Collarchat.com

Join Our Community
Collarchat.com

Home  Login  Search 

RE: Is this a threat? sedition? or just posturing?


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Is this a threat? sedition? or just posturing? Page: <<   < prev  20 21 [22] 23 24   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Is this a threat? sedition? or just posturing? - 10/26/2010 9:40:17 AM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
read the thread, we have established malum in se is not malum prohibitum, and it is trivial to see that the 17 enumerations are not the law of the land.

you may go over and lick the toilet seat. 

is there a fuckin full moon or what? or a retard convention somewhere?

< Message edited by mnottertail -- 10/26/2010 9:42:41 AM >


_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to lockedaway)
Profile   Post #: 421
RE: Is this a threat? sedition? or just posturing? - 10/26/2010 9:47:07 AM   
lockedaway


Posts: 1720
Joined: 3/15/2007
Status: offline
HAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!  Oh too funny.  YOU CAN'T ANSWER HIS FUCKING POST!  I'm not going to say YOU, knottedhead, but people LIKE you are losers and punks.

If you can't answer his post, simply tell him that you will have to get back to him.  If he is ACCURATE then simply admit that the point he made is true but you still disagree with it for the following reasons.  Isn't that easy?  Isn't that mature?  Isn't that the way serious people actually debate a point?  Don't be a sarcastic little c**t (not that you are of course because I would never levy such a personal attack!!!!!!!!).  Address his point and further the conversation.

(in reply to mnottertail)
Profile   Post #: 422
RE: Is this a threat? sedition? or just posturing? - 10/26/2010 9:50:59 AM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
Read the fucking thread. I answered his post, he is wrong in every way. 

Otherwise, point out what I did not wipe him all over the floor with.

As I do you. 

< Message edited by mnottertail -- 10/26/2010 9:52:37 AM >


_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to lockedaway)
Profile   Post #: 423
RE: Is this a threat? sedition? or just posturing? - 10/26/2010 9:59:34 AM   
lockedaway


Posts: 1720
Joined: 3/15/2007
Status: offline
Give a real answer to RealOne's post number 416.  Set it out Chapter and Verse or use case law.  Whatever authority you have, cite it. 

(in reply to mnottertail)
Profile   Post #: 424
RE: Is this a threat? sedition? or just posturing? - 10/26/2010 10:25:03 AM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
look at that placid federal park just outside your barred asylum window.......

enumerated? 

was my answer, all that was necessary for any reasonable man.



You may see the basis of the SCOTUS ruling in Roe v. Wade on the constitutions enumerations of rights.

What they fundamentally said, and Roe v. Wade is available, is that the enumeration of rights in the constituion does not construe deny or disparage others retained by the people (the government is the people).

Now, to waltz ahead to your first wait a minute, I will point out that the SCOTUS recently pretty much ruled that a corporation was a person.
Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission. 


Next, is that fact that several cases (and this is not an exhaustive list) :

Marbury v. Madison
McCulloch v. Maryland
Gibbons v. Ogden

and others which come to say that the government has powers not enumerated.  

so, since someone makes an unfounded claim that there are 17 and only 17 rights that are enumerated and therefore the law of the land, it falls to me to prove them wrong, which anyone knows on the street knows for a fact is not the case in the constitution or american law..............

Nope, now you and 0 have it backwards. 

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to lockedaway)
Profile   Post #: 425
RE: Is this a threat? sedition? or just posturing? - 10/26/2010 11:01:00 AM   
tazzygirl


Posts: 37833
Joined: 10/12/2007
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: FirmhandKY

quote:

ORIGINAL: Icarys

quote:

Why the silly rifle rhetoric?

I think he's made it pretty clear that it's not something he would look forward to nor has he said he would engage..As far as I can tell he's just making observations.

And Icarys, this is the very root of the problem.

They are not listening, and what they hear, they incorrectly interpret.

How can is it even possible to get across to them the concerns?

It does not bode well for the future, methinks.

Firm



Oddly enough, i didnt hear a threat... nor did i hear a warning. I heard desperation.

_____________________________

Telling me to take Midol wont help your butthurt.
RIP, my demon-child 5-16-11
Duchess of Dissent 1
Dont judge me because I sin differently than you.
If you want it sugar coated, dont ask me what i think! It would violate TOS.

(in reply to FirmhandKY)
Profile   Post #: 426
RE: Is this a threat? sedition? or just posturing? - 10/26/2010 11:22:35 AM   
Real0ne


Posts: 21189
Joined: 10/25/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

look at that placid federal park just outside your barred asylum window.......

enumerated? 

was my answer, all that was necessary for any reasonable man.



You may see the basis of the SCOTUS ruling in Roe v. Wade on the constitutions enumerations of rights.

What they fundamentally said, and Roe v. Wade is available, is that the enumeration of rights in the constituion does not construe deny or disparage others retained by the people (the government is the people).

So now you claim there are no individual rights?  Just priviledges handed to you by the democracy huh?

The government is NOT the people, the people CREATED the government.

quote:

bouviers law dictionary:

PEOPLE. A state: as, the people of the state of New York. A nation In Its collective and political capacity. 4 Term 783. See U. S. v. Qulncy, 6 Pet. (U. S.) 467, 8 L. Ed. 458. The aggregate or mass of the individuals who constitute the state. Solon v. State, 54 Tex. Cr. R. 261, 114 S. W. 349.
Thats the plural version...

In neutrality laws, a government recognized by the United States. The Three Friends, 78 Fed. 175. "People of the county" and "the county" may be regarded as Interchangeable. St Louis County Ct. v. Grlswold, 58 Mo. 175.
When the term the people Is made use of in constitutional law or discussions, it is often the case that those only are intended who have a share In the government through being clothed with the elective franchise. Thus, the people elect delegates to a constitutional convention; the people choose the officers under the constitution, and so on.' For these and similar purposes, the electors, though constituting but a small minority of the whole body of the community, nevertheless act for all, and, as being for the time the representatives of sovereignty, they are considered and spoken of as the sovereign people. But in all the enumerations and guaranties of rights the whole people are intended, because the rights of all are equal, and are meant to be equally protected; Cooley, Const (2d Ed.) .40, 267; Cooley, Const. L. 278.
Sovereign people. Every citizen is one of this people, and a constituent member of the sovereignty; Scott v. Sandford, 19 How. (U. S.) 393, 15 L. Ed, 691; it includes registered voters as well as tax payers; In re Incurring State Debts, 19 R. I. 610, 37 Atl. 14.
Thats the singular version...


Every citizen sounds pretty singular to me!
you wanna argue with bouviers law dictionary be my guest, it is the favorite of the supreme court FWIW.




Now, to waltz ahead to your first wait a minute, I will point out that the SCOTUS recently pretty much ruled that a corporation was a person.
Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission. 

Yeh so what?  Nothing new there its been that way for well over 1000 years.

Next, is that fact that several cases (and this is not an exhaustive list) :

Marbury v. Madison
McCulloch v. Maryland
Gibbons v. Ogden

and others which come to say that the government has powers not enumerated. 

Proving the usurpation of power thank you very much!


so, since someone makes an unfounded claim that there are 17 and only 17 rights that are enumerated and therefore the law of the land, it falls to me to prove them wrong, which anyone knows on the street knows for a fact is not the case in the constitution or american law..............

Nope, now you and 0 have it backwards. 


the claim is correct and you just proved my point over and over again....  some people (meaning one YOU), just dont get it!

pun intended LMAO

< Message edited by Real0ne -- 10/26/2010 11:28:53 AM >


_____________________________

"We the Borg" of the us imperialists....resistance is futile

Democracy; The 'People' voted on 'which' amendment?

Yesterdays tinfoil is today's reality!

"No man's life, liberty, or property is safe while the legislature is in session

(in reply to mnottertail)
Profile   Post #: 427
RE: Is this a threat? sedition? or just posturing? - 10/26/2010 11:29:27 AM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
This is why I don't go into long insightful and credible and logical legal citations with fuckin retards.

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to Real0ne)
Profile   Post #: 428
RE: Is this a threat? sedition? or just posturing? - 10/26/2010 11:33:50 AM   
Politesub53


Posts: 14862
Joined: 5/7/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: FirmhandKY

Do you have the slightest clue how many people in the States actually supported the War of Independence from Great Britian?  How many remained Tories?



Around 15/20% Of the American population fought for the Loyalists. I seem to remember reading some 45 % of the population supported the Revolution. After the war some 70,000 plus loyalists left America, most for other colonies. Many of the British soldiers decided to stay in America, I am unsure of the number though.

What gets me is most of you on the right are saying if we dont get the government we want, we will have a revolution. Sounds a bit "Third world" to me, the one thing it isnt, is democratic.

(in reply to FirmhandKY)
Profile   Post #: 429
RE: Is this a threat? sedition? or just posturing? - 10/26/2010 11:36:04 AM   
Real0ne


Posts: 21189
Joined: 10/25/2004
Status: offline


when you prove the way it is done which runs contrary to the way it is supposed to be done only proves a usurpation.

You do not need to be a rocket scientist to figure that out.

Just like "gun control", completely in violation of the constitution but its done and it does not make the supreme court right and its written so clearly that even a 20 iq idiot can come up with the right answer on that one.



_____________________________

"We the Borg" of the us imperialists....resistance is futile

Democracy; The 'People' voted on 'which' amendment?

Yesterdays tinfoil is today's reality!

"No man's life, liberty, or property is safe while the legislature is in session

(in reply to mnottertail)
Profile   Post #: 430
RE: Is this a threat? sedition? or just posturing? - 10/26/2010 12:52:30 PM   
slvemike4u


Posts: 17896
Joined: 1/15/2008
From: United States
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Politesub53

quote:

ORIGINAL: FirmhandKY

Do you have the slightest clue how many people in the States actually supported the War of Independence from Great Britian?  How many remained Tories?



Around 15/20% Of the American population fought for the Loyalists. I seem to remember reading some 45 % of the population supported the Revolution. After the war some 70,000 plus loyalists left America, most for other colonies. Many of the British soldiers decided to stay in America, I am unsure of the number though.

What gets me is most of you on the right are saying if we dont get the government we want, we will have a revolution. Sounds a bit "Third world" to me, the one thing it isnt, is democratic.
A freaken limey(apologies polite one...no offence meant) and he gets is....meanwhile our own erstwhile patriotic tea bag dip shits think that threatening the very institutions they hold dear is the essence of patriotism.
The Constitution and the Bill of Rights still remain....and they hint at armed revolt....ask them their grievences and they complain about taxes,rail against the overreaching powers of the Fed and long for the good old days .They even dust off that old canard(used once before if I recall) States Rights.
Ask them what rights have been abridged.....
Ask them when they were denied due proccess....
Ask them when they were last barred from voting.....
Ask them anything of substance.....and all they can come back with is a general feeling of discontent...and than blithley tell you that the conditions for the insurrection are not quite right yet.And therein lies the threat ,the implication that there is a right way to vote and failure to do so might just force a crisis.

_____________________________

If we want things to stay as they are,things will have to change...Tancredi from "the Leopard"

Forget Guns-----Ban the pools

Funny stuff....https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eNwFf991d-4


(in reply to Politesub53)
Profile   Post #: 431
RE: Is this a threat? sedition? or just posturing? - 10/26/2010 12:57:27 PM   
Moonhead


Posts: 16520
Joined: 9/21/2009
Status: offline
Well, didn't it become obvious that was what all the bitching was about when it kicked off the second a Kenyan Democrat was sworn in? They've hardly been going out of their way to hide it.

_____________________________

I like to think he was eaten by rats, in the dark, during a fog. It's what he would have wanted...
(Simon R Green on the late James Herbert)

(in reply to slvemike4u)
Profile   Post #: 432
RE: Is this a threat? sedition? or just posturing? - 10/26/2010 1:01:53 PM   
slvemike4u


Posts: 17896
Joined: 1/15/2008
From: United States
Status: offline
No moon you are correct...this is nothing new,and given the givens it was to be expected.

_____________________________

If we want things to stay as they are,things will have to change...Tancredi from "the Leopard"

Forget Guns-----Ban the pools

Funny stuff....https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eNwFf991d-4


(in reply to Moonhead)
Profile   Post #: 433
RE: Is this a threat? sedition? or just posturing? - 10/26/2010 1:02:41 PM   
PatrickG38


Posts: 338
Joined: 10/8/2010
Status: offline
Adult political parties used to keep people like this licking envelopes in the backroom far from the press, but it is clear that in a once great party, the lunatics are in charge of the asylum.

(in reply to Lucylastic)
Profile   Post #: 434
RE: Is this a threat? sedition? or just posturing? - 10/26/2010 1:04:01 PM   
Moonhead


Posts: 16520
Joined: 9/21/2009
Status: offline
Well, when was it last a great party? It's all been downhill for the Republicans since Nixon, hasn't it?

_____________________________

I like to think he was eaten by rats, in the dark, during a fog. It's what he would have wanted...
(Simon R Green on the late James Herbert)

(in reply to PatrickG38)
Profile   Post #: 435
RE: Is this a threat? sedition? or just posturing? - 10/26/2010 1:08:11 PM   
slvemike4u


Posts: 17896
Joined: 1/15/2008
From: United States
Status: offline
Eisenhower wasn't bad....lord knows we should have paid more attention to his  entreaty to beware the military-industrial complex.

< Message edited by slvemike4u -- 10/26/2010 1:09:32 PM >


_____________________________

If we want things to stay as they are,things will have to change...Tancredi from "the Leopard"

Forget Guns-----Ban the pools

Funny stuff....https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eNwFf991d-4


(in reply to Moonhead)
Profile   Post #: 436
RE: Is this a threat? sedition? or just posturing? - 10/26/2010 1:08:45 PM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
I wasn't looking at Hoover as any sort of savior, nor Coolidge, come to that.

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to Moonhead)
Profile   Post #: 437
RE: Is this a threat? sedition? or just posturing? - 10/26/2010 1:10:30 PM   
PatrickG38


Posts: 338
Joined: 10/8/2010
Status: offline
Yes, since Nixon basically.

(in reply to Moonhead)
Profile   Post #: 438
RE: Is this a threat? sedition? or just posturing? - 10/26/2010 1:19:57 PM   
Real0ne


Posts: 21189
Joined: 10/25/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: slvemike4u

quote:

ORIGINAL: Politesub53

quote:

ORIGINAL: FirmhandKY

Do you have the slightest clue how many people in the States actually supported the War of Independence from Great Britian?  How many remained Tories?



Around 15/20% Of the American population fought for the Loyalists. I seem to remember reading some 45 % of the population supported the Revolution. After the war some 70,000 plus loyalists left America, most for other colonies. Many of the British soldiers decided to stay in America, I am unsure of the number though.

What gets me is most of you on the right are saying if we dont get the government we want, we will have a revolution. Sounds a bit "Third world" to me, the one thing it isnt, is democratic.
A freaken limey(apologies polite one...no offence meant) and he gets is....meanwhile our own erstwhile patriotic tea bag dip shits think that threatening the very institutions they hold dear is the essence of patriotism.

The essense and root of patriot is parens patrae meaning state as parent, whats to hold dear about that?  I mean if you are an adult?


The Constitution and the Bill of Rights still remain....

Yeh they aint nothing but a god damn piece of paper!  ~G W Bush


and they hint at armed revolt....ask them their grievences and they complain about taxes,

How about everyone send them to you eh?


rail against the overreaching powers of the Fed and long for the good old days.

You mean before the usurpation of government?


They even dust off that old canard(used once before if I recall) States Rights.

Oh thats right they dont have any do they?


Ask them what rights have been abridged.....

1st, 2nd, 4th, 5th, 7th, 10th, need more?


Ask them when they were denied due proccess....

Every fucking traffic ticket, tax cases, zoning, ordinances and on and on and on!

Whats the last amendment you or your uncle or you grand father or great great grand father VOTED ON?


Ask them when they were last barred from voting.....

When voter fraud became an acceptable in the general elections,

when the supreme decided who the president would be.


Ask them anything of substance.....and all they can come back with is a general feeling of discontent...and than blithley tell you that the conditions for the insurrection are not quite right yet.And therein lies the threat ,the implication that there is a right way to vote and failure to do so might just force a crisis.


well lets see what you come back with...I called and raised you 100.


_____________________________

"We the Borg" of the us imperialists....resistance is futile

Democracy; The 'People' voted on 'which' amendment?

Yesterdays tinfoil is today's reality!

"No man's life, liberty, or property is safe while the legislature is in session

(in reply to slvemike4u)
Profile   Post #: 439
RE: Is this a threat? sedition? or just posturing? - 10/26/2010 1:43:45 PM   
Lucylastic


Posts: 40310
Status: offline
What makes me squeal in derision is the fact that "freedom" for baggers  is now only for conservative middle aged english speaking christians
wanting "their" country back.
Used and abused the immigrants and  people of colour, and the working poor, and suddenly  look down on them and realise that they are heading in the same direction because of greed.
A fight for freedom my arse its a fight to crawl back in the womb because they  are scared of the results of their selfishness.
Ten years or even five years ago, this should have happened( la revolution) , but they were still eye deep in the trough
most of them  act like petulent three year olds who dont like to share



_____________________________

(•_•)
<) )╯SUCH
/ \

\(•_•)
( (> A NASTY
/ \

(•_•)
<) )> WOMAN
/ \

Duchess Of Dissent
Dont Hate Love

(in reply to Moonhead)
Profile   Post #: 440
Page:   <<   < prev  20 21 [22] 23 24   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Is this a threat? sedition? or just posturing? Page: <<   < prev  20 21 [22] 23 24   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2024
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.102