Collarchat.com

Join Our Community
Collarchat.com

Home  Login  Search 

RE: "Inconvenient Sequel" hits theatres July 28th


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: "Inconvenient Sequel" hits theatres July 28th Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3 4 5   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: "Inconvenient Sequel" hits theatres July ... - 4/7/2017 9:55:33 AM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: BoscoX


quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery

What the hell? You haven't proven anything, stupid moron.


Typical "liberal" posting style.

Q: How do you make a "liberal" mad?

A: You don't need to do anything, they're completely mad already


How do you make a factless felchgobbling nutsucker mad? facts. its why they are always mad, shitting in their pants, sackless, hysterical homophobes, pimping pedophiles and felchgobbling, like this idiot, old compound gimp and pedophile pimp, Felchgobbler gobbles

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to BoscoX)
Profile   Post #: 21
RE: "Inconvenient Sequel" hits theatres July ... - 4/7/2017 10:21:30 AM   
Musicmystery


Posts: 30259
Joined: 3/14/2005
Status: offline
When he can't insult or construct straw men, he has nothing to say.

That must feel very empty.

(in reply to mnottertail)
Profile   Post #: 22
RE: "Inconvenient Sequel" hits theatres July ... - 4/7/2017 10:24:02 AM   
BoscoX


Posts: 10663
Joined: 12/10/2016
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery

When he can't insult or construct straw men, he has nothing to say.

That must feel very empty.


Keep projecting troll boys



_____________________________

Hunter is the smartest guy I know

(in reply to Musicmystery)
Profile   Post #: 23
RE: "Inconvenient Sequel" hits theatres July ... - 4/7/2017 10:25:28 AM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
keep felchgobbling compound gimp and pedophile pimp. CGPP.

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to BoscoX)
Profile   Post #: 24
RE: "Inconvenient Sequel" hits theatres July ... - 4/7/2017 10:31:18 AM   
Musicmystery


Posts: 30259
Joined: 3/14/2005
Status: offline
He has nothing else to say. It's all he has.

(in reply to mnottertail)
Profile   Post #: 25
RE: "Inconvenient Sequel" hits theatres July ... - 4/7/2017 10:41:10 AM   
BoscoX


Posts: 10663
Joined: 12/10/2016
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery

He has nothing else to say. It's all he has.


It's nice that you can at least follow orders

_____________________________

Hunter is the smartest guy I know

(in reply to Musicmystery)
Profile   Post #: 26
RE: "Inconvenient Sequel" hits theatres July ... - 4/7/2017 11:01:40 AM   
thompsonx


Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline
ORIGINAL: InfoMan




Water levels have been rising ever since we've began observing them,


You really are full of shit

http://science.jrank.org/pages/1542/Coast-Beach-Emergent-coasts.html



(in reply to InfoMan)
Profile   Post #: 27
RE: "Inconvenient Sequel" hits theatres July ... - 4/7/2017 11:02:44 AM   
thompsonx


Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline

ORIGINAL: CreativeDominant

I wo see why fantasy movie makers always feel the need to do a sequel?


When may we expect a sequel to your irish slave story?

(in reply to CreativeDominant)
Profile   Post #: 28
RE: "Inconvenient Sequel" hits theatres July ... - 4/7/2017 11:10:33 AM   
WickedsDesire


Posts: 9362
Joined: 11/4/2015
Status: offline
I did exclude things like:
Isostatic rebound
Loch Lomand stadial
Thermal expansion

from my earlier waffle because there are many dumbfuks on here, by no means all ;) Shit link by the way thompsonx

< Message edited by WickedsDesire -- 4/7/2017 11:11:16 AM >

(in reply to thompsonx)
Profile   Post #: 29
RE: "Inconvenient Sequel" hits theatres July ... - 4/7/2017 11:24:15 AM   
heavyblinker


Posts: 3623
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: InfoMan
https://www2.usgs.gov/climate_landuse/glaciers/glaciers_sea_level.asp

Water levels have been rising ever since we've began observing them, it has been projected that ocean levels have risen ~400 feet in the past 21,000 years, but since the 1900's ocean levels have only risen something like 6-8 inches...


WTF you're comparing ocean level rise over 21,000 years to ocean level rise over less than 150?? How does that make sense?

Even if you're actually talking about an average (I'm not in the mood to look up the figures), the past 21,000 years included the transition from a glacial to interglacial period... so of course you're going to have dramatic ocean rise... because there is more ice to melt. The shift from glacial to interglacial is part of a natural cycle that in this case has produced a remarkably stable climate that has allowed humanity to flourish over the past 10,000 years.

Including the transition period is NOT helpful in understanding our current climate. The last glacial period is over. The transition is over. We have already arrived at the new climatic norm... and now it's just a matter of whether or not we're going to totally fuck it up.

The question isn't whether recent levels of ocean rise are normal for a glacial or transition period, it's whether or not they're normal or can be explained by natural forces within THIS type of climate.

(in reply to InfoMan)
Profile   Post #: 30
RE: "Inconvenient Sequel" hits theatres July ... - 4/7/2017 11:26:48 AM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: WickedsDesire

I did exclude things like:
Isostatic rebound
Loch Lomand stadial
Thermal expansion

from my earlier waffle because there are many dumbfuks on here, by no means all ;) Shit link by the way thompsonx

You have excluded things like the East Staines massiv

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bwgO3V6htEo

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to WickedsDesire)
Profile   Post #: 31
RE: "Inconvenient Sequel" hits theatres July ... - 4/7/2017 11:38:28 AM   
WickedsDesire


Posts: 9362
Joined: 11/4/2015
Status: offline
....And the wicked’s swollen balls of might need drained by big breasted whores...yup

(in reply to mnottertail)
Profile   Post #: 32
RE: "Inconvenient Sequel" hits theatres July ... - 4/7/2017 11:59:40 AM   
InfoMan


Posts: 471
Joined: 2/20/2017
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery

What the hell? You haven't proven anything, stupid moron. Just posted a bunch of pretend science news. You don't suppose, that perhaps, banning polar bear hunting after the 70s had anything to do with an increase of their numbers since then?

Has it occurred to you, oh Almighty thinking one, that factors other than that might impact polar Bear population's? That melting sea ice will have an impact?

Or are you one of these priceless princesses who says oh no the sea ice isn't really melting!


So the U.S. Geological Survey - the leading scientific body on natural and earth sciences - is 'pretend science'...
Good to know you feel that way.

And i do love that - 'Polar Bears are going extinct because melting Sea Ice!' - which was the argument held by an Inconvinent Truth, and that you tried to peddle to me - Very quickly was rolled off into 'Well, we haven't been hunting them since the 70s! so obviously they would be increasing!' As if you were not just an instant ago making the argument that Global Ice Melting was causing Polar Bears to die in droves because of the destruction of it's natural ecosystem.


quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery

When he can't insult or construct straw men, he has nothing to say.

That must feel very empty.


So despite being presented 2 Very clear and direct counter points...
you take it upon yourself to call me a 'stupid moron', decry what i present as 'pretend science news', state that i am in Denial of facts while not presenting any evidence to the contrary, and only provide conjecture as a counter to everything I've said...

I'm the one that is insulting and constructing straw men here...
Again, further insight into how you think.

(in reply to Musicmystery)
Profile   Post #: 33
RE: "Inconvenient Sequel" hits theatres July ... - 4/7/2017 12:00:43 PM   
Musicmystery


Posts: 30259
Joined: 3/14/2005
Status: offline
Well OK, nothing to see here, all pretend.

Gosh, that was easy!

Let's fix Syria next.

(in reply to InfoMan)
Profile   Post #: 34
RE: "Inconvenient Sequel" hits theatres July ... - 4/7/2017 12:10:49 PM   
InfoMan


Posts: 471
Joined: 2/20/2017
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: heavyblinker

quote:

ORIGINAL: InfoMan
https://www2.usgs.gov/climate_landuse/glaciers/glaciers_sea_level.asp

Water levels have been rising ever since we've began observing them, it has been projected that ocean levels have risen ~400 feet in the past 21,000 years, but since the 1900's ocean levels have only risen something like 6-8 inches...


WTF you're comparing ocean level rise over 21,000 years to ocean level rise over less than 150?? How does that make sense?

Even if you're actually talking about an average (I'm not in the mood to look up the figures), the past 21,000 years included the transition from a glacial to interglacial period... so of course you're going to have dramatic ocean rise... because there is more ice to melt. The shift from glacial to interglacial is part of a natural cycle that in this case has produced a remarkably stable climate that has allowed humanity to flourish over the past 10,000 years.

Including the transition period is NOT helpful in understanding our current climate. The last glacial period is over. The transition is over. We have already arrived at the new climatic norm... and now it's just a matter of whether or not we're going to totally fuck it up.

The question isn't whether recent levels of ocean rise are normal for a glacial or transition period, it's whether or not they're normal or can be explained by natural forces within THIS type of climate.


The point i was making was that ocean levels have been rising near constantly since the last glacial period... several ancient harbors and coastal cities from ancient Greece and Egypt are now under water because of the steady increasing sea level. Making it a some what natural event... The idea that global warming is the sole cause of rising sea levels and pointing out the fact that the ocean gets closer and closer to coastal buildings each year is not a valid argument.

Yes, global warming is a thing.
Yes we are contributing to it.

but guess what - The streets of miami that are getting flooded during high tide?
Yeah they probably would still be getting flooded even if we never discovered fossil fuels...

(in reply to heavyblinker)
Profile   Post #: 35
RE: "Inconvenient Sequel" hits theatres July ... - 4/7/2017 12:15:41 PM   
BoscoX


Posts: 10663
Joined: 12/10/2016
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: InfoMan


quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery

What the hell? You haven't proven anything, stupid moron. Just posted a bunch of pretend science news. You don't suppose, that perhaps, banning polar bear hunting after the 70s had anything to do with an increase of their numbers since then?

Has it occurred to you, oh Almighty thinking one, that factors other than that might impact polar Bear population's? That melting sea ice will have an impact?

Or are you one of these priceless princesses who says oh no the sea ice isn't really melting!


So the U.S. Geological Survey - the leading scientific body on natural and earth sciences - is 'pretend science'...
Good to know you feel that way.

And i do love that - 'Polar Bears are going extinct because melting Sea Ice!' - which was the argument held by an Inconvinent Truth, and that you tried to peddle to me - Very quickly was rolled off into 'Well, we haven't been hunting them since the 70s! so obviously they would be increasing!' As if you were not just an instant ago making the argument that Global Ice Melting was causing Polar Bears to die in droves because of the destruction of it's natural ecosystem.


quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery

When he can't insult or construct straw men, he has nothing to say.

That must feel very empty.


So despite being presented 2 Very clear and direct counter points...
you take it upon yourself to call me a 'stupid moron', decry what i present as 'pretend science news', state that i am in Denial of facts while not presenting any evidence to the contrary, and only provide conjecture as a counter to everything I've said...

I'm the one that is insulting and constructing straw men here...
Again, further insight into how you think.


Excellent post, nailed him. Exactly right.

_____________________________

Hunter is the smartest guy I know

(in reply to InfoMan)
Profile   Post #: 36
RE: "Inconvenient Sequel" hits theatres July ... - 4/7/2017 12:37:11 PM   
Kirata


Posts: 15477
Joined: 2/11/2006
From: USA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx

ORIGINAL: InfoMan

Water levels have been rising ever since we've began observing them,

You really are full of shit

http://science.jrank.org/pages/1542/Coast-Beach-Emergent-coasts.html






K.

(in reply to thompsonx)
Profile   Post #: 37
RE: "Inconvenient Sequel" hits theatres July ... - 4/7/2017 12:45:30 PM   
heavyblinker


Posts: 3623
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: InfoMan

The point i was making was that ocean levels have been rising near constantly since the last glacial period... several ancient harbors and coastal cities from ancient Greece and Egypt are now under water because of the steady increasing sea level. Making it a some what natural event... The idea that global warming is the sole cause of rising sea levels and pointing out the fact that the ocean gets closer and closer to coastal buildings each year is not a valid argument.


Except they haven't been rising near constantly... there was a massive rapid melt as the Earth transitioned from glacial to interglacial (violent climate shifts as well), and then everything stabilized.

You can't just say that several cities from ancient Greece and Egypt are underwater and declare that ocean levels always rise-- you have to look at the RATE of ocean level rise from that time onward and compare it to the current RATE of ocean level rise.

You must realize that a rise of about an inch over 50 years isn't the same thing as a rise of about an inch over say 300 years, right? I'm not claiming this is a fact, I'm just giving a random example... because if the current rate of ocean level rise is faster than the rate of ocean level rise has been over the past 10,000 years, that is very significant.

Choosing 21,000 years ago as a starting point is unhelpful because we simply haven't seen similar rates of ocean level rise over the past 10,000 years as the planet did over the previous 10,000 years. You're cherry picking-- using a starting point with no scientific value simply because it helps your argument.

To identify a climate trend, the picture cannot be too big or too small. To include the highly unstable pre-interglacial climate (ice core data shows how unstable it was and how rapidly ocean levels rose) with the far more stable climate of our current interglacial period (in which ocean level rise slowed and stabilized) is to deny that the climate ever really stabilized... which it most certainly did.

< Message edited by heavyblinker -- 4/7/2017 12:49:59 PM >

(in reply to InfoMan)
Profile   Post #: 38
RE: "Inconvenient Sequel" hits theatres July ... - 4/7/2017 12:52:15 PM   
Musicmystery


Posts: 30259
Joined: 3/14/2005
Status: offline
Not only that, but to say "Well, I've decided it's not a valid argument, so let's pretend the sea is not rising" is ridiculous. That something is the "sole" reason (something InfoIdiot introduced, incidentally, not something I claimed) doesn't negate that it's happening.

FFS. This must be among the dumbest countries ever.

(in reply to heavyblinker)
Profile   Post #: 39
RE: "Inconvenient Sequel" hits theatres July ... - 4/7/2017 3:07:21 PM   
CreativeDominant


Posts: 11032
Joined: 3/11/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx


ORIGINAL: CreativeDominant

I wo see why fantasy movie makers always feel the need to do a sequel?


When may we expect a sequel to your irish slave story?

It wasn't my story, I simply brought it to the boards. You'd have to speak to the author. I was taken in by one author...how many times have you been taken in by a limousine-riding, jet-flying, biggest house-I-can-buy "green activist"?

(in reply to thompsonx)
Profile   Post #: 40
Page:   <<   < prev  1 [2] 3 4 5   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: "Inconvenient Sequel" hits theatres July 28th Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3 4 5   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2024
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.293