Collarchat.com

Join Our Community
Collarchat.com

Home  Login  Search 

RE: Are Science and Religion incompatible?


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Are Science and Religion incompatible? Page: <<   < prev  23 24 [25] 26 27   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Are Science and Religion incompatible? - 1/18/2017 9:47:36 AM   
Rule


Posts: 10479
Joined: 12/5/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne
The Qur’an clearly states “There is no compulsion in religion, the path of guidance stands out clear from error” [2:256] and [60:8]. In this verse, the word “rushd” or “path of guidance” refers to the entire domain of human life, not just to the rites and theology of Islam.

There is no debate about the fact that pre-Islamic Arabia was a misguided society dominated by tribalism and a blind obedience to custom. In contrast, the clarity of Islam and its emphasis on reason and rational proofs excluded any need to impose it by force. This verse is a clear indication that the Qur’an is strictly opposed to the use of compulsion in religious faith. Similarly, Allah addressed Sayiddina Muhammad r saying, “Remind them, for you are only one who reminds.” [88:21] Allah addresses the believers, urging them to obey the injunctions of Islam, “Obey Allah, and obey the Messenger, and beware (of evil): if you do turn back, then know that it is Our Messenger’s duty to proclaim (the message) in the clearest manner.” [5:92] However, this verse makes it clear that the Messenger’s duty is only to proclaim and preach the message; it remains to each individual to accept and to follow.
http://islamicsupremecouncil.org/understanding-islam/legal-rulings/5-jihad-a-misunderstood-concept-from-islam.html?start=3

Those are all lies. Those who obey God submit to the effects of nature. Jews and Muslims and such Christian sects as the Amish in contrast do not submit to nature. They oppose God in every way possible.

_____________________________

"I tend to pay attention when Rule speaks" - Aswad

"You are sweet, kind, and ever so smart, Rule. You ALWAYS stretch my mind and make me think further than I might have on my own" - Duskypearls

Si vis pacem, para bellum.

(in reply to Real0ne)
Profile   Post #: 481
RE: Are Science and Religion incompatible? - 1/18/2017 9:50:54 AM   
Real0ne


Posts: 21189
Joined: 10/25/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Kirata



Well, I don't think beheading will force someone to believe something.
K.





agreed, which is where religion and gubmint part company, the same which was intended to be in the US, (freedom of religion) but where does any political system operate according to their stated purpose. The reason they do that is conversion over a long period time, its a battle of attrition guns win.




< Message edited by Real0ne -- 1/18/2017 9:54:09 AM >


_____________________________

"We the Borg" of the us imperialists....resistance is futile

Democracy; The 'People' voted on 'which' amendment?

Yesterdays tinfoil is today's reality!

"No man's life, liberty, or property is safe while the legislature is in session

(in reply to Kirata)
Profile   Post #: 482
RE: Are Science and Religion incompatible? - 1/18/2017 9:57:31 AM   
Rule


Posts: 10479
Joined: 12/5/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne
They wanted to remain pious and observant Muslims, but believed that the way to return to the “glory days” of Islam was to “return” to the original spirit of vitality and authenticity of Islam, before the influence of “foreign ideas” crept into Islam, sapping its authenticity.

Foreign - Jewish - ideas crept into Islam when the Jews who were defeated by Mohammed told Mohammed's followers "Your God is the same as our God". From that moment onwards Islam did not exist anymore: it had become a Jewish sect.

< Message edited by Rule -- 1/18/2017 9:59:54 AM >


_____________________________

"I tend to pay attention when Rule speaks" - Aswad

"You are sweet, kind, and ever so smart, Rule. You ALWAYS stretch my mind and make me think further than I might have on my own" - Duskypearls

Si vis pacem, para bellum.

(in reply to Real0ne)
Profile   Post #: 483
RE: Are Science and Religion incompatible? - 1/18/2017 9:58:59 AM   
tamaka


Posts: 5079
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne

I am not going to chase you around the block every time you get your ass handed to you and move the goal posts to a new argument, especially when I have to post definitions for simple words that you use incorrectly.

Well, then you are comatose, the only one with their ass handed them is you. You can now put your head up it again. There is no new argument, no eyewitness accounts, no miracles with eyewitness accounts.

Here are some simple dates on nero, 15 December 37 AD – 9 June 68 AD

Give me Jeebus. And then you can do the same for god.


What do you mean by AD, exactly?

(in reply to mnottertail)
Profile   Post #: 484
RE: Are Science and Religion incompatible? - 1/18/2017 10:05:36 AM   
Rule


Posts: 10479
Joined: 12/5/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne
All Muslims seek to emulate the Prophet Muhammad.

Muhammad is dead. He is frozen in time, like the dinosaurs; they don't evolve anymore. Anyone who tries to emulate Muhammad tries to emulate a corpse.

_____________________________

"I tend to pay attention when Rule speaks" - Aswad

"You are sweet, kind, and ever so smart, Rule. You ALWAYS stretch my mind and make me think further than I might have on my own" - Duskypearls

Si vis pacem, para bellum.

(in reply to Real0ne)
Profile   Post #: 485
RE: Are Science and Religion incompatible? - 1/18/2017 10:25:59 AM   
MrRodgers


Posts: 10540
Joined: 7/30/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne

wow beevus thats briliant, how do you kill a triune God? LOL
We arent talking about any constitution, better double down on your meds before you post

Ok, I'll use my imagination since I am required to, to believe all of the religious bullshit, it all being only in one's imagination.

_____________________________

You can be a murderous tyrant and the world will remember you fondly but fuck one horse and you will be a horse fucker for all eternity. Catherine the Great

Under capitalism, man exploits man. Under communism, it's just the opposite.
J K Galbraith

(in reply to Real0ne)
Profile   Post #: 486
RE: Are Science and Religion incompatible? - 1/18/2017 10:29:50 AM   
MrRodgers


Posts: 10540
Joined: 7/30/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne


quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail


quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne

wow beevus thats briliant, how do you kill a triune God? LOL
We arent talking about any constitution, better double down on your meds before you post

well, buttlick, a triune god? seems like he was one once, after they got rid of his wife in the original fairytale, but you have the problem that jeebus prayed to what he called his father, and never proclaimed himself, or the holy spirit god.

By the Three, what a changeable impotent god you have.

And now we aint seen none of these three, so theres the proof the invisibility cloak is working



Seems you have big problems.

The Triune God of Christianity, became flesh and blood (transubstantiated), and walked among us, too bad you missed it. You managed to kill the body, the flesh and blood, but you did not kill God nor did you kill the Holy Spirit.

I sort of doubt you would ever see so much as a hint of anything what so ever about God since you spend all your time cursing God.




He missed nothing, there is no such thing as transubstantiation. It is ALL in your imagination remember ? One does not curse what does not exist.

_____________________________

You can be a murderous tyrant and the world will remember you fondly but fuck one horse and you will be a horse fucker for all eternity. Catherine the Great

Under capitalism, man exploits man. Under communism, it's just the opposite.
J K Galbraith

(in reply to Real0ne)
Profile   Post #: 487
RE: Are Science and Religion incompatible? - 1/18/2017 10:30:51 AM   
MrRodgers


Posts: 10540
Joined: 7/30/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: tamaka


quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail


quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne


quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail


quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne

wow beevus thats briliant, how do you kill a triune God? LOL
We arent talking about any constitution, better double down on your meds before you post

well, buttlick, a triune god? seems like he was one once, after they got rid of his wife in the original fairytale, but you have the problem that jeebus prayed to what he called his father, and never proclaimed himself, or the holy spirit god.

By the Three, what a changeable impotent god you have.

And now we aint seen none of these three, so theres the proof the invisibility cloak is working



Seems you have big problems.

The Triune God of Christianity, became flesh and blood (transubstantiated), and walked among us, too bad you missed it. You managed to kill the body, the flesh and blood, but you did not kill God nor did you kill the Holy Spirit.

I sort of doubt you would ever see so much as a hint of anything what so ever about God since you spend all your time cursing God.




Ja, trouble with you retards is someone who is as fucking retarded as you are writes some fantastick toilet lick, and now you got some three headed monster, who nobody, and I mean nobody has ever seen, who does not talk, who does not interact, who you retards missed that never walked amongst you, not existing and so on. And kills the human body and spirit, but not the hallucinations of you retarded fucks. Go transubstantiate your felchgobbling asswipe, dumbass.


Many people have experienced God's interaction.


Proof ?

_____________________________

You can be a murderous tyrant and the world will remember you fondly but fuck one horse and you will be a horse fucker for all eternity. Catherine the Great

Under capitalism, man exploits man. Under communism, it's just the opposite.
J K Galbraith

(in reply to tamaka)
Profile   Post #: 488
RE: Are Science and Religion incompatible? - 1/18/2017 10:33:31 AM   
MrRodgers


Posts: 10540
Joined: 7/30/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne

So much hatred, you must be off your meds again, you are denying recorded history......again.
Dont worry, I am confident that you will never see God regardless its been recorded in secular history and the sacred texts of the Jews.


Nero fastened the guilt ... on a class hated for their abominations, called Christians by the populace. Christus, from whom the name had its origin, suffered the extreme penalty during the reign of Tiberius at the hands of ... Pontius Pilatus, and a most mischievous superstition, thus checked for the moment, again broke out not only in Judaea, the first source of the evil, but even in Rome....[5]
-Tacitus, Annals 15.44, cited in Strobel, The Case for Christ, 82.

Lucian
The Christians ... worship a man to this day – the distinguished personage who introduced their novel rites, and was crucified on that account.... [It] was impressed on them by their original lawgiver that they are all brothers, from the moment that they are converted, and deny the gods of Greece, and worship the crucified sage, and live after his laws.
-Lucian, "The Death of Peregrine", 11-13, in The Works of Lucian of Samosata, transl. by H.W. Fowler and F.G. Fowler, 4 vols. (Oxford: Clarendon, 1949), vol. 4., cited in Habermas, The Historical Jesus, 206.

Babylonian Talmud <-the Jewish Bible
On the eve of the Passover Yeshu was hanged. For forty days before the execution took place, a herald ... cried, "He is going forth to be stoned because he has practiced sorcery and enticed Israel to apostasy."

Josephus
About this time there lived Jesus, a wise man, if indeed one ought to call him a man. For he ... wrought surprising feats.... He was the Christ. When Pilate ...condemned him to be crucified, those who had . . . come to love him did not give up their affection for him. On the third day he appeared ... restored to life.... And the tribe of Christians ... has ... not disappeared.
-Josephus, Antiquities 18.63-64, cited in Yamauchi, "Jesus Outside the New Testament", 212


Let's summarize what we've learned about Jesus from this examination of ancient non-Christian sources. First, both Josephus and Lucian indicate that Jesus was regarded as wise. Second, Pliny, the Talmud, and Lucian imply He was a powerful and revered teacher. Third, both Josephus and the Talmud indicate He performed miraculous feats. Fourth, Tacitus, Josephus, the Talmud, and Lucian all mention that He was crucified. Tacitus and Josephus say this occurred under Pontius Pilate. And the Talmud declares it happened on the eve of Passover. Fifth, there are possible references to the Christian belief in Jesus' resurrection in both Tacitus and Josephus. Sixth, Josephus records that Jesus' followers believed He was the Christ, or Messiah. And finally, both Pliny and Lucian indicate that Christians worshipped Jesus as God!

http://www.bethinking.org/jesus/ancient-evidence-for-jesus-from-non-christian-sources

Face it everyone seen him but you.

Plagiarism based on hearsay...based on hearsay.

_____________________________

You can be a murderous tyrant and the world will remember you fondly but fuck one horse and you will be a horse fucker for all eternity. Catherine the Great

Under capitalism, man exploits man. Under communism, it's just the opposite.
J K Galbraith

(in reply to Real0ne)
Profile   Post #: 489
RE: Are Science and Religion incompatible? - 1/18/2017 10:35:14 AM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: tamaka


quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne

I am not going to chase you around the block every time you get your ass handed to you and move the goal posts to a new argument, especially when I have to post definitions for simple words that you use incorrectly.

Well, then you are comatose, the only one with their ass handed them is you. You can now put your head up it again. There is no new argument, no eyewitness accounts, no miracles with eyewitness accounts.

Here are some simple dates on nero, 15 December 37 AD – 9 June 68 AD

Give me Jeebus. And then you can do the same for god.


What do you mean by AD, exactly?


Anno Domini. You might want to walk very carefully thru your next question or comment. it does not bode well for those of faith.

LOL.

< Message edited by mnottertail -- 1/18/2017 10:38:24 AM >


_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to tamaka)
Profile   Post #: 490
RE: Are Science and Religion incompatible? - 1/18/2017 10:35:49 AM   
MrRodgers


Posts: 10540
Joined: 7/30/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne

Jesus appeared 12 times to different group sizes ranging from just one person to 500 people.

1) Mary Magdalene (Mark 16.9-11; John 20.11-18), Peter in Jerusalem (Luke 24.34; 1 Cor. 15.5), Jesus' brother (insider skeptic) James (1 Cor. 15.7). "And they went out quickly, and fled from the sepulchre; for they trembled and were amazed: neither said they any thing to any [man]; for they were afraid" (Mark 16.8). Some of the New Testament authors explicitly claimed to be eyewitnesses to Jesus' resurrection (and transfiguration). Peter said, "We did not follow cleverly invented stories when we told you about the power and coming of our Lord Jesus Christ, but we were eyewitnesses of his majesty" (2 Pet. 2.16). John also said, "That which was from the beginning, which we have heard, which we have seen with our eyes, which we have looked at and our hands have touched...we proclaim to you what we have seen and heard" (1 John 1.1,3).
2) The other women at the tomb (Matthew 28.8-10).
3) The two travelers on the road (Mark 16.12,13; Luke 24.13-34).
4) Ten disciples behind closed doors (Mark 16.14; Luke 24.35-43; John 20.19-25).
5) All the disciples, with Thomas, excluding Judas Iscariot (John 20.26-31; 1 Cor. 15.5).
6) Seven disciples while fishing (John 21.1-14).
7) Eleven disciples on the mountain (Matthew 28.16-20).
8) A crowd of 500 "most of whom are still alive" at the time of Paul writing (1 Cor. 15.6). This may have been the same group as in Matt. 28.16: the rendezvous was to "to Galilee, to the mountain to which Jesus had directed them." Unlike the other accounts which were unexpected and by surprise, and to gather such a large number of people, this meeting was held outdoors. The women were told to tell the disciples to meet Jesus in Galilee as well. "And when they saw him, they worshipped him: but some doubted" (Matt. 28.17) may be a reference to many present, both believers and non-believers. Paul had firsthand contact with them. So it was not a legend. He knew some of the people had died in the interim, but most were still alive. He is saying in effect they are still around to be questioned. You can talk to some of the witnesses. He never could have made this challenge if this event had not occurred.
9) "Then to all the apostles" (1 Cor. 15.7) which includes the Twelve plus all the other apostles.
10) Jesus appeared to the disciples in Jerusalem (Luke 24.44-49).
11) Those who watched Jesus ascend to heaven (Mark 16.19,20; Luke 24.50-53; Acts 1.3-8).
12) Least of all Paul (outsider skeptic) with others present and as though he was not living in the proper time (1 Cor. 15.8-9; Gal. 1.13-16; Acts 9.1-8, 22.9, read all of chapters 22 and 26; 13.30-37; 1 Cor. 15.10-20; Gal. 2.1-10).


sure got around a lot for a dead guy


Referring to writings doesn't prove a thing...see my last. There was no guy, let alone a dead guy.

_____________________________

You can be a murderous tyrant and the world will remember you fondly but fuck one horse and you will be a horse fucker for all eternity. Catherine the Great

Under capitalism, man exploits man. Under communism, it's just the opposite.
J K Galbraith

(in reply to Real0ne)
Profile   Post #: 491
RE: Are Science and Religion incompatible? - 1/18/2017 10:43:09 AM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: MrRodgers

Referring to writings doesn't prove a thing...see my last. There was no guy, let alone a dead guy.


Punctiliously speaking, that is not strictly true, Since Yeshua was the 6th most popular name in Israel at the time, and it has been some 2000 years according to the fairytale, there are many dead guys whose molecules and dust are blowing around from that time.

Just no Jeebuses we can find actual credible citations for.

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to MrRodgers)
Profile   Post #: 492
RE: Are Science and Religion incompatible? - 1/18/2017 11:10:37 AM   
tamaka


Posts: 5079
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

quote:

ORIGINAL: tamaka


quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne

I am not going to chase you around the block every time you get your ass handed to you and move the goal posts to a new argument, especially when I have to post definitions for simple words that you use incorrectly.

Well, then you are comatose, the only one with their ass handed them is you. You can now put your head up it again. There is no new argument, no eyewitness accounts, no miracles with eyewitness accounts.

Here are some simple dates on nero, 15 December 37 AD – 9 June 68 AD

Give me Jeebus. And then you can do the same for god.


What do you mean by AD, exactly?


Anno Domini. You might want to walk very carefully thru your next question or comment. it does not bode well for those of faith.

LOL.


No need for further question or comment. : ) i rest my case.

(in reply to mnottertail)
Profile   Post #: 493
RE: Are Science and Religion incompatible? - 1/18/2017 12:35:14 PM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
Exactly, they dont know have the date correct even in fantasy, any AD or BC is incorrect. I rest my case. Don't know what your case is, but if it is to prove that there are abundant lack of facts and reason that makes up the fairytale, good one on ya. If it was something else, then not so much.

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to tamaka)
Profile   Post #: 494
RE: Are Science and Religion incompatible? - 1/18/2017 1:40:21 PM   
vincentML


Posts: 9980
Joined: 10/31/2009
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: MrRodgers


quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne


quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail


quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne

wow beevus thats briliant, how do you kill a triune God? LOL
We arent talking about any constitution, better double down on your meds before you post

well, buttlick, a triune god? seems like he was one once, after they got rid of his wife in the original fairytale, but you have the problem that jeebus prayed to what he called his father, and never proclaimed himself, or the holy spirit god.

By the Three, what a changeable impotent god you have.

And now we aint seen none of these three, so theres the proof the invisibility cloak is working



Seems you have big problems.

The Triune God of Christianity, became flesh and blood (transubstantiated), and walked among us, too bad you missed it. You managed to kill the body, the flesh and blood, but you did not kill God nor did you kill the Holy Spirit.

I sort of doubt you would ever see so much as a hint of anything what so ever about God since you spend all your time cursing God.




He missed nothing, there is no such thing as transubstantiation. It is ALL in your imagination remember ? One does not curse what does not exist.

RO has a false impression of the meaning of transubstantiation. He should probably google the word to discover that it refers to the communion wafer in the Catholic Mass.

_____________________________

vML

Our lives begin to end the day we become silent about things that matter. ~ MLK Jr.

(in reply to MrRodgers)
Profile   Post #: 495
RE: Are Science and Religion incompatible? - 1/18/2017 2:28:16 PM   
Real0ne


Posts: 21189
Joined: 10/25/2004
Status: offline
good point, Christ was actually born like everyone else though of a virgin.

transubstantiation is the turning of wine into the blood of Christ and the bread into the flesh of Christ.

_____________________________

"We the Borg" of the us imperialists....resistance is futile

Democracy; The 'People' voted on 'which' amendment?

Yesterdays tinfoil is today's reality!

"No man's life, liberty, or property is safe while the legislature is in session

(in reply to vincentML)
Profile   Post #: 496
RE: Are Science and Religion incompatible? - 1/18/2017 2:34:18 PM   
Real0ne


Posts: 21189
Joined: 10/25/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: MrRodgers


quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne

Jesus appeared 12 times to different group sizes ranging from just one person to 500 people.

1) Mary Magdalene (Mark 16.9-11; John 20.11-18), Peter in Jerusalem (Luke 24.34; 1 Cor. 15.5), Jesus' brother (insider skeptic) James (1 Cor. 15.7). "And they went out quickly, and fled from the sepulchre; for they trembled and were amazed: neither said they any thing to any [man]; for they were afraid" (Mark 16.8). Some of the New Testament authors explicitly claimed to be eyewitnesses to Jesus' resurrection (and transfiguration). Peter said, "We did not follow cleverly invented stories when we told you about the power and coming of our Lord Jesus Christ, but we were eyewitnesses of his majesty" (2 Pet. 2.16). John also said, "That which was from the beginning, which we have heard, which we have seen with our eyes, which we have looked at and our hands have touched...we proclaim to you what we have seen and heard" (1 John 1.1,3).
2) The other women at the tomb (Matthew 28.8-10).
3) The two travelers on the road (Mark 16.12,13; Luke 24.13-34).
4) Ten disciples behind closed doors (Mark 16.14; Luke 24.35-43; John 20.19-25).
5) All the disciples, with Thomas, excluding Judas Iscariot (John 20.26-31; 1 Cor. 15.5).
6) Seven disciples while fishing (John 21.1-14).
7) Eleven disciples on the mountain (Matthew 28.16-20).
8) A crowd of 500 "most of whom are still alive" at the time of Paul writing (1 Cor. 15.6). This may have been the same group as in Matt. 28.16: the rendezvous was to "to Galilee, to the mountain to which Jesus had directed them." Unlike the other accounts which were unexpected and by surprise, and to gather such a large number of people, this meeting was held outdoors. The women were told to tell the disciples to meet Jesus in Galilee as well. "And when they saw him, they worshipped him: but some doubted" (Matt. 28.17) may be a reference to many present, both believers and non-believers. Paul had firsthand contact with them. So it was not a legend. He knew some of the people had died in the interim, but most were still alive. He is saying in effect they are still around to be questioned. You can talk to some of the witnesses. He never could have made this challenge if this event had not occurred.
9) "Then to all the apostles" (1 Cor. 15.7) which includes the Twelve plus all the other apostles.
10) Jesus appeared to the disciples in Jerusalem (Luke 24.44-49).
11) Those who watched Jesus ascend to heaven (Mark 16.19,20; Luke 24.50-53; Acts 1.3-8).
12) Least of all Paul (outsider skeptic) with others present and as though he was not living in the proper time (1 Cor. 15.8-9; Gal. 1.13-16; Acts 9.1-8, 22.9, read all of chapters 22 and 26; 13.30-37; 1 Cor. 15.10-20; Gal. 2.1-10).


sure got around a lot for a dead guy


Referring to writings doesn't prove a thing...see my last. There was no guy, let alone a dead guy.



while some require proof beyond a shadow of a doubt, others can get kicked in the nuts and still deny, the test for this sort of thing is 'preponderance of evidence', which we have. To place the evidentiary requirements at the level of a crimnal case is patently ridiculous 2000 years after the fact, which is to say doesnt matter to some people.

The problem you all are faced with is without proof to the contrary it is not possible to prove Christ did not exist.

_____________________________

"We the Borg" of the us imperialists....resistance is futile

Democracy; The 'People' voted on 'which' amendment?

Yesterdays tinfoil is today's reality!

"No man's life, liberty, or property is safe while the legislature is in session

(in reply to MrRodgers)
Profile   Post #: 497
RE: Are Science and Religion incompatible? - 1/18/2017 2:39:30 PM   
Real0ne


Posts: 21189
Joined: 10/25/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

Exactly, they dont know have the date correct even in fantasy, any AD or BC is incorrect. I rest my case. Don't know what your case is, but if it is to prove that there are abundant lack of facts and reason that makes up the fairytale, good one on ya. If it was something else, then not so much.



only a complete imbicile would claim it was a fairytale and claim they lack facts which of course means they are a 1/2 wit blowing smoke up everyone ass.

Now if you can prove fraud (which you cant) you might bring your credibility up 1/2 notch.

_____________________________

"We the Borg" of the us imperialists....resistance is futile

Democracy; The 'People' voted on 'which' amendment?

Yesterdays tinfoil is today's reality!

"No man's life, liberty, or property is safe while the legislature is in session

(in reply to mnottertail)
Profile   Post #: 498
RE: Are Science and Religion incompatible? - 1/18/2017 2:53:30 PM   
tamaka


Posts: 5079
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne

good point, Christ was actually born like everyone else though of a virgin.

transubstantiation is the turning of wine into the blood of Christ and the bread into the flesh of Christ.


Yeah... that's a bunch of bullshit.

(in reply to Real0ne)
Profile   Post #: 499
RE: Are Science and Religion incompatible? - 1/18/2017 2:54:15 PM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne


quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

Exactly, they dont know have the date correct even in fantasy, any AD or BC is incorrect. I rest my case. Don't know what your case is, but if it is to prove that there are abundant lack of facts and reason that makes up the fairytale, good one on ya. If it was something else, then not so much.



only a complete imbicile would claim it was a fairytale and claim they lack facts which of course means they are a 1/2 wit blowing smoke up everyone ass.

Now if you can prove fraud (which you cant) you might bring your credibility up 1/2 notch.

You are a fucking fraud. you cannot spell imbecile. you have no facts. who is they?
again, born of a virgin? who says? any eyewitnesses? why the joe genealogy, why did jesus call himself the son of man, others called him the son of god, and since god fucked mary or joe fucked mary, or both fucked mary out of wedlock, makes her a whore not a virgin.

there is no fact, not a claim prima facie evidence there are no credible facts.

remember, you didnt witness this, therefore you are a retarded dumbass, just like you didnt witness the 9/11 towers falling, hows that working out for you?

Sorry, cant sound as fucking retarded as you do saying it.


_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to Real0ne)
Profile   Post #: 500
Page:   <<   < prev  23 24 [25] 26 27   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Are Science and Religion incompatible? Page: <<   < prev  23 24 [25] 26 27   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2024
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.051