RE: Strategies

RE: Strategies (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Ask a Master

Message

TheFireWithinMe -> RE: Strategies (10/16/2011 6:34:40 PM)
I'm lazy besides there's less drama llama stuff that way.

AdorkableAiley -> RE: Strategies (10/16/2011 6:41:45 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: TheFireWithinMe I'm lazy besides there's less drama llama stuff that way. Na if the drama llama rears its ugly head that is when the block option comes into play.

LillyBoPeep -> RE: Strategies (10/16/2011 7:18:12 PM)
I put you on hide, NS, because you insulted a dead person who was very important to me. I obviously don't have you on hide anymore. Go read the OP and then read VAX response. Againg, what about "(and maybe more?)" Means oonly male masters. The op created the exception himself. It's not my fault if you get riled up because you can't read. You are hardly in the position to comment on idiocy on the baords considering that you rarly, if ever, interject anything but your tired "snobby boy~king" schtick. Your opinion means absolutely nothing to me anymore.

MistressLilliana -> RE: Strategies (10/16/2011 7:24:12 PM)
There are a few points in your post which cause me some issues on my end but of course it is only my opinion. First of all, with the way you put things such as you blocking American Americans (whether or not they are your thing) and other ethnicity because they tend to be scammers is very judgmental and stereotypical. I may be Caucasian but even I was slightly offended by this. Also, I agree with so many others on here that I don't ever go on cam because of how many people abuse it, not all but many and it's just not worth the hassle. To add to the list, I do not appreciate immediately being asked about sexual preferences or "abilities". I will list what I am into on my profile but when I first communicate with someone I like to get to know them as a person not just the sex aspect. Of course I'm looking for something more serious and not just for play so I guess that makes a difference. Also, instead of blocking someone because they say they don't like something you really do why don't you get to know them first. If they trust you enough and your willing to take things slow with them they might just open up to that one thing they thought they were against. For example: I'm talking to a slave that I'm hoping will work out and he happens to enjoy having his Mistress use him as a toilet. This isn't something I've ever done and the thought of doing it doesn't excite me at all BUT it is the only thing I've found so far that we don't have in common. Though he is more than willing to forget about it because it doesn't please me and sacrifice that enjoyment, I told him that, should everything work out and trust is established, I see no harm in trying it at least once. If I find I enjoy it then great, if I don't then he knew ahead of time and no harm done. Like with any relationship there are compromises. If you aren't willing to accept this and hope that there is a "perfect" person out there then I wish you luck because I don't think any two people are exactly alike.

xxblushesxx -> RE: Strategies (10/16/2011 9:02:09 PM)
NS, don't pick on my Lilly. I luvs her. This obviously did not warrant "domly" attention (save for Kana, and one or two others) If the other doms wanted to jump in, you can be sure they would. They are not intimidated by a few subs having a dommy roast. However, since you did find the OP's post(s) to be fair, what advice do you have to give the original question(s)? I'm genuinely curious what anyone could possibly say save "take the stick out, and just treat people as people." (that would be my advice anyway.) I am very good friends with several engineers (no one understands them) and even they wouldn't have come up with that anal approach. So...what would you say to the first couple of posts from the OP?

NocturnalStalker -> RE: Strategies (10/16/2011 9:09:09 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: xxblushesxx NS, don't pick on my Lilly. I luvs her. This obviously did not warrant "domly" attention (save for Kana, and one or two others) If the other doms wanted to jump in, you can be sure they would. They are not intimidated by a few subs having a dommy roast. However, since you did find the OP's post(s) to be fair, what advice do you have to give the original question(s)? I'm genuinely curious what anyone could possibly say save "take the stick out, and just treat people as people." (that would be my advice anyway.) I am very good friends with several engineers (no one understands them) and even they wouldn't have come up with that anal approach. So...what would you say to the first couple of posts from the OP? The OP indicates that he has pretty much abandoned this topic. If he comes back and asks, I'll do my best to provide my outlook but right now it would just be lost advice.

xxblushesxx -> RE: Strategies (10/16/2011 9:21:14 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: NocturnalStalker quote: ORIGINAL: xxblushesxx NS, don't pick on my Lilly. I luvs her. This obviously did not warrant "domly" attention (save for Kana, and one or two others) If the other doms wanted to jump in, you can be sure they would. They are not intimidated by a few subs having a dommy roast. However, since you did find the OP's post(s) to be fair, what advice do you have to give the original question(s)? I'm genuinely curious what anyone could possibly say save "take the stick out, and just treat people as people." (that would be my advice anyway.) I am very good friends with several engineers (no one understands them) and even they wouldn't have come up with that anal approach. So...what would you say to the first couple of posts from the OP? The OP indicates that he has pretty much abandoned this topic. If he comes back and asks, I'll do my best to provide my outlook but right now it would just be lost advice. I'm really curious what you would say. I have an idea what you might say had we not all jumped in. Can you honestly say you would give a serious and well-thought out response? Or would it be closer to what the rest of us have been posting most of the day?

littlewonder -> RE: Strategies (10/16/2011 9:21:48 PM)
None of this or any of the other threads made by the op are of any importance. He has 75% of c.com on hide lol.

LillyBoPeep -> RE: Strategies (10/16/2011 9:27:47 PM)
p.s from the OP's second post quote: This is the reason why I told in the OP that this message is mostly for dominant males. mostly is not an exclusionary word. "mostly: As regards the greater part or number." -- but it does not exclude. at some point after that, the OP then tried to "instruct" someone on how they should post here, which was ridiculous. you're doing the same thing, which is also ridiculous, especially given your track record.

NocturnalStalker -> RE: Strategies (10/16/2011 10:27:59 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: LillyBoPeep p.s from the OP's second post quote: This is the reason why I told in the OP that this message is mostly for dominant males. mostly is not an exclusionary word. "mostly: As regards the greater part or number." -- but it does not exclude. at some point after that, the OP then tried to "instruct" someone on how they should post here, which was ridiculous. you're doing the same thing, which is also ridiculous, especially given your track record. Do you not read my posts thoroughly? I am not saying the OP wouldn't consider good replies from a submissive or domme, but that he would appreciate more the input of a male dominant in the "Ask A Master" sub-forum. This for whatever reason, made some tampons turn red and lead in to this predicament. Yes, I'm asking for people to post on topic and not spiral yet another topic out of control. Here, since I derail so many topics please show me which I've derailed in the BDSM forums in the past month? I can really recall only one but maybe you can help me out!

seasnail -> RE: Strategies (10/16/2011 11:02:42 PM)
What can I say I would never want to meet you in person. You know why you are doing that don't you? It's because you don't have a date, know why you don't have a date? Cause you are to i mean way to busy looking in the mirror telling yourself how wonderful you are and that no one is ever going to break you two up.

gungadin09 -> RE: Strategies (10/16/2011 11:11:46 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: NocturnalStalker Guess who else did that? Everybody that disliked me when I began to calling them out on their obvious bullshit. i feel so left out. NS, please... call me out on my obvious bullshit. pam

NocturnalStalker -> RE: Strategies (10/16/2011 11:16:30 PM)
You're not an avian. You're a human. Deal with it. Now call me a girly-looking jerk-off.

gungadin09 -> RE: Strategies (10/16/2011 11:17:35 PM)
Awwwwwwwwww. i'm so disappointed. pam

NocturnalStalker -> RE: Strategies (10/16/2011 11:20:37 PM)
Well now you know how I feel when I come here.

gungadin09 -> RE: Strategies (10/16/2011 11:20:59 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: NocturnalStalker Now call me a girly-looking jerk-off. Actually, i think you're really smart and funny, when you aren't being a whiney little douche. But we'll never know whether i'm really twofaced unless you insult me, so give it your best shot, girly-boy. pam

gungadin09 -> RE: Strategies (10/16/2011 11:25:23 PM)
Why do you come, then? pam

NocturnalStalker -> RE: Strategies (10/16/2011 11:28:49 PM)
Because somebody has to do it.

NocturnalStalker -> RE: Strategies (10/16/2011 11:29:55 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: gungadin09 quote: ORIGINAL: NocturnalStalker Now call me a girly-looking jerk-off. Actually, i think you're really smart and funny, when you aren't being a whiney little douche. But we'll never know whether i'm really twofaced unless you insult me, so give it your best shot, girly-boy. pam I think I'm one of the last honest men there is.

gungadin09 -> RE: Strategies (10/16/2011 11:32:30 PM)
Didn't say you weren't. Said you whine a lot. Whether it's true or not, it's still whining. Your turn. pam

Page: << < prev 4 5 [6] 7 8 next > >>

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

0.046875