WolfyMontgomery
Posts: 234
Joined: 9/28/2010 Status: offline
|
I think that Aquatic is merely implying that not ALL teens and younger people are as immature as people think. Just as "ALL Generation" teenagers are all different with different levels of individual maturity. It is unfair for those that are not immature little gits (I name them such because I've known plenty) to be placed in the same category as those who cause trouble. Just as it is blind to place ALL elderly people in the same category as being wise and learned, as there are many who are just as immature as the immature little gits among the teenagers. Not all people are the same, and as such, should all be looked at with the potential for respect (not SHOWN respect, just courtesy - note that I say potential) until they prove that they are undeserving of those sentiments. No one expects anyone to submit to or Dominate a person who is outside of their interests - as I am not interested in subbing to a Dom who is as old as my mother, neither is Master interested in being Dominant over someone who is as old as his mother - nor would he ever expect any woman TO submit to him who was not interested in him, due to age, looks, personality, or otherwise. Age often points to being more learned, but it's what the people do with that knowledge that makes them wise and respectable. If they throw that knowledge away, no matter what their age, what gives them the right to demand anything? If a person stops learning and growing, old age or not, what makes them wise when they are no longer open to the world around them? While Wisdom is often considered an accumulation of knowledge, it is ALSO considered " the ability or result of an ability to think and act utilizing knowledge, experience, understanding, common sense, and insight" (I pulled that from an online dictionary, thus the quotes, I wanted to make sure *I* even understood the definition clearly before writing this), thus if a person refuses to learn from their experiences - no matter how many experiences they've had - how does that make them wise? If a person who may be young, DOES use what knowledge is presented to them, is able to utilize their knowledge, to learn from their experiences, to understand and learn from new knowledge, would that not make them wiser than one that is older who cannot? So why be unfair to those that have learned, or turn a blind eye that knowledge does not *always* beget wisdom? Why not just look at the individual, and if they happen to be young and stupid, tell them such. If they happen to be old and stupid, tell THEM such. If they happen to be young and wise in what they have learned, accept such. If they happen to be old and wise in what they have learned, accept such. To use sweeping generalities is to insult those that do not fall into those generalities. It is, obviously, always good to teach the younger generations what they need to know, but I don't feel that they (including me, since I'm young) should ever be insulted without first earning the insult. If a youth does not know a thing, teach them, and if they learn from it then they are wise. If a youth knows something you do not know, let them teach you what they know, and if you learn from it then you are wise.
_____________________________
~Eleven -A Wolf of a Different Color Fear me and my Gleaming Metal Chompers of DOOM! ..........that means my braces. >_>
|