Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: Army Mulls Women in Combat Arms


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Army Mulls Women in Combat Arms Page: <<   < prev  4 5 [6] 7 8   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Army Mulls Women in Combat Arms - 1/14/2011 5:33:51 PM   
LPslittleclip


Posts: 1163
Joined: 9/29/2007
Status: offline 		i have served for more than 20 years now and i have been in direct combat with female soldiers. they were no diffrent than the males most did fine some outstanding and some not good. so i would support the females that want to in to all jobs in the army. as far as sex being all male hasent stoped it. in the current conflict having females is a great benifit as they are allowed to search the females and do the things that are not allowed to be done by males in that culture.ther is no superior gender just diffrent, males have more muscle mass and females have more flexability. i have found that you find what you look for. if you seek reasons to have females be usefull then you will find them. similary if you seek for reasons for females to be refused you will find that.

_____________________________

proud to serve the awsome
LadyPact

(in reply to Icarys)
Profile   Post #: 101
RE: Army Mulls Women in Combat Arms - 1/14/2011 5:34:04 PM   
Icarys


Posts: 5757
Status: offline
quote:

typographical error 

–noun an error in printed or typewritten matter resulting from striking the improper key of a keyboard, from mechanical failure, or the like.

(dictionary.com)

There was mechanical failure..I missed the key

Vicious  viScous  Wrong key? So let me get this straight. You have issue with ME because I don't type that great? Meaning good typing skills are the end all of intelligence?

Got it. I'll be sure to drop those on occasion so you can giggle like a school girl.

Would you like to move on now?



_____________________________

submission - the feeling of patient, submissive humbleness - the state of being submissive or compliant; meekness.

Alaska Bound-The Official Countdown Has Started!
http://tinyurl.com/872mcu3
http://alturl.com/mog7m

(in reply to rulemylife)
Profile   Post #: 102
RE: Army Mulls Women in Combat Arms - 1/14/2011 5:35:32 PM   
kalikshama


Posts: 14805
Joined: 8/8/2010
Status: offline 		/Adopts Philo's Law while maintaining appreciation for the pedants cuz I'm that way/


quote:

ORIGINAL: philosophy

FR

...we've all heard of Godwins Law. The idea that the first person in an argument to compare the opponent to a Nazi automatically loses.

I now propose for you Philo's Law.

The first person to attack their opponent on a purely typographical point loses.

Seriously.....RML, attacking someone over a typo rather than attacking their argument is lazy. Stop it.


(in reply to philosophy)
Profile   Post #: 103
RE: Army Mulls Women in Combat Arms - 1/14/2011 5:37:56 PM   
RapierFugue


Posts: 4740
Joined: 3/16/2006
From: London, England
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: kalikshama

/Adopts Philo's Law while maintaining appreciation for the pedants cuz I'm that way/

It's a thankless task being a pedant, but every so often someone learns something.

Sometimes, that someone is me :)

(in reply to kalikshama)
Profile   Post #: 104
RE: Army Mulls Women in Combat Arms - 1/14/2011 5:38:06 PM   
philosophy


Posts: 5284
Joined: 2/15/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: kalikshama

/Adopts Philo's Law while maintaining appreciation for the pedants cuz I'm that way/







....lol........although somehow i doubt Philo's law will make it to wikipedia......

(in reply to kalikshama)
Profile   Post #: 105
RE: Army Mulls Women in Combat Arms - 1/14/2011 5:39:41 PM   
RapierFugue


Posts: 4740
Joined: 3/16/2006
From: London, England
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Icarys
You have issue with ME because I don't type that great?

It's "that well" ... "because I don't type that well" ;)

(sorry, I realise I'm the only one who finds that funny, but I had to)

(in reply to Icarys)
Profile   Post #: 106
RE: Army Mulls Women in Combat Arms - 1/14/2011 5:40:10 PM   
dcnovice


Posts: 37282
Joined: 8/2/2006
Status: offline 		I love Philo's Law too!

Being an editor, I generally take typos in stride, but I did chuckle when my beloved diner offered "Beef Barely" soup yesterday.

_____________________________

No matter how cynical you become,
it's never enough to keep up.

JANE WAGNER, THE SEARCH FOR SIGNS OF
INTELLIGENT LIFE IN THE UNIVERSE

(in reply to philosophy)
Profile   Post #: 107
RE: Army Mulls Women in Combat Arms - 1/14/2011 5:41:02 PM   
Icarys


Posts: 5757
Status: offline
quote:

(sorry, I realise I'm the only one who finds that funny, but I had to)


What no takers? Dammit man.

Okay I'm off to spend time with my furry kids.

Night.


< Message edited by Icarys -- 1/14/2011 5:47:22 PM >

_____________________________

submission - the feeling of patient, submissive humbleness - the state of being submissive or compliant; meekness.

Alaska Bound-The Official Countdown Has Started!
http://tinyurl.com/872mcu3
http://alturl.com/mog7m

(in reply to RapierFugue)
Profile   Post #: 108
RE: Army Mulls Women in Combat Arms - 1/14/2011 5:41:19 PM   
Lucylastic


Posts: 40310
Status: offline 		I want a pendant



_____________________________

(•_•)
<) )╯SUCH
/ \

\(•_•)
( (> A NASTY
/ \

(•_•)
<) )> WOMAN
/ \

Duchess Of Dissent
Dont Hate Love

(in reply to dcnovice)
Profile   Post #: 109
RE: Army Mulls Women in Combat Arms - 1/14/2011 5:42:47 PM   
philosophy


Posts: 5284
Joined: 2/15/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

I want a pendant






.....a pearl necklace do?

(in reply to Lucylastic)
Profile   Post #: 110
RE: Army Mulls Women in Combat Arms - 1/14/2011 5:44:27 PM   
kalikshama


Posts: 14805
Joined: 8/8/2010
Status: offline 		/imagines the wikipedia entry/


(in reply to philosophy)
Profile   Post #: 111
RE: Army Mulls Women in Combat Arms - 1/14/2011 5:44:37 PM   
Lucylastic


Posts: 40310
Status: offline 		what a damn waste

_____________________________

(•_•)
<) )╯SUCH
/ \

\(•_•)
( (> A NASTY
/ \

(•_•)
<) )> WOMAN
/ \

Duchess Of Dissent
Dont Hate Love

(in reply to philosophy)
Profile   Post #: 112
RE: Army Mulls Women in Combat Arms - 1/14/2011 5:46:24 PM   
Lucylastic


Posts: 40310
Status: offline 		LPs Clip, Thanks for a great response amongst the flotsam. Stay as safe as you can  and renewed thanks!

_____________________________

(•_•)
<) )╯SUCH
/ \

\(•_•)
( (> A NASTY
/ \

(•_•)
<) )> WOMAN
/ \

Duchess Of Dissent
Dont Hate Love

(in reply to Lucylastic)
Profile   Post #: 113
RE: Army Mulls Women in Combat Arms - 1/14/2011 5:48:49 PM   
RapierFugue


Posts: 4740
Joined: 3/16/2006
From: London, England
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Icarys

quote:

(sorry, I realise I'm the only one who finds that funny, but I had to)


Yes? And? I'm English, we're writing English.

Check the OED, old sport ;)

(in reply to Icarys)
Profile   Post #: 114
RE: Army Mulls Women in Combat Arms - 1/14/2011 5:49:59 PM   
RapierFugue


Posts: 4740
Joined: 3/16/2006
From: London, England
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: LPslittleclip
if you seek reasons to have females be usefull then you will find them. similary if you seek for reasons for females to be refused you will find that.

True in life as well as this debate ;)

(in reply to LPslittleclip)
Profile   Post #: 115
RE: Army Mulls Women in Combat Arms - 1/14/2011 5:50:13 PM   
ScaryJello


Posts: 103
Joined: 10/19/2006
Status: offline 		Provided women can pass the same physical requirements that the men have to pass I see no problem with it.

(in reply to RapierFugue)
Profile   Post #: 116
RE: Army Mulls Women in Combat Arms - 1/14/2011 5:52:06 PM   
philosophy


Posts: 5284
Joined: 2/15/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

what a damn waste



...that so depends on your frame of mind :p

(in reply to Lucylastic)
Profile   Post #: 117
RE: Army Mulls Women in Combat Arms - 1/14/2011 5:53:09 PM   
philosophy


Posts: 5284
Joined: 2/15/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: RapierFugue


quote:

ORIGINAL: LPslittleclip
if you seek reasons to have females be usefull then you will find them. similary if you seek for reasons for females to be refused you will find that.

True in life as well as this debate ;)



.....quoted for truth........

(in reply to RapierFugue)
Profile   Post #: 118
RE: Army Mulls Women in Combat Arms - 1/14/2011 5:59:11 PM   
Lucylastic


Posts: 40310
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: philosophy


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

what a damn waste



...that so depends on your frame of mind :p

and your reward/punishment level


_____________________________

(•_•)
<) )╯SUCH
/ \

\(•_•)
( (> A NASTY
/ \

(•_•)
<) )> WOMAN
/ \

Duchess Of Dissent
Dont Hate Love

(in reply to philosophy)
Profile   Post #: 119
RE: Army Mulls Women in Combat Arms - 1/14/2011 6:01:22 PM   
pahunkboy


Posts: 33061
Joined: 2/26/2006
From: Central Pennsylvania
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: ScaryJello

Provided women can pass the same physical requirements that the men have to pass I see no problem with it.


You could not really leave women in around straight male troops.  They would go wild- have sex- and this could effect morale.

(in reply to ScaryJello)
Profile   Post #: 120
Page:   <<   < prev  4 5 [6] 7 8   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Army Mulls Women in Combat Arms Page: <<   < prev  4 5 [6] 7 8   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.093