Collarchat.com

Join Our Community
Collarchat.com

Home  Login  Search 

RE: The Bain of Obama


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: The Bain of Obama Page: <<   < prev  1 2 3 4 [5]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: The Bain of Obama - 7/19/2012 5:30:10 PM   
Edwynn


Posts: 4105
Joined: 10/26/2008
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

it is ad nauseam (whoever said that) it means:

to nauseA

it does not mean:

to Nauseu

Ron Melby, proud failure of Mrs. Engen's 9th  Grade Latin Class.  



This is how I've always misunderstood it:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L762HQ-ha7I

But that's because I took French in the 9th grade. Those guys don't know how to spell anything.



< Message edited by Edwynn -- 7/19/2012 5:41:59 PM >

(in reply to mnottertail)
Profile   Post #: 81
RE: The Bain of Obama - 7/19/2012 5:57:03 PM   
MileHighM


Posts: 400
Joined: 10/8/2009
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Edwynn


You are making up even more crap than the partisans are.

Europe has appropriate taxation (except for Greece and Portugal, who have barn-sized tax loopholes), more unions, better maternity/paternity benefits, better basic education, as proven by the scores, far better public transportation, far more cost effective health care systems, far lower incarceration rate, ... the list goes on. They're still in business, even if currently suffering from the result of deregulation frenzy that transpired in the US. Even after that, their economic and social statistics have them at the top, as the stats for the US align us with Mexico, Turkey, etc.
Here's the news; some countries think that is incumbent on businesses to actually be of use to its own citizens, to society. Then there are countries with a third world mentality, who make every effort to that end, such as the US.



That really confirms what I said about the relationship between the two. I was not saying you can't have unions, benefits and public transit. In fact, those things can help and benefit business in the right perportion. The US, R or D controlled, has just become to unstable and unpredictable in its policy for business. That is how we are similar to the third world. The economy, above all, prefers a stable predictable government. It is the current partisanship that is creating the chaos we watching unfold. Pick a strategy and stick to it, just make sure it isn't too radical one way or the other.

(in reply to Edwynn)
Profile   Post #: 82
RE: The Bain of Obama - 7/19/2012 8:46:23 PM   
thompsonx


Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline
So far you have failed to respond to the question of how did the niagra power company acquired the use of the falls for the purpose of making power.
Here is a hint...the same way that bush jr. made his fortune.

(in reply to Yachtie)
Profile   Post #: 83
RE: The Bain of Obama - 7/19/2012 8:50:54 PM   
thompsonx


Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline
So, it was NY State Government that hired him to harness electricity at Niagra Falls. That was your statement, wasn't it, to which I replied?

Now, the Niagara Falls Hydraulic Power and Mining Company. Is that government? If you say yes, please be so kind as to source.

The answer is yes and the source is the link you posted the nfpc.
Perhaps if you were to read the things you post your post would not be so mind numbingly stupid.


< Message edited by thompsonx -- 7/19/2012 8:51:44 PM >

(in reply to Yachtie)
Profile   Post #: 84
RE: The Bain of Obama - 7/19/2012 9:01:54 PM   
DomYngBlk


Posts: 3316
Joined: 3/27/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: MileHighM


quote:

ORIGINAL: Edwynn


You are making up even more crap than the partisans are.

Europe has appropriate taxation (except for Greece and Portugal, who have barn-sized tax loopholes), more unions, better maternity/paternity benefits, better basic education, as proven by the scores, far better public transportation, far more cost effective health care systems, far lower incarceration rate, ... the list goes on. They're still in business, even if currently suffering from the result of deregulation frenzy that transpired in the US. Even after that, their economic and social statistics have them at the top, as the stats for the US align us with Mexico, Turkey, etc.
Here's the news; some countries think that is incumbent on businesses to actually be of use to its own citizens, to society. Then there are countries with a third world mentality, who make every effort to that end, such as the US.



That really confirms what I said about the relationship between the two. I was not saying you can't have unions, benefits and public transit. In fact, those things can help and benefit business in the right perportion. The US, R or D controlled, has just become to unstable and unpredictable in its policy for business. That is how we are similar to the third world. The economy, above all, prefers a stable predictable government. It is the current partisanship that is creating the chaos we watching unfold. Pick a strategy and stick to it, just make sure it isn't too radical one way or the other.



Sorry if that was the case then people would be running away from Gov't backed equities. They aren't. We've the most stable and relaible system on eartth.

(in reply to MileHighM)
Profile   Post #: 85
RE: The Bain of Obama - 7/19/2012 9:06:53 PM   
DomYngBlk


Posts: 3316
Joined: 3/27/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: MileHighM

I love this arguement!! The partisan idiocy in this is classic!!!!!

Any righty that claims that a business man's success is all of his own doing is blind. A 'good' government can create a stable and healthy environment in which business can thrive as well as provide the infrastructure for which that business can rely upon to make their business function. Even if the government neither controls or operates the infrastructure, it is needed for the use of eminent domain and the mediation of private land and access disputes in court. Without a stable and sensible government business would succumb to crime and anarchy.

Yet any lefty that feels that the 'people' are entitled to the profits of the business are ignorant of the very hand that feeds the government. Sure business (or at least the person's who own said business) should pay for use of such infrastructure or services through either fees, tolls, or taxes. However, the belief that the majority of that success is up for confiscation is ridiculous. If we tax the success of business in this country 60+%, watch business close their doors and move. 'We' are not entitled to the success of business any more than their 'fair' use. If business is overly burdened by such an entitlement attitude, their won't be such business to pay for all of that infrastucture, schools, military, etc.

It is not a matter of what came first! They grew up together and need each other. One without the other would fail. A government without a successful economy is broke and unable to provide any services. An economy without a government dedicated to its success is lacking the tools and stability to succeed.



Which is the point of both Elizabeth Warren and Barack Obama and Mitt Romney till he thought he could politicize it...

(in reply to MileHighM)
Profile   Post #: 86
RE: The Bain of Obama - 7/25/2012 10:43:41 AM   
thompsonx


Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline
quote:

So, it was NY State Government that hired him to harness electricity at Niagra Falls. That was your statement, wasn't it, to which I replied?

Now, the Niagara Falls Hydraulic Power and Mining Company. Is that government? If you say yes, please be so kind as to source.

It really does seem that you guys fall all over yourselves to find some connection to government to which you can say - SEE! SEE! Without government...


Why is it that you post a link that you do not seem to have read. It not only does not prove what you claim it does but it specifically points out that your post is full of shit.

http://library.buffalo.edu/libraries/projects/cases/niagara.htm

The property was acquired by the state through eminent domain (private property taken by the government for use by the general public)
It was then tranfered to private ownership for private profit.


"New York City banking interests were becoming intrigued, and by 1889 an option to purchase the tunnel company was acquired by a group consisting of William B. Stetson, attorney to mogul J.P. Morgan; Edward B. Wickes, identified as "a Vanderbilt man"; and William B. Rankine, a New York City attorney who had recently relocated to Niagara Falls in the prospect of substantial involvement in the Niagara project. Part interest in the project was offered to the New York City banking firm of Winslow, Lanier & Company--Charles Lanier was a good friend of Morgan's--which delegated Edward Dean Adams, a partner in the firm and a director of the Edison Electric Illuminating Company, to conduct an investigation into the merits of the enterprise. Morgan, incidentally, also had substantial interest in the Edison enterprises.

Then in 1889 and 1890, in a complicated series of legal/financial transactions, the Niagara River Tunnel, Power and Sewer Company was renamed the Niagara Falls Power Company, and the Cataract Construction Company was formed as a holding company to own the entire capital stock of the Niagara Falls Power company and act as its financial agent. Adams was named president of the Cataract Construction Company and a director of the power company. Stetson, Wickes, and Rankine were the other officers of the Cataract Company, whose board of directors included John Jacob Astor"

A mere six years after the govt. took private land, it passed it's use on to private investors. These investors did not spend their own money to acquire the land. They did not use their own money to do the construction...they held all of the capital stock and the land was the security for the construction loan.
How are these people risk takers?


quote:

You leftists really are all about government. Nope, couldn't do squat without government. No one does one damn thing lest someone else, even vaunted government, made it happen. Damn parasite would die but for the host.


You wil note that electrical power for domestic use, while touted as a selling point, was actually a miniscule portion of the power that was produced.

"The first use of Niagara Falls Power Company electricity was by the Pittsburgh Reduction Company (later to be renamed Aluminum Company of America), which used an electrolytic process invented by James M. Hall. The company was founded in Pittsburgh in 1886 but transferred operations to Niagara Falls during this period because of the prospect of cheap and reliable electrical power.

The second electrochemical industry in Niagara Falls also transferred from the Pittsburgh area. The Carborundum Company produced the extremely hard silicon carbide compound using a process invented by Edward G. Acheson. Founded in Monongahela, Pennsylvania, in 1891, in that year the company used 135 horsepower of electricity to produce 45 tons of product. Its contract of 1894 with the Niagara Falls Power Company was for 1000 horsepower, with which it increased its output twenty-fold. Within a decade, the Carborundum Company was using 5000 horsepower of electricity.

A decade after the startup of the power company, the Union Carbide Company was using 15,000 horsepower, the total production of the original three generators. Union Carbide produced calcium carbide, which was used to produce acetylene gas. Union Carbide eventually came to incorporate several other Niagara Falls industries, including the Electro-Metallurgical Company, National Carbon, and Acheson Graphite. The graphite production process was a serendipitous offshoot of Acheson's carborundum process. The pure graphite was used to make high quality electrodes needed for the electrochemical and electrometallurgical industries.

Other uses of electricity in Niagara Falls were for production of basic chemicals such as chlorine and caustic soda, and ferro-alloys using chemical elements such as titanium, vanadium, tungsten, and molybdenum.

In Buffalo the electrical power was used in grain handling and processing, iron foundries, machine shops. Through the first half of the twentieth century, the biggest industries in Buffalo were grain milling, iron and steel production, and all varieties of manufacturing from hairpins to airplanes.

Subsequent power production facilities would supplement and replace the original facilities. The present plant on the American side, operated by the New York State Power Authority, provides about 2.5 million kilowatts (which in the twentieth century came to replace the system of measurement in horsepower, 2.5 million kilowatts translating to 3.3 million horsepower). The plant on the Canadian side, operated by Ontario Hydropower, produces another 1.8 million kilowatts. The electricity is transmitted at 345,000 volts over a power grid that covers the nation and the world and is the ultimate legacy of the Niagara innovations."

Government seems to be the prime mover in this case.
Big bussiness seems to be the prime recipient of the benifits.
Thank you for linking us to the data which proves your post are filled with disingenuous,puerile, insipid half truths and whole lies.




< Message edited by thompsonx -- 7/25/2012 10:47:23 AM >

(in reply to Yachtie)
Profile   Post #: 87
RE: The Bain of Obama - 7/25/2012 11:48:05 AM   
Moonhead


Posts: 16520
Joined: 9/21/2009
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Yachtie


quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

If I want any lip off of you, I will scrape it off my zipper.  Go over in the corner by your dish and lay down.

But first, pay your bills you fuckin deadbeat.


You're really quite emotional, aren't you?


Some people respond to being flamebaited that way, you'll find.

_____________________________

I like to think he was eaten by rats, in the dark, during a fog. It's what he would have wanted...
(Simon R Green on the late James Herbert)

(in reply to Yachtie)
Profile   Post #: 88
Page:   <<   < prev  1 2 3 4 [5]
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: The Bain of Obama Page: <<   < prev  1 2 3 4 [5]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2024
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.109