in here apologized for his naughty behavior and left it at that, no hoity toity reasons and talk about all the friends he has. Simple, real. I dont think domi is a slug except the part where he likes to slug beers.

slug 1 |sləg|
noun
1 a tough-skinned terrestrial mollusk that typically lacks a shell and secretes a film of mucus for protection. It can be a serious plant pest. See also sea slug . • Order Stylommatophora, class Gastropoda.
2 a slow, lazy person; a sluggard.
3 an amount of an alcoholic drink, typically liquor, that is gulped or poured : he took a slug of whiskey. [ORIGIN: mid 18th cent.: figuratively from sense 4.]
4 an elongated, typically rounded piece or metal : the reactor uses embedded slugs of uranium.
• a counterfeit coin; a token.
• a bullet, esp. one of lead.
• a missile for an air gun.
• a line of type in Linotype printing.
• Printing a metal bar used in spacing.
verb ( slugged |sləgd|, slugging |sləgɪŋ|) [ trans. ]
drink (something, typically alcohol) in a large draft; swig : she picked up her drink and slugged it straight back.
ORIGIN late Middle English (in sense 2) : probably of Scandinavian origin; compare with Norwegian dialect slugg ‘large heavy body.’ Sense 1 dates from the early 18th cent.
slug 2 |sləg| |slʌg| informal
verb ( slugged |sləgd|, slugging |sləgɪŋ|) [ trans. ]
strike (someone) with a hard blow : he was the one who'd get slugged.
• ( slug it out) settle a dispute or contest by fighting or competing fiercely : they went outside to slug it out.
noun
a hard blow.
ORIGIN mid 19th cent.: of unknown origin; compare with the verb slog .




tigreetsa -> RE: The Perils of Being Yourself (5/4/2010 3:33:46 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Mercnbeth

tigreetsa,
We've found that most of the intolerant people claiming to be in a 'lifestyle' on-line who don't want anything other than social 'norms' represented in public are hypocritical and cowardly. They are self loathing and project all the whispered negative comments onto themselves. They just can't handle it. They wish they were as confident having the ability to be themselves, but can't handle it.

They hide behind fake persona and the anonymity of the internet. Often even their profile picture is stolen from some other source. They are clowns, amusing behind their clown make-up, usually lonely and scared. They are envious of people such as yourself strong enough to live your life as you choose and appreciating that accepting yourself is much more important than acquiring the acceptance of foolish clowns.


Why am I not surprised that you have hit the nail squarely on the head?

Why am I not surprised that you have been just as supportive as people in the kink community here in London with regard to the film I'm currently working on?

Why am I not surprised that despite the fact that Merc identifies as being on the opposite end of the political spectrum to me that we find common ground and agree on many issues?




Mercnbeth -> RE: The Perils of Being Yourself (5/4/2010 3:36:29 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: domiguy

It was bad form on my part to bring beth into the fray. My sound apology goes out to beth.

Forget it, Jake, it's Chinatown.

Good enough - Thank you - Forgotten.




leadership527 -> RE: The Perils of Being Yourself (5/4/2010 3:41:02 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: heartcream
Nope not you Jeff, I was addressing Merc.

damnit! that means I'm not one of the collarme cool kids... *sighs* Another dream dashed by the cold light of reality. I'm gonna go console myself with some nice vanilla ice cream.




tigreetsa -> RE: The Perils of Being Yourself (5/4/2010 4:25:23 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: brainiacsub

I don't want to make excuses for any bad behavior, but this issue of "tolerance" is a big red herring.



No it isn't. People talk about 'the lifestyle' as if it's some sort of alternative to the Catholic Church. It isn't.

Go through the profiles and you will find people from all walks of life.

People are individuals and BDSM and D/s whether you like it or not is all about interacting and relating to other people. It certainly isn't about people fitting in with how you expect society or other people to be.

quote:

ORIGINAL: brainiacsub

The fact is, there is alot of mental health, personality disorders and just plain stupidity masquerading as kink or "lifestyle" in these forums.



Exactly and there's an awful lot of people who just don't give a damn about relating to other people because they're so focussed on massaging their own egos and they think BDSM is where they can escape the reality of having a proper relationship and where they can get away with doing just that - massaging their egos.

You see this on both sides of the kneel, the doms who think 'this is all about me' or 'because you are submissive I'm perfectly entitled to treat you like shit' or the submissives who think this is really all about kink and sex or that 'submission is a gift'

quote:

ORIGINAL: brainiacsub

Where does one draw the line between tolerating and enabling?



I don't even get that far. I draw the line between those I can form a decent mutually beneficial relationship or friendship with and those with whom it isn't possible.

If you have contact with other people and live in what we all know as 'society' you're going to end up with a certain amount of emotional baggage which you either have to deal with or carry with you through life.

There's people here from all walks of life, and that to me includes the weak and the strong, the intelligent and stupid, the sane and the insane. I have no wish to play 'armchair psychologist' because I openly admit that some of the stupidity and mistakes I see others making right now I have made in the past and I remember that.

I have spent a few years on these boards and simultaneously I have been working with homeless people here in London. I wouldn't like to say who has the most issues overall but I tell you this much, for me the homeless people have the edge because they are more likely to openly admit that they have the issues, whereas I have come across quite a few people on this website who have the issues, they project them and you can see it a mile off. Only they just don't see it. 

quote:

ORIGINAL: brainiacsub

It's a tough call so most of us just ignore or dismiss it for the sake of tolerance.



Well if it isn't affecting you directly, what difference does it make?

quote:

ORIGINAL: brainiacsub

But these guys will unapologetically call people on their bullshit. Love them or hate them, despise their methods, but without them alot of people would be drinking the koolaid.



And you really think that other people can solve these issues of mental illness, emotional disturbances and emotional baggage just like that? And you really believe that they have some sort of insight or understanding? From a profile or postings on a message board?

And who are you to believe that you have never drank the koolaid of self-deception and delusion in your past or relationships?

quote:

ORIGINAL: brainiacsub

This kind of honesty is needed, especially on a site like this. I see people reinforce each others delusions daily in the name of tolerance.



This part I do agree with. Some people do actually learn from mistakes made by other people. Something said by someone might just cause people to stop and think about what they are doing, what they think about others and what attitudes they have.

But you know generally nothing generally changes until these people themselves actually work out what is wrong and want to implement changes in their lives.

This honesty has been on the Internet ever since it began. And yet people still make the same stupid mistakes, still get involved in the same delusions, still have the same issues, and still have the same issues with dealing with other people.

The other thing is while you are so quick to judge people who have issues through what they are projecting online, how can you be so sure that there aren't other people reading what you put out on the Internet who are judging you for what they perceive to be your issues?

We are all human and therefore individual and imperfect. Each and everyone of us have people who love us, people who like us, and people who don't. This is the reality. 

This community is no different from society, there are people you accept and people you don't.

However the difference is is that unlike society, you come here of your own free will and your own choice. Nobody forces you to be involved with BDSM and WIITWD.





Icarys -> RE: The Perils of Being Yourself (5/4/2010 4:43:14 PM)

quote:

The other thing is while you are so quick to judge people who have issues through what they are projecting online, how can you be so sure that there aren't other people reading what you put out on the Internet who are judging you for what they perceive to be your issues?

Good post, tigreetsa.

Hell you can't be sure your right when you make that judgment..unless your ego whispers so in your ear.(Which seems to be the case more times than not..I'm sure I'm right I'm sure I'm right..Okay Dorothy..one more time and your home!)

To Jeff and Carol.
Pretty much everything has been said. I'm sorry it didn't work out the way you had hoped. Time heals and new paths show themselves.




playfulotter -> RE: The Perils of Being Yourself (5/4/2010 5:52:54 PM)

Chinatown was a great movie wasn't it?




SailingBum -> RE: The Perils of Being Yourself (5/4/2010 8:17:44 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: leadership527


You know I have to admit, I don't get this SB's sort of comment. I find lots of threads on collarme to be not particularly relevant to me or else distasteful. I just stop reading them.

Even more amazing to me is that there must be some segment of the submissive population that sees such behavior as "dominant". I look at posters like Domiguy and SailingBugm and that question is endlessly intriguing to me. Would this be the "need to be humiliated and abused" crowd?


Please by all means do your best to twist my words around and lump me in with Domiguy.  My guess is since your post has nothing whatsoever to do with my comment, Im thinking your attempting to baffle readers with your BS.

Ill break it down for you as perhaps English is not your first language.  My point was and still is.  Someone who thinks that one set/ group of ppl<say the Irish> are more tolerant <than say the Germans> just because they are in that group, is a moron. 

More than one person in this thread has advanced this theory that group x is better <read tolerant> than group y because they say so.  My guess is leadership that you believe this to be true due to your nonsense comment.

BadOne




Page: <<   < prev  3 4 5 [6] 7   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875