GotSteel
Posts: 5871
Joined: 2/19/2008 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Nawashiwallace Well, here is the problem with that suspension pictured above; improper anchoring point to the ceiling. Oh there are several problems with that suspension. quote:
ORIGINAL: Nawashiwallace Granted there is always an inherent danger with all suspension, but in the case of this suspension, if should fall from either the rope breaking or the anchor point giving way, this model is dead. Mat or not. C2,3,4 shattered (instant death), both ankles, shin bones and knees shattered along with wrist, radius & ulna bones, and clavicles broken. Possible pelvic and lower lumbar dislocation or fractures. Thank you for explaining that so well. That's my point, with some suspensions meh it doesn't really matter if the anchors are crap and the rope is inadequate. Just throw a mattress down and a fall of a few feet doesn't matter. However, there are plenty of positions where it's quite dangerous to fall even if there is a mat. quote:
ORIGINAL: Nawashiwallace Only a total idiot will use a single suspension point in my professional opinion on such a highly dangerous suspension. But what about the rope? quote:
ORIGINAL: Nawashiwallace Yes, I have a medical background, I am a Trauma Specialist for the last 15 years. So I take extreme precautions when it comes to my rigging and safety backups. I would never employ this suspension. But you still use a kind of rope that's made of suck and fail. It goes back to the kind of thing I was saying on page one. quote:
ORIGINAL: GotSteel It's baffling to me how those people will argue endlessly over building the strongest possible anchor point only to turn around and hang people off as few strands of very narrow diameter hemp/jute as they could possibly get away with. What's the point of the system above the anchor being able to hold 7500 lbs when the rope will only be capable of holding a few hundred pounds?
|