Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: AG Holder Hides Behind Obama's Skirt


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: AG Holder Hides Behind Obama's Skirt Page: <<   < prev  6 7 [8] 9 10   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: AG Holder Hides Behind Obama's Skirt - 6/22/2012 7:07:48 AM   
RacerJim


Posts: 1583
Joined: 1/1/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

LOL, and I am sure he could give a fuck less.

For once you speak the truth about Obama. I am positive he could give a fuck less...about anyone and/or anything except himself and his Marxist fundamental transformation of the United States of America.

(in reply to mnottertail)
Profile   Post #: 141
RE: AG Holder Hides Behind Obama's Skirt - 6/22/2012 7:10:38 AM   
Musicmystery


Posts: 30259
Joined: 3/14/2005
Status: offline

(in reply to RacerJim)
Profile   Post #: 142
RE: AG Holder Hides Behind Obama's Skirt - 6/22/2012 7:17:20 AM   
RacerJim


Posts: 1583
Joined: 1/1/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Owner59

quote:

ORIGINAL: lovmuffin

We all know that if the Obamanistas hadn't botched the operation (like the Clintonistas with Reno and Waco), then they would have more political ammo to get these awful so called assault weapons banned. Have no fear Rob and Sannity, the committee should just send in pit bull Senator Luger to investigate and uncover any wrong doing. And when he doesn't uncover anything and it all blows over after the election then just hope the issue will have kept nippin at Obamas heels and this freakin affirmative action socialist hack along with his minions will have bitten the electoral dust as I know they will.




It was a legit,on going long time operation that went wrong.People make mistakes.....they`re human.

It`s happened since the beginning and will continue till the end.Can`t be helped.

But taking the inevitable tragedies and trying to suggest there`s a scandal is just low-life dirty tricks and disgraceful.

That however.....can be helped.

Like claiming the Koreshian`s self-immolation........was Reno`s fault.

People do indeed make mistakes.

It has indeed happened since the beginning and will continue.

But lying and/or intentionally misleading a Congressional committee is not a mistake, and hiding behind Obama's skirt does indeed suggest there's a scandal and is just low-life tricks and disgraceful as then Senator Obama himself said when Bush was POTUS.




That

(in reply to Owner59)
Profile   Post #: 143
RE: AG Holder Hides Behind Obama's Skirt - 6/22/2012 7:25:34 AM   
Sanity


Posts: 22039
Joined: 6/14/2006
From: Nampa, Idaho USA
Status: offline

Not vetted

"Unknown"

quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery

Nonetheless, not "unknown."





_____________________________

Inside Every Liberal Is A Totalitarian Screaming To Get Out

(in reply to Musicmystery)
Profile   Post #: 144
RE: AG Holder Hides Behind Obama's Skirt - 6/22/2012 7:32:46 AM   
Musicmystery


Posts: 30259
Joined: 3/14/2005
Status: offline
The long primary didn't hash that out for ya?



(in reply to Sanity)
Profile   Post #: 145
RE: AG Holder Hides Behind Obama's Skirt - 6/22/2012 8:09:21 AM   
subrob1967


Posts: 4591
Joined: 9/13/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic
Prosed and rejected....




Who rejected it Lucy? And when did budgets become one of the powers of the Executive branch?

_____________________________

http://www.extra-life.org/

(in reply to Lucylastic)
Profile   Post #: 146
RE: AG Holder Hides Behind Obama's Skirt - 6/22/2012 8:19:19 AM   
Musicmystery


Posts: 30259
Joined: 3/14/2005
Status: offline
quote:

when did budgets become one of the powers of the Executive branch?


1921

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_budget_process#Overview

(in reply to subrob1967)
Profile   Post #: 147
RE: AG Holder Hides Behind Obama's Skirt - 6/22/2012 8:19:33 AM   
Lucylastic


Posts: 40310
Status: offline
it says who rejected it in my post ...cant you read???
Or do you need me to point it out to you??


_____________________________

(•_•)
<) )╯SUCH
/ \

\(•_•)
( (> A NASTY
/ \

(•_•)
<) )> WOMAN
/ \

Duchess Of Dissent
Dont Hate Love

(in reply to subrob1967)
Profile   Post #: 148
RE: AG Holder Hides Behind Obama's Skirt - 6/22/2012 8:28:48 AM   
subrob1967


Posts: 4591
Joined: 9/13/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen

Isn't it hilarious that rob is busy denying that this is all due to a conspiracy theory while sanity is admiting it is and actually believes it?



Where did I deny it? I just refused to answer your loaded question, and point out your & Rachel's fallacious argument.

Let me spell it out in language even you and Ms Maddow can understand...

Gun Runner was the name of the over all mission to try and STOP Mexican drug dealers from obtaining guns from the US.

Wide Receiver was ONE operation under the overall mission called Gun Runner.

Wide Receiver's mission orders were to interdict or stop the guns sold in the US from reaching drug dealers hands. When the ATF agents running the mission failed to track of some guns, the mission was ended... Thus ends the Bush's involvement in Gun Runner.

The Obama administration restarted Gun Runner in 09 and called the first operation Fast & Furious.
Operation F&F had different parameters than the previous mission WR. WR's SOP was to interdict guns BEFORE they reached the drug gangs.

F&F's SOP was to allow the guns to reach the Mexican drug gangs, so the US and Mexican authorities could track them.

Even you and Ms Maddow should be able to see the difference between the operation procedures.

Now one should ask why the administration thought it was a good idea to let the guns walk. What is the logic behind letting over 2000 guns get into the hands of Mexican drug dealers.

One should want to know if the Obama administration was too stupid to know what the guns would be used for?


_____________________________

http://www.extra-life.org/

(in reply to DomKen)
Profile   Post #: 149
RE: AG Holder Hides Behind Obama's Skirt - 6/22/2012 8:30:24 AM   
subrob1967


Posts: 4591
Joined: 9/13/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

it says who rejected it in my post ...cant you read???
Or do you need me to point it out to you??




Point it out to me... In detail... Please don't forget to point out that it was the Dem controlled Senate who rejected the President's proposal by a vote of 99-0

_____________________________

http://www.extra-life.org/

(in reply to Lucylastic)
Profile   Post #: 150
RE: AG Holder Hides Behind Obama's Skirt - 6/22/2012 8:37:00 AM   
Musicmystery


Posts: 30259
Joined: 3/14/2005
Status: offline
You guys keep asking questions you're answering yourself.
quote:

ORIGINAL: subrob1967

Now one should ask why the administration thought it was a good idea to let the guns walk. What is the logic behind letting over 2000 guns get into the hands of Mexican drug dealers.


quote:

ORIGINAL: subrob1967

to allow the guns to reach the Mexican drug gangs, so the US and Mexican authorities could track them.

Seems the Mexican drug gangs aren't in the yellow pages or on Facebook. Who knew?

It's not like it's hard to get guns.


(in reply to subrob1967)
Profile   Post #: 151
RE: AG Holder Hides Behind Obama's Skirt - 6/22/2012 8:44:42 AM   
Lucylastic


Posts: 40310
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: subrob1967


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

it says who rejected it in my post ...cant you read???
Or do you need me to point it out to you??




Point it out to me... In detail... Please don't forget to point out that it was the Dem controlled Senate who rejected the President's proposal by a vote of 99-0

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

The Obama administration proposed his 2012 budget on February 14, 2011. Obama's budget proposal aimed to reduce annual deficits to more sustainable levels by making selective cuts in spending, while increasing support in specific areas such as education and clean energy to foster long-term economic growth. The plan did not contain specific proposals to rein in spending on entitlement programs such as Medicare, Medicaid, and Social Security, which are expected to make up much of the increase in the deficit in future years. The budget represented a shift from the Obama administration's strategy in previous years of using increased government spending, such as the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009, to combat the late 2000s recession. The 2012 budget plan was instead projected to reduce deficits by $1.1 trillion over the next ten years. Republicans criticized the plan for not going far enough to reduce future deficits.[4] A motion to proceed on President Obama's 2012 budget proposal was defeated in the Senate by a margin of 0-97 votes on May 25, 2011, the same day that the Ryan budget was also defeated.[5]
wikipedia
its out there if you can be bothered to actually try to be factual
anymore research is up to you, Ive wasted enough time on you for one day
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2012_United_States_federal_budget
Prosed and rejected....




there ya go.... do you need any more proof??? can you read now??? or is it your comprehension thats screwed?

_____________________________

(•_•)
<) )╯SUCH
/ \

\(•_•)
( (> A NASTY
/ \

(•_•)
<) )> WOMAN
/ \

Duchess Of Dissent
Dont Hate Love

(in reply to subrob1967)
Profile   Post #: 152
RE: AG Holder Hides Behind Obama's Skirt - 6/22/2012 8:48:58 AM   
subrob1967


Posts: 4591
Joined: 9/13/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

there ya go.... do you need any more proof??? can you read now??? or is it your comprehension thats screwed?



Um, you missed Obama's 2012 budget proposal that was rejected by the Senate 99-0, but thanks for admitting Obama's proposal was so ridiculous that even the party he leads overwhelmingly rejected him.

_____________________________

http://www.extra-life.org/

(in reply to Lucylastic)
Profile   Post #: 153
RE: AG Holder Hides Behind Obama's Skirt - 6/22/2012 8:53:50 AM   
Musicmystery


Posts: 30259
Joined: 3/14/2005
Status: offline
It's an election year, rob.

"Republicans forced the vote by offering the president's plan on the Senate floor. <-- [not the actual budget]

"Democrats disputed that it was actually the president's plan, arguing that the slim amendment didn't actually match Mr. Obama's budget document, which ran thousands of pages."

Theater.

http://www.washingtontimes.com/blog/inside-politics/2012/may/16/obama-budget-defeated-99-0-senate/

(in reply to subrob1967)
Profile   Post #: 154
RE: AG Holder Hides Behind Obama's Skirt - 6/22/2012 9:01:13 AM   
Lucylastic


Posts: 40310
Status: offline
oh for fucks sake, here we go again

The Obama administration proposed his 2012 budget on February 14, 2011. Obama's budget proposal aimed to reduce annual deficits to more sustainable levels by making selective cuts in spending, while increasing support in specific areas such as education and clean energy to foster long-term economic growth. The plan did not contain specific proposals to rein in spending on entitlement programs such as Medicare, Medicaid, and Social Security, which are expected to make up much of the increase in the deficit in future years.The budget represented a shift from the Obama administration's strategy in previous years of using increased government spending, such as the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009, to combat the late 2000s recession. Republicans criticized the plan for not going far enough to reduce future deficits.[4] A motion to proceed on President Obama's 2012 budget proposal was defeated in the Senate by a margin of 0-97 votes on May 25, 2011, the same day that the Ryan budget was also defeated.[5]
wikipedia
its out there if you can be bothered to actually try to be factual
anymore research is up to you, Ive wasted enough time on you for one day
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2012_United_States_federal_budget
Prosed and rejected....


BTW I was merely responding to the other idiots claim that there had been NO PROPOSAL
NOTHING MORE
FOCUS

_____________________________

(•_•)
<) )╯SUCH
/ \

\(•_•)
( (> A NASTY
/ \

(•_•)
<) )> WOMAN
/ \

Duchess Of Dissent
Dont Hate Love

(in reply to subrob1967)
Profile   Post #: 155
RE: AG Holder Hides Behind Obama's Skirt - 6/22/2012 9:02:49 AM   
Lucylastic


Posts: 40310
Status: offline
so the vote was out by 2 votes according to the wikipedia source, the facts are still there and I did post it....for the correct budget year


_____________________________

(•_•)
<) )╯SUCH
/ \

\(•_•)
( (> A NASTY
/ \

(•_•)
<) )> WOMAN
/ \

Duchess Of Dissent
Dont Hate Love

(in reply to Lucylastic)
Profile   Post #: 156
RE: AG Holder Hides Behind Obama's Skirt - 6/22/2012 9:48:05 AM   
DomKen


Posts: 19457
Joined: 7/4/2004
From: Chicago, IL
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: RacerJim


quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery

Or, the House could start solving problems instead of moving paper.

Or, the Demoncrap Senate could at least PROPOSE a Federal Budget instead of ignoring their fiduciary duty for the past three years.

Have you ever even read the Constitution?

Article I Section 7
quote:

All bills for raising Revenue shall originate in the House of Representatives

(in reply to RacerJim)
Profile   Post #: 157
RE: AG Holder Hides Behind Obama's Skirt - 6/22/2012 9:49:42 AM   
Musicmystery


Posts: 30259
Joined: 3/14/2005
Status: offline
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_budget_process#Overview

(in reply to DomKen)
Profile   Post #: 158
RE: AG Holder Hides Behind Obama's Skirt - 6/22/2012 10:09:41 AM   
Moonhead


Posts: 16520
Joined: 9/21/2009
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: RacerJim


quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

LOL, and I am sure he could give a fuck less.

For once you speak the truth about Obama. I am positive he could give a fuck less...about anyone and/or anything except himself and his Marxist fundamental transformation of the United States of America.

Have you read any Marx?
Because if so, you could explain how the third term of the chimp he's wasted his first term on is a "fundamental Marxist transformation".

_____________________________

I like to think he was eaten by rats, in the dark, during a fog. It's what he would have wanted...
(Simon R Green on the late James Herbert)

(in reply to RacerJim)
Profile   Post #: 159
RE: AG Holder Hides Behind Obama's Skirt - 6/22/2012 10:58:20 AM   
subrob1967


Posts: 4591
Joined: 9/13/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery

It's an election year, rob.

"Republicans forced the vote by offering the president's plan on the Senate floor. <-- [not the actual budget]

"Democrats disputed that it was actually the president's plan, arguing that the slim amendment didn't actually match Mr. Obama's budget document, which ran thousands of pages."

Theater.

http://www.washingtontimes.com/blog/inside-politics/2012/may/16/obama-budget-defeated-99-0-senate/


Agreed it was theater, and election year politics. But was it a lie that the republicans used the President's numbers, when they omitted the wording of the proposal?

The dems are bitching that the republicans didn't mention every word in the thousands of pages, the repubs are claiming that every word didn't need to be read because in the end, the budget comes down to the numbers.

The irony of the situation that should be pointed out is Nancy Pelosi decided that bills should be voted on before they are read when she was Speaker, but now that the republicans proposed an amendment that deleted the President's terms of use, they're called obstructionists.

_____________________________

http://www.extra-life.org/

(in reply to Musicmystery)
Profile   Post #: 160
Page:   <<   < prev  6 7 [8] 9 10   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: AG Holder Hides Behind Obama's Skirt Page: <<   < prev  6 7 [8] 9 10   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.094