quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne

quote:

ORIGINAL: Anaxagoras
You stated they were exclusively telluric transmitters, as in they transmit through the ground rather than the air, and so my source was completely wrong. I'm afraid its you who is out of your depth old chap. Do you actually know what the Kennelly–Heaviside layer is? Its an area of the atmosphere. Thus the signal is transmitted through the air.

the e layer? of course used to do short range transmission using the e layer and it is very undependable to say the least, contrary to the tesla devices.

quote:

quote:


Your argument simply doesn't follow. Tesla did not truly "invent" the system of electricity we use today. He developed and innovated an AC system, of the sort we use today. His competitors used DC.

the cool thing about word twisters is that they always bite themselves in the ass! LOL

quote:

Why are we paying 5 bucks per gallon for gas when we have an infinite supply of selfsustaining power at our fingertips that is CLEAN CLEAN CLEAN CLEAN CLEAN CLEAN CLEAN CLEAN and GREEN! NO POLLUTION ZERO NADA!!

quote:

ORIGINAL: Anaxagoras

quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne

quote:

ORIGINAL: Anaxagoras
You stated they were exclusively telluric transmitters, as in they transmit through the ground rather than the air, and so my source was completely wrong. I'm afraid its you who is out of your depth old chap. Do you actually know what the Kennelly–Heaviside layer is? Its an area of the atmosphere. Thus the signal is transmitted through the air.

the e layer? of course used to do short range transmission using the e layer and it is very undependable to say the least, contrary to the tesla devices.

You are obfuscating yet again.

No you simply do not understand what I am talking about, get eith it already!
You stated that the quote I pasted up agreed with your stance here http://www.collarchat.com/fb.asp?m=4118340 - to reiterate what you said "They cant be all bad since they agreed with me, sure you aint out of your league here?" - you didn't know what the Kennelly–Heaviside layer was or you wouldn't have said the quote I pasted agreed with your assertion Tesla's system was a Telluric transmitter. Now you seem to be pretending Tesla's system didn't plan to use this area of the atmosphere.

You posted more than one quote.

quote:

quote:


Your argument simply doesn't follow. Tesla did not truly "invent" the system of electricity we use today. He developed and innovated an AC system, of the sort we use today. His competitors used DC.

the cool thing about word twisters is that they always bite themselves in the ass! LOL

My point was simple. Tesla's AC system was very innovative but it wasn't even remotely as radical as his plans to transmit energy. The system that worked relied on Faraday's fundamentals, with some practical innovations of his own which allowed his system of AC to succeed over the less efficient DC system. He didn't invent the system single-handedly.

How do you figger that ac is more efficient than dc?

when someone invents something they are given the credit, you are mincing words circumventing the substance as usual.

quote:

Why are we paying 5 bucks per gallon for gas when we have an infinite supply of selfsustaining power at our fingertips that is CLEAN CLEAN CLEAN CLEAN CLEAN CLEAN CLEAN CLEAN and GREEN! NO POLLUTION ZERO NADA!!

Yeah the free energy shit once again! Your whacko arguments go from "A" which is already well understood in the fucking class room to "W" with ilooninati science-fiction.

At a later time you may be able to improve your bullshit but for now you can't other than rehashing/pasting your Op with graphics to obfuscate, and misrepresent the opinions of others, because you lost the debate. Your little tricks are so predictable its time you innovated a few new ones - try to be inventive like your hero Tesla.

now now temper temper I told you that you may be out of your league but you insisted. The sun is free energy you know. Novel huh?

Why is he NOT getting a shock? A baby could hang on to both sides of the wire and never feel a thing! Why are people claiming its dangerous when it is demostratably NOT

Light, The Tesla Way-01 - TMT 72.4 Scale

Look mom I am touching the wires and no shock!

Explain how this works radiation people.

Excuse me while I gloat over this one more time!



So fucking awesome.

undeniable proof proof of concept!

Why is he NOT getting a shock?

Explain it.

How about it einstein?





< Message edited by Real0ne -- 5/15/2012 9:14:40 PM >

_____________________________

"We the Borg" of the us imperialists....resistance is futile

Democracy; The 'People' voted on 'which' amendment?

Yesterdays tinfoil is today's reality!

"No man's life, liberty, or property is safe while the legislature is in session

(in reply to Anaxagoras)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne

quote:

ORIGINAL: Anaxagoras

quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne

quote:

ORIGINAL: Anaxagoras
You stated they were exclusively telluric transmitters, as in they transmit through the ground rather than the air, and so my source was completely wrong. I'm afraid its you who is out of your depth old chap. Do you actually know what the Kennelly–Heaviside layer is? Its an area of the atmosphere. Thus the signal is transmitted through the air.

the e layer? of course used to do short range transmission using the e layer and it is very undependable to say the least, contrary to the tesla devices.

You are obfuscating yet again.

No you simply do not understand what I am talking about, get eith it already!
You stated that the quote I pasted up agreed with your stance here http://www.collarchat.com/fb.asp?m=4118340 - to reiterate what you said "They cant be all bad since they agreed with me, sure you aint out of your league here?" - you didn't know what the Kennelly–Heaviside layer was or you wouldn't have said the quote I pasted agreed with your assertion Tesla's system was a Telluric transmitter. Now you seem to be pretending Tesla's system didn't plan to use this area of the atmosphere.

You posted more than one quote.

quote:

quote:

quote:


Your argument simply doesn't follow. Tesla did not truly "invent" the system of electricity we use today. He developed and innovated an AC system, of the sort we use today. His competitors used DC.

the cool thing about word twisters is that they always bite themselves in the ass! LOL

My point was simple. Tesla's AC system was very innovative but it wasn't even remotely as radical as his plans to transmit energy. The system that worked relied on Faraday's fundamentals, with some practical innovations of his own which allowed his system of AC to succeed over the less efficient DC system. He didn't invent the system single-handedly.

How do you figger that ac is more efficient than dc?

when someone invents something they are given the credit, you are mincing words circumventing the substance as usual.

quote:

quote:

Why are we paying 5 bucks per gallon for gas when we have an infinite supply of selfsustaining power at our fingertips that is CLEAN CLEAN CLEAN CLEAN CLEAN CLEAN CLEAN CLEAN and GREEN! NO POLLUTION ZERO NADA!!

Yeah the free energy shit once again! Your whacko arguments go from "A" which is already well understood in the fucking class room to "W" with ilooninati science-fiction.

At a later time you may be able to improve your bullshit but for now you can't other than rehashing/pasting your Op with graphics to obfuscate, and misrepresent the opinions of others, because you lost the debate. Your little tricks are so predictable its time you innovated a few new ones - try to be inventive like your hero Tesla.

now now temper temper I told you that you may be out of your league but you insisted. The sun is free energy you know. Novel huh?

quote:


There is only one maybe 2 loonynatti's that I have seen so far in this thread.

Here is my previous post FOR YOUR CONVENIENCE that I put up for the hippie.

quote:

ORIGINAL: SternSkipper
What I would really like to know is is there any real quality implementation studies done with Tesla's static technology besides of course the all important 'Uncle Fester' study RealOne discusses

quote:

ORIGINAL: Anaxagoras

More of R0's copy and paste horseshit that he keeps pulling when a thread isn't going his way.

Actually I am laughing my ass off watching you squirm.

The experiments were explained by static electricity as is very fucking well known.

Really? Well explain it for everyone so everyone can be as smart as you!


YIts very well known Tesla's AC system was more efficient at the transmission of electricity than the competing DC system. Thats partly why it won out.

Realy? Explain how that works too k! All these statements and nothing more than a bag of hot air to back them up. Maybe you can dig up a good engineering book and be like really vague and say "see that proves it". Its one of the more entertaining forum tricks and I have not seen it for a while so I am over due. Humor me! Post a whole book!

I'm not angry, just amused at your shit, and you obfuscate more here. We were talking about the basic principle of energy in, energy out. The free energy ilooninati club you are a member of believes there is such a thing as free energy that circumvents that principle.

I dont put any energy into a solar collector so lets see zero in ..... um what does that come to again?

Don't be concerned about my convenience. I already read your post because I replied to it. I direct you to the initial sentence re. static electricity. None of your videos prove anything that isn't already accepted.

Good then lets wire your ass up JUST LIKE THIS:



and then we will get enough static to light that bulb and watch what happens to you LOL Lets do it on national tv!

Neither do they indicate such a thing as free energy or long distance energy transmission, when you dishonestly try to make out that they do.

Now now not so fast. Lets start with the basics and explain the problems I gave you instead of your billowing hot air for a change.

26 miles is long distance, it is far field why must you change the face of the matter to the bleeding edge of lying? Is that the only way you can debate? Mince words, move goal posts, huff and puff saying nothing, and call others down for your shortcomings and inability to explain it? LOLOL

quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne
Wow what venom! I really hit a nerve didnt I! Ok I got a 12 pack you dodged explaining why is not getting a shock by the same electricity he is lighting a 100 watt 120 volt bulb with.

quote:

quote:

ORIGINAL: Anaxagoras

More of R0's copy and paste horseshit that he keeps pulling when a thread isn't going his way.

Actually I am laughing my ass off watching you squirm.

quote:


The experiments were explained by static electricity as is very fucking well known.

Really? Well explain it for everyone so everyone can be as smart as you!

quote:


YIts very well known Tesla's AC system was more efficient at the transmission of electricity than the competing DC system. Thats partly why it won out.

Realy? Explain how that works too k! All these statements and nothing more than a bag of hot air to back them up. Maybe you can dig up a good engineering book and be like really vague and say "see that proves it". Its one of the more entertaining forum tricks and I have not seen it for a while so I am over due. Humor me! Post a whole book!

quote:

Also in the late 1880s, Tesla and Thomas Edison became adversaries in part because of Edison's promotion of direct current (DC) for electric power distribution over the more efficient alternating current advocated by Tesla and Westinghouse. Until the development of the induction motor, AC's advantages for long distance high voltage transmission were counterbalanced by the inability to operate motors on AC.

quote:


I'm not angry, just amused at your shit, and you obfuscate more here. We were talking about the basic principle of energy in, energy out. The free energy ilooninati club you are a member of believes there is such a thing as free energy that circumvents that principle.

I dont put any energy into a solar collector so lets see zero in ..... um what does that come to again?

quote:


Don't be concerned about my convenience. I already read your post because I replied to it. I direct you to the initial sentence re. static electricity. None of your videos prove anything that isn't already accepted.

Good then lets wire your ass up and we can get enough static to light that bulb and watch what happens to you LOL

quote:


Neither do they indicate such a thing as free energy or long distance energy transmission, when you dishonestly try to make out that they do.

Now now not so fast. Lets start with the basics and explain the problems I gave you instead of your billowing hot air for a change.

26 miles is long distance, it is far field why must you change the face of the matter to the bleeding edge of lying? Is that the only way you can debate? Mince words, move goal posts, huff and puff saying nothing, and call others down for your shortcomings and inability to explain it? LOLOL

quote:

Kool so why dont you show me static electricity lighting a 100 watt bulb, that would be even more novel! Did you invent it?

quote:

So fucking awesome.

undeniable proof proof of concept!

Why is he NOT getting a shock?

Explain it.

How about it einstein?

quote:

ORIGINAL: Anaxagoras

quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne
Wow what venom! I really hit a nerve didnt I! Ok I got a 12 pack you dodged explaining why is not getting a shock by the same electricity he is lighting a 100 watt 120 volt bulb with.

You can keep pretending I'm angry if you want or maybe you ilooninati have mind reading powers too! Did Tesla develop such a device that the ebil grubafia suppressed?


you can keep pretending purport to the looninatis. I dont I argue with them all the time.

quote:

quote:

ORIGINAL: Anaxagoras

More of R0's copy and paste horseshit that he keeps pulling when a thread isn't going his way.

Actually I am laughing my ass off watching you squirm.

Squirm about what? You copy and paste to pretend you have something to say or some answer to give when you don't.

I posted proof.

quote:


The experiments were explained by static electricity as is very fucking well known.

Really? Well explain it for everyone so everyone can be as smart as you!

Dude, get your hands on a book about basic physics. It'll have nice illustrations and pictures of Tesla coils and Van der Graaf generators to help you on your way.

DODGE!

quote:


YIts very well known Tesla's AC system was more efficient at the transmission of electricity than the competing DC system. Thats partly why it won out.

Realy? Explain how that works too k! All these statements and nothing more than a bag of hot air to back them up. Maybe you can dig up a good engineering book and be like really vague and say "see that proves it". Its one of the more entertaining forum tricks and I have not seen it for a while so I am over due. Humor me! Post a whole book!

Why should I "humor" you by explaining how it works? Its not even the topic of the thread. Even if I explained, taking a great deal of time to do so it would be a waste on you.

ANOTHER DODGE
Its and essential element to the topic of this thread.

quote:

Also in the late 1880s, Tesla and Thomas Edison became adversaries in part because of Edison's promotion of direct current (DC) for electric power distribution over the more efficient alternating current advocated by Tesla and Westinghouse. Until the development of the induction motor, AC's advantages for long distance high voltage transmission were counterbalanced by the inability to operate motors on AC.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nikola_Tesla#American_citizenship

Thanks for the picture of teslas remote contreol boats, aside from that ANOTHER DODGE, because you do not know why you think ac is more efficient than dc LMAO

quote:


I'm not angry, just amused at your shit, and you obfuscate more here. We were talking about the basic principle of energy in, energy out. The free energy ilooninati club you are a member of believes there is such a thing as free energy that circumvents that principle.

I dont put any energy into a solar collector so lets see zero in ..... um what does that come to again?

The sun is a light source so it still conforms to the rule V in/out. You were claiming there is such a way of creating free energy from no source. Thats the Ilooninati club there.

GREAT! EXPLAIN HOW THAT WORKS! LMAO

quote:


Don't be concerned about my convenience. I already read your post because I replied to it. I direct you to the initial sentence re. static electricity. None of your videos prove anything that isn't already accepted.

Good then lets wire your ass up and we can get enough static to light that bulb and watch what happens to you LOL

You have this odd erotic obsession with men's asses. I've noticed that you keep talking about them. Does that have any reflection on your sexual identity?

ANOTHER DODGE
and trust me you have nothing to worry about! LMAO

quote:


Neither do they indicate such a thing as free energy or long distance energy transmission, when you dishonestly try to make out that they do.

It wouldnt matter because you deny what is proven in front of your face. Rare I run into that level of dishonest lameness out here.

Now now not so fast. Lets start with the basics and explain the problems I gave you instead of your billowing hot air for a change.


Now read this next part really slow and try really hard ot figger out what it means;
26 miles is long distance, it is far field why must you change the face of the matter to the bleeding edge of lying? Is that the only way you can debate? Mince words, move goal posts, huff and puff saying nothing, and call others down for your shortcomings and inability to explain it? LOLOL

You are accusing me of doing the very things you are known for. If you have proof stop "dicking" (LOL) around and post up a video of long distance energy travel instead of two amateurs playing about in their cellars.

See you did not understand a damn word I said or you could not say that.
Another cheap shot at gays on a bdsm site

Furthermore the contention was not that energy couldn't be transferred but that it could to any meaningful degree of scale. Sending a few watts for a bulb a couple of miles? lol

Thanks for telling ME the OP what the contention is or was! Any other loonynatti mind reading you care to do tonite?

Oh and when you are done let me know what bulb you ever lit tuned to a megawatt tv station

quote:

Kool so why dont you show me static electricity lighting a 100 watt bulb, that would be even more novel! Did you invent it?

Go to a performance. One was televised on the BBC a few years back - one of the memorable scenes was man with a light bulb in his mouth near one of the coils and it lit up brightly. It was quite safe since the r.f. current from the coil flows over the surface of the skin.

quote:

ORIGINAL: SternSkipper

quote:

So fucking awesome.

undeniable proof proof of concept!

Why is he NOT getting a shock?

Explain it.

How about it einstein?

Stop calling people names and listen... this isn't tesla magic.
Linemen do it with thousands of volts right out in front of your house occasionally. You isolate yourself from ground (-). closer examination would reveal isolation using a dialectric. Perhaps as simple as a thick rubber mat.
There IS in fact some transmission through the tissue because it touches the circuit in several places. But because this is most likely DC at those voltages, the current has no pulse to it and flows MOSTLY through the path of shortest resistance, which is the bulb, or circuit. And WHY because those materials are EXPONENTIALLY more conductive.

Jesus... got anything to show us that isn't in the boy scout manual for the 'electricity' merit badge?

quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne

quote:

ORIGINAL: Anaxagoras

quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne
Wow what venom! I really hit a nerve didnt I! Ok I got a 12 pack you dodged explaining why is not getting a shock by the same electricity he is lighting a 100 watt 120 volt bulb with.

You can keep pretending I'm angry if you want or maybe you ilooninati have mind reading powers too! Did Tesla develop such a device that the ebil grubafia suppressed?

you can keep pretending purport to the looninatis. I dont I argue with them all the time.

quote:

quote:

quote:

ORIGINAL: Anaxagoras

More of R0's copy and paste horseshit that he keeps pulling when a thread isn't going his way.

Actually I am laughing my ass off watching you squirm.

Squirm about what? You copy and paste to pretend you have something to say or some answer to give when you don't.

I posted proof.

quote:

quote:


YIts very well known Tesla's AC system was more efficient at the transmission of electricity than the competing DC system. Thats partly why it won out.

Realy? Explain how that works too k! All these statements and nothing more than a bag of hot air to back them up. Maybe you can dig up a good engineering book and be like really vague and say "see that proves it". Its one of the more entertaining forum tricks and I have not seen it for a while so I am over due. Humor me! Post a whole book!

Why should I "humor" you by explaining how it works? Its not even the topic of the thread. Even if I explained, taking a great deal of time to do so it would be a waste on you.

DODGE
Its and essential element to the topic of this thread.

quote:

quote:

Also in the late 1880s, Tesla and Thomas Edison became adversaries in part because of Edison's promotion of direct current (DC) for electric power distribution over the more efficient alternating current advocated by Tesla and Westinghouse. Until the development of the induction motor, AC's advantages for long distance high voltage transmission were counterbalanced by the inability to operate motors on AC.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nikola_Tesla#American_citizenship

Thanks for the picture of teslas remote contreol boats, aside from that ANOTHER DODGE, because you do not know why you think ac is more efficient than dc LMAO

quote:

quote:


I'm not angry, just amused at your shit, and you obfuscate more here. We were talking about the basic principle of energy in, energy out. The free energy ilooninati club you are a member of believes there is such a thing as free energy that circumvents that principle.

I dont put any energy into a solar collector so lets see zero in ..... um what does that come to again?

The sun is a light source so it still conforms to the rule V in/out. You were claiming there is such a way of creating free energy from no source. Thats the Ilooninati club there.

GREAT! EXPLAIN HOW THAT WORKS! LMAO

quote:

In this context, the term "free energy" is not well-defined, and should not be confused with thermodynamic free energy. Generally, it is used to refer to purported transformative technologies which have the potential to dramatically reduce personal energy costs with relatively little capital investment.

There have been numerous free energy claims over the years.[1] Many, such as those implying perpetual motion or those based on extracting zero-point energy, are viewed as impossible according to accepted physical laws.[2] Others, such as cold fusion, while not fundamentally impossible, are not accepted as established by the scientific community. Conspiracy advocates therefore claim that the scientific community has controlled and suppressed research into alternative avenues of energy production via the institutions of peer review.[3]

quote:

quote:



Good then lets wire your ass up and we can get enough static to light that bulb and watch what happens to you LOL

You have this odd erotic obsession with men's asses. I've noticed that you keep talking about them. Does that have any reflection on your sexual identity?

ANOTHER DODGE
and trust me you have nothing to worry about! LMAO

quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne

quote:

ORIGINAL: Anaxagoras
Neither do they indicate such a thing as free energy or long distance energy transmission, when you dishonestly try to make out that they do.

It wouldnt matter because you deny what is proven in front of your face. Rare I run into that level of dishonest lameness out here.

quote:

quote:


Now now not so fast. Lets start with the basics and explain the problems I gave you instead of your billowing hot air for a change.

Now read this next part really slow and try really hard ot figger out what it means;
26 miles is long distance, it is far field why must you change the face of the matter to the bleeding edge of lying? Is that the only way you can debate? Mince words, move goal posts, huff and puff saying nothing, and call others down for your shortcomings and inability to explain it? LOLOL

You are accusing me of doing the very things you are known for. If you have proof stop "dicking" (LOL) around and post up a video of long distance energy travel instead of two amateurs playing about in their cellars.

See you did not understand a damn word I said or you could not say that.
Another cheap shot at gays on a bdsm site

quote:


Furthermore the contention was not that energy couldn't be transferred but that it could to any meaningful degree of scale. Sending a few watts for a bulb a couple of miles? lol

Thanks for telling ME the OP what the contention is or was! Any other loonynatti mind reading you care to do tonite?

quote:


Oh and when you are done let me know what bulb you ever lit tuned to a megawatt tv station

quote:

quote:

Go to a performance. One was televised on the BBC a few years back - one of the memorable scenes was man with a light bulb in his mouth near one of the coils and it lit up brightly. It was quite safe since the r.f. current from the coil flows over the surface of the skin.

I lost a very good friend who was killed in a "safe" RF accident.

Are you able to post anything but complete trash and hot air?

quote:

Tesla coils are not harmless toys. One must constantly be watchful of what is touched. It is said that the r.f. current from the coil flows over the surface of the skin, and is therefore not capable of killing.

quote:

The guy is holding the screw thread of the bulb and touching the center to the copper tube in the flower pot LOL Here is another one:

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

Ok, Uncle Fester.   why should he be dead?  give us the voltage and the amperes please, with credible certified citation.   the fucking things can be activated with less than a volt.

Lick a 9 volt battery, and why aint you dead, or your teeth blown out your head?


Lets quit the magic words and the sensationalist confutations of simple everyday drab shit.

And now that we have that done, where is the high gas price in these pictures, or the automobiles driving with him in the middle of the circuit.............fuckin anything on the topic at all, throw us a bone here...... 

quote:

I'm not sure anyone is aware of this, with all the photos flying...

...but the state of technology has considerably advanced since 1899.

Thought you should know.