LadyPact
Posts: 32566
Status: offline
|
First to Lucy, and then I'll get into the quote below. I don't know if you've been reading the blog that PonyGroom linked in a prior response, but there are mentions of some other kinky people (by screen name) who helped the folks avoid authorities for a bit. Probably a stupid decision on their part. I'm not sure how that will turn out. quote:
ORIGINAL: bounty44 I don't know the facts of the particular case, or the guy in question, but from the outside looking in, just looking at the words you've used to describe it: id say that the guy had a prior conviction, or restraining order, concerning sexual misconduct is immaterial to the larger question at hand. in fact it even clouds the issue---people can look at the guy and say "see, convicted predator!" and then whatever he does after that fact that's sexually controversial just flows naturally from that and is more of the same. his present actions are already judged by his previous ones. Not entirely and I can say not from everyone. Personally, I didn't know of his prior conviction and his time on the sexual offender registry until after hearing about the current case. It's occurred to me that this guy might be hoping to push his personal agendas through court of law, either for kink or poly to have some legal changes. If somebody's got that dream, this is not the guy you want spearheading some kind of "BDSM practitioner's rights" kind of thing and it's sure as heck not the case that somebody wants to use to do it. We all know what happens when anything that involves any type of BDSMish, pervy sex type case hits the media. Sex sells papers, kinky sex sells more, and it ends up making most of us look worse. We don't need anybody who is helping 17 year old girls run away from home thinking he's the champion for the cause. quote:
im assuming at the end of your paragraph youre referencing in the particular girl in question in this case--people use the word "grooming" in instances like this always in an indicting manner, again, telling me their minds are already made up on the issue of that what the guy did was wrong. he's a predator who groomed his prey, as opposed to a man who liked younger women and courted one. if she was 17, she's "groomed;" if she's 18, she's "pursued" or "sought after" or "chased" much in the same way men have been doing so with women since whenever. your saying "manipulating" is indicative of thinking that the girl didn't make her own choices in the matter and was a victim of a sort of mental/emotional plot, as opposed to the guys genuine interest in her and her genuine interest in him. In my opinion, "grooming" is probably the best term. I know what I'm about to say is probably going to be confusing because some of the way we phrase things as kinky people are also used by non kink people to describe certain areas. This male person was pretty much in what could be described as a position of power when this whole thing started. You had a very impressionable high school girl who was already start struck with the guy before she ever contacted him due to him being an author of some BDSM books. Almost two sets of class structures from the very beginning because of the age difference regarding what one could do legally and the other couldn't do legally. In this country, we don't allow persons under the age of eighteen to do certain things because of what we now know about human development. That's why we don't allow them to vote, sign legal contracts on their own accord, and a bunch of other different things because most of them aren't advanced enough to understand the consequences of what such things entail. It's not uncommon among kinky/alternative lifestyle people to have an s-type that is not the person in control of the household money, only is allowed so much money, or have no voice in how money is used. When grown ups do that, I don't have a problem with it because an adult understands what they are getting into. That's not really how it works here because the underage person can't even legally work full time, so if she ever had to get away from this person, she wouldn't have her own earning power to have the resources to do so. The potential existed for her to be trapped where she was, with less common knowledge than the average adult about how to get away from this guy if anything bad happened to her. No matter how we who indulge in BDSM slice it, law overrides our kinks every. single. time. We have to have laws in place to protect those who can not protect themselves and I think that's what is happening in this case. It really can't be compared to a hundred years ago because we lacked the knowledge, the legal structure, and protections that we have now. One of the reasons the Mann Act came about was very specifically because people were being forced into prostitution after being transported from one place to another and no way for them to leave. quote:
none of that still really gets to the heart of why/how its immoral or wrong such that we've made, seemingly anyways, such a change from a century ago, to present times. id love to read a giant book on this topic! I think it very possible that a giant book could be written on the subject and it has the potential to be very interesting. How these things relate to BDSM. How these things relate to law. From a number of angles. Heck, ten years from now, it would be interesting to read a book just about this case from the perspective of the person that would then-be 27. Whether she will see herself as having been groomed or not, whether she decides to remain in kink or not, what really happened, etc. She has the potential of having something here that could make her some money via a book of her own.
_____________________________
The crowned Diva of Destruction. ~ ExT Beach Ball Sized Lady Nuts. ~ TWD Happily dating a new submissive. It's official. I've named him engie. Please do not send me email here. Unless I know you, I will delete the email unread
|