LadiesBladewing
Posts: 944
Joined: 8/31/2005 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Proprietrix It seems a lot of people are hung up on a Dominant mentoring a submissive. I view that more as training than mentoring. When I think of mentoring, I think of a person who is wise in the ways of XYZ, offering advice and guidance to a newcomer who is learning XYZ. From that perspective, wouldn't it make more sense for a submissive to mentor a submissive and a Dominant to mentor a Dominant? Not that it should be completely dependent on orientation in the lifestyle... Anyone with experience & integrity (the will, character, etc..) could mentor newcomers, but for the more specifics aspects, wouldn't it make sense for a mentor to be someone who has "walked in those shoes" already? Someone who has an understanding of what questions are running through the newcomers brain, can speak to the questions that arise from that end of the whip, etc.... (I'm normally more well-spoken than this, but I'm not feeling up to par tonight, so I'm sorry if that post made no sense whatsoever.) *nodding* Perhaps this is the issue that so many are having here... I know from my mate's experience and my own, both in and out of lifestyle choices, that it is important for the person who is providing mentorship to be someone that an individual can respect, and who has skills and experience that the individual feels will be valuable to his or her progress. With that in mind, it makes sense that the individual providing mentorship would be an experienced colleague... someone who shares or has shared the same path, which can also help to avoid issues of mixed goals... someone who is on the same path, but a few steps ahead, is less likely to be interested in pushing a hidden agenda. A servant who guides and mentors his or her fellow servants can provide valuable information and experiences to help someone on that path make positive choices for his or her development. In the same way, the challenges of an owner will be best explained by an individual who has actually -been- responsible for another's life. This is the way that we use mentorship. When I guide individuals spiritually, I don't go -looking- for people to guide... I offer guidance to those who come to me and tell me that they have been working on the teachings that I am familiar with, and desire guidance to help them to understand and make good choices. When I mentor at work, I mentor those whose career path follows the track that mine has followed, because that is where I have knowledge and experience. If they decide that they need to go another direction, my greatest responsibility as a mentor is in helping them to find someone who can guide them where I can't. In the same way, in this life, when I was being mentored, it was by individuals who understood my goals, and who were experienced in methods and philosophies that I wanted to learn, but needed clarification and a measure of self-confidence in expressing. Now, when I mentor, it is for those individuals for whom my particular set of experiences and the understandings I've obtained from those experiences might actually be of value for where -they- want to go on their own path. This is why it was so hard for me to understand why there was such a malignant attitude towards mentorship, since it has always been such an outstanding resource everywhere else I've been. Lady Zephyr
< Message edited by LadiesBladewing -- 4/29/2006 8:41:27 PM >
_____________________________
"Should have", "could have", "would have" and "can't" may be the most dangerous phrases in the English language. Bladewing Enclave
|