|
BamaD -> RE: California's gun restrictions are working! (8/25/2014 4:27:16 PM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: eulero83
quote:
ORIGINAL: BamaD
quote:
ORIGINAL: freedomdwarf1
quote:
ORIGINAL: BamaD
Wrong, he didn't use the best tactics.
That doesn't mean he did anything in violation of the law.
What he's eluding at is that the law is fucking wrong in the US compared to every other civilized country in the world.
And what I am eluding to is the fact that it makes no difference what you think the law should be here. I don't tell you that something is illegal there because it is here and I don't like the way do it. If you think declaring something illegal here because you don't do it that way in your worn out country is ok you are an idiot. I find it hard to believe that bad tactics are a crime anywhere.
We have a saying here in Alabama, usually reserved for loudmouth Yankees, I don't care how they do it where you come from.
With this logic you are not entitled to criticize californian gun laws, so if you are not suggesting people of alabama should rule all the united states, most of your comments on this thread are inappropriate. Like I explained to ThirdWheelWanted I can only talk about my expereince due to my culture an my personal sensibility, being aware in most aspects it's on the opposite side of the spectrum than american one. I'm not a gun control lobbyst, so it is just something it puzzles me like fishing dolphins in japan, I feel free to express my opinions.
I was pointing out that homicide is an unlawfull act, and self defence is a justification cause, so if all the prescriptions of the law are not perfectly respected you are committing a crime. In the second part of my post I was pointing out when a man can legally be justified even if there was no actual threat but just a presumed one, the response was not necessary, and there was no proportion between offence and response, there is a very tiny amount of responsibility required for gun owners.
Bingo
Wrong on all counts
A what happens in one part of the country affects the whole country
B the relationship is between reasonably understood threat and response. I guess people over there, being so much more advanced than we are can read minds. Thus we are not held accountable for what they think but what they do. For example in someone shoved open my door and tried to force me out without explanation I would not be responsible for them being drunk and in the wrong house but you gun a phobs would be ranting that I shot him for getting lost on the way home, and that getting lost doesn't warent being killed.
C In the case in question the man defending the home met all the legal requirements perfectly, he could just have used better tactics. You can't make not being a master of tactics a crime. That is unless you are a hopeless elitist.
|
|
|
|
