Zonie63
Posts: 2826
Joined: 4/25/2011 From: The Old Pueblo Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: LadyPact The odd thing about this is that this only comes up when it comes to female professionals. Not even the male professionals, who are on the site as well. It never comes up for any other type of kink related business that people have profiles here for. Not the whip makers, club owners, people selling fetish wear, or any other type of thing. I haven't come across any profiles from male professionals or others who might be here for commercial purposes, but in any case, I'm not advocating any double standard here. quote:
ORIGINAL: LadyPact That doesn't sound phrased very well, so I want to make sure that we are on the same page. I happen to be glad the folks who are associated with those businesses are on the site because, as I see it, those people are a part of our community, too. They are at our events, we buy their products, etc. Some of them are even the advertisers that really do pay the bills around here. Well, sure, the paid banner advertisements are a completely different matter. I was referring to the actual profiles where people put their details (age, gender, ht., wt., location, etc.) and what they're actively seeking. Since the profiles are free, I can't see how Collarme would derive revenue from that. The profiles part seems specifically geared for posting and searching personal profiles. This is especially obvious when one looks at the list of what a profile holder might be actively seeking (i.e. Dominant Women, Dominant Men, Submissive Women, Submissive Men, Friends Only, Poly Household, etc.). There's no option for "Actively Seeking Customers/Clients" or anything like that. If such an option did exist, then that would at least remove any ambiguity or confusion over this question. quote:
ORIGINAL: LadyPact The part about not sticking the ads in Politics and Religion, I'm completely in agreement with you about. I think the forums are set up in a certain way and it's a lot easier to find what you are looking for when using them correctly. The angle that I'm coming from is that you then have to say the same thing about other sections of the boards. Most certainly the "Sought for Sale" forum as well as "Upcoming Events". The sought for sale area even has in it's guidelines that if you want to discuss something about what has been posted/offered to please contact the person through their profile to do so. Up in the Upcoming Events section, they don't have that in the guidelines, but as a person who has posted events there, I can tell you that a person will get some responses on the thread (hopefully) but there will also be those who would prefer to send an email to the profile. Even My own profile clearly states that is why I have it up. It's for when people want to contact Me about munches and events. While I don't make any money personally for those endeavors, I can promise you that somebody does, unless we are talking about those events that specifically related to a not for profit or a charity function. I really can't say much about what the site's owners categorize acceptable commercial related enterprise and what isn't, except for what you've got listed from TOS in the above. I would have to think legal and not legal would be the easiest part to sort, of course, and the rest probably lies somewhere in the middle. On the message boards, having different sections makes perfect sense, as that's just a matter of organizing the boards and making it easier for users to select the sections they're interested in. If I'm looking through Politics and Religion, I would hope that the threads would be within the scope of those particular topics. If they weren't, then it would get too confusing, unwieldy, and a bit difficult to utilize for the end user. If a board gets inundated with off-topic and spam threads, it ends up becoming practically unusable. Users would have cause to complain about it, too. But the solution is relatively easy by keeping things organized in different sections by topic. Similarly, the same thing could probably be done on the profiles side as well by adding a few more options and filters within the search parameters. Since this issue comes up quite often, I can't understand why such an obvious solution isn't given any consideration. That's why I'm always a bit baffled whenever this issue comes up, since there seems to be a lot of complaints from both sides, but nobody wants to listen to any possible solutions.
|