LaTigresse
Posts: 26123
Joined: 1/15/2006 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Copper29 In exploring the kink community at large and this forum specifically, I've run across many people who state that they are only interested in "real" bdsm experience, or that they are frustrated with the lack of a "real" experience. However, it seems to me that there is no real consensus on what exactly that experience is, much like eating "real" food or having "real" hobbies. Every person has a different and specific idea about what that means, and has different ideas about what does not qualify as as true bdsm. This seems counteractive to me-- as if we were policing other's interests and kinks, as if one experience somehow invalidates another. What are we to gain from criticizing another's desire? Is it not "real" bdsm if they're new, or unsure about what they're doing? If they pay for it? If their hard limits are what someone else would consider vanilla? What for you, counts as "real" bdsm? What quantifies it? Why do you feel that your brand is the true version, while others are not? Discuss. For ME...real is whatever turns me on, sexually or mentally. The only, non physically in person, play that trips my trigger is coming here and making fun of people that get their undies in a bunch when people don't agree with their version of real. I especially love when they cyber flounce.
_____________________________
My twisted, self deprecating, sense of humour, finds alot to laugh about, in your lack of one! Just because you are well educated, articulate, and can use big, fancy words, properly........does not mean you are right!
|