Collarchat.com

Join Our Community
Collarchat.com

Home  Login  Search 

"Save A Life - Surrender Your Knife"


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> "Save A Life - Surrender Your Knife" Page: [1] 2 3 4   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
"Save A Life - Surrender Your Knife" - 12/6/2015 11:22:17 AM   
Real0ne


Posts: 21189
Joined: 10/25/2004
Status: offline
With Knife Murders Spiking After Gun Ban, UK Urges "Save A Life - Surrender Your Knife"

Don’t be a victim


If you feel you are in immediate danger from knife crime there are a number of steps you can take to protect yourself:

• Move away from the situation towards a public place (shop, house, restaurant etc.) as quickly as possible.

• Make as much noise as you can.

• Instead of carrying a knife, carry a personal alarm.

• Don’t fight back.





Just a week ago, we noted the hard-working US government was drawing up plans for "knife regulations." Well, in The UK it appears to have already begun...



State and local laws

Each American state also has laws that govern the legality of carrying weapons, either concealed or openly, and these laws explicitly or implicitly cover various types of knives. Some states go beyond this, and criminalize mere possession of certain types of knives.







Whats next?
cutting off and surrendering body parts?







< Message edited by Real0ne -- 12/6/2015 11:31:45 AM >


_____________________________

"We the Borg" of the us imperialists....resistance is futile

Democracy; The 'People' voted on 'which' amendment?

Yesterdays tinfoil is today's reality!

"No man's life, liberty, or property is safe while the legislature is in session
Profile   Post #: 1
RE: "Save A Life - Surrender Your Knife" - 12/6/2015 11:38:41 AM   
PeonForHer


Posts: 19612
Joined: 9/27/2008
Status: offline
quote:

Whats next?
cutting off and surrendering body parts?


Good idea, RO. I can think of several people here who should be surrendering their brains in order to make wider society safer. It's not as if they'd miss them, anyway.

_____________________________

http://www.domme-chronicles.com


(in reply to Real0ne)
Profile   Post #: 2
RE: "Save A Life - Surrender Your Knife" - 12/6/2015 11:59:10 AM   
freedomdwarf1


Posts: 6845
Joined: 10/23/2012
Status: offline
RO is a bit behind. lol.

We've had several knife amnesties over the last decade or more.

ETA: Guns aren't banned in the UK.

< Message edited by freedomdwarf1 -- 12/6/2015 12:00:44 PM >


_____________________________

If liberty means anything at all, it means the right to tell people what they do not want to hear.
George Orwell, 1903-1950


(in reply to PeonForHer)
Profile   Post #: 3
RE: "Save A Life - Surrender Your Knife" - 12/6/2015 2:13:26 PM   
joether


Posts: 5195
Joined: 7/24/2005
Status: offline
I was waiting for some conservative to announce this one....

Some guy with a knife manages to injure some individuals. A pair of gun totting individuals wrecked havoc in California and days earlier, one pro-lifer shot up a Planned Parenthood clinic. What all the gun nuts hate to admit: Firearms are much more efficient tools for injuring and killing humans. Might be....WHY....we arm our soldiers with such tools before going into battle. You can have a knife that kills one or two at close range, or thirty at about three hundred yards. Tactically speaking, its not to hard to figure which tool is the greater threat to society.

Likewise it is....much...easier to take down a knife wielding opponent than one armed with a 233/556 semi auto assault rifle. To say otherwise is to deny reality, fact, and physics.

In a crowded room, an individual might be able to injure/kill up to a half dozen individuals. The rest either flee or team up to over power the attacker. With a 233/556 semi auto assault rifle with thirty round mag; that same person could drop half the crowd in the opening half dozen seconds of the surprise attack. Drop the empty mag and reload in under four seconds (no real time to stage a counter attack) while mowing down the remainder. One has to be in total denial of reality to argue to me that someone with a knife can 'out injure/kill' someone with such a rifle. It would take considerable skill to succeed in such a task with a inife; while it takes practically nothing (in comparison) to load, operate, and kill many in the same time frame with a firearm.

In tests it has been shown whenever someone with a handgun tried to mount a defense against a surprise attack, was eliminated in every instance. Their rate of survival only rose when they fled like everyone else. In each of these mass shootings, why have we not seen 'honest and law abiding' gun nut whipping out their CCW and taking down the active shooter directly? Instead when the shots fly....EVERYONE...including those that had CCWs fled the area. It was only when an...ACTUAL...."...Well Regulated Militia..." (i.e. the Cops) systematically bore down on the attacker did the shooting end. Yes, I'm sure the gun nuts can find a very well 'cherry picked' situation that supports their insane ideology. Yet there have been more mass shootings in the last three years than days on the calendar!

The California attackers easily by-passed all the gun controls in place with flying colors. That tells me the existing laws do....NOTHING...to protect society. After all, anyone with a firearm is potentially a mass murder. How do we, as society, know they will not go on a shooting rampage? Oh, that's right, we have 'their word', that they will not do it. Yet, if anyone asked a day before to that couple, "Would you kill people as a criminal/terrorist attack with your guns", they would say (just like anyone else with a gun whom REALLY wouldn't do such a thing) "Nope". Gun nuts do not trust anyone, yet demand unconditional trust from anyone towards them. Don't trust me? Then I don't trust you. Since I don't trust you; I'll get laws that force you through a shit load of hoops to obtain and MORE just to use a firearm. That is the price for not trusting me in the first place. Bitch at me about the 2nd amendment 'protections'? Fine, we revoke it. Wouldn't be the first time this nation revoked an amendment because the majority of people were against something. Get the idea that I'm (an ever growing nation of individuals) are not happy with gun owners/nuts? When you shovel shit like this RealOne, is helping my arguments out more and more.


(in reply to freedomdwarf1)
Profile   Post #: 4
RE: "Save A Life - Surrender Your Knife" - 12/6/2015 2:40:56 PM   
bounty44


Posts: 6374
Joined: 11/1/2014
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: joether
one pro-lifer shot up a Planned Parenthood clinic.


this reminds me you are not just a moron, but a delusional one as well, and that doesn't even address the rest of the nonsense in your post, some of which you have been corrected on before.


< Message edited by bounty44 -- 12/6/2015 2:45:51 PM >

(in reply to joether)
Profile   Post #: 5
RE: "Save A Life - Surrender Your Knife" - 12/6/2015 3:05:58 PM   
BamaD


Posts: 20687
Joined: 2/27/2005
Status: offline
In tests it has been shown whenever someone with a handgun tried to mount a defense against a surprise attack, was eliminated in every instance.

Which shows that the tests are horribilly flawed since when it happens in reality that opposite is closer to the truth. We have shown you the studies of REAL LIFE incidents that prove that your tests are garbage.

_____________________________

Government ranges from a necessary evil to an intolerable one. Thomas Paine

People don't believe they can defend themselves because they have guns, they have guns because they believe they can defend themselves.

(in reply to joether)
Profile   Post #: 6
RE: "Save A Life - Surrender Your Knife" - 12/6/2015 3:10:24 PM   
PeonForHer


Posts: 19612
Joined: 9/27/2008
Status: offline
That article makes me chortle. Its really saying, ever so smugly, 'OK, the weapons laws in the UK work in practice. But, aha, aha! Do they work in *theory*?!'

_____________________________

http://www.domme-chronicles.com


(in reply to Real0ne)
Profile   Post #: 7
RE: "Save A Life - Surrender Your Knife" - 12/6/2015 3:10:37 PM   
BamaD


Posts: 20687
Joined: 2/27/2005
Status: offline
The California attackers easily by-passed all the gun controls in place with flying colors.

They got them via straw purchase, already illegal.
She was a foriegn citizen ineligable.
Modifications making them illegal.
Bombs.
They didn't subvert Ca law, they violated it, apparently you don't understand the difference.

< Message edited by BamaD -- 12/6/2015 3:21:17 PM >


_____________________________

Government ranges from a necessary evil to an intolerable one. Thomas Paine

People don't believe they can defend themselves because they have guns, they have guns because they believe they can defend themselves.

(in reply to joether)
Profile   Post #: 8
RE: "Save A Life - Surrender Your Knife" - 12/6/2015 3:16:28 PM   
BamaD


Posts: 20687
Joined: 2/27/2005
Status: offline
EVERYONE...including those that had CCWs fled the area.

How do you know there were any ccw holders there?
Can't be talking about Colorado since the cops were there from the biginning and the first responsibility of a ccw holder is to stay out of the cops way.
The reason ccw holders never syop mass killings because, as several of us have documented, they stop it BEFORE it reaches the mass murder level.

_____________________________

Government ranges from a necessary evil to an intolerable one. Thomas Paine

People don't believe they can defend themselves because they have guns, they have guns because they believe they can defend themselves.

(in reply to joether)
Profile   Post #: 9
RE: "Save A Life - Surrender Your Knife" - 12/6/2015 3:18:32 PM   
LadyPact


Posts: 32566
Status: offline
<Fast reply>

I'm not sticking this one out for another round of gun debate, which is now going to go into knife control/debate.

I just find it really amusing that, one a kink site, we're going to start talking about people giving up their knives. That's going to go very well.

Have fun. Save your knives for kink.


_____________________________

The crowned Diva of Destruction. ~ ExT

Beach Ball Sized Lady Nuts. ~ TWD

Happily dating a new submissive. It's official. I've named him engie.

Please do not send me email here. Unless I know you, I will delete the email unread

(in reply to BamaD)
Profile   Post #: 10
RE: "Save A Life - Surrender Your Knife" - 12/6/2015 3:31:08 PM   
BamaD


Posts: 20687
Joined: 2/27/2005
Status: offline
Gun nuts do not trust anyone, yet demand unconditional trust from anyone towards them. Don't trust me? Then I don't trust you. Since I don't trust you; I'll get laws that force you through a shit load of hoops to obtain and MORE just to use a firearm. That is the price for not trusting me in the first place. Bitch at me about the 2nd amendment 'protections'? Fine, we revoke it.

This starts with a gross misstatedment.
You proceed with a childish temper tantrum.
This you admit that your position is based on your childish need for revenge since the adults won't do what you want.

You want us to proove that no one who owns a firearm will ever do anything wrong or all of us must give up that right. That is stupid.

_____________________________

Government ranges from a necessary evil to an intolerable one. Thomas Paine

People don't believe they can defend themselves because they have guns, they have guns because they believe they can defend themselves.

(in reply to joether)
Profile   Post #: 11
RE: "Save A Life - Surrender Your Knife" - 12/6/2015 4:34:35 PM   
CreativeDominant


Posts: 11032
Joined: 3/11/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: joether

I was waiting for some conservative to announce this one....

Some guy with a knife manages to injure some individuals. A pair of gun totting individuals wrecked havoc in California and days earlier, one pro-lifer shot up a Planned Parenthood clinic. What all the gun nuts hate to admit: Firearms are much more efficient tools for injuring and killing humans. Might be....WHY....we arm our soldiers with such tools before going into battle. You can have a knife that kills one or two at close range, or thirty at about three hundred yards. Tactically speaking, its not to hard to figure which tool is the greater threat to society.

Likewise it is....much...easier to take down a knife wielding opponent than one armed with a 233/556 semi auto assault rifle. To say otherwise is to deny reality, fact, and physics.

In a crowded room, an individual might be able to injure/kill up to a half dozen individuals. The rest either flee or team up to over power the attacker. With a 233/556 semi auto assault rifle with thirty round mag; that same person could drop half the crowd in the opening half dozen seconds of the surprise attack. Drop the empty mag and reload in under four seconds (no real time to stage a counter attack) while mowing down the remainder. One has to be in total denial of reality to argue to me that someone with a knife can 'out injure/kill' someone with such a rifle. It would take considerable skill to succeed in such a task with a inife; while it takes practically nothing (in comparison) to load, operate, and kill many in the same time frame with a firearm.

In tests it has been shown whenever someone with a handgun tried to mount a defense against a surprise attack, was eliminated in every instance. Their rate of survival only rose when they fled like everyone else. In each of these mass shootings, why have we not seen 'honest and law abiding' gun nut whipping out their CCW and taking down the active shooter directly? Instead when the shots fly....EVERYONE...including those that had CCWs fled the area. It was only when an...ACTUAL...."...Well Regulated Militia..." (i.e. the Cops) systematically bore down on the attacker did the shooting end. Yes, I'm sure the gun nuts can find a very well 'cherry picked' situation that supports their insane ideology. Yet there have been more mass shootings in the last three years than days on the calendar!

The California attackers easily by-passed all the gun controls in place with flying colors. That tells me the existing laws do....NOTHING...to protect society. After all, anyone with a firearm is potentially a mass murder. How do we, as society, know they will not go on a shooting rampage? Oh, that's right, we have 'their word', that they will not do it. Yet, if anyone asked a day before to that couple, "Would you kill people as a criminal/terrorist attack with your guns", they would say (just like anyone else with a gun whom REALLY wouldn't do such a thing) "Nope". Gun nuts do not trust anyone, yet demand unconditional trust from anyone towards them. Don't trust me? Then I don't trust you. Since I don't trust you; I'll get laws that force you through a shit load of hoops to obtain and MORE just to use a firearm. That is the price for not trusting me in the first place. Bitch at me about the 2nd amendment 'protections'? Fine, we revoke it. Wouldn't be the first time this nation revoked an amendment because the majority of people were against something. Get the idea that I'm (an ever growing nation of individuals) are not happy with gun owners/nuts? When you shovel shit like this RealOne, is helping my arguments out more and more.


I was waiting for that one liberal who would try to skew things and he showed up.

Do you have ANY definitive...other than these 4 words from an adrenaline charged, most likely mentally ill individual: no more baby parts...proof that Mr. Dear is a pro-lifer? An interview none of the rest of us have been privy too...a membership card...anything other than his ex-wife's word for it (and we know what unbiased sources exes are)?

The two in California are not just individuals, Joether. The two in California are not just attackers, Joether. They are...come on, you can say this...you certainly have the words when the attacker is White.
The attackers were Muslims..radicalized...one of them even pledged allegiance to ISIS via Facebook DURING the attack.

The gun laws in California are among the stiffest in the Nation...yet they could have been stiffer and it would not have made any difference. The pair obtained the two AR-15 STYLE weapons from a friend. They circumvented the law. They modified the weapons. They broke the law. When people like this want to break the bigger laws..."it is illegal to assault someone. Using a weapon makes the crime worse. Killing someone is a capital offense"...then breaking or circumventing the smaller laws, no matter how restrictive, doesn't matter. The only ones the laws matter to are those who have no intention of breaking them. The LAW-ABIDING citizens.

How many times does this need to be explained to you? And yes, Joether...you, and others who think like you, are the ones who I'm talking to. You come up with some shut about a Firearms Myth Testing Lab and expects us to go for it. You ask for facts and when they're presented to you in a way you can't argue against, you ignore them...even when I and others have asked you for a response.
There are posters from both sides willing to look at changes...once the laws that are in place are enforced. Both sides again agree that those systems put into place to do the monitoring need to be funded so they can do just that.

But not you. You talk about trust but be honest, Joether...the ONLY person you would trust with a gun would be one following a protocol that you and others like you lay down. A protocol developed by people who fear and dislike firearms.

You want to revoke the 2ND Amendment? Go ahead and try...good luck with THAT. Bun until you and others...on both sides...can be as honest with real, rational solutions as you are with the assessment, then the assessment remains real while the solutions seem far away.

(in reply to joether)
Profile   Post #: 12
RE: "Save A Life - Surrender Your Knife" - 12/6/2015 4:44:18 PM   
Politesub53


Posts: 14862
Joined: 5/7/2007
Status: offline
I didnt realize anyone was stupid enough to think someone used facebook while carrying an armed attack........ As per normal it didnt take long for me to be proved wrong. My thanks to CD for again showing how creative he can be.

(in reply to CreativeDominant)
Profile   Post #: 13
RE: "Save A Life - Surrender Your Knife" - 12/6/2015 5:06:16 PM   
BamaD


Posts: 20687
Joined: 2/27/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: joether

I was waiting for some conservative to announce this one....

Some guy with a knife manages to injure some individuals. A pair of gun totting individuals wrecked havoc in California and days earlier, one pro-lifer shot up a Planned Parenthood clinic. What all the gun nuts hate to admit: Firearms are much more efficient tools for injuring and killing humans. Might be....WHY....we arm our soldiers with such tools before going into battle. You can have a knife that kills one or two at close range, or thirty at about three hundred yards. Tactically speaking, its not to hard to figure which tool is the greater threat to society.

Likewise it is....much...easier to take down a knife wielding opponent than one armed with a 233/556 semi auto assault rifle. To say otherwise is to deny reality, fact, and physics.

In a crowded room, an individual might be able to injure/kill up to a half dozen individuals. The rest either flee or team up to over power the attacker. With a 233/556 semi auto assault rifle with thirty round mag; that same person could drop half the crowd in the opening half dozen seconds of the surprise attack. Drop the empty mag and reload in under four seconds (no real time to stage a counter attack) while mowing down the remainder. One has to be in total denial of reality to argue to me that someone with a knife can 'out injure/kill' someone with such a rifle. It would take considerable skill to succeed in such a task with a inife; while it takes practically nothing (in comparison) to load, operate, and kill many in the same time frame with a firearm.

In tests it has been shown whenever someone with a handgun tried to mount a defense against a surprise attack, was eliminated in every instance. Their rate of survival only rose when they fled like everyone else. In each of these mass shootings, why have we not seen 'honest and law abiding' gun nut whipping out their CCW and taking down the active shooter directly? Instead when the shots fly....EVERYONE...including those that had CCWs fled the area. It was only when an...ACTUAL...."...Well Regulated Militia..." (i.e. the Cops) systematically bore down on the attacker did the shooting end. Yes, I'm sure the gun nuts can find a very well 'cherry picked' situation that supports their insane ideology. Yet there have been more mass shootings in the last three years than days on the calendar!

The California attackers easily by-passed all the gun controls in place with flying colors. That tells me the existing laws do....NOTHING...to protect society. After all, anyone with a firearm is potentially a mass murder. How do we, as society, know they will not go on a shooting rampage? Oh, that's right, we have 'their word', that they will not do it. Yet, if anyone asked a day before to that couple, "Would you kill people as a criminal/terrorist attack with your guns", they would say (just like anyone else with a gun whom REALLY wouldn't do such a thing) "Nope". Gun nuts do not trust anyone, yet demand unconditional trust from anyone towards them. Don't trust me? Then I don't trust you. Since I don't trust you; I'll get laws that force you through a shit load of hoops to obtain and MORE just to use a firearm. That is the price for not trusting me in the first place. Bitch at me about the 2nd amendment 'protections'? Fine, we revoke it. Wouldn't be the first time this nation revoked an amendment because the majority of people were against something. Get the idea that I'm (an ever growing nation of individuals) are not happy with gun owners/nuts? When you shovel shit like this RealOne, is helping my arguments out more and more.




Please give us your definition of "gun nut" because the way you use it it means anyone who doesn't want to give up thier 2nd amendment rights to make you feel good.
Where do you get your clearly bogus information, the Brady Bunch? They are only slightly more honest than Bloomberg, a proven liar.


_____________________________

Government ranges from a necessary evil to an intolerable one. Thomas Paine

People don't believe they can defend themselves because they have guns, they have guns because they believe they can defend themselves.

(in reply to joether)
Profile   Post #: 14
RE: "Save A Life - Surrender Your Knife" - 12/6/2015 5:09:24 PM   
ifmaz


Posts: 844
Joined: 7/22/2015
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: joether

...
In tests it has been shown whenever someone with a handgun tried to mount a defense against a surprise attack, was eliminated in every instance. Their rate of survival only rose when they fled like everyone else.
...


Make an effort and cite a source before lying through your teeth.

(Technically, yes, you're lying through your fingers)

quote:

ORIGINAL: joether
The California attackers easily by-passed all the gun controls in place with flying colors. That tells me the existing laws do....NOTHING...to protect society. After all, anyone with a firearm is potentially a mass murder. How do we, as society, know they will not go on a shooting rampage? Oh, that's right, we have 'their word', that they will not do it.


How do we know you won't continue to post idiocy? Perhaps we should revoke everyone's First Amendment right to be on the safe side.

quote:

ORIGINAL: joether
...
I'll get laws that force you through a shit load of hoops to obtain and MORE just to use a firearm. That is the price for not trusting me in the first place. Bitch at me about the 2nd amendment 'protections'? Fine, we revoke it.
...


You despise others having rights especially when you disagree with those rights. That's not being an American, joether, that's being an authoritarian. Authoritarians like yourself hate freedom.

(in reply to joether)
Profile   Post #: 15
RE: "Save A Life - Surrender Your Knife" - 12/6/2015 5:12:58 PM   
JanahX


Posts: 3443
Joined: 8/21/2010
Status: offline
<fast reply>

What about bows and arrows? These can do some nasty damage at a distance. I mean even a 25 lb. bow can do damage. Oddly, no one ever brings these being used as weapons up.

I myself, love archery.

_____________________________

The first rule of Fight Club is you do not talk about Fight Club.

The second rule of Fight Club is you do not talk about Fight Club.


(in reply to BamaD)
Profile   Post #: 16
RE: "Save A Life - Surrender Your Knife" - 12/6/2015 5:17:19 PM   
BamaD


Posts: 20687
Joined: 2/27/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: JanahX

<fast reply>

What about bows and arrows? These can do some nasty damage at a distance. I mean even a 25 lb. bow can do damage. Oddly, no one ever brings these being used as weapons up.

I myself, love archery.

Anything can be a weapon.

_____________________________

Government ranges from a necessary evil to an intolerable one. Thomas Paine

People don't believe they can defend themselves because they have guns, they have guns because they believe they can defend themselves.

(in reply to JanahX)
Profile   Post #: 17
RE: "Save A Life - Surrender Your Knife" - 12/6/2015 5:22:38 PM   
JanahX


Posts: 3443
Joined: 8/21/2010
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD


quote:

ORIGINAL: JanahX

<fast reply>

What about bows and arrows? These can do some nasty damage at a distance. I mean even a 25 lb. bow can do damage. Oddly, no one ever brings these being used as weapons up.

I myself, love archery.

Anything can be a weapon.


Really captain obvious? Good to know.


_____________________________

The first rule of Fight Club is you do not talk about Fight Club.

The second rule of Fight Club is you do not talk about Fight Club.


(in reply to BamaD)
Profile   Post #: 18
RE: "Save A Life - Surrender Your Knife" - 12/6/2015 5:22:59 PM   
DeviantlyD


Posts: 4375
Joined: 5/26/2007
From: Hawai`i
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD


quote:

ORIGINAL: JanahX

<fast reply>

What about bows and arrows? These can do some nasty damage at a distance. I mean even a 25 lb. bow can do damage. Oddly, no one ever brings these being used as weapons up.

I myself, love archery.

Anything can be a weapon.


Yes, many things can be a weapon. However, I believe JanahX may have been referring to implements whose primary use/development is as a weapon. I'm sure you would agree that the primary purpose for a bow and arrow is as a weapon. :)

_____________________________

ExiledTyrant's groupie. Catering to his ego since May 26, 2007. :D

(in reply to BamaD)
Profile   Post #: 19
RE: "Save A Life - Surrender Your Knife" - 12/6/2015 5:30:33 PM   
CreativeDominant


Posts: 11032
Joined: 3/11/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Politesub53

I didnt realize anyone was stupid enough to think someone used facebook while carrying an armed attack........ As per normal it didnt take long for me to be proved wrong. My thanks to CD for again showing how creative he can be.
Really? Prove it. Because the mainstream media here made note of it. So bring forth your source that says she did not.

If you're referring to minutiae like "well, she did pledge her allegiance but it wasn't during the attack, it was during the episode" or "she didn't pledge allegiance, only her support and that was just to the group's leader", then you're full of shit.

Tashfeen Malik, 27, vowed her support for the terror group’s leader, Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, on the site at around 11 a.m. Wednesday just as the first 911 calls were made by workers at the attacked Southern California facility.

The message, later scrubbed by Facebook for violating its code of conduct, was posted under a different name
http://nypost.com/2015/12/04/killer-wife-in-california-massacre-swore-allegiance-to-isis/

The woman who helped her husband kill 14 people at holiday party in California praised the leader of the Islamic State group in a Facebook post just minutes into the attack.
A Facebook executive told The Associated Press that Tashfeen Malik posted the material under an alias account at 11 a.m. Wednesday. That was about the time the first 911 calls came in and when the couple were believed to have stormed into the San Bernardino social service center and opened fire.

https://www.yahoo.com/tech/latest-relative-shooter-bad-person-not-radical-135655071.html

The woman, Tashfeen Malik, declared allegiance to the Islamic State on Facebook at roughly the time of the shooting on Wednesday, a Facebook spokesman said. At a news conference in San Bernardino, David Bowdich, the F.B.I. assistant director in charge of the Los Angeles office, said he was aware of the post, which was taken down by Facebook on Wednesday, but he would not elaborate.

http://mobile.nytimes.com/2015/12/05/us/tashfeen-malik-islamic-state.html?referer=https://www.google.com/

(in reply to Politesub53)
Profile   Post #: 20
Page:   [1] 2 3 4   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> "Save A Life - Surrender Your Knife" Page: [1] 2 3 4   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2024
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.334