Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: Hillary Probed


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Hillary Probed Page: <<   < prev  51 52 [53] 54 55   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Hillary Probed - 5/12/2016 6:38:41 PM   
BamaD


Posts: 20687
Joined: 2/27/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Greta75

I find it interesting that Jon Stewart, a super left wing dude, has publicly called Hillary a fake.

I guess he must be for Bernie.

maybe he is just honest

_____________________________

Government ranges from a necessary evil to an intolerable one. Thomas Paine

People don't believe they can defend themselves because they have guns, they have guns because they believe they can defend themselves.

(in reply to Greta75)
Profile   Post #: 1041
RE: Hillary Probed - 5/12/2016 6:40:48 PM   
Lucylastic


Posts: 40310
Status: offline
There are more than a few here under different accounts because they were "moderated" in the past. Im specifically talking about P&R.
I hope you reported him.



_____________________________

(•_•)
<) )╯SUCH
/ \

\(•_•)
( (> A NASTY
/ \

(•_•)
<) )> WOMAN
/ \

Duchess Of Dissent
Dont Hate Love

(in reply to bounty44)
Profile   Post #: 1042
RE: Hillary Probed - 5/12/2016 6:55:10 PM   
stef


Posts: 10215
Joined: 1/26/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

There are more than a few here under different accounts because they were "moderated" in the past. Im specifically talking about P&R.
I hope you reported him.

For what? I don't think reading posts under a different username is a violation of the rules since you can read using a guest account. If he posts from that account, I would imagine that to be a different matter.

_____________________________

Welcome to PoliticSpace! If you came here expecting meaningful BDSM discussions, boy are you in the wrong place.

"Hypocrisy has consequences"

(in reply to Lucylastic)
Profile   Post #: 1043
RE: Hillary Probed - 5/12/2016 7:03:00 PM   
Lucylastic


Posts: 40310
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: stef


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

There are more than a few here under different accounts because they were "moderated" in the past. Im specifically talking about P&R.
I hope you reported him.

For what? I don't think reading posts under a different username is a violation of the rules since you can read using a guest account. If he posts from that account, I would imagine that to be a different matter.

dammit, LOL go spoil my fun why dont you.
he seems to be enjoying himself...I thought it would make him happier if he could do that as well!!

_____________________________

(•_•)
<) )╯SUCH
/ \

\(•_•)
( (> A NASTY
/ \

(•_•)
<) )> WOMAN
/ \

Duchess Of Dissent
Dont Hate Love

(in reply to stef)
Profile   Post #: 1044
RE: Hillary Probed - 5/12/2016 8:19:12 PM   
Phydeaux


Posts: 4828
Joined: 1/4/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

There are more than a few here under different accounts because they were "moderated" in the past. Im specifically talking about P&R.
I hope you reported him.



To whom are you referring Lucy?

(in reply to Lucylastic)
Profile   Post #: 1045
RE: Hillary Probed - 5/12/2016 8:20:49 PM   
Phydeaux


Posts: 4828
Joined: 1/4/2004
Status: offline
I've heard the 20,000 figure from more sources than just napolitano. I think its pretty clear the russians cracked her email.

Pretty good article (dif sub): https://www.wired.com/2016/05/maksym-igor-popov-fbi/

(in reply to Phydeaux)
Profile   Post #: 1046
RE: Hillary Probed - 5/13/2016 4:25:26 AM   
bounty44


Posts: 6374
Joined: 11/1/2014
Status: offline
right, I should have made more clear I was talking about "posting" when I mentioned "not allowed."


(in reply to DaddySatyr)
Profile   Post #: 1047
RE: Hillary Probed - 5/13/2016 6:29:55 AM   
Lucylastic


Posts: 40310
Status: offline
yeah they call that backpedaling.
Its easy to spot.



_____________________________

(•_•)
<) )╯SUCH
/ \

\(•_•)
( (> A NASTY
/ \

(•_•)
<) )> WOMAN
/ \

Duchess Of Dissent
Dont Hate Love

(in reply to bounty44)
Profile   Post #: 1048
RE: Hillary Probed - 5/13/2016 7:26:35 AM   
bounty44


Posts: 6374
Joined: 11/1/2014
Status: offline
the story just keeps getting better and better:

"New Emails Show Clinton Opted to Use Home Phone Over Secure Line"

quote:

New emails obtained by Judicial Watch reveal that she instructed a top aide to call her on her home phone number after the two had technological difficulties using the secure line.

“I give up. Call me on my home #,” Clinton told her then chief of staff Cheryl Mills in a February 22, 2009 email after failing to set up a secure communication.

“I just spoke to ops and called you reg line - we have to wait until we see each other b/c [the] technology is not working,” Mills said in an email sent moments later.

“Pls try again,” Clinton followed up.

The emails, which were obtained as part of a lawsuit against the State Department under the Freedom of Information Act, were not among the more than 30,000 messages already released in recent months

The previously unreleased Clinton emails date back as far as January 2009 and further contradict statements by Hillary Clinton that, “as far as she knew,” all of her government emails were turned over to the State Department and that she did not use her clintonemail.com system until March 18, 2009. The new Clinton emails cover topics such as: the administration’s Iran policy; Obama’s stimulus program; the sharing of “management issues” with “Maggie” Williams, former campaign manager for Clinton’s 2008 presidential campaign; confusion over voice mail versus text messages; image coaching from 2008 campaign advisor Doug Hattaway; and a thank you note from Mark Hyman for “opening the door” for a Senate hearing on functional medicine; as well email detailing incoming calls from China and Russia.


http://townhall.com/tipsheet/leahbarkoukis/2016/05/13/new-emails-show-clinton-opted-to-use-home-phone-over-secure-line-n2162466

(in reply to bounty44)
Profile   Post #: 1049
RE: Hillary Probed - 5/13/2016 7:51:04 AM   
Lucylastic


Posts: 40310
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: bounty44

the story just keeps getting better and better:

"New Emails Show Clinton Opted to Use Home Phone Over Secure Line"

quote:

New emails obtained by Judicial Watch reveal that she instructed a top aide to call her on her home phone number after the two had technological difficulties using the secure line.

“I give up. Call me on my home #,” Clinton told her then chief of staff Cheryl Mills in a February 22, 2009 email after failing to set up a secure communication.

“I just spoke to ops and called you reg line - we have to wait until we see each other b/c [the] technology is not working,” Mills said in an email sent moments later.

“Pls try again,” Clinton followed up.

The emails, which were obtained as part of a lawsuit against the State Department under the Freedom of Information Act, were not among the more than 30,000 messages already released in recent months

The previously unreleased Clinton emails date back as far as January 2009 and further contradict statements by Hillary Clinton that, “as far as she knew,” all of her government emails were turned over to the State Department and that she did not use her clintonemail.com system until March 18, 2009. The new Clinton emails cover topics such as: the administration’s Iran policy; Obama’s stimulus program; the sharing of “management issues” with “Maggie” Williams, former campaign manager for Clinton’s 2008 presidential campaign; confusion over voice mail versus text messages; image coaching from 2008 campaign advisor Doug Hattaway; and a thank you note from Mark Hyman for “opening the door” for a Senate hearing on functional medicine; as well email detailing incoming calls from China and Russia.


http://townhall.com/tipsheet/leahbarkoukis/2016/05/13/new-emails-show-clinton-opted-to-use-home-phone-over-secure-line-n2162466




You keep using townhall for all your sparkling evidence. WHy not use judicial watch? you know the actual people who are putting info out there?
Despite the email you mention has been in judicial watches hands since last september.

The PDF can be found at http://www.judicialwatch.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/JW-v.-State-Huma-production-7-00684-pg-100-232-9752-59.pdf
its on page 4.
quote:

From: "Cheryl Mills"
Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2009 22:02 :23 -0500
To: <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Can we talk tonight?
Jusl dul - no answer
·-----Origmal Message----
From · H <hdr22@cbntonemoiLcom>
To: Cheryl Mills
Sent' Sun Feb 22 22:01:52 2009
Suhjed: Re Can we talk lomghl'l
I give up Call me on my home#.
------Onginal Message-----From:
Cheryl Mills
To: hdr22@clintonc;maiLcom
Sent: Feb 22, 2009 9·39 PM
Subject. RE· Can we talk tonight?
the:y were supposed to com1ect us - I called some time ago to do a secure
call with you-· call them and ask them to try the connection
·----Origmal Message-----
From: H (maiJto:[email protected]]
Sent: Stmdoy, February 22, 2009 9:39 PM
To: Cheryl Mills
Subject: Re Can we talk tonight?
Are you calling me? What#? I called ops and they gave me your "secure"·
cell which I just tned but only got a long high pitched whining sound.
-----Original Messlige------
From · Cheryl Mills
To: hdr22@clintonemail corn
Sent: Feb 22, 2009 8:58 PM
Suhjecl· Re Can we talk lonighl?
I can do now
-----Origrnal Message---
From H <[email protected]>
To Cheryl Mills
Sent: Swi. Feb 22 J 8·37:51 2009
Subject: Con we talk tonight?
I just landed and\\ ·u be home short! We l try a secure call at
your conveiuence Let me know what time
works.
86
RELEASE IN PART
,8=~6_ _ ___ __,, .
HA




or you can get the cached version from
http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:oUP4VIWfG4IJ:www.judicialwatch.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/JW-v.-State-Huma-production-7-00684-pg-100-232-9752-59.pdf+&cd=2&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=ca
Or you can see by the google search Ive snipped with the date and the origin.

_____________________________

(•_•)
<) )╯SUCH
/ \

\(•_•)
( (> A NASTY
/ \

(•_•)
<) )> WOMAN
/ \

Duchess Of Dissent
Dont Hate Love

(in reply to bounty44)
Profile   Post #: 1050
RE: Hillary Probed - 5/13/2016 8:14:07 AM   
Phydeaux


Posts: 4828
Joined: 1/4/2004
Status: offline
I've posted from JW. But I'm curious why you find the source of the information interesting - and yet the content not worthy of comment, hmm?

Its rather like pulling a splinter and ignoring the arrow going through your head. The great big fat corrupt jackass in the room - hillary clinton.

(in reply to Lucylastic)
Profile   Post #: 1051
RE: Hillary Probed - 5/13/2016 8:54:35 AM   
Lucylastic


Posts: 40310
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phydeaux

I've posted from JW. But I'm curious why you find the source of the information interesting - and yet the content not worthy of comment, hmm?

Its rather like pulling a splinter and ignoring the arrow going through your head. The great big fat corrupt jackass in the room - hillary clinton.

WHat do I need to comment on, Im calling him out on his rather late to the event "news"
It doesnt need comment, it needs proof. I showed the proof that his news ISNT.
Despite all the right wing sites saying its new.
I cant help it if he wont research or use good sources to prove his point.




_____________________________

(•_•)
<) )╯SUCH
/ \

\(•_•)
( (> A NASTY
/ \

(•_•)
<) )> WOMAN
/ \

Duchess Of Dissent
Dont Hate Love

(in reply to Phydeaux)
Profile   Post #: 1052
RE: Hillary Probed - 5/13/2016 8:54:46 AM   
bounty44


Posts: 6374
Joined: 11/1/2014
Status: offline
for the most part, that's all they got, whining about sources they don't like.

itd be fascinating to go back through this thread, and others, to see how many times they more or less ignored the content and instead based their "judgment" on the source.

its as old and tired as their ubiquitous cries of "raaaaaaaaaaaaacism."

< Message edited by bounty44 -- 5/13/2016 8:59:43 AM >

(in reply to Phydeaux)
Profile   Post #: 1053
RE: Hillary Probed - 5/13/2016 8:56:17 AM   
Lucylastic


Posts: 40310
Status: offline
so you cant respond to the facts:)
I knew it.


_____________________________

(•_•)
<) )╯SUCH
/ \

\(•_•)
( (> A NASTY
/ \

(•_•)
<) )> WOMAN
/ \

Duchess Of Dissent
Dont Hate Love

(in reply to bounty44)
Profile   Post #: 1054
RE: Hillary Probed - 5/13/2016 10:28:40 AM   
Nnanji


Posts: 4552
Joined: 3/29/2016
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic


quote:

ORIGINAL: bounty44

sorry there comrade, if you read all my posts on the matter you can see that what I said to Michael was directly implied by the context of stwrinklemeat posting so that he could be reported.

regardless, clarifying is not "backpedaling"---try reading other people's minds instead of mine.




LMAO when it comes down to you comrade(personal attack again from you what a surprise) I wonder if I should report you for all your personal attacks.
HAH
nah Im not as petty as you.
Well as far as reporting and whinging goes, no one is.


hum apparently you don't recognize all personal attacks.

(in reply to Lucylastic)
Profile   Post #: 1055
RE: Hillary Probed - 5/13/2016 11:14:17 AM   
bounty44


Posts: 6374
Joined: 11/1/2014
Status: offline
"comrade" is a personal attack? as opposed to a simple moniker recognition of those on the other side, so to speak, with collectivist social political worldviews?

and sorry there again lucy---saying someone would be fired if this were their job, or "you have comprehension problems" or "you don't read well" (and other things like that) is different in both kind and degree compared to:

"go fuck yoiurself retard...what as a fucking retard yoiu have explained...dont fuck around retard, i have gave you more information than in your retarded asswipe you are fucking sucking each other in the nutsucer...yu and your freinds are retards, and I am horified you teach anything other than how to suck dick pathetically"

and

"The scabs on your knees are healing well, but the pustules on your lips are seeping worse. I conclude that you are a leprous whore."

I keep seeing posts like that, im going to keep reporting them.

call it petty if you want, call it whining if you want---I call it cleaning out the garbage.

no doubt sometimes I could be gentler, and kinder but if you think im violating the tos by what I post, you are very invited to report mine.



< Message edited by bounty44 -- 5/13/2016 11:15:12 AM >

(in reply to Nnanji)
Profile   Post #: 1056
RE: Hillary Probed - 5/13/2016 12:19:03 PM   
Lucylastic


Posts: 40310
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: bounty44

"comrade" is a personal attack? as opposed to a simple moniker recognition of those on the other side, so to speak, with collectivist social political worldviews?

and sorry there again lucy---saying someone would be fired if this were their job, or "you have comprehension problems" or "you don't read well" (and other things like that) is different in both kind and degree compared to:

"go fuck yoiurself retard...what as a fucking retard yoiu have explained...dont fuck around retard, i have gave you more information than in your retarded asswipe you are fucking sucking each other in the nutsucer...yu and your freinds are retards, and I am horified you teach anything other than how to suck dick pathetically"

and

"The scabs on your knees are healing well, but the pustules on your lips are seeping worse. I conclude that you are a leprous whore."

I keep seeing posts like that, im going to keep reporting them.

call it petty if you want, call it whining if you want---I call it cleaning out the garbage.

no doubt sometimes I could be gentler, and kinder but if you think im violating the tos by what I post, you are very invited to report mine.




so you dont have a response to my post showing your "news" but you think that calling someone a comrade(communist) is cutesy pie, or putting up that bullshit about the aclu and lefties and trying to back it up with other blatantly ignorant partisan bullshit posts. Youve called lefties baby killers 3 times not to mention godless liberals continuously. Youve mentioned that more than a few posters are mentally ill. Drug and alcohol problems, at least three posters that I can think of.


You dont like the term bagger or nutsuckers but you are fine with tarring all with the same brush on the left. everyones a comrade godless liberal baby kille and muslim lover
Im not discussing RONS posts, Im discussing yours.
I dont answer to Ron OR FOR Ron , or you or anyone else.
You by the way, didnt get him banned, you got him moderated.
Big man.
Now back to the topic of your fascinating sparkling news that isnt....
care to respond or just whinge about ron some more?



_____________________________

(•_•)
<) )╯SUCH
/ \

\(•_•)
( (> A NASTY
/ \

(•_•)
<) )> WOMAN
/ \

Duchess Of Dissent
Dont Hate Love

(in reply to bounty44)
Profile   Post #: 1057
RE: Hillary Probed - 5/13/2016 1:40:37 PM   
Lucylastic


Posts: 40310
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Nnanji


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic


quote:

ORIGINAL: bounty44

sorry there comrade, if you read all my posts on the matter you can see that what I said to Michael was directly implied by the context of stwrinklemeat posting so that he could be reported.

regardless, clarifying is not "backpedaling"---try reading other people's minds instead of mine.




LMAO when it comes down to you comrade(personal attack again from you what a surprise) I wonder if I should report you for all your personal attacks.
HAH
nah Im not as petty as you.
Well as far as reporting and whinging goes, no one is.


hum apparently you don't recognize all personal attacks.

dunno, but someone reported bountys comment and its been removed ...for a reason.

_____________________________

(•_•)
<) )╯SUCH
/ \

\(•_•)
( (> A NASTY
/ \

(•_•)
<) )> WOMAN
/ \

Duchess Of Dissent
Dont Hate Love

(in reply to Nnanji)
Profile   Post #: 1058
RE: Hillary Probed - 5/13/2016 2:07:37 PM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
Well, yeah, big stuff this week, a brand new never before bombshell dropped on us by the nutsuckers.

I was gonna call you.
I didnt get your call.
No, you call me.
Do you want me to call you?
Never mind, I'll call you.


Jesus, pure guilt oozing out of that shit hah? What does Napalitano the nutsucker say?

Gowdy must be all over this.

Comey is probably slapping the cuffs on her as we speak over this.



_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to Lucylastic)
Profile   Post #: 1059
RE: Hillary Probed - 5/13/2016 2:12:37 PM   
Nnanji


Posts: 4552
Joined: 3/29/2016
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

Well, yeah, big stuff this week, a brand new never before bombshell dropped on us by the nutsuckers.

I was gonna call you.
I didnt get your call.
No, you call me.
Do you want me to call you?
Never mind, I'll call you.


Jesus, pure guilt oozing out of that shit hah? What does Napalitano the nutsucker say?

Gowdy must be all over this.

Comey is probably slapping the cuffs on her as we speak over this.



I can certainly see why you'd cast a jaundice eye at it from your perspective. Yet what interests me the most is that's a new email chain popping up long after we were assure by Clinton we had all of her work related emails.

(in reply to mnottertail)
Profile   Post #: 1060
Page:   <<   < prev  51 52 [53] 54 55   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Hillary Probed Page: <<   < prev  51 52 [53] 54 55   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.137