Guilty1974
Posts: 467
Joined: 11/2/2005 From: Den Haag Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: MariaB Lets go right back to the beginning. The whole point of this post was to discuss what happened. We now know what happened but it seems to me that the logical conclusion is that we should now be doing something different and that people agree not to do what he did because what he did has been proven to fail. Instead, from what I am reading, it sounds like everyone is still talking about what a shame and 'yes' we appreciate how dangerous this is. No, you misinterpret. Yes, this needs analysis, and yes, I am quite sure Bob will not do the exact same move again. The ""sawing through" can probably be prevented. What happens here is that people who know jack shit about shibari keep whining about supposed solutions that do not fit within the framework of shibari. They miss the point of shibari as a system, which is not just a matter of aesthetics, but also of safety and performance related concepts. For instance, if you move to slick, synthetic rope, you can't do friction style techniques. Friction style techniques, howver, have huge advantages in tying AND untying speed, and has advantages doing dynamic moves, which make things safer (untie speed is king, and dynamic movements prevent nerve injuries. So, within the framework of shibari, the solution makes no sense. Solving this problem should be done from within the framework of shibari as a whole, by people who understand that framework thoroughly.
|