Collarchat.com

Join Our Community
Collarchat.com

Home  Login  Search 

RE: Cop put on leave after tasing 61-year-old woman


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Cop put on leave after tasing 61-year-old woman Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4 5   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Cop put on leave after tasing 61-year-old woman - 10/5/2014 8:35:15 AM   
thompsonx


Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline

ORIGINAL: BamaD

People were going to complain no matter what they did.

How often does anyone complain when the cops actually do their job in an appropriate manner? You seem to feel that tazing was not called for or was that just lip service?


(in reply to BamaD)
Profile   Post #: 41
RE: Cop put on leave after tasing 61-year-old woman - 10/5/2014 8:44:29 AM   
eulero83


Posts: 1470
Joined: 11/4/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx



What makes the cops wishes law?



the taser apparently

(in reply to thompsonx)
Profile   Post #: 42
RE: Cop put on leave after tasing 61-year-old woman - 10/5/2014 8:45:26 AM   
thompsonx


Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline

ORIGINAL: ThirdWheelWanted

As I understand it, the police had arrested several boys/men on drug charges. The woman came over and kept trying to involve herself in the situation. She was told to step back so that the scene could be secured. She refused and kept trying to interfere.

What law in my country prevents a citizen from speaking to the cops? What law in my country makes a cop exempt from scrutiny by the citizens he pretends to protect?


When told that she was under arrest,

When being placed under arrest it is required that you be informed as to what law you have broken?At least the is the law in my country.

she pulled away from the officer, then turned and began walking away. So as far as charges go, failure to comply with a lawful order,

She is not in the army and is under very little obligation to obey anything a cop tells her to do.


interfering with police/obstructing, resisting arrest, and possibly assault.

Asking what is going on is not interfering or obstructing, refusing to be intimidated is not resisting arrest. Assault differs from battery as you have been informed on numerous occasions.


I doubt she'll be charged, too much public outcry, but that's what she could be charged with.

The d.a. who would do so would have their ass spanked purple in court and laughed out of town at the next election....look at the phoquing vidio.

(in reply to ThirdWheelWanted)
Profile   Post #: 43
RE: Cop put on leave after tasing 61-year-old woman - 10/5/2014 8:48:25 AM   
thompsonx


Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline

ORIGINAL: thishereboi

And how would you have stopped her from walking away?


Believe it or not there are prescribed methods for taking a suspect into custody that do not involve tazing them...again we have two boy cops and one girl...is she phoquing wonder woman or was she just wearing a wonder bra that gave her the powers you seem to feel she has?

(in reply to thishereboi)
Profile   Post #: 44
RE: Cop put on leave after tasing 61-year-old woman - 10/5/2014 8:53:03 AM   
thompsonx


Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline

ORIGINAL: ThirdWheelWanted

Because people wouldn't have complained if two white cops had restrained her? Or had to bring her to the ground by force?

Why do you feel that "bringing someone to the ground by force" is part of two boy cops arresting a girl? What part of effecting a simple arrest does "bringing someone to the ground by force" part of?



This just seems like another unwinable situation for the police,

Only for the terminally stupid cop. Any cop with a three digit iq and a pulse could have made the arrest with no issue.

anything they could have done would have been wrong and they'd have been branded as racist thugs.

White cops arrest black women everyday and are not branded as racist thugs. Typically only racist thugs are branded as such.




(in reply to ThirdWheelWanted)
Profile   Post #: 45
RE: Cop put on leave after tasing 61-year-old woman - 10/5/2014 8:58:13 AM   
BamaD


Posts: 20687
Joined: 2/27/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: eulero83


quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx



What makes the cops wishes law?



the taser apparently

The need for them to control a crime scene.

_____________________________

Government ranges from a necessary evil to an intolerable one. Thomas Paine

People don't believe they can defend themselves because they have guns, they have guns because they believe they can defend themselves.

(in reply to eulero83)
Profile   Post #: 46
RE: Cop put on leave after tasing 61-year-old woman - 10/5/2014 9:02:08 AM   
thompsonx


Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline
ORIGINAL: ThirdWheelWanted

Except that's not what happened. She was told to step back, she refused.

What law says she has to "step back"?


It was only after she was told that she was under arrest

Arrested for not breaking any law.


that she decided to leave. At that point, it's not her choice.

What crime had she committed? No crime= no arrest. So the 1st. ammendment no longer applies if you are black and talking to a cop?


Had she left when she was told to do so, that's one thing, but she didn't. You can't just decide that you don't feel like being arrested and walk away.

If the arrest is illegal in texas you can not only walk away you can resist with deadly force.

And you're right, she probably won't be charged. Not because she isn't guilty, but because they're afraid of a riot. She broke the law, but of course she's going to get a pass.


You have yet to tell us what law she broke.


< Message edited by thompsonx -- 10/5/2014 9:51:32 AM >

(in reply to ThirdWheelWanted)
Profile   Post #: 47
RE: Cop put on leave after tasing 61-year-old woman - 10/5/2014 9:07:28 AM   
thompsonx


Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline

ORIGINAL: thishereboi

Yes they are but it doesn't always work out that way.

Really Perhaps you can cite for us where two boy cops got their butts spanked purple by a girl?

(in reply to thishereboi)
Profile   Post #: 48
RE: Cop put on leave after tasing 61-year-old woman - 10/5/2014 9:10:49 AM   
thompsonx


Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline

ORIGINAL: BamaD
ORIGINAL: thompsonx

What makes the cops wishes law?


The need for them to control a crime scene.

One more time moron what law makes a cops wishes the law?...They were not controlling a crime sceene they were avoiding the legitimate questions of someone they claim to be protecting.


(in reply to BamaD)
Profile   Post #: 49
RE: Cop put on leave after tasing 61-year-old woman - 10/5/2014 9:19:02 AM   
thompsonx


Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline

ORIGINAL: ThirdWheelWanted

It's against the law to hinder the police when they're making an arrest or investigating a crime.

Asking questions is hardly hindering.

Regardless of your own personal opinion of what should be allowed, you just can't do that. If there's police brutality, report it. Call the media. Take a video. But you're not allowed to walk into the middle of an arrest and start causing trouble.

If you were armed and saw a cop about to execute a suspect on the ground and in cuffs you would not intervene to save another human beings life?


And if you've read the reports, she wasn't complaining about brutality, she just "wanted to know what was going on".

How does that amount to "hindering"?

I suspect it might have something to do with one of the suspects being arrested also being named Young who was arrested for probation violations from a prior drug conviction.

Opinions are a lot like assholes aint they?

You said earlier that the police should have just ignored her. If you were trying to effect an arrest and cuff suspects, would you ignore someone at your back yelling?


Is that what happened?



You never know when someone might go from yelling to violence. (There was also already a crowd around the officers when Young pulled up and started interfering.)


Earlier you said she was asking questions

You also don't want random people contaminating any evidence that might be there.


You have thus far failed to provide any evidence that there was any evidence to be preserved since there was no police line tape aroung the "sceene of the crime"

That's why everyone is told to step back and clear the scene. That's a lawful order.

What law says that?



(in reply to ThirdWheelWanted)
Profile   Post #: 50
RE: Cop put on leave after tasing 61-year-old woman - 10/6/2014 10:19:15 AM   
Zonie63


Posts: 2826
Joined: 4/25/2011
From: The Old Pueblo
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: NorthernGent
Zonie,

There have to be rules and regulations so that we all know where we stand. This concept is inseparable from the Rule of Law.

As has been pointed out in this thread, the lady was causing a problem at a crime scene and in effect hampering the efforts of the polis to undertake their duties, and as such she needed to be reprimanded.


The rules and regulations are also supposed to apply to the police officers, too. No one is above the law. Due to past abuses, particularly when it comes to State and police treatment towards poor or disadvantaged communities, even more scrutiny has had to be put on the police and their methods. The lady simply wanted to know what was going on.

quote:


Where I do agree with you is that we have a situation over here whereby people can be stopped and detained at airports and the like, and have their property confiscated for this period of time, I think it's up to 10 hours; and the polis can do this without holding any reasonable suspicion of guilt (all to do with 'security'). In effect, they can stop and detain anyone. Accusations of a 'police state' could quite justifiably be levelled at our government and associates in this scenario.


The only difference is that citizens have a choice as to whether they want to enter an airport or travel by airplane. But if a person is in his/her own home or neighborhood (either trying to get home, to the store, to work, etc.), then that's a different matter entirely. At the airport, their primary concern is terrorism and potential threats to human life, although I would agree that what they're doing now is overkill...but not necessarily indicative of a "police state," since going to the airport or traveling by air is strictly voluntary. There are plenty of signs posted, and (unlike the lady who got tased) everyone has the choice to simply walk away and exit the airport perimeter.

Similarly, when one is in a motorized vehicle, the cops have a certain amount of leeway in pulling people over if they're driving in a manner which might put other lives at risk. Sometimes they might use this to their advantage and pull people over for bullshit reasons - or there might be speed traps set up just for the sake of writing citations to gain revenue. Some jurisdictions have also set up DUI checkpoints at certain times. Then there are also various checkpoints established by the Border Patrol, who also have quite a bit of leeway in the regions along the border - not just at the border, but quite a ways inside too.


quote:


It's the age old question of how order and liberty can be balanced.

And, in my opinion, the balance was struck with this lady in the US and I don't think she can have any complaints, whereas what is happening over here with detaining people in the interests of 'security' is another matter.


I think it really depends on how high the stakes are and whether or not it's really worth it. Is society any safer or more secure due to this "lawbreaker" being tased and subdued by the police? And her complaint is valid and being taken seriously by the powers that be within that jurisdiction. This was not a case of balancing liberty with security, since this lady was clearly no threat to national security, or society, or anyone else for that matter. There was no clear and present danger.

And the whole pretext for the cops being out there in the first place - arresting people for "drugs" - even that might be a questionable use of the law which justifies too many other encroachments upon civil liberties. A few months ago, some Border Patrol agents shot and killed an unarmed man who was running away because they caught him with some marijuana in his car. (They "thought" he had a gun.) Cops going around acting like Rambo over a bag of weed. Is this a proper balance between liberty and security? Are the "security" benefits to society really that great as to justify such a ridiculous level of overkill? I think not.

(in reply to NorthernGent)
Profile   Post #: 51
RE: Cop put on leave after tasing 61-year-old woman - 10/6/2014 10:50:42 AM   
thishereboi


Posts: 14463
Joined: 6/19/2008
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Zonie63


quote:

ORIGINAL: NorthernGent
Zonie,

There have to be rules and regulations so that we all know where we stand. This concept is inseparable from the Rule of Law.

As has been pointed out in this thread, the lady was causing a problem at a crime scene and in effect hampering the efforts of the polis to undertake their duties, and as such she needed to be reprimanded.


The rules and regulations are also supposed to apply to the police officers, too. No one is above the law. Due to past abuses, particularly when it comes to State and police treatment towards poor or disadvantaged communities, even more scrutiny has had to be put on the police and their methods. The lady simply wanted to know what was going on.



Yes the rules apply to cops to but they were not breaking any at the time. And while I agree the lady probably was just trying to find out what was happening, when the cops told her to stop she should have stopped. Hopefully she has learned her lesson but I would not be surprised if she didn't. This idea that anyone can ignore the cops and act like asshats and the cops can't do anything to hurt them is bullshit. Yes the cops are supposed to go to extremes to keep people safe but after reading all the headlines does anyone here actually believe it's always going to work that way. So why would you intentionally put yourself in a position to provoke them. Much easier to just do what they say and step back.

_____________________________

"Sweetie, you're wasting your gum" .. Albert


This here is the boi formerly known as orfunboi


(in reply to Zonie63)
Profile   Post #: 52
RE: Cop put on leave after tasing 61-year-old woman - 10/6/2014 11:18:24 AM   
eulero83


Posts: 1470
Joined: 11/4/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: thishereboi


quote:

ORIGINAL: Zonie63


quote:

ORIGINAL: NorthernGent
Zonie,

There have to be rules and regulations so that we all know where we stand. This concept is inseparable from the Rule of Law.

As has been pointed out in this thread, the lady was causing a problem at a crime scene and in effect hampering the efforts of the polis to undertake their duties, and as such she needed to be reprimanded.


The rules and regulations are also supposed to apply to the police officers, too. No one is above the law. Due to past abuses, particularly when it comes to State and police treatment towards poor or disadvantaged communities, even more scrutiny has had to be put on the police and their methods. The lady simply wanted to know what was going on.



Yes the rules apply to cops to but they were not breaking any at the time. And while I agree the lady probably was just trying to find out what was happening, when the cops told her to stop she should have stopped. Hopefully she has learned her lesson but I would not be surprised if she didn't. This idea that anyone can ignore the cops and act like asshats and the cops can't do anything to hurt them is bullshit. Yes the cops are supposed to go to extremes to keep people safe but after reading all the headlines does anyone here actually believe it's always going to work that way. So why would you intentionally put yourself in a position to provoke them. Much easier to just do what they say and step back.


and exactly what would the lesson be? never question authority?

(in reply to thishereboi)
Profile   Post #: 53
RE: Cop put on leave after tasing 61-year-old woman - 10/6/2014 11:26:07 AM   
BamaD


Posts: 20687
Joined: 2/27/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: eulero83


quote:

ORIGINAL: thishereboi


quote:

ORIGINAL: Zonie63


quote:

ORIGINAL: NorthernGent
Zonie,

There have to be rules and regulations so that we all know where we stand. This concept is inseparable from the Rule of Law.

As has been pointed out in this thread, the lady was causing a problem at a crime scene and in effect hampering the efforts of the polis to undertake their duties, and as such she needed to be reprimanded.


The rules and regulations are also supposed to apply to the police officers, too. No one is above the law. Due to past abuses, particularly when it comes to State and police treatment towards poor or disadvantaged communities, even more scrutiny has had to be put on the police and their methods. The lady simply wanted to know what was going on.



Yes the rules apply to cops to but they were not breaking any at the time. And while I agree the lady probably was just trying to find out what was happening, when the cops told her to stop she should have stopped. Hopefully she has learned her lesson but I would not be surprised if she didn't. This idea that anyone can ignore the cops and act like asshats and the cops can't do anything to hurt them is bullshit. Yes the cops are supposed to go to extremes to keep people safe but after reading all the headlines does anyone here actually believe it's always going to work that way. So why would you intentionally put yourself in a position to provoke them. Much easier to just do what they say and step back.


and exactly what would the lesson be? never question authority?

How about don't interfere with a crime scene?

_____________________________

Government ranges from a necessary evil to an intolerable one. Thomas Paine

People don't believe they can defend themselves because they have guns, they have guns because they believe they can defend themselves.

(in reply to eulero83)
Profile   Post #: 54
RE: Cop put on leave after tasing 61-year-old woman - 10/6/2014 11:32:28 AM   
eulero83


Posts: 1470
Joined: 11/4/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD


quote:

ORIGINAL: eulero83

and exactly what would the lesson be? never question authority?

How about don't interfere with a crime scene?


supposing that ws a crime scene and there were proof to preservate, that's just an hypothesis and far from fact, what law says the sentence for interfering with a crime scene is being electrocuted till the loss of consciousness?

(in reply to BamaD)
Profile   Post #: 55
RE: Cop put on leave after tasing 61-year-old woman - 10/6/2014 11:40:10 AM   
BamaD


Posts: 20687
Joined: 2/27/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: eulero83


quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD


quote:

ORIGINAL: eulero83

and exactly what would the lesson be? never question authority?

How about don't interfere with a crime scene?


supposing that ws a crime scene and there were proof to preservate, that's just an hypothesis and far from fact, what law says the sentence for interfering with a crime scene is being electrocuted till the loss of consciousness?

Actually it is a documented fact, and they didn't tase her for that but for resisting arrest, haven't you been paying attention?

_____________________________

Government ranges from a necessary evil to an intolerable one. Thomas Paine

People don't believe they can defend themselves because they have guns, they have guns because they believe they can defend themselves.

(in reply to eulero83)
Profile   Post #: 56
RE: Cop put on leave after tasing 61-year-old woman - 10/6/2014 12:07:37 PM   
eulero83


Posts: 1470
Joined: 11/4/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD


quote:

ORIGINAL: eulero83


quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD


quote:

ORIGINAL: eulero83

and exactly what would the lesson be? never question authority?

How about don't interfere with a crime scene?


supposing that ws a crime scene and there were proof to preservate, that's just an hypothesis and far from fact, what law says the sentence for interfering with a crime scene is being electrocuted till the loss of consciousness?

Actually it is a documented fact, and they didn't tase her for that but for resisting arrest, haven't you been paying attention?


Ok so post the source with the list of proof she contaminated. And please post te florida's law that says you get electrocuted for resisting arrest without violence.

(in reply to BamaD)
Profile   Post #: 57
RE: Cop put on leave after tasing 61-year-old woman - 10/6/2014 12:14:49 PM   
BamaD


Posts: 20687
Joined: 2/27/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: eulero83


quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD


quote:

ORIGINAL: eulero83


quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD


quote:

ORIGINAL: eulero83

and exactly what would the lesson be? never question authority?

How about don't interfere with a crime scene?


supposing that ws a crime scene and there were proof to preservate, that's just an hypothesis and far from fact, what law says the sentence for interfering with a crime scene is being electrocuted till the loss of consciousness?

Actually it is a documented fact, and they didn't tase her for that but for resisting arrest, haven't you been paying attention?


Ok so post the source with the list of proof she contaminated. And please post te florida's law that says you get electrocuted for resisting arrest without violence.

Are you aware that you can interfere with an investigation without touching evidence. She was obstructing the officers who were attempting to arrest drug dealers. She wasn't electrocuted, she was shocked, I will assume the difference didn't translate well and that you are not exaggerating on purpose.
Show me were it is ok to just walk off when told you are under arrest and that the cops can't use force unless you do. If that were the case even murderer couldn't be arrested as long as they didn't use violence against the police.

_____________________________

Government ranges from a necessary evil to an intolerable one. Thomas Paine

People don't believe they can defend themselves because they have guns, they have guns because they believe they can defend themselves.

(in reply to eulero83)
Profile   Post #: 58
RE: Cop put on leave after tasing 61-year-old woman - 10/6/2014 12:27:18 PM   
PeonForHer


Posts: 19612
Joined: 9/27/2008
Status: offline
quote:

She was obstructing the officers who were attempting to arrest drug dealers.


Eh? A tased and incapacitated woman lying on the ground and whose health now needs to be seen to presents even more of an obstruction, doesn't it?

_____________________________

http://www.domme-chronicles.com


(in reply to BamaD)
Profile   Post #: 59
RE: Cop put on leave after tasing 61-year-old woman - 10/6/2014 1:12:48 PM   
BamaD


Posts: 20687
Joined: 2/27/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: PeonForHer

quote:

She was obstructing the officers who were attempting to arrest drug dealers.


Eh? A tased and incapacitated woman lying on the ground and whose health now needs to be seen to presents even more of an obstruction, doesn't it?

no

_____________________________

Government ranges from a necessary evil to an intolerable one. Thomas Paine

People don't believe they can defend themselves because they have guns, they have guns because they believe they can defend themselves.

(in reply to PeonForHer)
Profile   Post #: 60
Page:   <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4 5   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Cop put on leave after tasing 61-year-old woman Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4 5   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2024
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.094