AneNoz -> RE: Do you have contempt for submissive males? (4/28/2011 8:17:49 PM)
|
quote:
If you seriously think this has been accomplished through politeness, then your model of the world needs substantial work. I commend to you a study of history - particularly Chinese history - and you'll discover that the world in which we exist has been purchased with more bloodshed than you could possibly imagine. Your naive notions are very clearly rocognisable for the quaint empty-headed idealism that it is. Never once did I say that the world was in fact run on a basis of politeness, I did say that politeness is the better option. Surely even you can see the difference, no? And I have studied history, what has been does not alter what should be. We have the ability to chose our path, we are not bound to repeat the errors of the past. And my empty-headed idealism has kept my people alive for centuries in a world that has made every effort to eradicate them. My notions are not naive, they are based on the teachings of a long line of very wise women, who's understanding of the world and its people exceeds yours. like so many, you fear what you do not understand and so you belittle it so as to make yourself feel superior. It is as I said before. quote:
And the statement you're responding to was my reply to the idea that I don't respect your opinion because you're a woman. Then perhaps it would have been wise to have stated such, rather than to simply say subs prefer such and such. I did not realize you considered yourself a sub, so I did not connect the stated preference of subs with you. In the future I will keep in mind that you consider yourself a sub, yet mask yourself as a Dom. This is good to know. quote:
*laugh* You mock yourself and are blind to it. There is no self mockery in admitting difficulty understanding a thing said in a foreign language. This is doubly so when the statement made is vague and unclear. But as evidenced by your previous section, it would appear that this is a deliberate thing on your part. quote:
Yes. Which is exactly why you did it previously. I did exactly the same thing as you did. I posited a non sequitur then expected you to respond to it. You posited a non sequitur - asking why I feared submissive men - and expected me to respond to it. Perhaps if you had followed the thread, you would have known that I made a statement early in this thread that people hold in contempt that which they fear. You clearly hold submissive men in contempt, and thus fear them on some level. Perhaps their mere existence challenges your misguided ideas regarding the proper place and roles of the sexes. quote:
Your inability to tolerate dissenting opinion is - I'm afraid - a classic sign of weakness. I am not incapable of tolerating dissenting opinion, it is you that have repeatedly done so on this thread and others. I am of the belief that all opinions should be accepted and seen on the strength of their merits, not evaluated through a lens of preconception. quote:
The mistake which you've made is to presume that because someone has a diametrically opposed world-view to yours, that this says something about who they are as an individual. I have not done so, it is you. I have assumed a fear on your part because your words and stated position reveal such a fear. You have assumed a nonexistent weakness on my part based on an intolerance which you imagined. This is the reason and logic of which you boast. quote:
Basically, what offends you - and indeed others - is that I dare to hold these views. What makes it worse is that I can explain them articulately and don't feel the need to apologise for them. It is not your views that annoyed me, nor your ability to explain them, nor your lack of a need to apologize for them. It is the arrogance with which you expound them and the dismissive nature of your replies. You attempt to insult with every post you make. You may or may not hold the views you claim, but you present them in a way so as to annoy, and this is a deliberate ploy on your part. Perhaps you are but a shit disturber (I hope I have this term correct). quote:
It's good you at least understand the concept of self-awareness. I suggest you try applying it. Then ask yourself why you've responded in this way. The answer is less flattering than you'd like to imagine. This I simply had to smile at. Self-awareness and self- examination are the cornerstone of my way of life. I responded in the way I did because I was foolish and allowed your deliberate attempts to provoke to succeed. So yes, I agree the reason is unflattering. It saddens me that one must be so bitter and angry in this life which is meant to be a joy. I will pray to My Goddess that you be granted peace and happiness. Be at peace Aneka
|
|
|
|