DomKen
Posts: 19457
Joined: 7/4/2004 From: Chicago, IL Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Hippiekinkster quote:
ORIGINAL: DomKen quote:
ORIGINAL: Hippiekinkster TY for unlocking this. Excellent post, jefff. Exactly on point, particularly the last paragraph. Seems to me there are two ways to resolve cognitive dissonance: either assimilate new information, and change, or reject anything which contradicts one's beliefs, and remain in a state of intentional ignorance. IMO, those who believe in cosmic spooks (other than the FSM) belong in the latter category, as do the majority of conservatives. It's not just the majority of conservatives its the majority of all people. Liberals are no exception. Some Conservatives reject AGW or the ToE or believe there were WMD in Iraq but some liberals believe in crystals or some other variety of woo. It might be inetresting to compare the sorts of untrue thngs each side tends to believe in but I strongly disaprove of trying to claim this is solely the province of a single political philosophy. I can't disagree with the fact that many non-cons believe in New-Agey hooey, but you'll find just as many cons who believe in Area 51 (a classic conspiracy theory) or colloidal silver or magnets or homeopathic (water) remedies. There have been studies which correlate education with a tendency towards Progressivism. Also with more education comes a correlation with disbelief in a higher power, and other myths. I infer, therefore (and I may very well be wrong; I don't know of any studies correlating political orientation with UFOs and such), that Progressivism correlates with disbelief in conspiracy theories, alternative medicine and other junk science, and the various New Age beliefs. If only it were so. Plenty of educated progrssive people believe some of the stupidest shit ever. I belong to a number of local progressive groups and its certain that we had plenty of truthers, new agers etc.. Truthfully they were useful idiots in that they eagerly did alot of the grunt work. You just have to avoid their conversations and don't let them be spokesperson for the group. This might be better than the situation on the right at this momemnt in that the nuts seem to have taken over on that side but it remains dishonest to try and put the onus entirely on the cons.
|