Collarchat.com

Join Our Community
Collarchat.com

Home  Login  Search 

RE: Second hand smoke


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid >> RE: Second hand smoke Page: <<   < prev  19 20 [21] 22 23   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Second hand smoke - 8/9/2006 3:32:32 PM   
MistressLorelei


Posts: 997
Joined: 11/7/2005
Status: offline
And now back to square one.  Perhaps the smokers can teach their smoke to stay within the confines of their tables, and not filter through the vents or head over to the tables of others.  Then, we'd all be fine.


(in reply to stef)
Profile   Post #: 401
RE: Second hand smoke - 8/9/2006 4:21:10 PM   
ScooterTrash


Posts: 1407
Joined: 1/24/2005
From: Indiana
Status: offline
Just as an FYI;

July 31, 2006
 
Christina Pearson, an HHS spokeswoman, said HHS Secretary Mike Leavitt appreciated Carmona's service.

"He has helped provide good leadership and counsel to the department on prevention issues," Pearson said. "I would point to the recent smoking report he did, which got unprecedented attention. He also raised the profile of childhood obesity."

Carmona's term expired over the weekend with no announcement from the Health and Human Services Department.

No specific comment...just relaying information.

edited to note; This WAS the Surgeon General who keeps getting mentioned.

< Message edited by ScooterTrash -- 8/9/2006 4:23:25 PM >


_____________________________

Formal symbolic representation of qualitative entities is doomed to its rightful place of minor significance in a world where flowers and beautiful women abound.
-Albert Einstein

(in reply to MistressLorelei)
Profile   Post #: 402
RE: Second hand smoke - 8/9/2006 6:27:50 PM   
EnglishDomNW


Posts: 493
Joined: 12/24/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: MistressLorelei

And now back to square one.  Perhaps the smokers can teach their smoke to stay within the confines of their tables, and not filter through the vents or head over to the tables of others.  Then, we'd all be fine.


Surely most restaurants and cafes in America have already banned smoking.  I can't believe that a member of the anti-smoking group can really be having this much trouble finding somewhere that's smoke free.

I still think this is less to do with smoking and more to do with enjoying the art of complaining.

< Message edited by EnglishDomNW -- 8/9/2006 6:29:09 PM >


_____________________________


"I am woman hear me roar!"

(Yes and I am Man, keep the noise down, bitch.)
.

(in reply to MistressLorelei)
Profile   Post #: 403
RE: Second hand smoke - 8/9/2006 7:47:28 PM   
MistressLorelei


Posts: 997
Joined: 11/7/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: EnglishDomNW

quote:

ORIGINAL: MistressLorelei

And now back to square one.  Perhaps the smokers can teach their smoke to stay within the confines of their tables, and not filter through the vents or head over to the tables of others.  Then, we'd all be fine.


Surely most restaurants and cafes in America have already banned smoking.  I can't believe that a member of the anti-smoking group can really be having this much trouble finding somewhere that's smoke free.

I still think this is less to do with smoking and more to do with enjoying the art of complaining.

The comments I addressed early on in the thread were in regards to those who are upset about the ban or the possible ban (where not already banned), and then to those who insist  that second hand smoke has not been proven to be of no harm to others.

I have no trouble finding non-smoking places... it's banned publicly where I live.  The "complaints" were to those who want the ban lifted in places such as where I live, and are no less valid than the "complaints" smokers have continued to make.

Just as you feel the need to stand up for your right to smoke... I defend  my right to to breathe carcinogen-free air in public places.  I'm all for scrapping the ban when  smokers decide to respect the common places shared by the general population, most who do trust the experts who deem second hand smoke harmful... but that's highly unlikely to ever happen.  If the smokers displayed such consideration for the well-being of others, I bet you'd hear very little from the 'anti-smoking group'.

If you are fine with no smoking indoors publicly... then we have no issue.

(in reply to EnglishDomNW)
Profile   Post #: 404
RE: Second hand smoke - 8/9/2006 11:23:07 PM   
Termyn8or


Posts: 18681
Joined: 11/12/2005
Status: offline
OK, go to places that are carcinogen free. I have no problem with that.

When I am sitting at the bar, it will be in an establishment that allows smoking. Won't see you there. Your money will go elsewhere. The ratio of smoking to non-smoking establishments will undoubtedly follow market forces.

Let it be. Establish a policy where non-smoking establishments proudly display a placard at each entrance that says "This business is a non-smoking evironment. If you smoke here you are guilty of criminal trespass and subject to a fine between $100-$1,000 and could serve jail time".

I would support that. I would not have a problem, even having to leave the parking lot to smoke. I would comply. On the other hand, another business that has not decided to comply with the "Clean Air Guarantee" should post that as well.

Go into one of the stank, smoke filled honkytonks I used to go to and you might get yourself a dose. Feel totally free to walk out and not spend your money there. We have no duty to make every publicly used place safe for everyobdy, much less comfortable. You haven't said a word about deisels, etc. But then OK they are needed. Cigarettes aren't needed, agreed.

What about the air fresheners, inscense and all the wierd chemicals people put on their body ? What about that perfume or aftershave ? What about all that ? This is also going into your lungs. Therefore a "Clean Air Guarantee" certified place must not let those wearing excessive perfume or cologne in either, to me that is worse. If you say "Clean Air Guarantee", mean it.

If people drop dead when they walk outside you're outta luck.

T

(in reply to MistressLorelei)
Profile   Post #: 405
RE: Second hand smoke - 8/9/2006 11:27:51 PM   
EnglishDomNW


Posts: 493
Joined: 12/24/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: MistressLorelei

quote:

ORIGINAL: EnglishDomNW

quote:

ORIGINAL: MistressLorelei

And now back to square one.  Perhaps the smokers can teach their smoke to stay within the confines of their tables, and not filter through the vents or head over to the tables of others.  Then, we'd all be fine.


Surely most restaurants and cafes in America have already banned smoking.  I can't believe that a member of the anti-smoking group can really be having this much trouble finding somewhere that's smoke free.

I still think this is less to do with smoking and more to do with enjoying the art of complaining.

The comments I addressed early on in the thread were in regards to those who are upset about the ban or the possible ban (where not already banned), and then to those who insist  that second hand smoke has not been proven to be of no harm to others.

I have no trouble finding non-smoking places... it's banned publicly where I live.  The "complaints" were to those who want the ban lifted in places such as where I live, and are no less valid than the "complaints" smokers have continued to make.

Just as you feel the need to stand up for your right to smoke... I defend  my right to to breathe carcinogen-free air in public places.  I'm all for scrapping the ban when  smokers decide to respect the common places shared by the general population, most who do trust the experts who deem second hand smoke harmful... but that's highly unlikely to ever happen.  If the smokers displayed such consideration for the well-being of others, I bet you'd hear very little from the 'anti-smoking group'.

If you are fine with no smoking indoors publicly... then we have no issue.


I absolutely agree that you shouldn't have to deal with anyone's smoke ever, indoors in a public place.  But I'm all in favour of having smoking establishments which non-smokers can simply avoid, as Termyn8tor said.   That seems to me to be the ideal answer.

My only issue is when anti-smokers talk about a total ban in public places, it just proves that their interest isn't in health, or avoiding second-hand smoking - they just want to ban something because they personally find it distasteful. 

< Message edited by EnglishDomNW -- 8/9/2006 11:39:05 PM >


_____________________________


"I am woman hear me roar!"

(Yes and I am Man, keep the noise down, bitch.)
.

(in reply to MistressLorelei)
Profile   Post #: 406
RE: Second hand smoke - 8/10/2006 12:04:53 AM   
MistressOfGa


Posts: 2929
Status: offline
quote:

Surely most restaurants and cafes in America have already banned smoking.

There is no smoking in public buildings in Georgia. I have recently moved to South Carolina. Pup and I went into an italian restaurant and the waitress asked us "Smoking or non?" I was surprised, because I had forgotten I was in S.C. lol I live just on the state line, so it is understandable <s> I asked the waitress, wasn't smoking in the restaurant against the law? She said, no not in this state. I must of looked confused because pup reminded me we were not in Georgia lol
I really don't have anything to add to this thread other than I smoked for 33 years and I quit 3 years ago. Second hand smoke only bothers me when someone blows it directly in my face.
I had a medical emergency a few months ago and they could not get my breathing under control. I have COPD so a visit to the emergency room was in order. The ambulance pulled up at the ER and they pushed the gurney I was on through a cloud of smoke. The ER nurses were standing right where the ambulance parks, smoking up a storm. As I felt my lungs filling with the smoke, I gasped out "You  have got to be fucking kidding me!" I was very pissed off that I had NO choice but to go where the gurney went, and where the gurney went was right through the smoking area of the ER staff. My oxygen level had stabalized prior to being wheeled through the smoking area, it took the ER staff another 40 minutes to get my levels back up. Oh and before you ask, yes, I got the COPD from smoking all those years. Nothing like shutting the gate after the horses are out.

_____________________________





(in reply to EnglishDomNW)
Profile   Post #: 407
RE: Second hand smoke - 8/10/2006 12:37:49 AM   
MistressLorelei


Posts: 997
Joined: 11/7/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: EnglishDomNW

I absolutely agree that you shouldn't have to deal with anyone's smoke ever, indoors in a public place.  But I'm all in favour of having smoking establishments which non-smokers can simply avoid, as Termyn8tor said.   That seems to me to be the ideal answer.

My only issue is when anti-smokers talk about a total ban in public places, it just proves that their interest isn't in health, or avoiding second-hand smoking - they just want to ban something because they personally find it distasteful. 


Florida has some cigar bars, pool halls, pubs, where smoking is allowed.  I think the laws in Fla tied indoor smoking into how much food could be sold in order to allow smoke.  Most venues chose to ban smoking and make a buck on high quantity food sales.

It would be ideal to have smoking and non-smoking places.... restaurants would work this way, but multiple courthouses, libraries, etc. wouldn't be a reasonable option, and then there is still the issue of employees. 

No, I can't stand smoke.... but that's not what motivates me on this issue.  I can't stand  red meat either, but I don't  wish to ban it in public places because I don't like to look at it, or even smell it, as I am not harmed by its presence.

Being that you stated the words I bolded, perhaps we never actually disagreed.

(in reply to EnglishDomNW)
Profile   Post #: 408
RE: Second hand smoke - 8/10/2006 7:04:50 AM   
EnglishDomNW


Posts: 493
Joined: 12/24/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: MistressLorelei

quote:

ORIGINAL: EnglishDomNW

I absolutely agree that you shouldn't have to deal with anyone's smoke ever, indoors in a public place.  But I'm all in favour of having smoking establishments which non-smokers can simply avoid, as Termyn8tor said.   That seems to me to be the ideal answer.

My only issue is when anti-smokers talk about a total ban in public places, it just proves that their interest isn't in health, or avoiding second-hand smoking - they just want to ban something because they personally find it distasteful. 


Florida has some cigar bars, pool halls, pubs, where smoking is allowed.  I think the laws in Fla tied indoor smoking into how much food could be sold in order to allow smoke.  Most venues chose to ban smoking and make a buck on high quantity food sales.

It would be ideal to have smoking and non-smoking places.... restaurants would work this way, but multiple courthouses, libraries, etc. wouldn't be a reasonable option, and then there is still the issue of employees. 

No, I can't stand smoke.... but that's not what motivates me on this issue.  I can't stand  red meat either, but I don't  wish to ban it in public places because I don't like to look at it, or even smell it, as I am not harmed by its presence.

Being that you stated the words I bolded, perhaps we never actually disagreed.


Yes but if you re-ead the words you emboldened, it says you "shouldn't have to deal with anyone's smoke in a public place",  not "smoking in public should be banned outright". 

What that means is you should have the choice and wisdom to avoid places where tobacco smoking is allowed, rather than putting yourself in a smoking-allowed establishment and then complaining about it.

Don't go to establishments that allow smoking.  Everybody's problem is solved (except the hard-core of anti-smoking who want it banned altogether, not because of health but because they personally don't enjoy it and don't want to see anyone else enjoying it either.)

< Message edited by EnglishDomNW -- 8/10/2006 7:14:21 AM >


_____________________________


"I am woman hear me roar!"

(Yes and I am Man, keep the noise down, bitch.)
.

(in reply to MistressLorelei)
Profile   Post #: 409
RE: Second hand smoke - 8/10/2006 8:03:14 AM   
MistressLorelei


Posts: 997
Joined: 11/7/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: EnglishDomNW

Yes but if you re-ead the words you emboldened, it says you "shouldn't have to deal with anyone's smoke in a public place",  not "smoking in public should be banned outright". 

What that means is you should have the choice and wisdom to avoid places where tobacco smoking is allowed, rather than putting yourself in a smoking-allowed establishment and then complaining about it.

Don't go to establishments that allow smoking.  Everybody's problem is solved (except the hard-core of anti-smoking who want it banned altogether, not because of health but because they personally don't enjoy it and don't want to see anyone else enjoying it either.)


And in the states with the ban, smokers can choose to go to the places they can't smoke in... or to stay out.  They have had the choice to go or not go since the day the ban began.... yet I still hear protesting from smokers.  Your point works both ways.  Smokers want it not banned altogether... because they personally enjoy smoking, and they don't want to see anyone else being able to enjoy smoke-free air.

I am going to quit adding to it, and maybe this non-productive thread will eventually die.


  


(in reply to EnglishDomNW)
Profile   Post #: 410
RE: Second hand smoke - 8/10/2006 1:48:50 PM   
mistoferin


Posts: 8284
Joined: 10/27/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: MistressLorelei

quote:

ORIGINAL: EnglishDomNW

Yes but if you re-ead the words you emboldened, it says you "shouldn't have to deal with anyone's smoke in a public place",  not "smoking in public should be banned outright". 

What that means is you should have the choice and wisdom to avoid places where tobacco smoking is allowed, rather than putting yourself in a smoking-allowed establishment and then complaining about it.

Don't go to establishments that allow smoking.  Everybody's problem is solved (except the hard-core of anti-smoking who want it banned altogether, not because of health but because they personally don't enjoy it and don't want to see anyone else enjoying it either.)


And in the states with the ban, smokers can choose to go to the places they can't smoke in... or to stay out.  They have had the choice to go or not go since the day the ban began.... yet I still hear protesting from smokers.  Your point works both ways.  Smokers want it not banned altogether... because they personally enjoy smoking, and they don't want to see anyone else being able to enjoy smoke-free air.

I am going to quit adding to it, and maybe this non-productive thread will eventually die.







Does what you say actually make any sense to you...because it surely doesn't to me.

If it's banned everywhere....then where exactly do you see a choice? A "choice" would indicate that you can choose between one thing or another. If there were smoking establishments and non-smoking establishments...we both (smokers and non smokers) would have a choice as to which establishments we chose to frequent. See how that works???

If all establishments are non smoking....where is the choice?

The part of your quoted that I bolded....yes, smokers don't want it banned altogether because they DO enjoy smoking. Because they want to have that choice. As for the part of your quote "they don't want to see anyone else being able to enjoy smoke-free air"....that is utter bullshit. There is not one person on this thread who has stated any such thing....although that is the sentiment you seem to draw no matter what anyone says.  

I don't know why it is that you or anyone else seems to have such a problem with others choices so long as they don't affect you. Grow up....the world doesn't revolve around you.

< Message edited by mistoferin -- 8/10/2006 1:50:41 PM >


_____________________________

Peace and light,
~erin~

There are no victims here...only volunteers.

When you make a habit of playing on the tracks, you thereby forfeit the right to bitch when you get hit by a train.

"I did it! I admit it and I'm gonna do it again!"

(in reply to MistressLorelei)
Profile   Post #: 411
RE: Second hand smoke - 8/10/2006 10:42:02 PM   
Termyn8or


Posts: 18681
Joined: 11/12/2005
Status: offline
Me too. I just lit a cigarette, it's sweet flavor and aroma, oh wait, that's a joint.

Ever notice how alot of non-smokers smoke pot ? Or burn insence, or have one of those awful air fresheners in their car ?

We should make caigarettes a prerequisite to these things.

Non-productive ? I agree. Nothing put into this thread will convince certain people, their bad science trumps all. They might get their way, but what comes around goes around.

It's just like the F______ game governments play, they don't see the end of the game. They are bringing about the end of the game when money will be worthless, but haven't relized that it is they who have the most to lose when it happens.

Suppose we beam into a paralell universe or some shit. Smoking and non-smoking public places are strictly segregated. All but the top ten percent of all the idiots have been satisfied. They really do live in a smoke free environment.

Want to know what happens next ? Everyone who gets lung cancer will be a non-smoker. I knew a non-smoker who died of lung cancer. Victim of second hand smoke ? Absolutely, apparently smoke is intelligent and stealths itself by causing kidney cancer first. Also for some reason this second hand smoke also manages to completely avoid the smokers and head straight for the non-smokers.

Can't someone just be totally fucking honest and just say "I hate the smell of it" and just let smokers be polite and not smoke in their presence ?

I will be happy to be polite, but you give an inch and they take a mile, and waaaaaay too many miles have been taken.

End of story. If you can't accept that, this means war.

T

(in reply to mistoferin)
Profile   Post #: 412
RE: Second hand smoke - 8/10/2006 11:31:46 PM   
FelinePersuasion


Posts: 4792
Joined: 11/20/2004
Status: offline
I hope wheny ou were back to normal again you bitched them out quite throughly, and I hope the ER will rethink their smokeing area

At my adult ed school there's a no smoking sign right by the door. well people will still sit right there and smoke in the door.
quote:

ORIGINAL: MistressOfGa

quote:

Surely most restaurants and cafes in America have already banned smoking.

There is no smoking in public buildings in Georgia. I have recently moved to South Carolina. Pup and I went into an italian restaurant and the waitress asked us "Smoking or non?" I was surprised, because I had forgotten I was in S.C. lol I live just on the state line, so it is understandable <s> I asked the waitress, wasn't smoking in the restaurant against the law? She said, no not in this state. I must of looked confused because pup reminded me we were not in Georgia lol
I really don't have anything to add to this thread other than I smoked for 33 years and I quit 3 years ago. Second hand smoke only bothers me when someone blows it directly in my face.
I had a medical emergency a few months ago and they could not get my breathing under control. I have COPD so a visit to the emergency room was in order. The ambulance pulled up at the ER and they pushed the gurney I was on through a cloud of smoke. The ER nurses were standing right where the ambulance parks, smoking up a storm. As I felt my lungs filling with the smoke, I gasped out "You  have got to be fucking kidding me!" I was very pissed off that I had NO choice but to go where the gurney went, and where the gurney went was right through the smoking area of the ER staff. My oxygen level had stabalized prior to being wheeled through the smoking area, it took the ER staff another 40 minutes to get my levels back up. Oh and before you ask, yes, I got the COPD from smoking all those years. Nothing like shutting the gate after the horses are out.

(in reply to MistressOfGa)
Profile   Post #: 413
RE: Second hand smoke - 8/11/2006 4:00:12 AM   
twicehappy


Posts: 2706
Joined: 2/5/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: mistoferin

If all establishments are non smoking....where is the choice?

The part of your quoted that I bolded....yes, smokers don't want it banned altogether because they DO enjoy smoking. Because they want to have that choice. As for the part of your quote "they don't want to see anyone else being able to enjoy smoke-free air"....that is utter bullshit. There is not one person on this thread who has stated any such thing....although that is the sentiment you seem to draw no matter what anyone says.  

I don't know why it is that you or anyone else seems to have such a problem with others choices so long as they don't affect you. Grow up....the world doesn't revolve around you.



Best post on this thread yet!

_____________________________

Infinite Diversity in Infinite Combinations.

The human heart is not a finite container but an ever expanding universe with all the stars contained there in.

(in reply to mistoferin)
Profile   Post #: 414
RE: Second hand smoke - 8/11/2006 5:02:01 AM   
EnglishDomNW


Posts: 493
Joined: 12/24/2005
Status: offline
I had a cigarette last night outside in my garden.  It was almost midnight.  There was no wind at all.  I blew a smoke ring and it rose up and made a halo around my head.

I swear I heard Saint Peter say "Bless you my child, you enjoy your cigarette".

"Cheers Pete, I always liked you", says I.

"No problem, mate" says the heavenly geezer, "talk to you later".


Disclaimer:  While some of this story is true, other parts may have been enhanced for dramatic effect

_____________________________


"I am woman hear me roar!"

(Yes and I am Man, keep the noise down, bitch.)
.

(in reply to twicehappy)
Profile   Post #: 415
RE: Second hand smoke - 8/11/2006 7:49:41 AM   
juliaoceania


Posts: 21383
Joined: 4/19/2006
From: Somewhere Over the Rainbow
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Termyn8or


Ever notice how alot of non-smokers smoke pot ? Or burn insence, or have one of those awful air fresheners in their car ?

We should make caigarettes a prerequisite to these things.




T


I do not use air freshener or insense.. they make my head hurt too. In fact many people are allergic to these things. Air fresheners are chemicals for crying out loud, who needs more toxins in their environment.. remember, I am a granola eating hippie.

I had a friend I lost about 18 months ago to cancer (shortly before I quit smoking I found out he had liver cancer). The research I did with him showed that smokers were much more likely to get all sorts of cancers because nicotine is a carcinogen that permeates your body.. it must be dispelled from the body via kidneys and liver (these organs collect toxins of all sorts including the ones found in cigarettes). He was a smoker, he thought it was the cigarettes before he died. His illness was part of the reason I quit (among many others)I loved Andy, he did much for voting rights in my state and was a political comrade of mine. I still miss him. He was only 43

< Message edited by juliaoceania -- 8/11/2006 7:51:25 AM >


_____________________________

Once you label me, you negate me ~ Soren Kierkegaard

Reality has a well known Liberal Bias ~ Stephen Colbert

Great minds discuss ideas; Average minds discuss events; Small minds discuss people. Eleanor Roosevelt

(in reply to Termyn8or)
Profile   Post #: 416
RE: Second hand smoke - 8/11/2006 8:31:58 PM   
MistressOfGa


Posts: 2929
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: FelinePersuasion

I hope wheny ou were back to normal again you bitched them out quite throughly, and I hope the ER will rethink their smokeing area

At my adult ed school there's a no smoking sign right by the door. well people will still sit right there and smoke in the door.
quote:

ORIGINAL: MistressOfGa

quote:

Surely most restaurants and cafes in America have already banned smoking.

There is no smoking in public buildings in Georgia. I have recently moved to South Carolina. Pup and I went into an italian restaurant and the waitress asked us "Smoking or non?" I was surprised, because I had forgotten I was in S.C. lol I live just on the state line, so it is understandable <s> I asked the waitress, wasn't smoking in the restaurant against the law? She said, no not in this state. I must of looked confused because pup reminded me we were not in Georgia lol
I really don't have anything to add to this thread other than I smoked for 33 years and I quit 3 years ago. Second hand smoke only bothers me when someone blows it directly in my face.
I had a medical emergency a few months ago and they could not get my breathing under control. I have COPD so a visit to the emergency room was in order. The ambulance pulled up at the ER and they pushed the gurney I was on through a cloud of smoke. The ER nurses were standing right where the ambulance parks, smoking up a storm. As I felt my lungs filling with the smoke, I gasped out "You  have got to be fucking kidding me!" I was very pissed off that I had NO choice but to go where the gurney went, and where the gurney went was right through the smoking area of the ER staff. My oxygen level had stabalized prior to being wheeled through the smoking area, it took the ER staff another 40 minutes to get my levels back up. Oh and before you ask, yes, I got the COPD from smoking all those years. Nothing like shutting the gate after the horses are out.



Actually, crazy thing is, when I went to ex-ray, I left my eye glasses on the table beside the bed, when I returned they were gone. We searched everywhere for them and they were just simply gone.  While I had them on the phone complaining about the loss of my glasses, I also mentioned the complete lack of concern for my well being as the ER staff chose to smoke right at the ambulance entrance.
 
They paid for my new glasses, without a second thought. 



_____________________________





(in reply to FelinePersuasion)
Profile   Post #: 417
RE: Second hand smoke - 8/13/2006 7:24:01 AM   
Termyn8or


Posts: 18681
Joined: 11/12/2005
Status: offline
Moga;

It is common fucking sense that you don't smoke in hospitals or grocery stores. Those people were not too smart.

Smoking or non, use the yellow pages. When a business is "Clean Air" compliant, there is more. Smoke from the kitchen must be exhausted, way up high, if the parking lot is to be non-smoking. Thirty feet would do. The restaurant furniture would be tested for outgassing, and nobody is allowed in if you can smell anything on them, including perfume.

Violate, go to jail. I would actually agree to these terms, to be polite to non-smokers. But it does not seem to be enough. Nothing is ever enough for certain people. What I need to remind myself of is that this is a public place, and sociopaths and meglomaniacs are just as likely to be here as anyone else. The nice thing is that these nuts hear our words, something that would never have happened without these fora.

When people start talking about me smoking in my car on the freway, that is too much.

T

(in reply to MistressOfGa)
Profile   Post #: 418
RE: Second hand smoke - 8/13/2006 8:12:33 AM   
EnglishDomNW


Posts: 493
Joined: 12/24/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Termyn8or

When people start talking about me smoking in my car on the freway, that is too much.

T


I think there is a genuine and legitimate case for non-smokers to say "Don't do it around me please" which smokers need to respect.

But when they start saying "Don't do it anywhere except your own home, regardless of whether it's affecting anyone else or not", you wonder if it's really about health or just a section of people inflicting their beliefs on others simply because they personally don't want to smoke tobacco.

_____________________________


"I am woman hear me roar!"

(Yes and I am Man, keep the noise down, bitch.)
.

(in reply to Termyn8or)
Profile   Post #: 419
RE: Second hand smoke - 8/13/2006 8:22:21 AM   
meatcleaver


Posts: 9030
Joined: 3/13/2006
Status: offline
On the scale of things, smoking isn't that big a health issue for people who don't smoke and for the majority that smoke and with the absence of other threads ranting about more pressing health issues it is quite obvious, this thread was never about health issues in the first place. It is about social fascists and rabid puritans wanting power over other people. They are people who can't enjoy themselves and hate to see other people enjoying themselves. They really need to get a life and stop complaining about other people who enjoy certain habits as we journey between nothing and nothing.

(in reply to EnglishDomNW)
Profile   Post #: 420
Page:   <<   < prev  19 20 [21] 22 23   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid >> RE: Second hand smoke Page: <<   < prev  19 20 [21] 22 23   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2024
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

6.844