quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx

quote:

ORIGINAL: subrob1967


His past doesn't matter, the only thing that matters is, she had the gun, she fired the shot, and if she was so afraid of him, she should have shot him dead, that way the cops would only have HER side of the story... ALA Zimmerman.

Your post is most instructive.
You, an alleged cop, are advocating first degree murder and purjury.

quote:

Again, if she was so in fear for her life, why did she go to the garage, retrieve her gun, shoot the wall, then calmly let the guy and her sons to leave, while still holding her gun?

quote:

ORIGINAL: RacerJim

quote:

ORIGINAL: itsSIRtou

quote:

ORIGINAL: DarqueMirror

quote:

ORIGINAL: Nosathro
Well the DA on discovery released alot of evidence to O'Mara including some 64 CD and about 100 statement of witnesses.  So there is something, some will be presented in court, some will be released by the news.

And so far, the more evidence that comes to light, the more it support Zimmerman's claims.

I just find it telling that all the "new" evidence that comes to light is in oppostion to the 1st evidence that shows he didnt have hardly any damage to him at all.... videos with no blood... pics of his face with no broken nose. (and I know what a broken nose looks like since I personally have had 6 of them) and so on.... all this I feel to avoid a trial...because theres one point he cant avoid being asked......

WHY AFTER u WERE TOLD NOT TO GO AFTER THE SUSPECT... WHY DID U DO THAT ANYWAY?? To Me, all this other stuff is just telling how a grown man who wasnt police material got his ass kicked by a teenager while thinking if he caught a "suspect" he might be taken seriously as a rent-a-cop.... And rather than lose and be the allready embarrassed son of a judge even more he shot the teen.

BTW.... what muder trial anywhere releases evidence that could influence a POSSIBLE jury?? Other than maybe somebody doesnt want a credible or unbiased jury?? setting him up for an appeal for a retrial if convicted?


SIR

And I find it very telling that so many people, including the President of the United States, made a rush to judgement based on intentionally misleading initial "evidence"...like the video showing Zimmerman without hardly any damage at all without any mention that it was taken almost an hour AFTER his injuries had been treated at the scene by EMTs...pics of his face which couldn't show his internally broken nose or the swollen nose and two black eyes he would have the next day because it usually takes 24-36 hours post-assault for such to manifest themselves...the recording that an NBC reporter intentionally altered and was subsequently fired over...all that I feel in the interest of race-baiting...because there's one point that race-baiters can't refute because the recorded telephone conversation between Zimmerman and the police dispatcher proves it...

10-12 SECONDS AFTER THE POLICE DISPATCHER SAYS "WE DON'T NEED YOU TO DO THAT" YOU CAN HEAR ZIMMERMAN STOP BREATHING RAPIDLY AND DEEPLY LIKE HE WAS IMMEDIATELY BEFORE THE DISPATCHER TOLD HIM NOT TO CHASE MARTIN...MEANING ZIMMERMAN STOPPED CHASING MARTIN WITHIN 10-12 SECONDS OF BEING TOLD TO BY THE DISPATCHER. Recorded telephone conversations also prove that from the time Zimmerman told the police dispatcher he had lost sight of Martin until the time the first witness to the physical altercation called 911, Martin had plenty of time to WALK to his father's condo, go inside, and stay there...obviously he didn't. One of the investigators has stated that Martin would still be alive today if Zimmerman had stayed in his truck and waited for police to arrive...likewise Martin would also still be alive today if he had gone to his father's condo, stayed inside, called 911 and waited for police to arrive. To me, the totality of evidence proves that this tragedy is simply the result of a teenaged-punk picking a fight with the wrong person. And rather than own up to and be embarrassed by that race-baiters ignore the totalilty of evidence in order to make it a white on black "hate crime".

BTW...which of the 2-3 multiple black murderers on multiple white murder victims which occured within a month after Zimmerman stood his ground did the President of the United States publically comment about?

quote:

ORIGINAL: Owner59
Proving someone lied in court happens in court and lie itself is the evidence.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Owner59
Still doesn`t clear him......unless he can get a jury to believe that tall tale that EVERY George defender is going with( but without being able to explain)that they had words,parted ways and then George is attacked out of the blue without provocation, later.

quote:

ORIGINAL: DarqueMirror

quote:

ORIGINAL: Owner59
Proving someone lied in court happens in court and lie itself is the evidence.

Actually, no it isn't. To prove a lie is a lie there must be evidence to the contrary. In this case, there isn't. I'm sure you're aware the "liar liar pants on fire" bit doesn't hold up in front of a judge.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Nosathro
In court it is called perjury.  Under oath, if you can be shown you lied, and the evidence can be a previous sworn statement that is different then what is now sworn to, it is perjury, that is crime.  A motion to have all statements and testiomony can be striken.  Current only half the evidence has been released.  The DA is now asking the Judge to have the other half sealed so it will not be made public until trail.

quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyInara

quote:

ORIGINAL: Nosathro
In court it is called perjury.  Under oath, if you can be shown you lied, and the evidence can be a previous sworn statement that is different then what is now sworn to, it is perjury, that is crime.  A motion to have all statements and testiomony can be striken.  Current only half the evidence has been released.  The DA is now asking the Judge to have the other half sealed so it will not be made public until trail.

I'm aware of what perjury is, but t still requires proof. You can't just shout out "liar" and have the guy convicted of lying.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Owner59

 Still doesn`t clear him......unless he can get a jury to believe that tall tale that EVERY George defender is going with( but without being able to explain)that they had words,parted ways and then George is attacked out of the blue without provocation, later.