BamaD
Posts: 20687
Joined: 2/27/2005 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: PeonForHer quote:
ORIGINAL: BamaD quote:
ORIGINAL: PeonForHer quote:
But it was Hendrix who was doing the defending No. Hendrix was doing the attacking. Let's face it, Bama, this was yet another situation in which some aggressive, paranoid berk was able to wrap himself up in the Second Amendment and all the state's protection flowing from it in order to make it look like 'defence'. He had a gun, ready to hand, because he likes his gun and likes what it can do. He didn't have a flashlight to hand in order to see that the man was old and had a flashlight rather than a gun . . . because he doesn't care about flashlights and see no relevance. The matter of this old man having Alzheimer's is a side issue, to me. What I can't get is why the killer here made too little an effort to evaluate the situation. Flashlights have been around for a very long time, now. For me, it is *not* an excuse that one is not to hand on a dark night at a time when you need to determine whether someone requires being shot at, or not. In what lunatic world do you have a gun at the ready - cleaned, primed, loaded - to shoot at someone in the dark - but no flashlight so that you can *properly see* the person you're shooting at? It should not be an acceptable excuse that he thought that the old man's flashlight was a gun, because he couldn't see it properly. That is disgraceful. Bad news somebody else said that. Yes, that 'somebody else' was me, Bama, much earlier in this thread. And you didn't respond to my comment that time, either. On the other hand, you *have* mentioned elsewhere that, as a fundamental principal, it's incumbent on the shooter to be able to see what he is shooting at. In this case, the shooter did not know what he was shooting at. This is evidenced by his being unable to distinguish between a gun and an unlit flashlight. He could have seen what he was shooting at if he'd had a working flashlight. He did not. All he had - or all he cared about having - was a working gun. Actually I did explain it someone else made the same asinine point and I decided to just answer it once. For your edification Hendrix was actually but in his mind Westbrook was defending his home. It would seem that anyone could understand this without explanation.
_____________________________
Government ranges from a necessary evil to an intolerable one. Thomas Paine People don't believe they can defend themselves because they have guns, they have guns because they believe they can defend themselves.
|