|
MariaB -> RE: Is financial domination a legitimate form of D/s? (11/5/2013 10:55:49 AM)
|
As for what constitutes ‘a legitimate form of D/s ‘ ? well for me, both parties have to be getting something out of the D/s dynamic that draws them closer to that person. If that’s money then so be it. He gets something out of giving, she gets something out of receiving and I believe there is absolutely nothing wrong with that.
I just don’t though, see any difference between a Fin Domme and a pro Domme. By definition the pro Domme is a pro because she receives money and gifts, the Fin Domme is a pro because she also receives money and gifts. Monopoly money just wouldn’t work and neither would giving all the money back at the end of the week. I don’t believe that Dommes who are in charge of the mans finances (on a one to one rl basis) and who make sure he saves, pays his bills etc, etc, are financial Dommes unless they are taking a slice.
Bossing people around Jeff, especially at work or on forums, isn’t D/s unless you specifically make it that but to do so, surely you need a willing submissive? D/s is after all, a consensual act between two or more people?
I agree with you SeekingTrinity, we can’t really ask anyone to prove anything but that was my point! We do however, have page after page on here of Fin Dommes trying to prove to us why they are ‘real’ whatever real is!
K, I did go off on one! The thing is, I've always really liked your posts and I have a lot of respect for you as a Domme. What I saw and read from you hugely frustrated me because it appeared to me that you were desperate to get your point across at whatever cost to your reputation. It didn't make me dislike you, though I know I often give people that impression, it just made me... well if I'm honest, it made me angry at you and I had no right to be angry and I want to apologize for that.
|
|
|
|
