Collarchat.com

Join Our Community
Collarchat.com

Home  Login  Search 

RE: Hillary Probed


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Hillary Probed Page: <<   < prev  114 115 [116] 117 118   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Hillary Probed - 12/14/2017 5:42:47 PM   
Lucylastic


Posts: 40310
Status: offline
maaaybe because nothing in the evidence to that date needed the results of an interview?
nah that cant be it...Oh wait...from your own links photo...

quote:

Parts of a letter written by Sen. Ron Johnson, R-Wis., to FBI director Christopher Wray are photographed in Washington, Thursday, Dec. 14, 2017.
Johnson says edits to a draft FBI statement on the Hillary Clinton email investigation appear to have watered down the significance of the bureau’s findings.
Johnson said he had obtained from the FBI a draft statement that then-Director James Comey produced in May 2016 in anticipation of closing out the Clinton email case.
The document shows line-by-line edits. Though the FBI had not yet interviewed Clinton about her use of a private email server, officials had already determined that criminal charges were probably not warranted. (AP Photo/Jon Elswick)


_____________________________

(•_•)
<) )╯SUCH
/ \

\(•_•)
( (> A NASTY
/ \

(•_•)
<) )> WOMAN
/ \

Duchess Of Dissent
Dont Hate Love

(in reply to BoscoX)
Profile   Post #: 2301
RE: Hillary Probed - 12/14/2017 6:41:07 PM   
BoscoX


Posts: 10663
Joined: 12/10/2016
Status: offline

Keep mindlessly flailing away Lucy


Senator: Comey’s remarks on Clinton probe heavily edited

WASHINGTON (AP) — A draft statement former FBI Director James Comey prepared in anticipation of concluding the Hillary Clinton email case without criminal charges was heavily edited to change the “tone and substance” of the remarks, a Republican senator said Thursday.

Some of the edits proposed to the May 2016 draft, obtained by The Associated Press, appear to soften the gravity of the bureau’s findings.

Comey, for instance, initially wrote that the FBI believed that Clinton and her aides were “grossly negligent” in their handling of classified information, language also contained in the relevant criminal statute.

But the text was edited to say that the former secretary of state and her aides were simply “extremely careless” in their use of a personal email server, a phrase Comey adopted for his July 5 public announcement that the FBI would not be recommending charges.

In addition, while Comey initially said it was “reasonably likely” that “hostile actors” had gained access to Clinton’s email server, the text was edited to say that such an intrusion was “possible.”

Though the FBI had not yet interviewed Clinton, then the Democratic candidate for president, at the time the statement was drafted, FBI officials had already determined that criminal charges were probably not warranted and had begun thinking about how to present that conclusion to the public.

MORE

_____________________________

Hunter is the smartest guy I know

(in reply to Lucylastic)
Profile   Post #: 2302
RE: Hillary Probed - 12/15/2017 12:11:48 AM   
Lucylastic


Posts: 40310
Status: offline
Flailing is now taking an extraction from your own link.
Yep
flailing is pretending its not in there


_____________________________

(•_•)
<) )╯SUCH
/ \

\(•_•)
( (> A NASTY
/ \

(•_•)
<) )> WOMAN
/ \

Duchess Of Dissent
Dont Hate Love

(in reply to BoscoX)
Profile   Post #: 2303
RE: Hillary Probed - 12/15/2017 9:16:39 PM   
BoscoX


Posts: 10663
Joined: 12/10/2016
Status: offline

Imagine if on Aug. 15, 208, Strzok wrote: “I want to believe the path you threw out for consideration in [Deputy FBI Director Andrew McCabe’s] office that there’s no way Obama gets elected – but I’m afraid we can’t take that risk. It’s like an insurance policy in the unlikely event you die before you’re 40 …”

Imagine the riots, if news got out

_____________________________

Hunter is the smartest guy I know

(in reply to Lucylastic)
Profile   Post #: 2304
RE: Hillary Probed - 12/15/2017 10:05:18 PM   
Lucylastic


Posts: 40310
Status: offline
imagine...yep.
imagine we could see the texts from the select committees records....imagine gowdys, or chaffetz's texts
Or the text results that resulted in this....

While McCarthy walked back his comments, Democrats quickly seized on his gaffe and it ultimately contributed to the derailing of McCarthy's brief speaker bid.

"Everybody thought Hillary Clinton was unbeatable, right?" McCarthy had said. "But we put together a Benghazi special committee, a select committee. What are her numbers today? Her numbers are dropping. Why? Because she's untrustable. But no one would have known any of that had happened had we not fought."

http://www.cnn.com/2015/10/10/politics/benghazi-committee-democrats-react-ex-staffer-accusations/index.html
http://thehill.com/homenews/house/255734-mccarthy-critics-see-opening-after-benghazi-blunder
https://www.ohio.com/akron/news/politics/democrats-say-house-majority-leader-kevin-mccarthy-comments-on-clinton-are-shameful
And the text discussing how to spin it...
from the hillary camp and the repubs in the select committee.

watching the spin on this FBI is against trump on behalf of hils is a mugs game.
if they are that bad, hils would have bribed the EC....and be in the white house.

She wouldnt have conceded that for sure, LOL

talking of conceding..
about roy moore....
whats the gossip, god has him on hold?








_____________________________

(•_•)
<) )╯SUCH
/ \

\(•_•)
( (> A NASTY
/ \

(•_•)
<) )> WOMAN
/ \

Duchess Of Dissent
Dont Hate Love

(in reply to BoscoX)
Profile   Post #: 2305
RE: Hillary Probed - 12/15/2017 10:10:07 PM   
BoscoX


Posts: 10663
Joined: 12/10/2016
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

imagine...yep.
imagine we could see the texts from the select committees records....imagine gowdys, or chaffetz's texts
Or the text results that resulted in this....

While McCarthy walked back his comments, Democrats quickly seized on his gaffe and it ultimately contributed to the derailing of McCarthy's brief speaker bid.

"Everybody thought Hillary Clinton was unbeatable, right?" McCarthy had said. "But we put together a Benghazi special committee, a select committee. What are her numbers today? Her numbers are dropping. Why? Because she's untrustable. But no one would have known any of that had happened had we not fought."

http://www.cnn.com/2015/10/10/politics/benghazi-committee-democrats-react-ex-staffer-accusations/index.html
http://thehill.com/homenews/house/255734-mccarthy-critics-see-opening-after-benghazi-blunder
https://www.ohio.com/akron/news/politics/democrats-say-house-majority-leader-kevin-mccarthy-comments-on-clinton-are-shameful
And the text discussing how to spin it...
from the hillary camp and the repubs in the select committee.

watching the spin on this FBI is against trump on behalf of hils is a mugs game.
if they are that bad, hils would have bribed the EC....and be in the white house.

She wouldnt have conceded that for sure, LOL

talking of conceding..
about roy moore....
whats the gossip, god has him on hold?



Democrats and Republicans both investigate the executive branch through congress, that has been an accepted congressional role since forever

So what

The FBI wasn't doing it's job, neither was the DOJ

The FBI, the DOJ, the CIA, trying to steer the election toward Hillary after ignoring Hillary's crimes, then working toward the de facto coup against Trump, is unacceptable

That's extremely dangerous banana republic stuff

Even if you are far too insane to get something as simple and basic as that


_____________________________

Hunter is the smartest guy I know

(in reply to Lucylastic)
Profile   Post #: 2306
RE: Hillary Probed - 12/15/2017 10:34:26 PM   
BoscoX


Posts: 10663
Joined: 12/10/2016
Status: offline

Beside that, the congressmen were working to get the truth out while the FBI worked to suppress the truth about Hillary and manufacture false narratives about Donald Trump

What was the "insurance policy" discussed in Deputy FBI Director Andrew McCabe’s office, in case Hillary lost

_____________________________

Hunter is the smartest guy I know

(in reply to BoscoX)
Profile   Post #: 2307
RE: Hillary Probed - 12/15/2017 11:03:43 PM   
Lucylastic


Posts: 40310
Status: offline
and Im flailing, LMAO...
there's more evidence of trumps obstruction and corruption from trumps own mouth, let alone his tweets and actions, than there is with what you are so proudly bragging.
graspy mcgrasperson.
that you buy into this blatant division by trump isnt shocking, you would eat a shit sandwhich if he told you to.




_____________________________

(•_•)
<) )╯SUCH
/ \

\(•_•)
( (> A NASTY
/ \

(•_•)
<) )> WOMAN
/ \

Duchess Of Dissent
Dont Hate Love

(in reply to BoscoX)
Profile   Post #: 2308
RE: Hillary Probed - 12/16/2017 5:13:35 AM   
WhoreMods


Posts: 10691
Joined: 5/6/2016
Status: offline
...but Hilary!

_____________________________

On the level and looking for a square deal.

(in reply to BoscoX)
Profile   Post #: 2309
RE: Hillary Probed - 12/16/2017 6:11:52 AM   
BoscoX


Posts: 10663
Joined: 12/10/2016
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: WhoreMods

...but Hilary!


The thread is about Hillary

You are a moron

_____________________________

Hunter is the smartest guy I know

(in reply to WhoreMods)
Profile   Post #: 2310
RE: Hillary Probed - 12/16/2017 6:25:54 AM   
BoscoX


Posts: 10663
Joined: 12/10/2016
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

and Im flailing, LMAO...
there's more evidence of trumps obstruction and corruption from trumps own mouth, let alone his tweets and actions, than there is with what you are so proudly bragging.
graspy mcgrasperson.
that you buy into this blatant division by trump isnt shocking, you would eat a shit sandwhich if he told you to.



Obstructing a coup? There was no underlying crime.

How dare he obstruct a coup attempt against him

What was the "insurance policy" discussed in Deputy FBI Director Andrew McCabe’s office, in case Hillary lost

Whatever happened to all of the howling about "collusion with the Russians"

It was all bullshit and lies, so now you howl about "obstruction" because he fired the guy leftists howled about more than anyone

_____________________________

Hunter is the smartest guy I know

(in reply to Lucylastic)
Profile   Post #: 2311
RE: Hillary Probed - 12/16/2017 7:16:06 AM   
MasterJaguar01


Posts: 2323
Joined: 12/2/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: BoscoX

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

and Im flailing, LMAO...
there's more evidence of trumps obstruction and corruption from trumps own mouth, let alone his tweets and actions, than there is with what you are so proudly bragging.
graspy mcgrasperson.
that you buy into this blatant division by trump isnt shocking, you would eat a shit sandwhich if he told you to.



Obstructing a coup? There was no underlying crime.

How dare he obstruct a coup attempt against him

What was the "insurance policy" discussed in Deputy FBI Director Andrew McCabe’s office, in case Hillary lost

Whatever happened to all of the howling about "collusion with the Russians"

It was all bullshit and lies, so now you howl about "obstruction" because he fired the guy leftists howled about more than anyone


BoscoX you had me there agreeing with you about Hilary, and I was just about to post... And then I saw this????

A coup????????? Really? Is that the new talking point for the right wing?

No underlying crime? There are 3 indictments already!

I don't know about the howling, but it's pretty clear. The Russians offered assistance (e.g. the Wikileaks secure key to read hacked DNC emails) (The Quid) in return for removing the sanctions on Russia. (The Quo) Quid Pro Quo.

The Quid is already proven in emails. The Quo is proven in the President's unwillingness to implement the sanctions that Congress voted on. (And his non stop Putin ass-licking)

Call it Treason. Call it Corruption. I call it a "High Crime" as defined in Article II of the Constitution.

(in reply to BoscoX)
Profile   Post #: 2312
RE: Hillary Probed - 12/16/2017 7:26:31 AM   
BoscoX


Posts: 10663
Joined: 12/10/2016
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: MasterJaguar01


quote:

ORIGINAL: BoscoX

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

and Im flailing, LMAO...
there's more evidence of trumps obstruction and corruption from trumps own mouth, let alone his tweets and actions, than there is with what you are so proudly bragging.
graspy mcgrasperson.
that you buy into this blatant division by trump isnt shocking, you would eat a shit sandwhich if he told you to.



Obstructing a coup? There was no underlying crime.

How dare he obstruct a coup attempt against him

What was the "insurance policy" discussed in Deputy FBI Director Andrew McCabe’s office, in case Hillary lost

Whatever happened to all of the howling about "collusion with the Russians"

It was all bullshit and lies, so now you howl about "obstruction" because he fired the guy leftists howled about more than anyone


BoscoX you had me there agreeing with you about Hilary, and I was just about to post... And then I saw this????

A coup????????? Really? Is that the new talking point for the right wing?

No underlying crime? There are 3 indictments already!

I don't know about the howling, but it's pretty clear. The Russians offered assistance (e.g. the Wikileaks secure key to read hacked DNC emails) (The Quid) in return for removing the sanctions on Russia. (The Quo) Quid Pro Quo.

The Quid is already proven in emails. The Quo is proven in the President's unwillingness to implement the sanctions that Congress voted on. (And his non stop Putin ass-licking)

Call it Treason. Call it Corruption. I call it a "High Crime" as defined in Article II of the Constitution.



Three indictments? For minor procedural offenses totally unrelated to your insane Russia hysteria

There is no evidence anywhere of your literally insane "Russia" bs - nobody is even bringing that up anymore except for you. Everyone else has moved on to the women who have been hired to make false sexual harassment allegations against him

If refusing to enforce laws were a crime, Obama would have plenty of girlfriends named Bubba for life. That the president is working with Russia to do what Obama refused to do, bring the hammer down on ISIS, really pisses you off, doesn't it

Then you have the nerve to howl "treason" about HIM


_____________________________

Hunter is the smartest guy I know

(in reply to MasterJaguar01)
Profile   Post #: 2313
RE: Hillary Probed - 12/16/2017 7:39:15 AM   
MasterJaguar01


Posts: 2323
Joined: 12/2/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: BoscoX

quote:

ORIGINAL: MasterJaguar01


quote:

ORIGINAL: BoscoX

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

and Im flailing, LMAO...
there's more evidence of trumps obstruction and corruption from trumps own mouth, let alone his tweets and actions, than there is with what you are so proudly bragging.
graspy mcgrasperson.
that you buy into this blatant division by trump isnt shocking, you would eat a shit sandwhich if he told you to.



Obstructing a coup? There was no underlying crime.

How dare he obstruct a coup attempt against him

What was the "insurance policy" discussed in Deputy FBI Director Andrew McCabe’s office, in case Hillary lost

Whatever happened to all of the howling about "collusion with the Russians"

It was all bullshit and lies, so now you howl about "obstruction" because he fired the guy leftists howled about more than anyone


BoscoX you had me there agreeing with you about Hilary, and I was just about to post... And then I saw this????

A coup????????? Really? Is that the new talking point for the right wing?

No underlying crime? There are 3 indictments already!

I don't know about the howling, but it's pretty clear. The Russians offered assistance (e.g. the Wikileaks secure key to read hacked DNC emails) (The Quid) in return for removing the sanctions on Russia. (The Quo) Quid Pro Quo.

The Quid is already proven in emails. The Quo is proven in the President's unwillingness to implement the sanctions that Congress voted on. (And his non stop Putin ass-licking)

Call it Treason. Call it Corruption. I call it a "High Crime" as defined in Article II of the Constitution.



Three indictments? For minor procedural offenses totally unrelated to your insane Russia hysteria

There is no evidence anywhere of your literally insane "Russia" bs - nobody is even bringing that up anymore except for you

If refusing to enforce laws were a crime, Obama would have plenty of girlfriends named Bubba for life. That the president is working with Russia to do what Obama refused to do, bring the hammer down on ISIS, really pisses you off, doesn't it




Totally unrelated? Not quite. The evidence is pouring in daily.

https://www.justice.gov/file/1007346/download

Defendant PAPADOPOULOS made the following material false statements and material omissions to the FBI:

a. Defendant PAPADOPOULOS claimed that his interactions with an overseas professor, who defendant PAPADOPOULOS understood to have substantial
connections to Russian government officials, occurred before defendant PAPADOPOULOS became a foreign policy adviser to the Campaign. Defendant PAPADOPOULOS acknowledged that the professor had told him about the Russians possessing "dirt" on then-candidate Hillary Clinton in the form of"thousands of emails," but stated multiple times that he learned that information prior to joining the Campaign. In truth and in fact, however, defendant PAPADOPOULOS learned he would be an advisor to the Campaign in early March, and met the professor on or about March 14, 2016; the professor only took interest in defendant
PAPADOPOULOS because of his status with the Campaign; and the professor told defendant PAPADOPOULOS about the "thousands of emails" on or about April 26, 2016, when defendant PAPADOPOULOS had been a foreign policy adviser to the Campaign for over a month.

b. Defendant PAPADOPOULOS further told the investigating agents that the professor was "a nothing" and "just a guy talk[ing] up connections or something." In truth and in fact, however, defendant PAPADOPOULOS understood that the professor had substantial connections to Russian government officials (and had met with some of those officials in Moscow immediately prior to telling defendant PAPADOPOULOS about the "thousands of emails") and, over a period of months, defendant PAPADOPOULOS repeatedly sought to use the professor's Russian connections in an effort to arrange a meeting between the Campaign and
Russian government officials.

c. Defendant PAPADOPOULOS claimed he met a certain female Russian national before he joined the Campaign and that their communications consisted of emails such as, '"Hi , how are you?"' In truth and in fact, however, defendant PAPADOPOULOS met the female Russian national on or about March 24, 2016, after he had become an adviser to the Campaign; he believed that she had connections to Russian government officials; and he sought to use her Russian connections over a period of months in an effort to arrange a meeting between the Campaign and Russian government officials.

(in reply to BoscoX)
Profile   Post #: 2314
RE: Hillary Probed - 12/16/2017 7:46:10 AM   
BoscoX


Posts: 10663
Joined: 12/10/2016
Status: offline

Minor procedural charges unrelated to your "treason" howling

Despite your brainwashing meeting people is not yet a crime, even if they have funny accents

FWIW, the president has direct control over foreign policy, not congress

_____________________________

Hunter is the smartest guy I know

(in reply to MasterJaguar01)
Profile   Post #: 2315
RE: Hillary Probed - 12/16/2017 7:58:22 AM   
MasterJaguar01


Posts: 2323
Joined: 12/2/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: BoscoX

FWIW, the president has direct control over foreign policy, not congress


Nope. it is definitely shared.

From this link: A great article:

https://www.cfr.org/backgrounder/us-foreign-policy-powers-congress-and-president

The U.S. Constitution parcels out foreign relations powers to both the executive and legislative branches. It grants some powers, like command of the military, exclusively to the president and others, like the regulation of foreign commerce, to Congress, while still others it divides among the two or simply does not assign.

Regulation of Foreign Commerce? (Gee, could that be Sanctions???)

(in reply to BoscoX)
Profile   Post #: 2316
RE: Hillary Probed - 12/16/2017 8:02:02 AM   
MasterDrakk


Posts: 321
Status: offline
Then why, demented howler, have each and every one of them that have had these meetings we know about so far, lied about it, withheld evidence from the committee investigations, and covered it up?

(in reply to BoscoX)
Profile   Post #: 2317
RE: Hillary Probed - 12/16/2017 8:08:32 AM   
MasterJaguar01


Posts: 2323
Joined: 12/2/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: MasterDrakk

Then why, demented howler, have each and every one of them that have had these meetings we know about so far, lied about it, withheld evidence from the committee investigations, and covered it up?


He answered that one before. He said they are just stupid, because they had no reason to do that :)

Apparently, there is a massive hiring of stupid people in the administration.

(in reply to MasterDrakk)
Profile   Post #: 2318
RE: Hillary Probed - 12/26/2017 7:16:37 AM   
BoscoX


Posts: 10663
Joined: 12/10/2016
Status: offline

FR

Analysis: The quiet probe into Clinton email investigation could be a landmine for Robert Mueller

WASHINGTON — In early January, news that the Justice Department’s inspector general launched an investigation into the government's disputed handling of the Hillary Clinton email inquiry was quickly overtaken by the chaotic run-up to President Trump’s inauguration.

Nearly a year later, Inspector General Michael Horowitz’s wide-ranging review of the FBI and Justice’s work in the politically-charged Clinton case now looms as a potential landmine for Russia special counsel Robert Mueller.

For months, Horowitz’s investigation — which has amassed interviews with former Attorney General Loretta Lynch, former FBI Director James Comey and other key officials — had been grinding on in near anonymity. That is, until earlier this month when the inspector general acknowledged that Mueller was alerted to a cache of text messages exchanged between two FBI officials on his staff that disparaged Trump.

The communications, involving senior counter-intelligence agent Peter Strzok and bureau lawyer Lisa Page, were gathered in the course of Horowitz’s internal review of the Clinton case, which Strzok also helped oversee. Horowitz’s investigation is not examining Mueller’s operation. But the disclosures already have provided a hammer to Trump loyalists who are escalating their criticisms of the legitimacy of the special counsel’s inquiry.


Earlier this month, FBI Director Christopher Wray and Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein only highlighted the potential gravity of the inspector general's work when they repeatedly urged Republican House committee members during separate hearings to withhold judgment about allegations of bias within the FBI until the internal Justice probe is completed.

Justice officials have indicated that a report is likely in the next few months.

"The inspector general's investigation is very important," House Judiciary Committee Chairman Bob Goodlatte, R-Va., told Rosenstein at a Dec. 13 hearing. The deputy attorney general cited the probe multiple times as the reason for declining to respond to lawmakers' questions about how the texts might affect Mueller's probe.

"It is very encouraging to us that (Horowitz) is doing what I think is good, unbiased work," the chairman said.

MORE

_____________________________

Hunter is the smartest guy I know

(in reply to MasterJaguar01)
Profile   Post #: 2319
RE: Hillary Probed - 12/26/2017 9:42:24 AM   
Nnanji


Posts: 4552
Joined: 3/29/2016
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: MasterJaguar01


quote:

ORIGINAL: BoscoX

quote:

ORIGINAL: MasterJaguar01


quote:

ORIGINAL: BoscoX

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

and Im flailing, LMAO...
there's more evidence of trumps obstruction and corruption from trumps own mouth, let alone his tweets and actions, than there is with what you are so proudly bragging.
graspy mcgrasperson.
that you buy into this blatant division by trump isnt shocking, you would eat a shit sandwhich if he told you to.



Obstructing a coup? There was no underlying crime.

How dare he obstruct a coup attempt against him

What was the "insurance policy" discussed in Deputy FBI Director Andrew McCabe’s office, in case Hillary lost

Whatever happened to all of the howling about "collusion with the Russians"

It was all bullshit and lies, so now you howl about "obstruction" because he fired the guy leftists howled about more than anyone


BoscoX you had me there agreeing with you about Hilary, and I was just about to post... And then I saw this????

A coup????????? Really? Is that the new talking point for the right wing?

No underlying crime? There are 3 indictments already!

I don't know about the howling, but it's pretty clear. The Russians offered assistance (e.g. the Wikileaks secure key to read hacked DNC emails) (The Quid) in return for removing the sanctions on Russia. (The Quo) Quid Pro Quo.

The Quid is already proven in emails. The Quo is proven in the President's unwillingness to implement the sanctions that Congress voted on. (And his non stop Putin ass-licking)

Call it Treason. Call it Corruption. I call it a "High Crime" as defined in Article II of the Constitution.



Three indictments? For minor procedural offenses totally unrelated to your insane Russia hysteria

There is no evidence anywhere of your literally insane "Russia" bs - nobody is even bringing that up anymore except for you

If refusing to enforce laws were a crime, Obama would have plenty of girlfriends named Bubba for life. That the president is working with Russia to do what Obama refused to do, bring the hammer down on ISIS, really pisses you off, doesn't it




Totally unrelated? Not quite. The evidence is pouring in daily.

https://www.justice.gov/file/1007346/download

Defendant PAPADOPOULOS made the following material false statements and material omissions to the FBI:

a. Defendant PAPADOPOULOS claimed that his interactions with an overseas professor, who defendant PAPADOPOULOS understood to have substantial
connections to Russian government officials, occurred before defendant PAPADOPOULOS became a foreign policy adviser to the Campaign. Defendant PAPADOPOULOS acknowledged that the professor had told him about the Russians possessing "dirt" on then-candidate Hillary Clinton in the form of"thousands of emails," but stated multiple times that he learned that information prior to joining the Campaign. In truth and in fact, however, defendant PAPADOPOULOS learned he would be an advisor to the Campaign in early March, and met the professor on or about March 14, 2016; the professor only took interest in defendant
PAPADOPOULOS because of his status with the Campaign; and the professor told defendant PAPADOPOULOS about the "thousands of emails" on or about April 26, 2016, when defendant PAPADOPOULOS had been a foreign policy adviser to the Campaign for over a month.

b. Defendant PAPADOPOULOS further told the investigating agents that the professor was "a nothing" and "just a guy talk[ing] up connections or something." In truth and in fact, however, defendant PAPADOPOULOS understood that the professor had substantial connections to Russian government officials (and had met with some of those officials in Moscow immediately prior to telling defendant PAPADOPOULOS about the "thousands of emails") and, over a period of months, defendant PAPADOPOULOS repeatedly sought to use the professor's Russian connections in an effort to arrange a meeting between the Campaign and
Russian government officials.

c. Defendant PAPADOPOULOS claimed he met a certain female Russian national before he joined the Campaign and that their communications consisted of emails such as, '"Hi , how are you?"' In truth and in fact, however, defendant PAPADOPOULOS met the female Russian national on or about March 24, 2016, after he had become an adviser to the Campaign; he believed that she had connections to Russian government officials; and he sought to use her Russian connections over a period of months in an effort to arrange a meeting between the Campaign and Russian government officials.

Ya pops, the evidence is pouring daily. Drip drip drip.

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2017/dec/25/fbi-says-russia-dossiers-collusion-charges-unsubst/


(in reply to MasterJaguar01)
Profile   Post #: 2320
Page:   <<   < prev  114 115 [116] 117 118   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Hillary Probed Page: <<   < prev  114 115 [116] 117 118   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2024
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.703