tamaka -> RE: inferior? (4/9/2017 5:52:59 PM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: dreamlady quote:
ORIGINAL: tamaka What you don't understand Peon, Nobody here does. . . possibly due to not being fluent - ne parle pas - in the moronic. [8D] quote:
is that by placing yourself in the position of a sub, you are inferior to every other man that doesn't. . . . Which begs for translation in tamakanese: 1. Do you believe that "placing yourself in the position of a sub" makes every non-submissive man somehow superior to you, women in general, or just to submissive women? Placing myself, a woman, in the position of sub makes every non-submissive man nothing to me unless my Master tells me differently. Non-submissive men need to work out for themselves where they stand among other women . 2. (a) Is it your considered opinion that military men who are subordinate to their superior officers also fall into this broad category of "being inferior [in manhood] to every other" man in uniform who outranks them? No 2. (b) If not, then why not, according to your own [skewed] logic? It's their job and jobs have hierarchies 2. (c) Where does this leave military women in terms of social hierarchy? Are they somehow "less womanly" than the average civilian woman if they take command of others? Does this extend to the arena of law enforcement, etc.? It's a job. 3. (a) Do you see yourself as being superior, equal or inferior to other women who do not self-identify as their "Master's hole" as you have declared yourself to be nothing more than? I don't compare myself to others. Hint: You may avail yourself of whatever definition you feel applies, either according to ResidentSadist's post, or to your own implication of substandardness. 4. Paradoxically, do you see yourself as being superior to (a) non-submissive women and/or (b) submissive men in worth and value, because of the "Subblier Than Thou" stick you have shoved up one of your Master's holes? I don't compare myself to others. DreamLady
|
|
|
|