RemoteUser -> RE: -=Money Pigs/FinDomery - real fetish or fake? (soapbox)=- (7/29/2015 9:57:55 PM)
|
I think time will be the great justifier for financial domination. If it is still prevalent five years from now, I suspect it will be sidelined much in the same way Gor was. I remember clearly when Gor first hit the online scene. A lot of people scoffed at it, said it was just playing at BDSM, putting on roles crudely written out by a juvenile delinquent. But Gor stayed on, and in time while it carved its own niche out into the community it was segregated from the mainstream, and still is to this day. People who want it, will get into it, and people who don't, will avoid it. The current chaos is mainly over the fact that financial domination is a competitive market, and based on money, so there will always be thousands of young girls fighting over wallets. The reality of needing to advertise for this fetish means that any mainstream forum will be inundated, and the only way to stem that off will be segregation, fair or not. Otherwise, people will find exactly what is going on now: for every few journal pages they scroll through they will be subjected to advertisements for a fetish they do not subscribe to. I understand reluctance towards segregation. Heck, why not just make a list of choices to pick and choose and let people weed out everything but what they're focused on? Well. There's coding, there's funding, there's time; if you put one group to the side you'll be called on playing foul, if you make a choose-your-own-fetish system to keep the playing board level then you curb natural social functions. If you throw everyone together you'll have others crying foul for not being pandered to. Nonetheless, I see the segregation coming. Not now. I'll say, three years. Call me on it in 2018, we'll see how things have progressed by then. If the kink doesn't bottom out, sidelining may become the only way to go.
|
|
|
|