quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

LMAO its easier than admitting the alternative reason
mark levin is a douche bag on par with rush
you really need to expand your horizons and read whats out there that is lessss..... ridiculous.

Your ad hominem attacks are easily matched

Barack Obama is a lazy, clueless pile of shit who golfs while ISIS carves up innocent civilians right under his nose, and Hillary is a power mad bitch bent on getting rich on the back of the taxpayer

You really should pick your heroes a lot more carefully

And the purpose of that dribble .......is to what?.....
I ask because it really is not making any impression beyond your opposite opinion to mine.
have a nice day.

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

Oh, so we know since we do not have Cheneys emails, nor Ws, and there was a private meeting with Cheney and corporations, they are hiding something to this day, nor do we have Issas emails, or Gowdys, nor any of the other rightwing Nazi shiteaters.


As we said all along, and you have proven, they are hiding something.

quote:

ORIGINAL: CreativeDominant

"Mrs. Clinton is not the first government official — or first secretary of state — to use a personal email account on which to conduct official business. But her exclusive use of her private email, for all of her work, appears unusual..."
http://mobile.nytimes.com/2015/03/03/us/politics/hillary-clintons-use-of-private-email-at-state-department-raises-flags.html?referrer=&_r=0

But according to the National Archives and Records Administration, there was a regulation in place governing Clinton's use of personal email for official business while she was secretary of state. And it seems she did not fully abide by this. http://m.motherjones.com/politics/2015/03/hillary-clinton-state-department-emails

The State Department has had to rely upon Clinton and her aides to ensure it now has a complete record of her emails. Last October, the department asked secretaries of state going back to Madeleine Albright if any possessed material that should be within the agency's records system. Within weeks, Clinton handed in those 55,000 pages of email. Her team cites this as an act of transparency on her part. But one need not be a conspiracy theorist to note that there's no telling if she and her aides hung on to certain emails they did not want to share. In law enforcement parlance, the chain of custody has been tainted.
http://m.motherjones.com/politics/2015/03/hillary-clinton-state-department-emails

A senior State Department official tells ABC News that under rules in place while Mrs. Clinton was secretary of state, employees could only use private email accounts for official business if they turn those emails over to be entered into government computers. This policy is still in place.
http://abcnewsradioonline.com/politics-news/hillary-clinton-violated-state-department-policy-for-nearly.html

*note to joether* those aren't "radical right-wing" sources

quote:

[email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], and [email protected].

Other email addresses include [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], and [email protected].

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

Yes, we know that there is no hope and change or transparency with the rightwing Nazi shiteaters. So, good to go with that. They offer death and destruction.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

LMAO its easier than admitting the alternative reason
mark levin is a douche bag on par with rush
you really need to expand your horizons and read whats out there that is lessss..... ridiculous.

Your ad hominem attacks are easily matched

Barack Obama is a lazy, clueless pile of shit who golfs while ISIS carves up innocent civilians right under his nose, and Hillary is a power mad bitch bent on getting rich on the back of the taxpayer

You really should pick your heroes a lot more carefully

And the purpose of that dribble .......is to what?.....
I ask because it really is not making any impression beyond your opposite opinion to mine.
have a nice day.

Debate based on ad hominems and other such fallacies are ignoble and detract from the conversation

It is better to try to focus on things like policy, ideology and ideas

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

Same proofs required of you, and you do not indulge. Seems pointless for me.

You say this with absolutely no scintilla of proof:
Seems Hillary may have done a couple things here
1 - Violated rules on use of personal e-mail addresses for official business
2 - Release of classified documents to an unclassified source (not whistleblowing)


seems we have no proof of this, rather rightwing Nazi shiteating. Russia Today is as close as you can come to anything, but nobody is here with motivation, nobody has prosecuted her in a court of law, and so on and so forth.

We can see though, that Obamacare has been repealed some 55 times. So, thats kinda fun, it is pretty incontestable prima facie proof of my view.