quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

you are not entertaining, and I always behave myself or act in kind.

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

I think your hallucinations are probably outstanding for you, you will never dose on reality.

You didnt have anything to do with my stuff, and there was some confusion that should be now resolved. Since we can't comment on it by whichever forum guideline it is (dont remember where it is, but it is still there.........) that is about all there is to it for the moment.

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

Did you know there is an election for president this year, in November? First, I expect everyone knows it and it don't take 55 pages to tell about the election.

Same with the FBI investigation, there is one, and nobody who is not an active agent on the case or supervisor knows anything at all more.
Oh she may have violated 3 or 4 statutes, if you really stretch, no, seems like she didn't insofar as we know.
Now, thats worth 4 posts probably.

The suit against Donald Trump was allowed to go forward, there was a judge ruled on that. No thread, but until actual things happen and facts are revealed it is the same as this, nothing much to say beyond it.

Yet if she is brought to trial, there will be pages and pages where nutsuckers will say, we don't want a criminal, a convict for president, to which I will respond, well you already had one, good ol W.

And if she is not brought to trial, then we will listen to the slobberblog refelching of how all the entire government (even the nutsuckers in the legislature, Comey a 'republican' and several Joint Chiefs (many republican)) are in on the conspiracy and they must be, because she must be guilty of what the nutsuckers accuse her of for the last 25 years.

Somebody is clever, or somebody is stupid, not hard to sort out who is who, but the stupid appear at all events to be the nutsuckers.

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

Did you know there is an election for president this year, in November? First, I expect everyone knows it and it don't take 55 pages to tell about the election.

Same with the FBI investigation, there is one, and nobody who is not an active agent on the case or supervisor knows anything at all more.
Oh she may have violated 3 or 4 statutes, if you really stretch, no, seems like she didn't insofar as we know.
Now, thats worth 4 posts probably.

The suit against Donald Trump was allowed to go forward, there was a judge ruled on that. No thread, but until actual things happen and facts are revealed it is the same as this, nothing much to say beyond it.

Yet if she is brought to trial, there will be pages and pages where nutsuckers will say, we don't want a criminal, a convict for president, to which I will respond, well you already had one, good ol W.

And if she is not brought to trial, then we will listen to the slobberblog refelching of how all the entire government (even the nutsuckers in the legislature, Comey a 'republican' and several Joint Chiefs (many republican)) are in on the conspiracy and they must be, because she must be guilty of what the nutsuckers accuse her of for the last 25 years.

Somebody is clever, or somebody is stupid, not hard to sort out who is who, but the stupid appear at all events to be the nutsuckers.

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

Did you know there is an election for president this year, in November? First, I expect everyone knows it and it don't take 55 pages to tell about the election.

Same with the FBI investigation, there is one, and nobody who is not an active agent on the case or supervisor knows anything at all more.
Oh she may have violated 3 or 4 statutes, if you really stretch, no, seems like she didn't insofar as we know.
Now, thats worth 4 posts probably.

The suit against Donald Trump was allowed to go forward, there was a judge ruled on that. No thread, but until actual things happen and facts are revealed it is the same as this, nothing much to say beyond it.

Yet if she is brought to trial, there will be pages and pages where nutsuckers will say, we don't want a criminal, a convict for president, to which I will respond, well you already had one, good ol W.

And if she is not brought to trial, then we will listen to the slobberblog refelching of how all the entire government (even the nutsuckers in the legislature, Comey a 'republican' and several Joint Chiefs (many republican)) are in on the conspiracy and they must be, because she must be guilty of what the nutsuckers accuse her of for the last 25 years.

Somebody is clever, or somebody is stupid, not hard to sort out who is who, but the stupid appear at all events to be the nutsuckers.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Nnanji

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

Did you know there is an election for president this year, in November? First, I expect everyone knows it and it don't take 55 pages to tell about the election.

Same with the FBI investigation, there is one, and nobody who is not an active agent on the case or supervisor knows anything at all more.
Oh she may have violated 3 or 4 statutes, if you really stretch, no, seems like she didn't insofar as we know.
Now, thats worth 4 posts probably.

The suit against Donald Trump was allowed to go forward, there was a judge ruled on that. No thread, but until actual things happen and facts are revealed it is the same as this, nothing much to say beyond it.

Yet if she is brought to trial, there will be pages and pages where nutsuckers will say, we don't want a criminal, a convict for president, to which I will respond, well you already had one, good ol W.

And if she is not brought to trial, then we will listen to the slobberblog refelching of how all the entire government (even the nutsuckers in the legislature, Comey a 'republican' and several Joint Chiefs (many republican)) are in on the conspiracy and they must be, because she must be guilty of what the nutsuckers accuse her of for the last 25 years.

Somebody is clever, or somebody is stupid, not hard to sort out who is who, but the stupid appear at all events to be the nutsuckers.

Lol, I pretty much agree. Id tweak a couple of things. I'd throw in that Loretta Lynch and Obama will do what they can to preserve his legacy by trying to make sure Clinton (the rape shamer) is elected. They'll also do what they can to protect the administration from any pay for play she did while SOS, which will be most interesting. But you're correct. The FBI is being professional and we don't know anything except they had to grant immunity to her IT guy or he wouldn't talk, which pretty much historically never happens unless the FBI is going after a bigger fish. Oh, and we know Clinton (the rape shamer) has had to modify her lies over time. But, really, we don't know what the big lie is yet, or if there even is one.

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

Did you know there is an election for president this year, in November? First, I expect everyone knows it and it don't take 55 pages to tell about the election.

Same with the FBI investigation, there is one, and nobody who is not an active agent on the case or supervisor knows anything at all more.
Oh she may have violated 3 or 4 statutes, if you really stretch, no, seems like she didn't insofar as we know.
Now, thats worth 4 posts probably.

The suit against Donald Trump was allowed to go forward, there was a judge ruled on that. No thread, but until actual things happen and facts are revealed it is the same as this, nothing much to say beyond it.

Yet if she is brought to trial, there will be pages and pages where nutsuckers will say, we don't want a criminal, a convict for president, to which I will respond, well you already had one, good ol W.

And if she is not brought to trial, then we will listen to the slobberblog refelching of how all the entire government (even the nutsuckers in the legislature, Comey a 'republican' and several Joint Chiefs (many republican)) are in on the conspiracy and they must be, because she must be guilty of what the nutsuckers accuse her of for the last 25 years.

Somebody is clever, or somebody is stupid, not hard to sort out who is who, but the stupid appear at all events to be the nutsuckers.

Trump is facing a Civil suit, Hillary is facing Federal criminal charges.
You do understand the difference don't you?
Do you really think that violating 3 Federal laws is no big deal?
So now the Hiiary Koolaide drinkers are the nutsuckers?

quote:

ORIGINAL: Nnanji

Strictly speaking MNotter is correct. The FBI is being professional and we don't know. We can assume a lot based on our perspective. For instance, why would the FBI use so much time and material if they didn't see a possible law being broken. Yet, on the outside, MNotter is correct that it may be because of nutsucker political pressure...whoever the nutsuckers are in this instance. I have my perspective, you have yours, which I grant are similar to mine. MNotter has his.

quote:

ORIGINAL: bounty44

eric bolling thinks the Clinton foundation cash for influence story is bigger than the email problem and that we're only hearing the tip of the iceberg.

quote:

Under federal law, non-profit, tax-exempt organizations aren’t supposed to act on the private interests...The Clinton Foundation is back in the news. This time for doling out $2 million to a for-profit company run by friends of the family...

Oh, and it shouldn’t shock anyone that some of the owners of Energy Pioneer Solutions, Inc., like Mark Weiner, are donors to the Clinton Foundation. Hillary Clinton has paid Weiner’s company millions for campaign swag in her 2008 and 2016 presidential bids.

Former U.S. Attorney Matthew Whitaker of the Foundation for Accountability and Civic Trust was disconcerted by this revelation, furthering the notion that the Clinton Foundation is just a bank to deposit favors with the political couple, along with being a textbook example of quid pro quo politics:

This disturbing revelation reveals the Clinton’s quid pro quo approach to operating their family business interests. The formula was simple: If someone wanted access to the Clintons or a favor from them, they needed to be a top donor to their campaigns or philanthropic efforts. Whether it was the State Department, the Clinton Foundation or now the Clinton Global Initiative, the Clintons used these entities as revolving doors of access to reward their top donors and closest friends. This type of behavior poses very serious ethical and trust challenges for the Clintons, and especially Hillary who seeks the presidency to represent ordinary citizens who would never get this kind of treatment.”

quote:

ORIGINAL: bounty44

quote:

ORIGINAL: bounty44

eric bolling thinks the Clinton foundation cash for influence story is bigger than the email problem and that we're only hearing the tip of the iceberg.

a lot on the original story but i'll just post the essential snippet here:

"Quid Pro Quo: Clinton Foundation Gave Money To For-Profit Company Run By Clinton Friends"

quote:

Under federal law, non-profit, tax-exempt organizations aren’t supposed to act on the private interests...The Clinton Foundation is back in the news. This time for doling out $2 million to a for-profit company run by friends of the family...

Oh, and it shouldn’t shock anyone that some of the owners of Energy Pioneer Solutions, Inc., like Mark Weiner, are donors to the Clinton Foundation. Hillary Clinton has paid Weiner’s company millions for campaign swag in her 2008 and 2016 presidential bids.

Former U.S. Attorney Matthew Whitaker of the Foundation for Accountability and Civic Trust was disconcerted by this revelation, furthering the notion that the Clinton Foundation is just a bank to deposit favors with the political couple, along with being a textbook example of quid pro quo politics:

This disturbing revelation reveals the Clinton’s quid pro quo approach to operating their family business interests. The formula was simple: If someone wanted access to the Clintons or a favor from them, they needed to be a top donor to their campaigns or philanthropic efforts. Whether it was the State Department, the Clinton Foundation or now the Clinton Global Initiative, the Clintons used these entities as revolving doors of access to reward their top donors and closest friends. This type of behavior poses very serious ethical and trust challenges for the Clintons, and especially Hillary who seeks the presidency to represent ordinary citizens who would never get this kind of treatment.”

http://townhall.com/tipsheet/mattvespa/2016/05/13/quid-pro-quo-clinton-foundation-gave-money-to-forprofit-company-run-by-clinton-friends-n2162288

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

Did you know there is an election for president this year, in November? First, I expect everyone knows it and it don't take 55 pages to tell about the election.

Same with the FBI investigation, there is one, and nobody who is not an active agent on the case or supervisor knows anything at all more.
Oh she may have violated 3 or 4 statutes, if you really stretch, no, seems like she didn't insofar as we know.
Now, thats worth 4 posts probably.

The suit against Donald Trump was allowed to go forward, there was a judge ruled on that. No thread, but until actual things happen and facts are revealed it is the same as this, nothing much to say beyond it.

Yet if she is brought to trial, there will be pages and pages where nutsuckers will say, we don't want a criminal, a convict for president, to which I will respond, well you already had one, good ol W.

And if she is not brought to trial, then we will listen to the slobberblog refelching of how all the entire government (even the nutsuckers in the legislature, Comey a 'republican' and several Joint Chiefs (many republican)) are in on the conspiracy and they must be, because she must be guilty of what the nutsuckers accuse her of for the last 25 years.

Somebody is clever, or somebody is stupid, not hard to sort out who is who, but the stupid appear at all events to be the nutsuckers.

Trump is facing a Civil suit, Hillary is facing Federal criminal charges.
You do understand the difference don't you?
Do you really think that violating 3 Federal laws is no big deal?
So now the Hiiary Koolaide drinkers are the nutsuckers?

Nope, Trump is facing a civil suit. Hillary is facing nothing. Proof? You don't understand facts do you?
Nobody has violated 3 federal laws. Proof?
No, the nutsuckers are the nutsuckers, they are the ones shitting their pants and slobbering.