MadameMarque
Posts: 1128
Joined: 3/19/2005 Status: offline
|
It would be more accurate to say that the submissive's excitement is important to me. If the submissive weren't at least as excited as I, I would consider that a problem. Also, whereas I enjoy teasing, orgasm control, and control over the submissive's authority over their own body, among many other scenes, I also want to use the submissive sexually, so perpetual chastity would interfere with that. Besides, I just can't relate to someone being denied sexually all the time or wanting to be. I think it would be a mismatch between us, in personal chemistry. And, too, for me, that would be a bit "all about the submissive," in a backhanded sort of way. This is not to say that D/s begins or ends with the act of sex; for me, not at all so. But I will say, I can be very turned on by someone doing something entirely nonsexual for me that's purely submissive. To answer this question in essence, and to Cilicia, who posed the question, "does a TYPICAL male:Domme encounter involve the male getting off?" , different people are just wired differently. Not every dominant is into denial for their submissives, nor all we all indifferent to the submissive's sexuality or sexual release - or our own! On the other hand, not every dominant or submissive wants physical sexual relations with their BDSM. And then, for some of us the question is, is there such a thing as sex with No BDSM? Really, there are about as many specific scenes and kinks and preferences as there are inidividuals or pairs of people. But what I think you can rightfully say about anyone into bondage and discipline, dominance and submission, or sadomasochism, is that, in one sense or another, it gets them off! quote:
FrostedFlake It seems there are two kinds of people. Those who think kink is about getting off and those who spout unbelievable bullshit. http://www.collarchat.com/fb.asp?m=4406184
< Message edited by MadameMarque -- 3/24/2013 12:48:27 AM >
|