quote:

ORIGINAL: Politesub53

quote:

ORIGINAL: BitYakin
NOOOO sorry that how YOU decided you wanted to see it...

as for SPOT the difference, dead is dead, HOW it happens is only something YOU wish to make an ISSUE...


according to YOU 44 HUNDRED over 10 years is worse than 44 THOUSAND in ONE YEAR...
I exaggerate, its more like 34 thousand per year really

but you do make ONE valid point, soldiers get killed by bombs etc etc etc.. which they VOLUNTEERED to face, whereas none of the children killed in auto accidents volunteered for ANYTHING...

you like to IGNORE that small point, those men were TOLD UP FRONT what might happen and DECIDED to join up ANYHOW!

during the same period 1038 firefighters and 1938 police officers were killed...

so almost 3000 police and fire fighters were killed in the same period, making being a soldier in Iraq/Afganistan only a bit more dangerous

tell ya what, next dead person you see ASK THEM which they would prefer, to die by BOMB or CAR ACCIDENT

Sadly, I know you are serious...... The suggestion that dead is dead so murder is okay is somewhat laughable.

quote:

ORIGINAL: thishereboi

I agree the suggestion that dead is dead so murder is okay is totally laughable. But he never said that so we're all good.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Politesub53

quote:

ORIGINAL: thishereboi

I agree the suggestion that dead is dead so murder is okay is totally laughable. But he never said that so we're all good.

Have another read.

"OR are those children just the COLLATERAL DAMAGE you find acceptable so you have the CONVENIENCE of DRIVING?"

quote:

ORIGINAL: Politesub53

You wouldnt get my point if it hit you round the head with a wet fish. Others will so I am happy enough with that.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Politesub53

You wouldnt get my point if it hit you round the head with a wet fish. Others will so I am happy enough with that.

quote:

ORIGINAL: thishereboi

quote:

ORIGINAL: Politesub53

You wouldnt get my point if it hit you round the head with a wet fish. Others will so I am happy enough with that.

In other words you can't show me where he suggested that murder was ok so you will simply imply I am to stupid to understand and move on.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Politesub53

quote:

ORIGINAL: thishereboi

quote:

ORIGINAL: Politesub53

You wouldnt get my point if it hit you round the head with a wet fish. Others will so I am happy enough with that.

In other words you can't show me where he suggested that murder was ok so you will simply imply I am to stupid to understand and move on.

I havent implied anything. And you meant "Too" stupid.

quote:

ORIGINAL: SadistDave

DMX has already admitted he's scared of Zimmerman. He knows he can't take him in a fair fight. If he thought he was the better man, he wouldn't have to "break every rule in boxing".

Zimmerman has boxing experience. DMX has prison bitch experience. It's not even a contest.

-SD-

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

How does this square with his trainer, under oath, saying that George was physically incapable of defending himself in a fight?


fucking good question.
Gawd the lies, they trip so easily from their forked tongues

quote:

ORIGINAL: lovmuffin

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

How does this square with his trainer, under oath, saying that George was physically incapable of defending himself in a fight?


fucking good question.
Gawd the lies, they trip so easily from their forked tongues

I don't think that's precisely what his trainer said but even so, hasn't he had time now to harden up a bit. I would think that regardless of his capability at the moment, he's in it for the payout.

quote:

ORIGINAL: PeonForHer

FR:

Zimmy has youth and weight on his side, though he's a bit of a porker. The Rap artist in question, who I've never heard of, looks as though he might have a trick or two. Canny looking bastard. On the whole I think the rap man could take Zimmy, because I reckon he's got more craftiness about him.

None of this is as much fun as the idea of the UK's millionaire art connoisseur Charles Saatchi taking on the Telegraph journalist 'Taki', though. *That* I would seriously pay good money to see.