Collarchat.com

Join Our Community
Collarchat.com

Home  Login  Search 

RE: is holacaust denial antisemitic?


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: is holacaust denial antisemitic? Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4 5   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: is holacaust denial antisemitic? - 1/24/2013 8:53:35 PM   
kdsub


Posts: 12180
Joined: 8/16/2007
Status: offline
quote:

holocaust denial is not antisemitic


holocaust denial IS anti-Semitic... or if you please only claimed by those anti-Semitic...or those uneducated...otherwise dumb assed ignorant.

Butch

_____________________________

Mark Twain:

I don't see any use in having a uniform and arbitrary way of spelling words. We might as well make all clothes alike and cook all dishes alike. Sameness is tiresome; variety is pleasing

(in reply to jlf1961)
Profile   Post #: 41
RE: is holacaust denial antisemitic? - 1/24/2013 9:01:26 PM   
LafayetteLady


Posts: 7683
Joined: 5/2/2007
From: Northern New Jersey
Status: offline
I have to admit I haven't read most of the comments.  They make me too angry, even though many agree with me about anti-semitism.

As for YOU Real0ne, swimming pools at Auschwitz/Birchenou?  Your daddy told you this as a kid, huh?

Here's the thing.  I was THERE.  I walked alonged the barracks and the entire facility.  I saw with my own eyes the 2000 pounds of human hair that was taken to be spun into yarn to make pillowcases, sheets, uniforms.  I saw it with my own two eyes!  I saw the unheated barracks where there were wooden bunks that built to hold 3 people, held six.  I stood in the gas chamber looking up and wondering what those poor people, some of whome the Nazis actually forced to purchase trains tickets to their own death, were feeling when it happened to them.  I saw with my own eyes the prosthetics that were piled ten feet high, the suitcases, the shoes.

Originally, Auschwitz/Birkinau took "mug shot" style photos of the jews that entered the camp.  Quickly they realized that not only were the photos expensive, but when the person died a month later they couldn't tell who they were.  Starvation, abuse, illness drastically changed their appearance.  So they began to tattoo.

So yes, it happened.  It was horrific to say the least.  To think otherwise makes one just as ignorant as a skinhead, klanner or any other hate group you can think of.  Because that is the basis of their, and all hate.  Ignorance.

ETA:  I want to load the pictures, but am told they are too large.  I don't know how to do that.


< Message edited by LafayetteLady -- 1/24/2013 9:03:10 PM >

(in reply to Real0ne)
Profile   Post #: 42
RE: is holacaust denial antisemitic? - 1/24/2013 9:10:30 PM   
TAFKAA


Posts: 382
Joined: 1/5/2013
Status: offline
No, it's not implicitly anti-Semitic and to suggest it is, is - quite ironically - fascist.

The motivation behind advocating it may, indeed, be antisemitism, however you can't take a topic and venture that, by it's very nature, advocating a particular position is antisemitism.

What you're advocating is fascist censorship which is antithetical to the first amendment to the constitution. Your contention that anyone advocating Holocaust Denial is - by implication - making comments on the moral code of an entire culture is not only a logical fallacy, it is the most appalling kind of disingenuous bullshit which attempts to silence debate by winning the moral war and casting people who advocate a certain position as the bad guy.

Holocaust Denial - like all arguments - will live and die on the foothold it gains in the social consciousness. While the vast majority of academics and influential social commentators oppose it on the basis of historical fact and their ability to back that up remains intact, it will remain a fringe theory.

If, on the other hand, those advocating this position manage to present evidence which backs up their contention and they're able to persuade other people through reason, then the social position on this - or indeed any issue - can and should change. This is how society's position on - for example - the gay community and on the role of women in society have migrated from the 50's to the attitudes of the present day.

You're trying to turn the Holocaust into a sacred cow that cannot be re-examined or subject to the dictates of reason or science. And I would expect reason and science will largely continue to support the historical record as we know it.

You seem obsessed with antisemitism lately. I saw you going on about it in P&R the other day. Why?

(in reply to jlf1961)
Profile   Post #: 43
RE: is holacaust denial antisemitic? - 1/24/2013 9:11:19 PM   
Real0ne


Posts: 21189
Joined: 10/25/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: kdsub

quote:

holocaust denial is not antisemitic


holocaust denial IS anti-Semitic... or if you please only claimed by those anti-Semitic...or those uneducated...otherwise dumb assed ignorant.

Butch



ok so explain it then! You will get the gold star if you can!

The best explanation I have heard so far in so far as a generic explanation is concerned is:



“Semitic” and “anti-Semitic”
up vote 11 down vote favorite


Why does Semitic refer to several groups of people, including Babylonians, Assyrians, Arabs and Jews, whereas anti-Semitic only refers to Jews?

Because words mean what people use them to mean, not what some people think they ought to mean. (Not putting it in as an answer, because in a way it's not very helpful: but in a sense it is the whole of the answer to any question of the form "Why does/doesn't X mean Y"). – Colin Fine

@Colin: +100! excellent! where is the linguistics.SE site? But then sometimes, there -is- an explanatory reason. – Mitch

@Mitch: yes indeed, the historical explanation for how a word has come to have a particular meaning is often fascinating. But it is a field rife with unverified assumptions, ingenious invention masquerading as certainty, and lots of "we just don't know". – Colin



so then antisemite means: Babylonians, Assyrians, Arabs and Jews?

_____________________________

"We the Borg" of the us imperialists....resistance is futile

Democracy; The 'People' voted on 'which' amendment?

Yesterdays tinfoil is today's reality!

"No man's life, liberty, or property is safe while the legislature is in session

(in reply to kdsub)
Profile   Post #: 44
RE: is holacaust denial antisemitic? - 1/24/2013 9:48:00 PM   
NuevaVida


Posts: 6707
Joined: 8/5/2008
Status: offline
~ Fast Reply ~

While I think holocaust denial is ignorant, I am not sure I'd classify it as anti-semetic. Unless the one denying hates jewish people and has antisemitic motivations, I'd say simply saying the holocaust didn't exist doesn't necessarily show antisemitism.

That said...

I had the privilege of spending an afternoon with David Faber, an Auschwitz (and 7 other camps) survivor. He was doing a speaking engagement at my work at the time (2006) and his ride to his next engagement fell through, so I offered to drive him. He honored me with a personalized, signed copy of his book, "Because of Romek."

In the car, I asked him what he thought of those who deny the holocausts existence, that surely he's been confronted. He said he tells these people, "Before deciding that as truth, go visit. Go to Auschwitz. Go to where the other camps were. Look and see for yourself. And after that, if you still believe it didn't happen, then share that all you like. But until you personally see it, your words don't have any meaning to me."

As for the pools. Here's an excerpt from Faber's book, Chapter 19, Page 167:

"Strip and jump in!" the Kapo ordered.

As soon as the first people slid into the pool they started screaming. The rest of us hung back, but the Kapos hit us with bats and hoses, and the SS men hit us with their rifles and drove us into the pool.

[narrative removed until Page 168]

People climbed out of the pool screaming and crying. Many others floated in the water or lay on the bottom.

The SS men pushed us into the pool. It didn't feel like water. It burned. I grabbed for the side and pulled myself out.

[dialogue with fellow kids (they were teenagers) removed]

Showers lined the walls. Each of us got under one and let the cold water pour over us. I squinted at Jacob and the other people. Then I looked at my own body.

All my hair was gone. My armpits and my groin burned like they were on fire. Blisters covered my body, as if somebody had poured boiling water over me. My lips were swollen. My eyes were closed.

I picked up my prison uniform, but I couldn't stand to have it touch me. My skin was peeling. Naked, I went outside. The cold felt good on my burning skin.



(Kapos were political prisoners, or criminals convicted of murder or other serious crimes, assisting in the manning of the camp barracks)

The parts I removed/didn't quote were dialogues or recollections of being a child, that didn't apply to what we're talking about here, so I removed them for brevity.

In any case, I don't think the pools were for leisurely swims.






_____________________________

Live Simply. Love Generously. Care Deeply. Speak Kindly.



(in reply to Real0ne)
Profile   Post #: 45
RE: is holacaust denial antisemitic? - 1/24/2013 9:59:09 PM   
jlf1961


Posts: 14840
Joined: 6/10/2008
From: Somewhere Texas
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: TAFKAA

No, it's not implicitly anti-Semitic and to suggest it is, is - quite ironically - fascist.

The motivation behind advocating it may, indeed, be antisemitism, however you can't take a topic and venture that, by it's very nature, advocating a particular position is antisemitism.

What you're advocating is fascist censorship which is antithetical to the first amendment to the constitution. Your contention that anyone advocating Holocaust Denial is - by implication - making comments on the moral code of an entire culture is not only a logical fallacy, it is the most appalling kind of disingenuous bullshit which attempts to silence debate by winning the moral war and casting people who advocate a certain position as the bad guy.

Holocaust Denial - like all arguments - will live and die on the foothold it gains in the social consciousness. While the vast majority of academics and influential social commentators oppose it on the basis of historical fact and their ability to back that up remains intact, it will remain a fringe theory.

If, on the other hand, those advocating this position manage to present evidence which backs up their contention and they're able to persuade other people through reason, then the social position on this - or indeed any issue - can and should change. This is how society's position on - for example - the gay community and on the role of women in society have migrated from the 50's to the attitudes of the present day.

You're trying to turn the Holocaust into a sacred cow that cannot be re-examined or subject to the dictates of reason or science. And I would expect reason and science will largely continue to support the historical record as we know it.

You seem obsessed with antisemitism lately. I saw you going on about it in P&R the other day. Why?



A few reasons.

I know someone that survived the camps, he went in as an infant with a twin brother, was the subject of medical experiments and somehow survived.

I have toured the fucking camps and seen what they were.

I have a number of Jewish friends that have been the target of name calling and in two cases assaults because they were Jewish,
.

And finally there are a number of people on these boards that continually criticize Israel for actions that the Arab nations are doing to Jews.

Then of course you have idiots that deny the holocaust and post links to antisemitic sites as proof that it never happened.

\And while those posters can spout their crap and stuff all over these forums, when another poster calls them on it, their posts are removed and they are warned.

And for the record, Denial of the Holocaust is considered antisemitic by a lot of non Jewish groups around the world and some countries have enacted laws against it.

_____________________________

Boy, it sure would be nice if we had some grenades, don't you think?

You cannot control who comes into your life, but you can control which airlock you throw them out of.

Paranoid Paramilitary Gun Loving Conspiracy Theorist AND EQUAL OPPORTUNI

(in reply to TAFKAA)
Profile   Post #: 46
RE: is holacaust denial antisemitic? - 1/24/2013 10:01:39 PM   
VideoAdminAlpha


Posts: 3876
Joined: 7/25/2008
Status: offline
What was decided was there was not an antisemiticism remark made by a member that violated TOS> I have no opinion or comment, on the subject of Holocaust denial, and that is not germaine to the topic that was being discussed. I would never presume to make a decision on printings and links from sources that are operating and appear to be doing so lawfully. Please do not twist my words.

_____________________________


You can't please all the people all of the time.Unfortunately there are times you cannot please any of them :( You can only do your best, and hope they realize that.


(in reply to jlf1961)
Profile   Post #: 47
RE: is holacaust denial antisemitic? - 1/24/2013 10:23:27 PM   
Real0ne


Posts: 21189
Joined: 10/25/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: jlf1961

A few reasons.

I know someone that survived the camps, he went in as an infant with a twin brother, was the subject of medical experiments and somehow survived.

I have toured the fucking camps and seen what they were.

I have a number of Jewish friends that have been the target of name calling and in two cases assaults because they were Jewish,
.

And finally there are a number of people on these boards that continually criticize Israel for actions that the Arab nations are doing to Jews.

Then of course you have idiots that deny the holocaust and post links to antisemitic sites as proof that it never happened.

\And while those posters can spout their crap and stuff all over these forums, when another poster calls them on it, their posts are removed and they are warned.

And for the record, Denial of the Holocaust is considered antisemitic by a lot of non Jewish groups around the world and some countries have enacted laws against it.



fine you toured the camps, but do you know what it required to use gas without killing yourself or others around you?

Do you know the requirements for gassing?

You seen the bullet holes in the wall of death?

How about the fake russian chamber?

I am still waiting for all those death records you talked about in the other thread.

The germans kept exemplary records



finally you really have a thing for the anti-semite bit, is a polish-jew a semite?

I am trying to understand how you understand this.

_____________________________

"We the Borg" of the us imperialists....resistance is futile

Democracy; The 'People' voted on 'which' amendment?

Yesterdays tinfoil is today's reality!

"No man's life, liberty, or property is safe while the legislature is in session

(in reply to jlf1961)
Profile   Post #: 48
RE: is holacaust denial antisemitic? - 1/24/2013 10:29:24 PM   
OrionTheWolf


Posts: 7803
Joined: 10/11/2006
Status: offline
By itself I do not see it as antisemitic. Kind of idiotic, but I can only wish for laws and rules against that.

I agree that those that use it seem to be almost always antisemitic in many of their other personal comments.

To me it is a revisionist history that is often argued. I do not see how in good conscience anyone can squelch it as a free standing idea. Now the comments that may come with it, absolutely, but not just the misinformation about history portion.

Instead allow it to empower you with knowledge about the person.

I also read the definition from the link in the other thread and believe someone is again jumping to conclusions and rolling on a righteous bandwagon.

_____________________________

When speaking of slaves people always tend to ignore this definition "One who is abjectly subservient to a specified person or influence."

(in reply to jlf1961)
Profile   Post #: 49
RE: is holacaust denial antisemitic? - 1/24/2013 10:33:28 PM   
VideoAdminAlpha


Posts: 3876
Joined: 7/25/2008
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: jlf1961

I have complained repeatedly about this poster on a number of occasions, the denial of the holocaust, and other issues I felt were in violation of the TOS, nothing happened, yet my posts directly confronting him have been pulled on a number of occasions. It makes me wonder sometimes.



Several posts of specific posters have been pulled, and it is possible you did or did not see the remarks that were made. If a report was not made on a post, then it is very possible it was not seen. If it was reported, it was determined to not be in violation. There is not one poster that I can think of off the top of my head that has ever been reported with regularity that has not had some posts pulled because of reports, and also had some left in spite of reports. For example, you have had reports made about you that were found have no basis, and some that did according to TOS. It is HOW the remark is worded.

_____________________________


You can't please all the people all of the time.Unfortunately there are times you cannot please any of them :( You can only do your best, and hope they realize that.


(in reply to jlf1961)
Profile   Post #: 50
RE: is holacaust denial antisemitic? - 1/24/2013 10:35:29 PM   
VideoAdminAlpha


Posts: 3876
Joined: 7/25/2008
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: theRose4U


quote:

ORIGINAL: jlf1961

I have complained repeatedly about this poster on a number of occasions, the denial of the holocaust, and other issues I felt were in violation of the TOS, nothing happened, yet my posts directly confronting him have been pulled on a number of occasions. It makes me wonder sometimes.

The 50+page decline of CM pretty much proved there are agendas on what stays & what goes. I was called inappropriate names BY NAME when hadn't been on for 6 hours. Yet its still there while newbie spews his crap.
Worse is the more crap spewed the more convinced I become he's someone that keeps creating new Id's to troll the "I'm the best & twuest domly dom that ever dommed" vitrol



If you were called names and the posts still stand, please report those posts directly to my inbox and I will look at them. The only agenda is to uphold the TOS as objectively as we can. Please report the posts that call you names to my cmail. I will look at them personally.

_____________________________


You can't please all the people all of the time.Unfortunately there are times you cannot please any of them :( You can only do your best, and hope they realize that.


(in reply to theRose4U)
Profile   Post #: 51
RE: is holacaust denial antisemitic? - 1/24/2013 10:53:53 PM   
LafayetteLady


Posts: 7683
Joined: 5/2/2007
From: Northern New Jersey
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne

fine you toured the camps, but do you know what it required to use gas without killing yourself or others around you?


Yes, after touring the Auschwitz/Birkinau, I do know how they did it.

quote:

You seen the bullet holes in the wall of death?


Actually, I have seen the bullet holes in the wall of death, touched them with my own hands as well.

quote:


I am still waiting for all those death records you talked about in the other thread.

The germans kept exemplary records


Yes, they did keep meticulous records.  Those records have been and are currently used by camp survivors and their descendents to find out what happened to their kin who "disappeared" in the war.

Those records are not available on line.  They are also meticulously protected so that they aren't inadvertenly destroyed or otherwised damage.  I have viewed some of them myself.  I would gladly post pictures, but when I tried, I was told the file was too large and I don't know how to make the file smaller.

Here is my question to you:
 
Have YOU ever been there?  Because as NuevaVida mentioned.....if you haven't seen it for yourself, then your really don't know what you are talking about. 

(in reply to Real0ne)
Profile   Post #: 52
RE: is holacaust denial antisemitic? - 1/24/2013 10:57:51 PM   
jlf1961


Posts: 14840
Joined: 6/10/2008
From: Somewhere Texas
Status: offline
The definition of antisemitism as per VAA.


quote:

Disparaging either Jews as a whole, or individually, or the Jewish race/religion solely or substantially on account of their Jewishness or following recognized practices whether religious or not that is attributable to being either of the Jewish race or religion, singling out Jews for special treatment solely because they are Jewish. This all addresses their RACE or religion, it has nothing to do with political beliefs or the arena. Therefore, criticism of the Israeli state is not anti-Semitism. Other racial/religious comments that are not allowed can include, but not be limited to, any derogatory comment attacking someone because of something they practice or believe because of their race, gender, religious, or sexual beliefs.


Disparaging 1 : to lower in rank or reputation : degrade
2: to depreciate by indirect means (as invidious comparison) : speak slightingly about


an·ti-Sem·i·tism
[an-tee-sem-i-tiz-uhm, an-tahy-]
noun
discrimination against or prejudice or hostility toward Jews.

How is denying a people's history as false, or that it never happened not disparaging to the Jewish people?

How is denying the fact that 6 million Jews died at the hands of the Nazi's because there were "swimming pools" at the camps? And continuing with that assertion even when proven wrong is not disparaging the Jewish race?

In my opinion that is like claiming that the trail of tears never happened, and six of my ancestors died of old age, not starvation during the forced migration of Cherokee, Crow and other tribes from the south Eastern US.

Furthermore, this individual has made the claim that Ike Eisenhower was Jewish and had death camps of German POW's.

And most of the websites he links to in order to prove his point is either anti semitic revisionist history or managed by known antisemitic groups or individuals.


_____________________________

Boy, it sure would be nice if we had some grenades, don't you think?

You cannot control who comes into your life, but you can control which airlock you throw them out of.

Paranoid Paramilitary Gun Loving Conspiracy Theorist AND EQUAL OPPORTUNI

(in reply to VideoAdminAlpha)
Profile   Post #: 53
RE: is holacaust denial antisemitic? - 1/24/2013 11:00:31 PM   
Real0ne


Posts: 21189
Joined: 10/25/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: NuevaVida

~ Fast Reply ~

While I think holocaust denial is ignorant, I am not sure I'd classify it as anti-semetic. Unless the one denying hates jewish people and has antisemitic motivations, I'd say simply saying the holocaust didn't exist doesn't necessarily show antisemitism.

That said...

I had the privilege of spending an afternoon with David Faber, an Auschwitz (and 7 other camps) survivor. He was doing a speaking engagement at my work at the time (2006) and his ride to his next engagement fell through, so I offered to drive him. He honored me with a personalized, signed copy of his book, "Because of Romek."

In the car, I asked him what he thought of those who deny the holocausts existence, that surely he's been confronted. He said he tells these people, "Before deciding that as truth, go visit. Go to Auschwitz. Go to where the other camps were. Look and see for yourself. And after that, if you still believe it didn't happen, then share that all you like. But until you personally see it, your words don't have any meaning to me."

As for the pools. Here's an excerpt from Faber's book, Chapter 19, Page 167:

"Strip and jump in!" the Kapo ordered.

As soon as the first people slid into the pool they started screaming. The rest of us hung back, but the Kapos hit us with bats and hoses, and the SS men hit us with their rifles and drove us into the pool.

[narrative removed until Page 168]

People climbed out of the pool screaming and crying. Many others floated in the water or lay on the bottom.

The SS men pushed us into the pool. It didn't feel like water. It burned. I grabbed for the side and pulled myself out.

[dialogue with fellow kids (they were teenagers) removed]

Showers lined the walls. Each of us got under one and let the cold water pour over us. I squinted at Jacob and the other people. Then I looked at my own body.

All my hair was gone. My armpits and my groin burned like they were on fire. Blisters covered my body, as if somebody had poured boiling water over me. My lips were swollen. My eyes were closed.

I picked up my prison uniform, but I couldn't stand to have it touch me. My skin was peeling. Naked, I went outside. The cold felt good on my burning skin.



(Kapos were political prisoners, or criminals convicted of murder or other serious crimes, assisting in the manning of the camp barracks)

The parts I removed/didn't quote were dialogues or recollections of being a child, that didn't apply to what we're talking about here, so I removed them for brevity.

In any case, I don't think the pools were for leisurely swims.





I read some about him on other sites, now he does some serious word smithing with broad implications while literally saying something completely different.

From other cites I would hammer that guy with crossexamination and make him prove the word "the" every time he used it.

His statements really do not appear to be just a bit over the top?

If he had a more rare skill it was common every day thing for them to get on a train and go to another camp and work there every day for the duration of the job then commute to another camp. That was quite common.

the Kapos hit us with bats and hoses <-- whats up with that?

That burning almost sounds like he had a bad infestation of lice?

Can you tell me why they shaved his head? Was it some kind of a humiliation thing? or what



_____________________________

"We the Borg" of the us imperialists....resistance is futile

Democracy; The 'People' voted on 'which' amendment?

Yesterdays tinfoil is today's reality!

"No man's life, liberty, or property is safe while the legislature is in session

(in reply to NuevaVida)
Profile   Post #: 54
RE: is holacaust denial antisemitic? - 1/24/2013 11:43:36 PM   
Real0ne


Posts: 21189
Joined: 10/25/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: jlf1961

The definition of antisemitism as per VAA.


quote:

Disparaging either Jews as a whole, or individually, or the Jewish race/religion solely or substantially on account of their Jewishness or following recognized practices whether religious or not that is attributable to being either of the Jewish race or religion, singling out Jews for special treatment solely because they are Jewish. This all addresses their RACE or religion, it has nothing to do with political beliefs or the arena. Therefore, criticism of the Israeli state is not anti-Semitism. Other racial/religious comments that are not allowed can include, but not be limited to, any derogatory comment attacking someone because of something they practice or believe because of their race, gender, religious, or sexual beliefs.


Disparaging 1 : to lower in rank or reputation : degrade
2: to depreciate by indirect means (as invidious comparison) : speak slightingly about


an·ti-Sem·i·tism
[an-tee-sem-i-tiz-uhm, an-tahy-]
noun
discrimination against or prejudice or hostility toward Jews.

How is denying a people's history as false, or that it never happened not disparaging to the Jewish people?

How is denying the fact that 6 million Jews died at the hands of the Nazi's because there were "swimming pools" at the camps? And continuing with that assertion even when proven wrong is not disparaging the Jewish race?

I have not denied it, I am only the reporter Jeff, they are the ones that put up the new sign that lowered the count not me. I dont make the history I just present it as I find it.


In my opinion that is like claiming that the trail of tears never happened, and six of my ancestors died of old age, not starvation during the forced migration of Cherokee, Crow and other tribes from the south Eastern US.
That is what is so bad about imperialism and land grabs like afghanastan and Iraq, they did the same thing there, thank you very much GB and USofK
Furthermore, this individual has made the claim that Ike Eisenhower was Jewish and had death camps of German POW's.




Yeh while patton released most of his german prisoners Eisenhauer did not.

Eisenhauer wrote to his wife telling her how he "hated" germans.

Its all a matter of public record I do not understand why you have such difficulty with it all?

They do not teach this stuff, it comes from research and many hours at the national archives and other libraries.






And most of the websites he links to in order to prove his point is either anti semitic revisionist history or managed by known antisemitic groups or individuals.



But Jeff most of the pro holocaust sites are managed by Jewish people so why would you take issue when someone from other religions has an opinion?

So now what?


We need you to explain why the sign was changed Jeff?
See the original one said 4 million;



Now (and I have not checked recently) it says 1.5 Million.


We need for you to explain the difference because someone apparently cant count very well, that and another huge problem is that according to your standards that makes the proprietors of auschwitz antisemite because now there is a 2.5 million difference from the 6 million.

They changed the official count somehow just wiped out 2.5 million people

So Jeff what makes me an antisemite instead of a news reporter that is reporting interesting "stuff".

How is a Japanese-Jew a semite?

These are all very simple questions why have you not answered any of them?

< Message edited by Real0ne -- 1/25/2013 12:20:42 AM >


_____________________________

"We the Borg" of the us imperialists....resistance is futile

Democracy; The 'People' voted on 'which' amendment?

Yesterdays tinfoil is today's reality!

"No man's life, liberty, or property is safe while the legislature is in session

(in reply to jlf1961)
Profile   Post #: 55
RE: is holacaust denial antisemitic? - 1/24/2013 11:56:01 PM   
Real0ne


Posts: 21189
Joined: 10/25/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: LafayetteLady

I have to admit I haven't read most of the comments.  They make me too angry, even though many agree with me about anti-semitism.

As for YOU Real0ne, swimming pools at Auschwitz/Birchenou?  Your daddy told you this as a kid, huh?
Here is the one where you toured.


this one is ravensbruck, several camps had them.

Here's the thing.  I was THERE.  I walked alonged the barracks and the entire facility. 

So did you take a dip in that pool that I posted? You have to pay extra for a personal tour to see that.

I saw with my own eyes the 2000 pounds of human hair that was taken to be spun into yarn to make pillowcases, sheets, uniforms.  I saw it with my own two eyes!

But the question is did you find any pillow cases, sheets, uniforms, or yarn?

I have been looking for the actually products made from this hair and have not yet been able to find any. Post a link to them maybe?

You are aware that the soap from the fat of these people and lamp shades was proven to be a nasty ole hoax long time ago right?




I saw the unheated barracks where there were wooden bunks that built to hold 3 people, held six. 

Do you believe people can survive with no heat in -20 below zero weather? If yes then how? I cannot fathom that.
I stood in the gas chamber looking up and wondering what those poor people, some of whome the Nazis actually forced to purchase trains tickets to their own death, were feeling when it happened to them. 
So you really got into the passion and death feeling then? Catholics do that when they do the stations of the cross. Its called the passion.

Which gas chamber?



The fake russian one?


The bomb shelter?


the oven room?
cant find that one

the one with the window?



this one?



I saw with my own eyes the prosthetics that were piled ten feet high, the suitcases, the shoes.
You do realize that those are only displays do you not? in other words there are eevated platforms that are hollow underneath to give the illusion it is a huge pile when in fact it is only a lay, likewise the wall of shoes that are only maybe a foot and 1/2 thick just wide enough to fill any light gaps and to give the impression it extends back several feet.

You are aware those are only displays the yes?


Originally, Auschwitz/Birkinau took "mug shot" style photos of the jews that entered the camp.  Quickly they realized that not only were the photos expensive, but when the person died a month later they couldn't tell who they were.  Starvation, abuse, illness drastically changed their appearance.  So they began to tattoo.



So yes, it happened.  It was horrific to say the least.  To think otherwise makes one just as ignorant as a skinhead, klanner or any other hate group you can think of.  Because that is the basis of their, and all hate.  Ignorance.

ETA:  I want to load the pictures, but am told they are too large.  I don't know how to do that.








Did they show you the whore house and the library?


How about this? Did you see the huge indistrial complex where these people worked every day?


Did you meet this ole gal? She likes it there and has lived there since pre 1945. She is showing off her tatoo


The theater?



If you want I can give you my email on the other side and you can send all the pics you want and we will get them loaded up.


So does posting true pictures of what you will not see on the media or in any school book make ma an anti-semite or nothing more than a news reporter?





< Message edited by Real0ne -- 1/25/2013 12:32:35 AM >


_____________________________

"We the Borg" of the us imperialists....resistance is futile

Democracy; The 'People' voted on 'which' amendment?

Yesterdays tinfoil is today's reality!

"No man's life, liberty, or property is safe while the legislature is in session

(in reply to LafayetteLady)
Profile   Post #: 56
RE: is holacaust denial antisemitic? - 1/25/2013 12:27:25 AM   
Rule


Posts: 10479
Joined: 12/5/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: jlf1961
The truth of the matter is that by denying the Holocaust, you are basically calling Jews liars, denying there history.

I disagree. The mass murder during the Second World War of European peoples that practised circumcision (as well as of other peoples such as the gypsies and Dutch resistance fighters) is a fact of history and has got nothing to do with what Jews say.

quote:

ORIGINAL: jlf1961
Collarme has decided that holocaust denial is not antisemitic, I think it is, what is your opinions? Should the TOS reflect the given world view on the subject?

In my opinion it is not antisemitic, but instead it is stupid. But I think that Collarme has the right of it: if one poster says stupid things, other posters will shoot down the stupidity.

Now what I wonder about with great wonderment, is why the European nations, after having murdered most peoples that practice circumcision in Europe during WWII, opened their borders to immigration by massive numbers of barbaric peoples that also practice circumcision and that have as high a frequency of inherited diseases as the Jews do in the 1960's and after. Riddle me that.

_____________________________

"I tend to pay attention when Rule speaks" - Aswad

"You are sweet, kind, and ever so smart, Rule. You ALWAYS stretch my mind and make me think further than I might have on my own" - Duskypearls

Si vis pacem, para bellum.

(in reply to jlf1961)
Profile   Post #: 57
RE: is holacaust denial antisemitic? - 1/25/2013 12:32:07 AM   
TAFKAA


Posts: 382
Joined: 1/5/2013
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne
We need for you to explain the difference because someone apparently cant count very well, that and another huge problem is that according to your standards that makes the proprietors of auschwitz antisemite because now there is a 2.5 million difference from the 6 million.

They changed the official count somehow just wiped out 2.5 million people

So Jeff what makes me an antisemite instead of a news reporter that is reporting interesting "stuff".

How is a Japanese-Jew a semite?

These are all very simple questions why have you not answered any of them?
Oh, I can explain that dude. In fact Wikipedia is readily able to explain it to you: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Auschwitz_concentration_camp#Death_toll

In particular, I note this bit:

After the collapse of the Communist government in 1989, the plaque at Auschwitz State Museum was removed and the official death toll given as 1.1 million. Holocaust deniers have attempted to use this change as propaganda, in the words of the Nizkor Project:

Deniers often use the 'Four Million Variant' as a stepping stone to leap from an apparent contradiction to the idea that the Holocaust was a hoax, again perpetrated by a conspiracy. They hope to discredit historians by making them seem inconsistent. If they can't keep their numbers straight, their reasoning goes, how can we say that their evidence for the Holocaust is credible? One must wonder which historians they speak of, as most have been remarkably consistent in their estimates of a million or so dead... Few (if any) historians ever believed the Museum's four million figure, having arrived at their own estimates independently. The museum's inflated figures were never part of the estimated five to six million Jews killed in the Holocaust, so there is no need to revise this figure.


The simplest explanation is that - like Holocaust Deniers - communist governments have a very tenuous relationship with the truth and Poland's post-war government was distinctly communist.

It's not so much that you're an anti-Semite dude - you're just an apologist for Islamic aggression. And you think attacking the Holocaust is attacking the character of the Jewish people - and by extension the Israelis - instead of just being the ridiculous sideshow that it is.

(in reply to Real0ne)
Profile   Post #: 58
RE: is holacaust denial antisemitic? - 1/25/2013 12:42:56 AM   
Real0ne


Posts: 21189
Joined: 10/25/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: TAFKAA


quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne
We need for you to explain the difference because someone apparently cant count very well, that and another huge problem is that according to your standards that makes the proprietors of auschwitz antisemite because now there is a 2.5 million difference from the 6 million.

They changed the official count somehow just wiped out 2.5 million people

So Jeff what makes me an antisemite instead of a news reporter that is reporting interesting "stuff".

How is a Japanese-Jew a semite?

These are all very simple questions why have you not answered any of them?
Oh, I can explain that dude. In fact Wikipedia is readily able to explain it to you: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Auschwitz_concentration_camp#Death_toll

In particular, I note this bit:

After the collapse of the Communist government in 1989, the plaque at Auschwitz State Museum was removed and the official death toll given as 1.1 million. Holocaust deniers have attempted to use this change as propaganda, in the words of the Nizkor Project:

Deniers often use the 'Four Million Variant' as a stepping stone to leap from an apparent contradiction to the idea that the Holocaust was a hoax, again perpetrated by a conspiracy. They hope to discredit historians by making them seem inconsistent. If they can't keep their numbers straight, their reasoning goes, how can we say that their evidence for the Holocaust is credible? One must wonder which historians they speak of, as most have been remarkably consistent in their estimates of a million or so dead... Few (if any) historians ever believed the Museum's four million figure, having arrived at their own estimates independently. The museum's inflated figures were never part of the estimated five to six million Jews killed in the Holocaust, so there is no need to revise this figure.


The simplest explanation is that - like Holocaust Deniers - communist governments have a very tenuous relationship with the truth and Poland's post-war government was distinctly communist.

It's not so much that you're an anti-Semite dude - you're just an apologist for Islamic aggression. And you think attacking the Holocaust is attacking the character of the Jewish people - and by extension the Israelis - instead of just being the ridiculous sideshow that it is.



How did you come to that conclusion again?

How can the change they made for real be used as propaganda? Propaganda is invariantly completely false and misleading when in fact they did change the sign and the did lower it, I thought to 1.5 million but it looks like its 1.1 million now.

So then all those tourists were lied to huh? Isnt that propaganda?


quote:

Example Death certificate from Auschwitz


According to the official death books, there were 400,000 prisoners at Auschwitz

Half Israelis - 200,000

Of that number, 30,000 died
15%

Also according to the official death books, the other 200,000 breaks down like this

165,000 Catholics
12,300 Eastern Orthodox
11,600 Protestants
5,500 Greek Catholics
9,700 Other, including 5 Muslims and 387 Jehovah's Witnesses

of these numbers:

Almost 32,000 Catholics died, almost 2,500 Eastern Orthodox died, almost 2,300 Protestants died, over 1,000 Greek Catholics died

In other words:

82.5%
Of the Catholics died

20.3%
Of the Eastern Orthodox died

19.8%
Of the protestants died

18.2%
Of the Greek Catholics died

Compared to 15% of the Israelis







All the "Denier" stuff so when a historian comes along and disputes the present numbers regardless of his credibility he is thought of as a DENIER!

its usually not like wiki to use pejorative laced accusations as they have. Surprizing.





< Message edited by Real0ne -- 1/25/2013 12:53:05 AM >


_____________________________

"We the Borg" of the us imperialists....resistance is futile

Democracy; The 'People' voted on 'which' amendment?

Yesterdays tinfoil is today's reality!

"No man's life, liberty, or property is safe while the legislature is in session

(in reply to TAFKAA)
Profile   Post #: 59
RE: is holacaust denial antisemitic? - 1/25/2013 12:48:35 AM   
VideoAdminAlpha


Posts: 3876
Joined: 7/25/2008
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: jlf1961

The definition of antisemitism as per VAA.


quote:

Disparaging either Jews as a whole, or individually, or the Jewish race/religion solely or substantially on account of their Jewishness or following recognized practices whether religious or not that is attributable to being either of the Jewish race or religion, singling out Jews for special treatment solely because they are Jewish. This all addresses their RACE or religion, it has nothing to do with political beliefs or the arena. Therefore, criticism of the Israeli state is not anti-Semitism. Other racial/religious comments that are not allowed can include, but not be limited to, any derogatory comment attacking someone because of something they practice or believe because of their race, gender, religious, or sexual beliefs.


Disparaging 1 : to lower in rank or reputation : degrade
2: to depreciate by indirect means (as invidious comparison) : speak slightingly about


an·ti-Sem·i·tism
[an-tee-sem-i-tiz-uhm, an-tahy-]
noun
discrimination against or prejudice or hostility toward Jews.

How is denying a people's history as false, or that it never happened not disparaging to the Jewish people?

How is denying the fact that 6 million Jews died at the hands of the Nazi's because there were "swimming pools" at the camps? And continuing with that assertion even when proven wrong is not disparaging the Jewish race?

In my opinion that is like claiming that the trail of tears never happened, and six of my ancestors died of old age, not starvation during the forced migration of Cherokee, Crow and other tribes from the south Eastern US.

Furthermore, this individual has made the claim that Ike Eisenhower was Jewish and had death camps of German POW's.

And most of the websites he links to in order to prove his point is either anti semitic revisionist history or managed by known antisemitic groups or individuals.




My statement was what constituted an anti-semiticism remark. Addressing historical events is not disparaging. Addressing what your opinion is of the race or religion is in a disparaging manner does constitute anti semiticism. The topic of THIS thread is the holocaust. Throwing other past posts in here about Eisenhower etc has no relevance.

In actuality, TAFKAAs and Orions posts much earlier in the thread state what my thoughts are much better than I apparently can. It does not matter whether I privately agree with other posters views or not, their right to state them in the manner they are stating them is allowable. If this strays any further off topic with other subjects, or if no new posters add any different viewpoints, this thread will be closed shortly.

As an aside for future reference, Eisenhower, the American Indians, and circumcision have naught to do with the subject of this thread.

Also, I posted in here and didnt notice what area the topic was posted in, as I went to it from the scroller. It is definitely not an off-topic subject, so has been moved to its proper place. My apologies for not noticing that sooner.

< Message edited by VideoAdminAlpha -- 1/25/2013 12:50:21 AM >


_____________________________


You can't please all the people all of the time.Unfortunately there are times you cannot please any of them :( You can only do your best, and hope they realize that.


(in reply to jlf1961)
Profile   Post #: 60
Page:   <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4 5   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: is holacaust denial antisemitic? Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4 5   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2024
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.180