Collarchat.com

Join Our Community
Collarchat.com

Home  Login  Search 

Why Arabs Don't Like the U.S.


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> Why Arabs Don't Like the U.S. Page: [1] 2 3 4 5   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
Why Arabs Don't Like the U.S. - 7/11/2013 9:38:09 AM   
Zonie63


Posts: 2826
Joined: 4/25/2011
From: The Old Pueblo
Status: offline
I thought this was an interesting article, mainly discussing Egyptian attitudes towards the U.S. but it might also apply to other countries as well.

quote:

Some extremist Muslims hammer us because they don't like Western values; others see the conspiratorial hand of America everywhere -- sucking the life out of Arab and Muslim independence, pride and dignity.

But once you get away from the fringes, what you find is equally disturbing: Millions of Arabs and Muslims don't like us not because of who we are but because of what we do. It's our policies.

And since those are unlikely to change anytime soon, there's a pretty good chance America will continue to lose the public image battle in the Middle East. And here's why:

Minds and hearts: We've always had it backwards. It's not hearts then minds at all. If you want to capture the imagination of people living in the Middle East and get them to warm to America, you don't play to their emotions first. It's as if a new pretty bow on a package with the same contents as ever is somehow going to help sell U.S. policy. It won't.

First, capture people's minds, appeal to their cognitive self-interest and then their hearts will follow.

...

Values vs. interests: It's stunning testament to the American predicament in the Middle East that within two years of Hosni Mubarak's overthrow -- handled relatively well by the Obama administration -- we are being attacked for backing both Mohamed Morsy and the generals and criticized by just about everyone, even the secular opposition.

You can pick your favorite culprit. The U.S. ambassador, Secretary of State John Kerry's yachting outing, Barack Obama's naivete about the Muslim Brotherhood or his softness toward the military.

But none of them is the reason. We lost our footing in Egypt because the tension between our values and interests results in unpopular and inconsistent policies.

...

Great power hypocrisy: Great powers are big and strong enough that they can afford to behave inconsistently and hypocritically. And they do. It's as if it were part of their job description.

But that inconsistency can confuse and disappoint. Our policies toward the Arab Spring are laced with contradictions. We support real political change in Egypt, but we won't push it hard in Saudi Arabia or in Bahrain where oil, stability and U.S. bases reign supreme.

We'll intervene militarily in Libya because it's easier -- but not in Syria, where the strength of al-Assad's allies, military and a chemical weapons capacity make it much riskier.

And in the greatest paradox of all, our ties with the monarchies -- Jordan, Saudi Arabia and Morocco -- are much closer than with the emerging and struggling democracies at a time when the Middle East yearns for democracy and freedom. It is indeed remarkable that the Arab kings have become our new anchors in a turbulent sea of political change.


I think that the writer makes some interesting points about American inconsistency and great power hypocrisy, but I don't think he delves deeply enough as to the sources of this inconsistency and hypocrisy. What drives these policies that have incurred the wrath of all these people? Some might conclude that U.S. policies are all about money and corporate greed, but that would only explain part of it. A lot of it may be rooted in how we Americans tend to perceive and look at the rest of the world.

For example, I'm struck by phrases the writer uses here: "...emerging and struggling democracies..." and "...Middle East yearns for democracy and freedom." We're talking about an area of the world which learned how to govern itself thousands of years before the United States even existed, yet using phrases like "emerging and struggling" as if they're just starting out, setting ourselves up in some kind of paternalistic role as "mentor" of democracy and freedom - because we do it so much better than everyone else, apparently. That approach may seem somewhat arrogant and rub people the wrong way, even if it's applied with the best of intentions. As long as that perception continues to be propagated and unchallenged, then U.S. foreign policy may not ever change.


Profile   Post #: 1
RE: Why Arabs Don't Like the U.S. - 7/11/2013 10:03:54 AM   
Termyn8or


Posts: 18681
Joined: 11/12/2005
Status: offline
And what kind of "mentor" are we ?

The author puts into words much better what I have been saying for a long time, and not just words, deeds. We went in there and manipulated their governments, even before we put the Shah of Iran in place, deposing a popular leader. Then we put Saddam in place to fix that. See how that worked ?

If you REALLY look at it from their point of view, this country deserves anihilaion forthwith. We should have had friendly trade and nothing more. That is what the Founders called for and recommended, and it was the right way, but then the bankers came.

And now, since the tree of liberty is starved for the blood of tyrants, we will, after inflation and deflation, wake up homeless.

Many have.

All the ills the founders of this country tried to steer it away from have been done, and the wrath of nature is upon the US now. The governments, like Haliburton and Monsanto, and the other branches of government like Pfizer and British Petroleum, they have brought the wrath of the world upon our people. And being slaves to the almighty buck, we remain powerless to stop or stem the tide.

Be as well as you can people, the shit is very close to the fan. We are about to be in a war having Israel and England on our side, and all other countries neutral EXCEPT, China, Russia, India and Iran.

Has anyone added up their capabilities lately ? Oh yeah, they know when you scratched your balls, but they have no idea of Russian planes and shit, or what China has. They know if you are talking bad about the US in Berlin, and their PM says it's OK, even though the People don't

This is the biggest pile of shit to ever hit the fan in world history, at least recorded history. Yeah the glaciers, Krakatoa, shit like thatt, but none of them were caused by homo-magnanimous Esquire.

Die well. I will.

T^T

< Message edited by Termyn8or -- 7/11/2013 10:07:23 AM >

(in reply to Zonie63)
Profile   Post #: 2
RE: Why Arabs Don't Like the U.S. - 7/11/2013 11:23:28 AM   
kdsub


Posts: 12180
Joined: 8/16/2007
Status: offline
I look at it this way... fuck them... I don't care about them any more than they care about me. We are what we are and they are what they are... that should be good enough. On an individual level I've never met someone of the Islamic faith I did not like...and as far as I know they liked me...but these were Americans with much the same values I have. As for nations of people that don't like me and my values and how we deal with them then grow out of the middle ages and you may be able to deal with America on an equal basis. Until then...go...no I mean stay... in the hell you live in.


ps...thanks for the oil but we don't need it any more... hey how about some wheat or corn....you know maybe $150 a barrel or so.

Butch

_____________________________

Mark Twain:

I don't see any use in having a uniform and arbitrary way of spelling words. We might as well make all clothes alike and cook all dishes alike. Sameness is tiresome; variety is pleasing

(in reply to Zonie63)
Profile   Post #: 3
RE: Why Arabs Don't Like the U.S. - 7/11/2013 5:15:38 PM   
Powergamz1


Posts: 1927
Joined: 9/3/2011
Status: offline
There was a government in the part of the world we now call the Czech Republic thousands of years ago too, doesn't mean they weren't an emerging democracy after the Soviets left.

After the burning of the library at Alexandria was a long period where the broadest label was nomadic... not exactly a big factor in democracy.

The nations we think of as the Middle East didn't even have their own firm borders until very recently, which is a big part of the problem.... imposition of lines drawn by Western interests and the funneling of power to select groups, who did what all human beings do when given near absolute power.. they became corrupt.


Blame the Dulles Brothers. And the Queen(s).


_____________________________

"DOMA is unconstitutional as a deprivation of the equal liberty of persons that is protected by the Fifth Amendment" Anthony McLeod Kennedy

" About damn time...wooot!!' Me

(in reply to kdsub)
Profile   Post #: 4
RE: Why Arabs Don't Like the U.S. - 7/11/2013 11:53:45 PM   
RottenJohnny


Posts: 1677
Joined: 5/5/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: kdsub

ps...thanks for the oil but we don't need it any more... hey how about some wheat or corn....you know maybe $150 a barrel or so.



...and by the way, fly another jetliner into one of our skyscrapers and next time we'll just drop a MIRV in your bowl of goat soup.



< Message edited by RottenJohnny -- 7/11/2013 11:54:31 PM >


_____________________________

"I find your arguments strewn with gaping defects in logic." - Mr. Spock

"Give me liberty or give me death." - Patrick Henry

I believe in common sense, not common opinions. - Me

(in reply to kdsub)
Profile   Post #: 5
RE: Why Arabs Don't Like the U.S. - 7/12/2013 7:24:11 AM   
truckinslave


Posts: 3897
Joined: 6/16/2004
Status: offline
Boko Haram.

They detest our values, our actions, our very essence.
Their hatred is deep, vicious, and religiously based.
Until we accept that the source of their hatred is the God-damned Koran we will never even admit the problem.

They hate us for what we do, for who we are, and for breathing; but they hate us even more for what we are not. We are not Muslim.


_____________________________

1. Islam and sharia are indivisible.
2. Sharia is barbaric, homophobic, violent, and inimical to the most basic Western values (including free speech and freedom of religion). (Yeah, I know: SEE: Irony 101).
ERGO: Islam has no place in America.

(in reply to Zonie63)
Profile   Post #: 6
RE: Why Arabs Don't Like the U.S. - 7/12/2013 7:36:46 AM   
tweakabelle


Posts: 7522
Joined: 10/16/2007
From: Sydney Australia
Status: offline
The author of the text quoted in the OP makes some good relevant points.

Sadly, the main reasons why the USA is so on the nose in the Arab world - it's insane pro-Israel policies, its silence on Israel's ethnic cleansing and apartheid on the West Bank, and its unqualified support for Israel's abhorrent belligerence - fail to merit even a mention.

As long as such superficial analyses are taken seriously, there is little likelihood that things are going to improve from either side's perspective .

< Message edited by tweakabelle -- 7/12/2013 7:39:31 AM >


_____________________________



(in reply to Zonie63)
Profile   Post #: 7
RE: Why Arabs Don't Like the U.S. - 7/12/2013 9:09:40 AM   
Powergamz1


Posts: 1927
Joined: 9/3/2011
Status: offline
They hate Muslims too. Boko Haram literally translates to 'Books are Forbidden'.
In practice it works out to 'All knowledge is forbidden on pain of death'. 'All' as in medicine, maps of the world being round, telescopes setting the start of Ramadan more precisely, etc. No matter who the knowledge comes from, it is forbidden. They don't even want people reading the Quran, they want to tell the people what it means.


quote:

ORIGINAL: truckinslave

Boko Haram.

They detest our values, our actions, our very essence.
Their hatred is deep, vicious, and religiously based.
Until we accept that the source of their hatred is the God-damned Koran we will never even admit the problem.

They hate us for what we do, for who we are, and for breathing; but they hate us even more for what we are not. We are not Muslim.




_____________________________

"DOMA is unconstitutional as a deprivation of the equal liberty of persons that is protected by the Fifth Amendment" Anthony McLeod Kennedy

" About damn time...wooot!!' Me

(in reply to truckinslave)
Profile   Post #: 8
RE: Why Arabs Don't Like the U.S. - 7/12/2013 3:32:38 PM   
Zonie63


Posts: 2826
Joined: 4/25/2011
From: The Old Pueblo
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: truckinslave

Boko Haram.

They detest our values, our actions, our very essence.
Their hatred is deep, vicious, and religiously based.
Until we accept that the source of their hatred is the God-damned Koran we will never even admit the problem.

They hate us for what we do, for who we are, and for breathing; but they hate us even more for what we are not. We are not Muslim.



Maybe so, but when we're talking about the schism between Muslims and Christians, that's been going on for well over 1000 years. Their hatred of America is relatively recent, only within the past few decades. Looking back on U.S. history 100-150 years ago, I don't recall seeing any major problems with Arab countries back then. They didn't burn the U.S. flag or say "Death to America" back in those days, and even after WW2, the world in general had a very positive attitude towards America. Something has obviously changed between then and now, and it's not our values or actions, since they've been much the same all along.

(in reply to truckinslave)
Profile   Post #: 9
RE: Why Arabs Don't Like the U.S. - 7/12/2013 5:08:33 PM   
njlauren


Posts: 1577
Joined: 10/1/2011
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Zonie63


quote:

ORIGINAL: truckinslave

Boko Haram.

They detest our values, our actions, our very essence.
Their hatred is deep, vicious, and religiously based.
Until we accept that the source of their hatred is the God-damned Koran we will never even admit the problem.

They hate us for what we do, for who we are, and for breathing; but they hate us even more for what we are not. We are not Muslim.



Maybe so, but when we're talking about the schism between Muslims and Christians, that's been going on for well over 1000 years. Their hatred of America is relatively recent, only within the past few decades. Looking back on U.S. history 100-150 years ago, I don't recall seeing any major problems with Arab countries back then. They didn't burn the U.S. flag or say "Death to America" back in those days, and even after WW2, the world in general had a very positive attitude towards America. Something has obviously changed between then and now, and it's not our values or actions, since they've been much the same all along.



Read up on the history of the Treaty of Tripoli in 1798 (where it famously totally makes fools of the religious right in this country, when it says the US is not a Christian nation in black and white), when Muslim countries from North Africa were preying on US ships, often taking their crews into captivity to be used as Galley slaves, it is why there is the line in the Marine Corps hymn ('to the shores of Tripoli')....:).

To get into the root causes of all this would take several books, and it isn't just the US, the British left a mess in the middle east, forming 'countries' that made no sense tribally, and let us not forget the giant shaft of 1949, when Britain KO'ed the two state solution for Palestine, insisting that Hashemite Saudis who had fled Saudi Arabia be allowed to take what is now Jordan, which was supposed to be a Palestinian state.

The reasons are many, but to a large extent the hatred is because the US preaches freedom and democracy yet we in that reason meddled, often to keep brutal dictators in power, because we could 'trust them'.....keep in mind during the Cold War the US government viewed democracy with not a little bit of suspicion, because they feared, as they did in South America, that popular uprisings would lead to socialist governments, as did in Egypt with Nasser. We upended a democratically elected government in Iran and put the Shah on the throne for almost 30 years, we support the royal families of Saudi Arabia, Kuwait and the like, and then when oil became a big thing, when the US started importing oil, it became king...which left a lot of people poor, and frustrated, because the money was going to the ruling class and everyone else got nothing.

The middle east also became a chessboard for the cold war; the US supported Israel, the USSR Egypt and the Syrians, South Yemen, and it became a kind of proxy war when the arab countries pulled their various invasions, USSR equipped troops on one side, the US equipped Israelis on the other and that added to it.

Then, too, comes Israel, where without trying to cast blame on one side only, there has been shortsighted US policy, in part because of the incredibly strong Israeli lobby in the US, that has led us to be a little less strong with Israel then we should. You cannot claim to be bargaining in good faith when Israel is allowed to build all these settlements in Palestinian territory to please the Ultra Orthodox in their country (who frankly I find as repugnant as I do the militant Islamic types; they may not plant terrorist bombs, but they cause a lot of damage to Israel that we end up paying for), or when we don't use the very potent amount of aid Israel gets to gain concessions and stop people like Netanyahu from dealing out of both sides of his mouth (and before someone starts the rant about the Palestinians, what they represent, I realize what you are saying, and i don't disagree either, they also are dealing out of both sides of their mouth, and then some, when they have this idiotic dream that suddenly they are going to take the whole thing, there was no country of Palestine, it never was, was owned by others for several thousand years). Personally I think most of the Arab world could give a crap less about the real plight of the Palestinians, it is just propoganda, but it is effective.

One of the mistakes we make about Islam and why muslims seem to gravitate towards trying to make countries ruled by Sharia law is because if you read the Q'ran, a lot of it is about social justice, about the poor not getting screwed by the rich, one of its goals, even moreso then Christianity, was to create a world where the poor are taken care of and not exploited. Their rules on interest bearing loans being illegal is part of that, the Q'ran is full of that, and to many people, they see that as a hope that maybe, just maybe, they will see some social and economic justice in a part of the world where that is scarce. It isn't that I agree with that or think it is a great think (I don't, very simply because the Q'ran is an idealized book the way Marx's economic theories were or Plato's republic, and in practice they end up being oppressive, not freeing, just look at what the USSR did with Marx, or Iran with the Q'ran). Maybe if we saw it for what it was, we would find a way to help people their gain some justice. Our naivite about the "Arab Spring" in part was in thinking that this was the revolt of middle class, educated people, who would be less likely to go for a theocracy, but the problem is they may have triggered the revolt, but in the end the masses decide, who are uneducated, poor and see Islam as a shining beacon. If you look at Egypt, those opposed to Morsi were the educated classes, not the poor majority, they were for him.

I don't think it is because of the freedom of the US, or that we allow women full rights or don't stone gays to death, despite the religious right trying to use that as justification to oppress women and gays to please the critics *lol*, I think it is because they feel the US had the power to do good, and instead, in blind self interest, just piled on their misery. I could argue that a lot of what they feel isn't true, it is perception, but it doesn't matter....and when our so called friends, the Saudis, spend their not small wealth building radical islamic schools all over the middle east, when they sponsor media and such that spreads lies and half truths in order to curry favor with the radicals, it doesn't help.

I tend to agree with others, I think the biggest mistake the US made after 9/11 was not pulling a Manhattan project and getting the world off of oil within 10 years (not just the US, the world)..you do that, and you have the leeway to let the Middle East figure out things for themselves, rather than keeping petty ante tyrants like the Royal families in power.....among other things, basing your GDP on oil alone almost guarantees stratification, because there is no need for a middle class, who might otherwise be building a real economy.

I think with Egypt we learned a lesson, that Democracy doesn't always provide results we would want, it is why our founding fathers put the checks and balances and escape clauses they did; had Egypt had an electoral college of educated people, theoretically they could over stopped the Brotherhoods from taking power, it is why the electoral college exists in this country, so Vox Populi couldn't elect a dictator or worse.

BTW,be really careful about using Arab to mean all Muslims or Middle Easterners. The Iranians are Persian, and they would be insulted to be called Arabs, and for example, The Sudanese are not Arab, they are black I believe, whereas the Iraqis are Arab.

< Message edited by njlauren -- 7/12/2013 5:11:18 PM >

(in reply to Zonie63)
Profile   Post #: 10
RE: Why Arabs Don't Like the U.S. - 7/12/2013 5:52:38 PM   
thishereboi


Posts: 14463
Joined: 6/19/2008
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: tweakabelle

The author of the text quoted in the OP makes some good relevant points.

Sadly, the main reasons why the USA is so on the nose in the Arab world - it's insane pro-Israel policies, its silence on Israel's ethnic cleansing and apartheid on the West Bank, and its unqualified support for Israel's abhorrent belligerence - fail to merit even a mention.

As long as such superficial analyses are taken seriously, there is little likelihood that things are going to improve from either side's perspective .



Well from the tone of your posts that certainly seems to be why you hate us, but I really don't think you are qualified to speak for anyone else.

< Message edited by thishereboi -- 7/12/2013 5:53:38 PM >


_____________________________

"Sweetie, you're wasting your gum" .. Albert


This here is the boi formerly known as orfunboi


(in reply to tweakabelle)
Profile   Post #: 11
RE: Why Arabs Don't Like the U.S. - 7/12/2013 6:14:58 PM   
Phydeaux


Posts: 4828
Joined: 1/4/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: tweakabelle
, its silence on Israel's ethnic cleansing and apartheid on the West Bank, and its unqualified support for Israel's abhorrent belligerence - fail to merit even a mention.



Well there's an unbiased opinion for you.

< Message edited by Phydeaux -- 7/12/2013 6:15:10 PM >

(in reply to tweakabelle)
Profile   Post #: 12
RE: Why Arabs Don't Like the U.S. - 7/12/2013 6:26:25 PM   
Phydeaux


Posts: 4828
Joined: 1/4/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: njlauren

quote:

ORIGINAL: Zonie63


quote:

ORIGINAL: truckinslave

Boko Haram.

They detest our values, our actions, our very essence.
Their hatred is deep, vicious, and religiously based.
Until we accept that the source of their hatred is the God-damned Koran we will never even admit the problem.

They hate us for what we do, for who we are, and for breathing; but they hate us even more for what we are not. We are not Muslim.



Maybe so, but when we're talking about the schism between Muslims and Christians, that's been going on for well over 1000 years. Their hatred of America is relatively recent, only within the past few decades. Looking back on U.S. history 100-150 years ago, I don't recall seeing any major problems with Arab countries back then. They didn't burn the U.S. flag or say "Death to America" back in those days, and even after WW2, the world in general had a very positive attitude towards America. Something has obviously changed between then and now, and it's not our values or actions, since they've been much the same all along.



Read up on the history of the Treaty of Tripoli in 1798 ....


Needless to say, I don't agree with you, much if at all. I know about the barbary coast. What do you know about janissaries? Or for that matter the rape of vienna, or the battle of lepanto.

"You shall not suffer the infidel to live". And sure you can say that their are christian extremists - but fundamentally they don't represent a significant percentage of the populations of christians. The muslims have as their goal the conquest of uma. Their highest reward is for he who fights jihad. Until Islam can be reformed that this is not the predominant - or even acceptable view - there can be no peace.

ow, let us have a closer look at what the Koran says about the infidels:-

Slay the unbelievers wherever you find them(2:191)
Make war on the infidels living in your neighboorhood (9:123)
When opportunity arises, kill the infidels wherever you catch them (9:5)
Kill the Jews and the Christians if they do not convert to Islam or refuse to pay Jizya tax (9:29)
Any religion other than Islam is not acceptable (3:85)
The Jews and the Christians are perverts; fight them (9:30)
Maim and crucify the infidels if they criticise Islam. (5:33)
The infidels are unclean; do not let them into a mosque (9:28)
Punish the unbelievers with garments of fire, hooked iron rods, boiling water; melt their skin and bellies
(22:19)
Do not hanker for peace with the infidels; behead them when you catch them (47:4)
The unbelievers are stupid; urge the Muslims to fight them (8:65)
Muslims must not take the infidels as friends (3:28)
Terrorise and behead those who believe in scriptures other than the Qur’an (8:12)
Muslims must muster all weapons to terrorise the infidels (8:60)

The Qur’an certainly proclaims that when the time is appropriate, Muslims must use force to convert the unbelievers to Islam. For the non-Muslims, the alternative to this is to pay the humiliating protection money (Jizya tax) or be killed (by beheading, of course). A militarily dominant Islam, without doubt, precludes the peaceful co-existence with the unbelievers if the Muslims have to abide strictly by the unalterable stipulations of the Qur’an.

< Message edited by Phydeaux -- 7/12/2013 6:28:48 PM >

(in reply to njlauren)
Profile   Post #: 13
RE: Why Arabs Don't Like the U.S. - 7/12/2013 9:30:36 PM   
BitYakin


Posts: 882
Joined: 10/15/2005
Status: offline
quote:

Read up on the history of the Treaty of Tripoli in 1798 (where it famously totally makes fools of the religious right in this country, when it says the US is not a Christian nation in black and white), when Muslim countries from North Africa were preying on US ships, often taking their crews into captivity to be used as Galley slaves, it is why there is the line in the Marine Corps hymn ('to the shores of Tripoli')....:).

To get into the root causes of all this would take several books, and it isn't just the US, the British left a mess in the middle east, forming 'countries' that made no sense tribally, and let us not forget the giant shaft of 1949, when Britain KO'ed the two state solution for Palestine, insisting that Hashemite Saudis who had fled Saudi Arabia be allowed to take what is now Jordan, which was supposed to be a Palestinian state


while I agree with ALOT of what you said, there are a couple things I don't agree with

your interpetation of the treaty of triploi, says, " Treaty of Tripoli in 1798 (where it famously totally makes fools of the religious right in this country, when it says the US is not a Christian nation in black and white)"

which is untrue, it does not say that in the least, what it does say, and makes clear is that the treaty is between two nations, not two religions, it in no way says or implies that the USA, is or is not christian.

the other thing is your statment, "which was supposed to be a Palestinian state"

and the reason I take issue with this is because there is no such thing, palistine is just a name for a region, it is not a RACE, nor a culture, nor a country, nor a state, it IS just an AREA named palistine, just like the "midlde east" is none of those things, but just a geographical area. if you do a search for a map of palistine, prior to WW2 you'll find its a HUGE area that encompasses israel, jordan, syria, and other countries as well. to claim that lil tiny strip of land known as the west bank is "palistinian" is silly.
the palistinians are a MADE UP people, who prior to about 1960ish, claimed to be syrians. they in fact are a hodge podge of invaders and immigrants from all over the region.

lets take the city of jeruslem, while many many peoples have come and gone invaded and ruled for periods of time, romans persians etc etc etc, the hebrews had maintained a presance through out most of recorded history. empires rose and fell fose and fell, and thoughout it all the hebrews were there. if anyone has a historical right to jeruslem is has to be the hebrews.

beyond those two points I tend to pretty much agree with what you've said. and please don't misunderstand me by thinking I am some religious person who feels christianity should RULE the USA, I do not, just a point of fact, I have heard that treaty of tripoli argument used many times and its just NOT SO! the statment regarding religion is simply a clarification that the treaty is between two sovergn nations and not two religious cultures!

< Message edited by BitYakin -- 7/12/2013 9:34:38 PM >

(in reply to njlauren)
Profile   Post #: 14
RE: Why Arabs Don't Like the U.S. - 7/12/2013 9:45:27 PM   
Powergamz1


Posts: 1927
Joined: 9/3/2011
Status: offline
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Treaty_of_Tripoli#Translation_and_Article_11

quote:

the assurances in Article 11 were "intended to allay the fears of the Muslim state by insisting that religion would not govern how the treaty was interpreted and enforced. John Adams and the Senate made clear that the pact was between two sovereign states, not between two religious powers." Lambert writes,
"By their actions, the Founding Fathers made clear that their primary concern was religious freedom, not the advancement of a state religion. Individuals, not the government, would define religious faith and practice in the United States. Thus the Founders ensured that in no official sense would America be a Christian Republic.


_____________________________

"DOMA is unconstitutional as a deprivation of the equal liberty of persons that is protected by the Fifth Amendment" Anthony McLeod Kennedy

" About damn time...wooot!!' Me

(in reply to BitYakin)
Profile   Post #: 15
RE: Why Arabs Don't Like the U.S. - 7/12/2013 9:56:31 PM   
BitYakin


Posts: 882
Joined: 10/15/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Powergamz1

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Treaty_of_Tripoli#Translation_and_Article_11

quote:

the assurances in Article 11 were "intended to allay the fears of the Muslim state by insisting that religion would not govern how the treaty was interpreted and enforced. John Adams and the Senate made clear that the pact was between two sovereign states, not between two religious powers." Lambert writes,
"By their actions, the Founding Fathers made clear that their primary concern was religious freedom, not the advancement of a state religion. Individuals, not the government, would define religious faith and practice in the United States. Thus the Founders ensured that in no official sense would America be a Christian Republic.




not sure if you are saying you agree or disagree with me, but that seems to be essentially what I said.

as for what Lambert says, thats really just his view of it, he takes it to imply it rejects the notion that the USA is a christian republic, but the actual text of the treaty is ambigous on that, its just how he has decided to interpet it.
I agree with the 1st paragraph whole heartedly though!

< Message edited by BitYakin -- 7/12/2013 10:09:45 PM >

(in reply to Powergamz1)
Profile   Post #: 16
RE: Why Arabs Don't Like the U.S. - 7/12/2013 9:59:03 PM   
dcnovice


Posts: 37282
Joined: 8/2/2006
Status: offline
quote:

your interpetation of the treaty of triploi, says, " Treaty of Tripoli in 1798 (where it famously totally makes fools of the religious right in this country, when it says the US is not a Christian nation in black and white)"

which is untrue, it does not say that in the least, what it does say, and makes clear is that the treaty is between two nations, not two religions, it in no way says or implies that the USA, is or is not christian.


ARTICLE 11.

As the government of the United States of America is not in any sense founded on the Christian Religion,-as it has in itself no character of enmity against the laws, religion or tranquility of Musselmen,-and as the said States never have entered into any war or act of hostility against any Mehomitan nation, it is declared by the parties that no pretext arising from religious opinions shall ever produce an interruption of the harmony existing between the two countries.

http://avalon.law.yale.edu/18th_century/bar1796t.asp#art11

_____________________________

No matter how cynical you become,
it's never enough to keep up.

JANE WAGNER, THE SEARCH FOR SIGNS OF
INTELLIGENT LIFE IN THE UNIVERSE

(in reply to BitYakin)
Profile   Post #: 17
RE: Why Arabs Don't Like the U.S. - 7/12/2013 10:00:23 PM   
njlauren


Posts: 1577
Joined: 10/1/2011
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: BitYakin

quote:

Read up on the history of the Treaty of Tripoli in 1798 (where it famously totally makes fools of the religious right in this country, when it says the US is not a Christian nation in black and white), when Muslim countries from North Africa were preying on US ships, often taking their crews into captivity to be used as Galley slaves, it is why there is the line in the Marine Corps hymn ('to the shores of Tripoli')....:).

To get into the root causes of all this would take several books, and it isn't just the US, the British left a mess in the middle east, forming 'countries' that made no sense tribally, and let us not forget the giant shaft of 1949, when Britain KO'ed the two state solution for Palestine, insisting that Hashemite Saudis who had fled Saudi Arabia be allowed to take what is now Jordan, which was supposed to be a Palestinian state


while I agree with ALOT of what you said, there are a couple things I don't agree with

your interpetation of the treaty of triploi, says, " Treaty of Tripoli in 1798 (where it famously totally makes fools of the religious right in this country, when it says the US is not a Christian nation in black and white)"

which is untrue, it does not say that in the least, what it does say, and makes clear is that the treaty is between two nations, not two religions, it in no way says or implies that the USA, is or is not christian.

the other thing is your statment, "which was supposed to be a Palestinian state"

and the reason I take issue with this is because there is no such thing, palistine is just a name for a region, it is not a RACE, nor a culture, nor a country, nor a state, it IS just an AREA named palistine, just like the "midlde east" is none of those things, but just a geographical area. if you do a search for a map of palistine, prior to WW2 you'll find its a HUGE area that encompasses israel, jordan, syria, and other countries as well. to claim that lil tiny strip of land known as the west bank is "palistinian" is silly.
the palistinians are a MADE UP people, who prior to about 1960ish, claimed to be syrians. they in fact are a hodge podge of invaders and immigrants from all over the region.

lets take the city of jeruslem, while many many peoples have come and gone invaded and ruled for periods of time, romans persians etc etc etc, the hebrews had maintained a presance through out most of recorded history. empires rose and fell fose and fell, and thoughout it all the hebrews were there. if anyone has a historical right to jeruslem is has to be the hebrews.

beyond those two points I tend to pretty much agree with what you've said. and please don't misunderstand me by thinking I am some religious person who feels christianity should RULE the USA, I do not, just a point of fact, I have heard that treaty of tripoli argument used many times and its just NOT SO! the statment regarding religion is simply a clarification that the treaty is between two sovergn nations and not two religious cultures!


Here are the actual words of the Treaty of Tripoli that are cited:

As the government of the United States of America is not in any sense founded on the Christian religion as it has in itself no character of enmity [hatred] against the laws, religion or tranquility of Musselmen [Muslims] and as the said States [America] have never entered into any war or act of hostility against any Mahometan nation, it is declared by the parties that no pretext arising from religious opinions shall ever produce an interruption of the harmony existing between the two countries."

I have heard arguments this doesn't mean that the US is not a "Christian Nation" because this treaty was used to appease the Muslims who were angry at Christians for the crusades. That argument doesn't hold water, because the logic behind this is clear:

1)The US government (which is what we are talking about, the laws and government of the US) is not founded based on the Christian religion (ie the US government is not a theocracy) which means

2)The US government doesn't see Islam as an enemy because it is not based in the (then, and still) common notion among Christians that Islam is the enemy.

Were people in the US overwhelmingly Christian? Yes.Were the founders Christians of various sorts? Yes. Was the government established on Christian principles, as the fundies claim? No, and this treaty makes that point, saying it was done under duress, saying it didn't mean that is hogwash, this and the fact that the constitution has no Christian law in it tells the tale pretty clearly.

As far as the Palestinian issue, the UN came up with a Partition plan that would address the needs of the non Jews who were in the area, the various people who likewise had been living there a long time. Keep in mind that until the late 19th century, there were very few Jews living in what is now Israel and even with attempts at getting Jews to settle there it wasn't until the madness hit Europe in the 1930's that any significant numbers got there, having to sneak around the British who denied them access and then obviously the flood of refugees.

No, there was never a Palestinian state (I mentioned that), but there were Arabs, Muslims and Christian, who had been living there for a really long time as well. The Partition was a political solution to allow Israel to exist and also to allow the Arabs who had been living in the area to have a place to call their own, and it may have worked. The British basically used their veto power in the UN to stop it, because of the Saudi highbinders they owed some favors to (why Hashemites should have Jordan is even more problematic then your claim there is no Palestine; the Hashemites had been exiled to that area within 100 years of the time we are talking, and they in Jordan were outnumbered by what we call Palestinians something like 10 to 1).

As far as the west bank goes, Israel signed treaties in regards to those territories and even the government admits the settlements we are talking about are illegal, but because the Israelis give the ultra orthodox more power then they deserve, they look the other way, and I think the Palestinians have a right to be upset, even if I don't agree with their leaders and have a lot of problems with them as well.

While I think trying to boil down our problems with the mideast to Israel alone is simpleminded, it is part of the problem, it is well known Israel is the US's biggest client state (16 billion a year in aid last I checked) and the Arabs will point out that that would give the US a lot of leverage if they chose to use it. It isn't a black and white situation, but lots of shades of gray, but the reality is the US has never particularly been a neutral party , it often seems to come down to the US saying "this is my friend Israel, so you may want to take anything they are willing to give you, cause otherwise I might get pissed", and strong arming that way doesn't exactly make friends. I suspect even if we were more neutral in the Israel-Palestinian mess a lot of folks in the middle east would hate us, but it is a point of friction.

(in reply to BitYakin)
Profile   Post #: 18
RE: Why Arabs Don't Like the U.S. - 7/12/2013 10:09:39 PM   
njlauren


Posts: 1577
Joined: 10/1/2011
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phydeaux

quote:

ORIGINAL: njlauren

quote:

ORIGINAL: Zonie63


quote:

ORIGINAL: truckinslave

Boko Haram.

They detest our values, our actions, our very essence.
Their hatred is deep, vicious, and religiously based.
Until we accept that the source of their hatred is the God-damned Koran we will never even admit the problem.

They hate us for what we do, for who we are, and for breathing; but they hate us even more for what we are not. We are not Muslim.



Maybe so, but when we're talking about the schism between Muslims and Christians, that's been going on for well over 1000 years. Their hatred of America is relatively recent, only within the past few decades. Looking back on U.S. history 100-150 years ago, I don't recall seeing any major problems with Arab countries back then. They didn't burn the U.S. flag or say "Death to America" back in those days, and even after WW2, the world in general had a very positive attitude towards America. Something has obviously changed between then and now, and it's not our values or actions, since they've been much the same all along.



Read up on the history of the Treaty of Tripoli in 1798 ....


Needless to say, I don't agree with you, much if at all. I know about the barbary coast. What do you know about janissaries? Or for that matter the rape of vienna, or the battle of lepanto.

"You shall not suffer the infidel to live". And sure you can say that their are christian extremists - but fundamentally they don't represent a significant percentage of the populations of christians. The muslims have as their goal the conquest of uma. Their highest reward is for he who fights jihad. Until Islam can be reformed that this is not the predominant - or even acceptable view - there can be no peace.

ow, let us have a closer look at what the Koran says about the infidels:-

Slay the unbelievers wherever you find them(2:191)
Make war on the infidels living in your neighboorhood (9:123)
When opportunity arises, kill the infidels wherever you catch them (9:5)
Kill the Jews and the Christians if they do not convert to Islam or refuse to pay Jizya tax (9:29)
Any religion other than Islam is not acceptable (3:85)
The Jews and the Christians are perverts; fight them (9:30)
Maim and crucify the infidels if they criticise Islam. (5:33)
The infidels are unclean; do not let them into a mosque (9:28)
Punish the unbelievers with garments of fire, hooked iron rods, boiling water; melt their skin and bellies
(22:19)
Do not hanker for peace with the infidels; behead them when you catch them (47:4)
The unbelievers are stupid; urge the Muslims to fight them (8:65)
Muslims must not take the infidels as friends (3:28)
Terrorise and behead those who believe in scriptures other than the Qur’an (8:12)
Muslims must muster all weapons to terrorise the infidels (8:60)

The Qur’an certainly proclaims that when the time is appropriate, Muslims must use force to convert the unbelievers to Islam. For the non-Muslims, the alternative to this is to pay the humiliating protection money (Jizya tax) or be killed (by beheading, of course). A militarily dominant Islam, without doubt, precludes the peaceful co-existence with the unbelievers if the Muslims have to abide strictly by the unalterable stipulations of the Qur’an.


A lot of what you are quoting above are deliberate mistranslations. In the Q'ran it specifically says that to become a follower, that it has to be done without reservation or coercion, which contradicts them. Much of what you write above is probably taken out of context, it is late and I don't have the time to go through it, but I am always suspicious when people quote things like you just did.

Yes, I am familiar with the Muslim expansion into Europe, I am familiar that they took Vienna and the battles that went on, and I know who the Janisseries were...I also know about the Crusades, where when Jerusalem was taken in the first crusade, the 'noble Christians" with the blessing of the representatives of Rome that were with them, slaughtered 50,000 Muslim, Jewish and Christian locals, men , women and children, leaving very few survivors, yet when Sulamen took back Jerusalem, he spared the lives of those he fought against..who was the animal there and who was civilzed?

Ever read about what the Crusaders did as they marched across Europe and Asia Minor and so forth to get to the Holy land? Killed Jews, Killed Christians they decided they didn't like (Eastern Orthodox), raped women, looted, pillage and otherwise carried on like thugs....but they were Christian, right?

The reality is most Muslims don't hate Christians, the Saudis, The Iranians, The Egyptians represent minority viewpoints. Other than the tribal areas of the country, most Pakistani muslims don't hate the US, Indonesia is the most populous Muslim country and they don't hate us, most Muslims if they think of the US often think of it as a place to want to go, a lot of people come from the Muslim world, not because they want to bring Sharia here, but because they want to be free to live as they wish, too.

(in reply to Phydeaux)
Profile   Post #: 19
RE: Why Arabs Don't Like the U.S. - 7/12/2013 10:40:24 PM   
BitYakin


Posts: 882
Joined: 10/15/2005
Status: offline
I suppose I didn't specificly say this, but I never intended to imply I thought the USA was founded or in fact was a chirstian nation/gov't

I was just saying as many experts have said the intent of the line is clear, it was put there to assure that it was clear the treaty was between nations and not religions

that anti religious people choose to infer it means more than that, is ALSO hogwash

its also noteworthy that 10 years later when the treaty was ratified again that line was removed! I know it was 10 years later, but its also pretty much the same people in power 10 years later.

here is another interesting point, the treaty if we take it as the anti religion people like to take it says the country was not FOUNDED on christian principles, but it does not say that the ountry had not become a christian country

take for example a company named BSR, in ww2 it was started/founded as British Small Arms, then after the war stopped making guns and started making motorcycles, so just because it was founded as ONE thing, doesn't preclude it from BECOMING something entierly differant over a few year period

and AGAIN I am not saying the USA is or was or was ever intended to be a christian nation, just saying the treaty of tripoli proves nothing one way or the other!

its like comparing these two statements the man was shot by the shooter and the man stepped in front of the gun as he fired... both people viewed the same event, in both statments the man is dead, the only differance is perspective based on bias. one implies intent by the shooter, the other implies an accident...

< Message edited by BitYakin -- 7/12/2013 10:42:43 PM >

(in reply to njlauren)
Profile   Post #: 20
Page:   [1] 2 3 4 5   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> Why Arabs Don't Like the U.S. Page: [1] 2 3 4 5   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2024
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.125