Collarchat.com

Join Our Community
Collarchat.com

Home  Login  Search 

RE: Another "successful" carry story


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Another "successful" carry story Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4 5   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Another "successful" carry story - 12/30/2014 9:31:44 PM   
Kirata


Posts: 15477
Joined: 2/11/2006
From: USA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: kdsub

Then how can you be so sure gun ownership is a large enough deterrent to crime with no proof to back it up...

Nowhere in this thread have I said that gun ownership is a deterrent to crime. Nowhere. Period. But hey, I can see why you might think that I did because you've apparently noticed that that's the conclusion the studies suggest.

quote:

ORIGINAL: kdsub

to say the proliferation of conceal and carry is worth the carnage of children's loss of life.

Writing in 2001 (source), Steven D. Levitt, Professor of Economics, University of Chicago, noted the following...

In 1997 alone (the last year for which data are available), 742 children under the age of 10 drowned in the United States last year alone. Approximately 550 of those drownings — about 75 percent of the total — occurred in residential swimming pools. According to the most recent statistics, there are about six million residential pools, meaning that one young child drowns annually for every 11,000 pools. About 175 children under the age of 10 died in 1998 as a result of guns.

It's has been estimated that there are about 300 million guns in the US. Do the math...

On average, if you both own a gun and have a swimming pool in the backyard, the swimming pool is about 100 times more likely to kill a child than the gun is.

The loss of any child's life is a tragedy. But carnage because of legal carry? On what planet?

K.

(in reply to kdsub)
Profile   Post #: 41
RE: Another "successful" carry story - 12/30/2014 9:40:37 PM   
kdsub


Posts: 12180
Joined: 8/16/2007
Status: offline
Since we are using statistics... here is a real study with references listed for review... check it out.

The above is of course more than just youth... but those sections are clearly stated.

Once again let me say... I am only trying to find statistics that will show that the proliferation of conceal and carry and its benefit in reducing crime is enough to offset the death and injury of these children. Otherwise if someone can show me that all these guns save more lives then are lost to accidental deaths and injury then it would mean something in the gun debate... if not then what the hell are we advocating... the ownership of toys and not give a shit how many kids they kill?

Butch

< Message edited by kdsub -- 12/30/2014 9:42:38 PM >


_____________________________

Mark Twain:

I don't see any use in having a uniform and arbitrary way of spelling words. We might as well make all clothes alike and cook all dishes alike. Sameness is tiresome; variety is pleasing

(in reply to Kirata)
Profile   Post #: 42
RE: Another "successful" carry story - 12/30/2014 9:43:47 PM   
slvemike4u


Posts: 17896
Joined: 1/15/2008
From: United States
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: kdsub

Then how can you be so sure gun ownership is a large enough deterrent to crime with no proof to back it up... at least enough proof to say the proliferation of conceal and carry is worth the carnage of children's loss of life. I am not necessarily against gun ownership but perhaps the type of weapons and where they should be allowed and penalties for carelessness resulting in injury or death may need to be weighed against the hundreds of children killed or injured each year to accidental gun accidents... Is it worth it?

I believe studies should be made by neutral entities to find answers to this question. There may very well be solutions without repealing conceal and carry but this will require new laws and regulations that will not happen without statistics to show a need.

Butch



But the NRA won't allow such studies.
The NRA and it's lobbying efforts has denied funding to the CDC the NIH to study the issue.
The NRA and it's lobbying arm has blocked confirmation hearings for the head of the Federal Bureau of Alcohol,Tobacco,Firearms and Explosives.
The NRA and it's lobbying arm has declared that any one who has the temerity to characterize gun violence as a health issue can not be confirmed as Surgeon General

_____________________________

If we want things to stay as they are,things will have to change...Tancredi from "the Leopard"

Forget Guns-----Ban the pools

Funny stuff....https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eNwFf991d-4


(in reply to kdsub)
Profile   Post #: 43
RE: Another "successful" carry story - 12/30/2014 9:57:17 PM   
kdsub


Posts: 12180
Joined: 8/16/2007
Status: offline
I have never understood the NRA positions when it comes to these type of studies... or their opposition to new technology in weaponry for one owner operation firearms, registration, and tracking.

The give an inch they will take a mile attitude is crap

Butch

_____________________________

Mark Twain:

I don't see any use in having a uniform and arbitrary way of spelling words. We might as well make all clothes alike and cook all dishes alike. Sameness is tiresome; variety is pleasing

(in reply to slvemike4u)
Profile   Post #: 44
RE: Another "successful" carry story - 12/30/2014 9:57:36 PM   
Kirata


Posts: 15477
Joined: 2/11/2006
From: USA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: kdsub

I am only trying to find statistics that will show that the proliferation of conceal and carry and its benefit in reducing crime is enough to offset the death and injury of these children.

Really? On the evidence of your responses, it seems to me that you care more about restricting legal carry than you do about children dying.

K.

(in reply to kdsub)
Profile   Post #: 45
RE: Another "successful" carry story - 12/30/2014 9:58:16 PM   
BamaD


Posts: 20687
Joined: 2/27/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: kdsub

quote:

No comment on firearms safety courses.


What does that have to do with the number of children killed or injured..and how can facts be an exaggeration?

I am all for more stringent requirements for gun safety but that has nothing to do with exaggerating figures.

Butch



I didn't say you exaggerated but these figures are routinely exaggerated by claiming children when they include 25 year olds by claiming accidental death for people engaged in shootouts with the police, The devil is in the details.
I am for greater safety with firearms, cars and swimming pools, are you aware that the number of children who drown in pools dwarfs the number killed in firearms accidents?
One is too many but you have to have perspective.

_____________________________

Government ranges from a necessary evil to an intolerable one. Thomas Paine

People don't believe they can defend themselves because they have guns, they have guns because they believe they can defend themselves.

(in reply to kdsub)
Profile   Post #: 46
RE: Another "successful" carry story - 12/30/2014 10:04:22 PM   
kdsub


Posts: 12180
Joined: 8/16/2007
Status: offline
Good come back with useful information... I would be happy for you to tell me how I should word a debate to protect children... I'm all for it. Or do you believe there is no real problem with accidental gun deaths among children... and do you further think hand guns are not a factor in these deaths... or do you think the death of a few kids is not important compared to the freedom to carry hand guns in public or have them readily available to children in the home? Just because other reasons for death happen does not mean these deaths are OK does it?

I am at least willing to change my position if someone...even you ... can show that guns save more lives of owners than the lives of children they take.

Butch

< Message edited by kdsub -- 12/30/2014 10:13:02 PM >


_____________________________

Mark Twain:

I don't see any use in having a uniform and arbitrary way of spelling words. We might as well make all clothes alike and cook all dishes alike. Sameness is tiresome; variety is pleasing

(in reply to Kirata)
Profile   Post #: 47
RE: Another "successful" carry story - 12/30/2014 10:06:01 PM   
kdsub


Posts: 12180
Joined: 8/16/2007
Status: offline
quote:

I didn't say you exaggerated


lol... no big thing Bama... BUT YOU DID JUST THAT.

Butch

_____________________________

Mark Twain:

I don't see any use in having a uniform and arbitrary way of spelling words. We might as well make all clothes alike and cook all dishes alike. Sameness is tiresome; variety is pleasing

(in reply to BamaD)
Profile   Post #: 48
RE: Another "successful" carry story - 12/30/2014 10:08:45 PM   
BamaD


Posts: 20687
Joined: 2/27/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: kdsub

quote:

I didn't say you exaggerated


lol... no big thing Bama... BUT YOU DID JUST THAT.

Butch

Go back I was careful to blame your sources, not you.
True the first time I just stated that the figures you used were exaggerated, but I never said it was your fault. Very rarely does anyone just make up figure's and it is not something I would expect from you. But well meaning people often accept distorted figures.
For example I never quote figures from GOA or NRA but people often quote things from Bloomberg which is at least as biased a source that uses the kind of data I described.
It would help if you could name your source.

< Message edited by BamaD -- 12/30/2014 10:14:45 PM >


_____________________________

Government ranges from a necessary evil to an intolerable one. Thomas Paine

People don't believe they can defend themselves because they have guns, they have guns because they believe they can defend themselves.

(in reply to kdsub)
Profile   Post #: 49
RE: Another "successful" carry story - 12/30/2014 10:11:12 PM   
Kirata


Posts: 15477
Joined: 2/11/2006
From: USA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: kdsub

Good come back with useful information...

In light of the links I've already posted, I think you just proved my point.

K.


(in reply to kdsub)
Profile   Post #: 50
RE: Another "successful" carry story - 12/30/2014 10:11:31 PM   
kdsub


Posts: 12180
Joined: 8/16/2007
Status: offline
Damn Bama... I listed no sources. When it comes to the children killed and injured you said this was not what you were talking about... you are not making sense... so you misspoke... no big deal.

_____________________________

Mark Twain:

I don't see any use in having a uniform and arbitrary way of spelling words. We might as well make all clothes alike and cook all dishes alike. Sameness is tiresome; variety is pleasing

(in reply to BamaD)
Profile   Post #: 51
RE: Another "successful" carry story - 12/30/2014 10:16:49 PM   
BamaD


Posts: 20687
Joined: 2/27/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: kdsub

Damn Bama... I listed no sources. When it comes to the children killed and injured you said this was not what you were talking about... you are not making sense... so you misspoke... no big deal.

No the children killed is only a piece of the picture, I was trying to bring the whole picture.
I know you didn't list sources, that makes it impossible to evaluate them.

_____________________________

Government ranges from a necessary evil to an intolerable one. Thomas Paine

People don't believe they can defend themselves because they have guns, they have guns because they believe they can defend themselves.

(in reply to kdsub)
Profile   Post #: 52
RE: Another "successful" carry story - 12/30/2014 10:49:04 PM   
Edwynn


Posts: 4105
Joined: 10/26/2008
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD


quote:

ORIGINAL: Edwynn


quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD


quote:

ORIGINAL: Edwynn

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD
the real and better question here is, why do liberals hate guns so much?

Because they represent self reliance, when we should rely totally on the government.



So then, your sense of 'self-reliance' equates to both absolute reliance on corporations, and gun ownership?

Not my or most others' notion of self-reliance, in any sense.




First I never said a word about corporations, and this from a man who brags about running away from problems ("I have been mugged and when that happens I move to another neighborhood).


If you have a link to my ever saying that withinin your quote or anything resembling it, here or anywhere else, please link it. Otherwise shut up.

As for who proposes what about whatever, here's this from your post; "Because they represent self reliance, when we should rely totally on the government."

First, whoever in this thread, OP or otherwise, said anything about "relying totally on government"? The fact that no one on the thread said any such thing didn't stop you, did it?


Just save yourself further embarrassment and shut up.


Lets see, in this case our safety should be in the hands of the police of course you don't use the words I did, it would make it clear how ridiculous you position is.


Howevermuch I distrust the police, and even more however I might commiserate with what they have to deal with, I'm only saying that somebody should be in charge of letting guns out to moms or dads who let firearms into the public, especially in reach of kids.

But if you think that dullwit parents should be let loose on the streets with their guns and their toddlers, lest the police or other agency deign to interfere, then the other shoppers should just suck it up and deal with the reality that all the 'smarter' element of society should just deal with whatever collateral damage might occur elsewhere.

Better that my kid or wife take a stray bullet in the head from a clueless fuckwit or his/her child while we're shopping or strolling than the government intrude upon our freedom.

I hear ya.



(in reply to BamaD)
Profile   Post #: 53
RE: Another "successful" carry story - 12/30/2014 11:08:50 PM   
Edwynn


Posts: 4105
Joined: 10/26/2008
Status: offline
I'm not saying a damn thing about what anyone has in their house to make them feel better.

But when you bring it out in public, I and everyone else has a say-so in the matter.

(in reply to Edwynn)
Profile   Post #: 54
RE: Another "successful" carry story - 12/31/2014 12:49:29 AM   
Aylee


Posts: 24103
Joined: 10/14/2007
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: kdsub

Then how can you be so sure gun ownership is a large enough deterrent to crime with no proof to back it up... at least enough proof to say the proliferation of conceal and carry is worth the carnage of children's loss of life. I am not necessarily against gun ownership but perhaps the type of weapons and where they should be allowed and penalties for carelessness resulting in injury or death may need to be weighed against the hundreds of children killed or injured each year to accidental gun accidents... Is it worth it?

I believe studies should be made by neutral entities to find answers to this question. There may very well be solutions without repealing conceal and carry but this will require new laws and regulations that will not happen without statistics to show a need.

Butch




"proliferation of conceal and carry is worth the carnage of children's loss of life. "

Please tell me that you want to outlaw backyard pools in order tp prevent the death of children.

_____________________________

Ceterum censeo Carthaginem esse delendam

I don’t always wgah’nagl fhtagn. But when I do, I ph’nglui mglw’nafh R’lyeh.

(in reply to kdsub)
Profile   Post #: 55
RE: Another "successful" carry story - 12/31/2014 3:54:09 AM   
eulero83


Posts: 1470
Joined: 11/4/2005
Status: offline
FR

somehow it's a dog trying to bite it's tie, gun owners accept the risk they put their families in because they feel it reduces a bigger danger that's the outside violence, that by the way is probably created by the aviability of guns in first place, that the gun owner feel safe to deal with because he has a gun and fuck everybody else.
The question and variables are all connected, so for one statistic there is always another one that give the chance for the gun advocates to bring the discussion to a dead end. The only thing you could do is look how other countries are doing, and the answer is: just fine... probably better.
On top of that there is the old adage, Hitler took the guns, Stalin took the guns, Mao took the guns (and by the way Mussolini was pro gun ownership) so we need them to protect our freedom, than one see a governament spying on almost every person in your country, that tortures people with no regrets no resoults and many times no proofs, a violent and militarized police, civil forfeitures used to buy margarita's machines... but no armed reactions from the people.

I suppose the only thing I can say is have fun with your guns, any other sentence is futile.

(in reply to Aylee)
Profile   Post #: 56
RE: Another "successful" carry story - 12/31/2014 5:02:25 AM   
dcnovice


Posts: 37282
Joined: 8/2/2006
Status: offline
quote:

Toddler reaches into purse and gun goes off, killing mom

http://www.darwinawards.com/slush/submit_story.html

_____________________________

No matter how cynical you become,
it's never enough to keep up.

JANE WAGNER, THE SEARCH FOR SIGNS OF
INTELLIGENT LIFE IN THE UNIVERSE

(in reply to Musicmystery)
Profile   Post #: 57
RE: Another "successful" carry story - 12/31/2014 5:46:02 AM   
Lucylastic


Posts: 40310
Status: offline
Arizonas regulations for pools found below
36-1681. Pool enclosures; requirements; exceptions; enforcement

A. A swimming pool, or other contained body of water that contains water eighteen inches or more in depth at any point and that is wider than eight feet at any point and is intended for swimming, shall be protected by an enclosure surrounding the pool area, as provided in this section.

B. A swimming pool or other contained body of water required to be enclosed by subsection A whether a belowground or aboveground pool shall meet the following requirements:

1. Be entirely enclosed by at least a five foot wall, fence or other barrier as measured on the exterior side of the wall, fence or barrier.

2. Have no openings in the wall, fence or barrier through which a spherical object four inches in diameter can pass. The horizontal components of any wall, fence or barrier shall be spaced not less than forty-five inches apart measured vertically or shall be placed on the pool side of a wall, fence or barrier which shall not have any opening greater than one and three-quarter inches measured horizontally. Wire mesh or chain link fences shall have a maximum mesh size of one and three-quarter inches measured horizontally.

3. Gates for the enclosure shall:

(a) Be self-closing and self-latching with the latch located at least fifty-four inches above the underlying ground or on the pool side of the gate with a release mechanism at least five inches below the top of the gate and no opening greater than one-half inch within twenty-four inches of the release mechanism or be secured by a padlock or similar device which requires a key, electric opener or integral combination which can have the latch at any height.

(b) Open outward from the pool.

4. The wall, fence or barrier shall not contain openings, handholds or footholds accessible from the exterior side of the enclosure that can be used to climb the wall, fence or barrier.

5. The wall, fence or barrier shall be at least twenty inches from the water's edge.

C. If a residence or living area constitutes part of the enclosure required by subsection B for a swimming pool or other contained body of water in lieu of the requirements of subsection B, there shall be one of the following:

1. Between the swimming pool or other contained body of water and the residence or living area, a minimum four foot wall, fence or barrier to the pool area which meets all of the requirements of subsection B, paragraphs 2 through 5.

2. The pool shall be protected by a motorized safety pool cover which requires the operation of a key switch which meets the American society of testing and materials emergency standards 13-89 and which does not require manual operation other than the use of the key switch.

3. All ground level doors or other doors with direct access to the swimming pool or other contained body of water shall be equipped with a self-latching device which meets the requirements of subsection B, paragraph 3, subdivision (a). Emergency escape or rescue windows from sleeping rooms with access to the swimming pool or other contained body of water shall be equipped with a latching device not less than fifty-four inches above the floor. All other openable dwelling unit or guest room windows with similar access shall be equipped with a screwed in place wire mesh screen, or a keyed lock that prevents opening the window more than four inches, or a latching device located not less than fifty-four inches above the floor.

4. The swimming pool shall be an aboveground swimming pool which has non-climbable exterior sides which are a minimum height of four feet. Any access ladder or steps shall be removable without tools and secured in an inaccessible position with a latching device not less than fifty-four inches above the ground when the pool is not in use.

D. This section does not apply to:

1. A system of sumps, irrigation canals, irrigation, flood control or drainage works constructed or operated for the purpose of storing, delivering, distributing or conveying water.

2. Stock ponds, storage tanks, livestock operations, livestock watering troughs or other structures used in normal agricultural practices.

3. Public or semi-public swimming pools.

4. A swimming pool or contained body of water or barrier constructed prior to the effective date of this article.

5. Political subdivisions which enact a swimming pool barrier ordinance before the effective date of this article.

6. Political subdivisions which adopt ordinances after the effective date of this article provided that the ordinance is equal to or more stringent than the provisions of this article.

7. A residence in which all residents are at least six years of age.

E. A person on entering into an agreement to build a swimming pool or contained body of water or sell, rent or lease a dwelling with a swimming pool or contained body of water shall give the buyer, lessee or renter a notice explaining safety education and responsibilities of pool ownership as approved by the department of health services.

F. A person who violates this section is guilty of a petty offense except that no fine may be imposed if a sufficient showing is made that the person has subsequently equipped the swimming pool or contained body of water with a barrier pursuant to the standards adopted in subsection B within forty-five days of citation and has attended an approved swimming pool safety course.
http://www.azleg.state.az.us/ars/36/01681.htm



_____________________________

(•_•)
<) )╯SUCH
/ \

\(•_•)
( (> A NASTY
/ \

(•_•)
<) )> WOMAN
/ \

Duchess Of Dissent
Dont Hate Love

(in reply to dcnovice)
Profile   Post #: 58
RE: Another "successful" carry story - 12/31/2014 6:01:46 AM   
thishereboi


Posts: 14463
Joined: 6/19/2008
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

Arizonas regulations for pools found below
36-1681. Pool enclosures; requirements; exceptions; enforcement

A. A swimming pool, or other contained body of water that contains water eighteen inches or more in depth at any point and that is wider than eight feet at any point and is intended for swimming, shall be protected by an enclosure surrounding the pool area, as provided in this section.

B. A swimming pool or other contained body of water required to be enclosed by subsection A whether a belowground or aboveground pool shall meet the following requirements:

1. Be entirely enclosed by at least a five foot wall, fence or other barrier as measured on the exterior side of the wall, fence or barrier.

2. Have no openings in the wall, fence or barrier through which a spherical object four inches in diameter can pass. The horizontal components of any wall, fence or barrier shall be spaced not less than forty-five inches apart measured vertically or shall be placed on the pool side of a wall, fence or barrier which shall not have any opening greater than one and three-quarter inches measured horizontally. Wire mesh or chain link fences shall have a maximum mesh size of one and three-quarter inches measured horizontally.

3. Gates for the enclosure shall:

(a) Be self-closing and self-latching with the latch located at least fifty-four inches above the underlying ground or on the pool side of the gate with a release mechanism at least five inches below the top of the gate and no opening greater than one-half inch within twenty-four inches of the release mechanism or be secured by a padlock or similar device which requires a key, electric opener or integral combination which can have the latch at any height.

(b) Open outward from the pool.

4. The wall, fence or barrier shall not contain openings, handholds or footholds accessible from the exterior side of the enclosure that can be used to climb the wall, fence or barrier.

5. The wall, fence or barrier shall be at least twenty inches from the water's edge.

C. If a residence or living area constitutes part of the enclosure required by subsection B for a swimming pool or other contained body of water in lieu of the requirements of subsection B, there shall be one of the following:

1. Between the swimming pool or other contained body of water and the residence or living area, a minimum four foot wall, fence or barrier to the pool area which meets all of the requirements of subsection B, paragraphs 2 through 5.

2. The pool shall be protected by a motorized safety pool cover which requires the operation of a key switch which meets the American society of testing and materials emergency standards 13-89 and which does not require manual operation other than the use of the key switch.

3. All ground level doors or other doors with direct access to the swimming pool or other contained body of water shall be equipped with a self-latching device which meets the requirements of subsection B, paragraph 3, subdivision (a). Emergency escape or rescue windows from sleeping rooms with access to the swimming pool or other contained body of water shall be equipped with a latching device not less than fifty-four inches above the floor. All other openable dwelling unit or guest room windows with similar access shall be equipped with a screwed in place wire mesh screen, or a keyed lock that prevents opening the window more than four inches, or a latching device located not less than fifty-four inches above the floor.

4. The swimming pool shall be an aboveground swimming pool which has non-climbable exterior sides which are a minimum height of four feet. Any access ladder or steps shall be removable without tools and secured in an inaccessible position with a latching device not less than fifty-four inches above the ground when the pool is not in use.

D. This section does not apply to:

1. A system of sumps, irrigation canals, irrigation, flood control or drainage works constructed or operated for the purpose of storing, delivering, distributing or conveying water.

2. Stock ponds, storage tanks, livestock operations, livestock watering troughs or other structures used in normal agricultural practices.

3. Public or semi-public swimming pools.

4. A swimming pool or contained body of water or barrier constructed prior to the effective date of this article.

5. Political subdivisions which enact a swimming pool barrier ordinance before the effective date of this article.

6. Political subdivisions which adopt ordinances after the effective date of this article provided that the ordinance is equal to or more stringent than the provisions of this article.

7. A residence in which all residents are at least six years of age.

E. A person on entering into an agreement to build a swimming pool or contained body of water or sell, rent or lease a dwelling with a swimming pool or contained body of water shall give the buyer, lessee or renter a notice explaining safety education and responsibilities of pool ownership as approved by the department of health services.

F. A person who violates this section is guilty of a petty offense except that no fine may be imposed if a sufficient showing is made that the person has subsequently equipped the swimming pool or contained body of water with a barrier pursuant to the standards adopted in subsection B within forty-five days of citation and has attended an approved swimming pool safety course.
http://www.azleg.state.az.us/ars/36/01681.htm





And yet accidental drownings are on the top of the list of cause of death. But I have yet to hear anyone seriously suggest we do away with them.

_____________________________

"Sweetie, you're wasting your gum" .. Albert


This here is the boi formerly known as orfunboi


(in reply to Lucylastic)
Profile   Post #: 59
RE: Another "successful" carry story - 12/31/2014 6:08:38 AM   
Lucylastic


Posts: 40310
Status: offline
whoooosh right over your head



_____________________________

(•_•)
<) )╯SUCH
/ \

\(•_•)
( (> A NASTY
/ \

(•_•)
<) )> WOMAN
/ \

Duchess Of Dissent
Dont Hate Love

(in reply to thishereboi)
Profile   Post #: 60
Page:   <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4 5   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Another "successful" carry story Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4 5   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2024
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.191