Collarchat.com

Join Our Community
Collarchat.com

Home  Login  Search 

RE: 128 repudiate Trump's 9 against 35 abstain


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: 128 repudiate Trump's 9 against 35 abstain Page: <<   < prev  1 2 3 [4]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: 128 repudiate Trump's 9 against 35 abstain - 12/22/2017 4:33:25 PM   
bounty44


Posts: 6374
Joined: 11/1/2014
Status: offline
im still kinda standing on the principle that if the comrades here are fussing about it and railing over it, its probably a good thing.

(in reply to BamaD)
Profile   Post #: 61
RE: 128 repudiate Trump's 9 against 35 abstain - 12/22/2017 5:01:13 PM   
BamaD


Posts: 20687
Joined: 2/27/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: bounty44

im still kinda standing on the principle that if the comrades here are fussing about it and railing over it, its probably a good thing.

True

_____________________________

Government ranges from a necessary evil to an intolerable one. Thomas Paine

People don't believe they can defend themselves because they have guns, they have guns because they believe they can defend themselves.

(in reply to bounty44)
Profile   Post #: 62
RE: 128 repudiate Trump's 9 against 35 abstain - 12/22/2017 6:03:00 PM   
JVoV


Posts: 3226
Joined: 3/9/2015
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

Trump will be happy to start up drilling where the oil/gas is, on US ground.
No worries about regulations, he will just sign them away, much like he has done already.
Plus canada has a lot of stuff it will send still.
You dont need the ME for the oil anymore.
its the plan coming together.



That actually seems like a decent plan. We've made these countries rich by buying their oil for far too long already. They've proven to be unstable.

I also believe that any US embassy in Jerusalem will be a massive target for any Arab/Muslim/terrorist attack. And this takes us back to Dubbya's strategy of "better it happen over there than over here", which I agree with, as long as any attack on our embassy is dealt with beyond equal measures.

We aren't ready for a full-scale invasion really, but I'm sure we have plenty of bombs and such that are set to expire this decade anyway. And we can seize the US assets of anyone involved, or from anyone involved with the government(s) involved.

(in reply to Lucylastic)
Profile   Post #: 63
RE: 128 repudiate Trump's 9 against 35 abstain - 12/22/2017 6:04:06 PM   
MrRodgers


Posts: 10540
Joined: 7/30/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

FR

It would seem that there are some on here that believe
that the UN has veto power over our foreign policy.


The UN has no power the US doesn't allow it to have. And all the US has...is money and a navy. The US has no moral ground whatsoever to stand on here and hasn't had since 1947.

So the UN has the power to veto the borders of your country, kick you out of that part and give the other side to others, to create their own new country ?

How's this ? It was the US that 'empowered' the UN to partition Palestine and take their land in the first place and only then to, whole cloth, out-of-thin-air, created a new state...Israel.

How would all you righteous righties here feel about say what one American offered ? Have the UN give the Jews Oregon ? Then along comes this insecure blathering fucking asshole to declare Portland...the capitol of Israel.

_____________________________

You can be a murderous tyrant and the world will remember you fondly but fuck one horse and you will be a horse fucker for all eternity. Catherine the Great

Under capitalism, man exploits man. Under communism, it's just the opposite.
J K Galbraith

(in reply to BamaD)
Profile   Post #: 64
RE: 128 repudiate Trump's 9 against 35 abstain - 12/22/2017 6:17:22 PM   
JVoV


Posts: 3226
Joined: 3/9/2015
Status: offline
The US government doesn't even care about where State capitals are.

But think of all the world maps & globes that will have to be updated now, showing Jerusalem as the capital, right next door to Allthisshitneedstobeblowedupistan.

(in reply to MrRodgers)
Profile   Post #: 65
RE: 128 repudiate Trump's 9 against 35 abstain - 12/22/2017 6:30:57 PM   
BoscoX


Posts: 10663
Joined: 12/10/2016
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: MrRodgers


quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

FR

It would seem that there are some on here that believe
that the UN has veto power over our foreign policy.


The UN has no power the US doesn't allow it to have. And all the US has...is money and a navy. The US has no moral ground whatsoever to stand on here and hasn't had since 1947.

So the UN has the power to veto the borders of your country, kick you out of that part and give the other side to others, to create their own new country ?

How's this ? It was the US that 'empowered' the UN to partition Palestine and take their land in the first place and only then to, whole cloth, out-of-thin-air, created a new state...Israel.

How would all you righteous righties here feel about say what one American offered ? Have the UN give the Jews Oregon ? Then along comes this insecure blathering fucking asshole to declare Portland...the capitol of Israel.


I am sure you are entirely comfortable wallowing in your deliberate ignorance

No one gets to cherry pick what historical facts are real, and which ones may be ignored. Not even you

The Jewish people have a long history in Israel, much longer than the Muslims who slaughtered everyone there in Allah's name at a much later date, then also claimed the lands of those they slaughtered in the name of their bloodthirsty god

And you ignore what we found as we defeated the Nazis, what was done to the Jews and what the world also knew but chose not to see.

Don't tell me, let me guess. You are a "liberal" right

(spit)



_____________________________

Hunter is the smartest guy I know

(in reply to MrRodgers)
Profile   Post #: 66
RE: 128 repudiate Trump's 9 against 35 abstain - 12/22/2017 6:32:59 PM   
MrRodgers


Posts: 10540
Joined: 7/30/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: bounty44

"Nikki Haley's Finest Hour"

quote:

Aside from the nomination of Neil Gorsuch to replace Justice Scalia on the US Supreme Court, I'm not sure I've ever been any prouder of the Trump administration than I was during Nikki Haley's scathing and righteous speech before the UN General Assembly on Thursday. Katie wrote up Haley's remarks and the subsequent vote, in which the large majority of the UN's "community of nations" purported to declare the United States' decision to recognize Jerusalem as the capital city of Israel (which it is) 'null and void.' Your empty, symbolic votes to single out America for our unwavering support for a country you loathe mean nothing, Haley warned delegates. We've made our decision as a sovereign nation, and there's nothing you can do about it -- but we will remember your actions the next time you come, hat in hand, begging us for more money. Here's the video, in case you missed Amb. Haley's tour de force:

quote:

To its shame, the United Nations has long been a hostile place for the state of Israel. Both the current and the previous Secretary-Generals have objected to the UN’s disproportionate focus on Israel. It’s a wrong that undermines the credibility of this institution, and that in turn is harmful for the entire world...When we make generous contributions to the UN, we also have a legitimate expectation that our good will is recognized and respected. When a nation is singled out for attack in this organization, that nation is disrespected. What’s more, that nation is asked to pay for the “privilege” of being disrespected. In the case of the United States, we are asked to pay more than anyone else for that dubious privilege. Unlike in some UN member countries, the United States government is answerable to its people. As such, we have an obligation to acknowledge when our political and financial capital is being poorly spent. We have an obligation to demand more for our investment. And if our investment fails, we have an obligation to spend our resources in more productive ways.

Those are the thoughts that come to mind when we consider the resolution before us today...The United States will remember this day in which it was singled out for attack in the General Assembly for the very act of exercising our right as a sovereign nation. We will remember it when we are called upon to once again make the world’s largest contribution to the United Nations. And we will remember it when so many countries come calling on us, as they so often do, to pay even more and to use our influence for their benefit. America will put our embassy in Jerusalem. That is what the American people want us to do. And it is the right thing to do. No vote in the United Nations will make any difference on that. But this vote will make a difference on how Americans look at the UN and on how we look at countries who disrespect us in the UN. And this vote will be remembered.


Contrast that moral clarity with the shameful and craven actions of the previous administration, and the gratuitous and disloyal votes of normal US allies. Good for her. Israel was one of just eight nations who joined the United States on this vote, with a few dozen more abstaining. Haley is hosting a 'friendship reception' for the nations that chose not to vote against the US on this issue Israel's Prime Minister tweeted a short video thanking America and Amb. Haley for their leadership:

quote:

Thank you, Ambassador Haley. On Hanukkah, you spoke like a Maccabi. You lit a candle of truth. You dispel the darkness. One defeated the many. Truth defeated lies. Thank you, President Trump. Thank you, Nikki Haley.
12:48 PM - Dec 18, 2017


Jerusalem is the capital of Israel. That's a fact. It will remain a fact. It has been US policy to recognize that fact since 1995, reaffirmed overwhelmingly by Congress this past summer. After campaigning to relocate America's embassy accordingly, other presidents eventually chose to seek waivers to the law; President Trump chose to follow through on his pledge and not evade compliance any longer. A sovereign nation made a decision to uphold its own policy -- established by the elected representatives of a free people -- and to acknowledge empirical reality. For that transgression, the pitiful and feckless United Nations voted to condemn that sovereign nation. Americans should not forget Amb. Haley's leadership on this issue, nor should we forget the countries who sided with "the jackals" over the Middle East's only liberal democracy and United States of America. Between her General Assembly address and her defiant Security Council veto, this week has been Nikki Haley's finest hour:

quote:

Nikki Haley ✔ @nikkihaley
The United States will not be told by any country where we can put our embassy.
4:22 PM - Dec 18, 2017


Thank you, Madame Ambassador. As for the very first point she made at her speech, here is CNN's Jake Tapper calling out the mind-boggling hypocrisy and perverse priorities of the United Nations. His upbraiding of certain member nations is excellent, but keep w until the very end. The statistic he shares about UN resolutions is really extraordinary. Not all criticism of Israel policy is "anti-Semitic," obviously, but Tapper heavily hints that there's something dark behind the grossly disproportionate targeting of Israel by the UN. He's right…


www.comradeslovetownhall.com

Well yes, the UN is a hostile place for Israel and for very good reason. Israel is in violation of more UN res. than any other single country in the world and have been in violation starting with the very first declaring Jerusalem a autonomous city.

From that point on, it's been one violation after another.

However when the US cites other countries (Iran and N. Korea) for violation of UN resolutions/sanctions, well then, you had better get in line with the US.

_____________________________

You can be a murderous tyrant and the world will remember you fondly but fuck one horse and you will be a horse fucker for all eternity. Catherine the Great

Under capitalism, man exploits man. Under communism, it's just the opposite.
J K Galbraith

(in reply to bounty44)
Profile   Post #: 67
RE: 128 repudiate Trump's 9 against 35 abstain - 12/22/2017 6:45:40 PM   
MrRodgers


Posts: 10540
Joined: 7/30/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: BoscoX

quote:

ORIGINAL: MrRodgers


quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

FR

It would seem that there are some on here that believe
that the UN has veto power over our foreign policy.


The UN has no power the US doesn't allow it to have. And all the US has...is money and a navy. The US has no moral ground whatsoever to stand on here and hasn't had since 1947.

So the UN has the power to veto the borders of your country, kick you out of that part and give the other side to others, to create their own new country ?

How's this ? It was the US that 'empowered' the UN to partition Palestine and take their land in the first place and only then to, whole cloth, out-of-thin-air, created a new state...Israel.

How would all you righteous righties here feel about say what one American offered ? Have the UN give the Jews Oregon ? Then along comes this insecure blathering fucking asshole to declare Portland...the capitol of Israel.


I am sure you are entirely comfortable wallowing in your deliberate ignorance

No one gets to cherry pick what historical facts are real, and which ones may be ignored. Not even you

The Jewish people have a long history in Israel, much longer than the Muslims who slaughtered everyone there in Allah's name at a much later date, then also claimed the lands of those they slaughtered in the name of their bloodthirsty god

And you ignore what we found as we defeated the Nazis, what was done to the Jews and what the world also knew but chose not to see.

Don't tell me, let me guess. You are a "liberal" right

(spit)



Historical revisionist hey. since 1400 BC or during 3400 hundred years the Cannanites/Jews occupied that land for various periods...for only 400 years.

So for 3000 years...it was somebody else and at the time of Jesus...Palestine.

So who is cherry picking history ?

_____________________________

You can be a murderous tyrant and the world will remember you fondly but fuck one horse and you will be a horse fucker for all eternity. Catherine the Great

Under capitalism, man exploits man. Under communism, it's just the opposite.
J K Galbraith

(in reply to BoscoX)
Profile   Post #: 68
RE: 128 repudiate Trump's 9 against 35 abstain - 12/22/2017 6:48:00 PM   
jlf1961


Posts: 14840
Joined: 6/10/2008
From: Somewhere Texas
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: MrRodgers

The UN has no power the US doesn't allow it to have. And all the US has...is money and a navy. The US has no moral ground whatsoever to stand on here and hasn't had since 1947.

So the UN has the power to veto the borders of your country, kick you out of that part and give the other side to others, to create their own new country ?

How's this ? It was the US that 'empowered' the UN to partition Palestine and take their land in the first place and only then to, whole cloth, out-of-thin-air, created a new state...Israel.

How would all you righteous righties here feel about say what one American offered ? Have the UN give the Jews Oregon ? Then along comes this insecure blathering fucking asshole to declare Portland...the capitol of Israel.



The area that was subdivided into what is now Israel and should have had a country for Palestinians, was the British Mandate in the middle east, which they got after the Ottoman Empire was defeated along with the other Central powers of Germany and the Austria-Hungary Empire.

In point of historic fact, the entire region, every country, was carved up from territory taken from the Ottoman Empire and placed under British and French mandate.

They then turned around and started drawing lines on a map with zero regard for long standing religious and cultural conflicts in the region, which resulted in warring Muslim sects being put in the same country.

Which of course justified the British and French keeping troops in the region 'to keep peace' but actually were there to keep the new leaders in line.

Of course, in the years preceeding ww2, the Jews living in the region that is referred to as Palestine began to get a bit testy. So, in the late 30's, the Irgun began terrorist actions against the British occupiers, and the Palestinians, who in turn were killing Jews and Brits.

And the British colonial forces in the region reacted as British colonial forces did at the time, they came down on everyone with an iron boot. Basically, British troops in Palestine were fighting the Germans, Jews and Palestinians.

And the country that requested the UN to act was not the United States, but Great Britain.

So the UN formed UNSCOP (United Nations Special Committee on Palestine) who went in, studied the history of the people, conflicts and such for about 20 minutes (might have been longer, who knows) but their plan was adopted by the UN and the result was the creation of the States of Israel and Palestine.

Now, typical of western led UN ideas, the people living in the region were none to happy, the Palestinians more than the Jews, and the Arab countries were royally pissed.

So, pretty much within 24 hours after the state of Israel was created, the first Arab-Israeli war started, and the US started shipping ww2 war surplus to the region. Of course, the shipment of arms into the region was frowned on by the UN, and the Soviets began shipping arms and equipment to the Arab countries (hey, why waste a good bush war?)

So, the US one upped the Soviets and helped arrange former military commanders to help the Israeli army with whatever was needed, strictly as advisors, although some took active command in the field.

Then the British got involved and started sending actual ammo for the home made sten guns the Irgun had been making for years, thus the Israelis no longer had to make bullet casings from lipstick tubes.

The Brits also sent tanks to supplement the surplus Shermans the US was sending, along with trucks, guns, artillery and everything else a new country could need.

And of course, the Israeli army had two choices, every Jew in the region being exterminated or win. They won.

And since, when the Arabs or Palestinians do something the US did not like, we either gave the Israeli's the equipment to blow the holy shit out of them or we did it ourselves, while at the same time, when the Israeli government did something in defiance of the UN resolution, they got a "Bad Israel, dont do that, now we have to wait six months before we can send you more military equipment."

And after 30 or so years of this nonsense, the Islamic extremists realized the only way they could isolate Israel was to hurt the US so bad we would get out. They tried, we didnt and we got 9/11 for our efforts.

But even though Congress passed a resolution way back in 95 supporting Jerusalem as the capital of Israel, no president was stupid enough to announce it publicly, and no congress was stupid enough to force the issue, simply because common sense said it would make the situation worse.

_____________________________

Boy, it sure would be nice if we had some grenades, don't you think?

You cannot control who comes into your life, but you can control which airlock you throw them out of.

Paranoid Paramilitary Gun Loving Conspiracy Theorist AND EQUAL OPPORTUNI

(in reply to MrRodgers)
Profile   Post #: 69
RE: 128 repudiate Trump's 9 against 35 abstain - 12/23/2017 7:53:57 AM   
MrRodgers


Posts: 10540
Joined: 7/30/2005
Status: offline
Yea and I keep referring to Col. Lawrence because he led an Arab revolt against the Ottomans 1916-17 because when he saw what was in store later on with the formalized British mandate of 1923, whereupon the French and British quickly reneged on the agreement seen as a betrayal by the Arabs. (European powers were to leave the ME as soon as they could 'stand on their own)

Col. Lawrence wrote and spoke of these 'back channel' agreements, and saw his prediction of war and bloodshed come true as soon as the Zionists started to attack the British offices and installations in Palestine.

_____________________________

You can be a murderous tyrant and the world will remember you fondly but fuck one horse and you will be a horse fucker for all eternity. Catherine the Great

Under capitalism, man exploits man. Under communism, it's just the opposite.
J K Galbraith

(in reply to jlf1961)
Profile   Post #: 70
RE: 128 repudiate Trump's 9 against 35 abstain - 12/25/2017 7:45:11 AM   
DesideriScuri


Posts: 12225
Joined: 1/18/2012
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Politesub53
quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri
quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic
FR
Isolationism coming to a state near you.
Enjoy it...
Karma is a cunt...

I'm actually in favor of a more isolationist stance. Imagine how different the ME would be right now if the US was less imperialist. Wouldn't you rather the US not have meddled as much as it has?

An interesting question DS. Certainly Bush`s war on terror hasn`t worked out well. It is a shame Trump is more worried about where your embassy is situated than the ethnic cleansing in Israel. If he feels his decision will speed up the dormant Palestinian/Israeli peace process he is more delusional than normal.


My question refers all the way back to the 50's and the coup in Iran.


_____________________________

What I support:

  • A Conservative interpretation of the US Constitution
  • Personal Responsibility
  • Help for the truly needy
  • Limited Government
  • Consumption Tax (non-profit charities and food exempt)

(in reply to Politesub53)
Profile   Post #: 71
RE: 128 repudiate Trump's 9 against 35 abstain - 12/27/2017 11:06:37 AM   
MercTech


Posts: 3706
Joined: 7/4/2006
Status: offline
A> Israel considers its capitol city to be Jerusalem.

B> The usual location of an Embassy is in the city that hosts a country's government.

C> So, the UN censures the U.S. for recognizing the reality that Israel is being governed from Jerusalem.

Got it, Trump needs a reality check for acknowledging what is actually going on in Israel and moving our ambassador closer to the government officials he needs to do business.

(in reply to DesideriScuri)
Profile   Post #: 72
RE: 128 repudiate Trump's 9 against 35 abstain - 12/27/2017 11:10:01 AM   
WhoreMods


Posts: 10691
Joined: 5/6/2016
Status: offline
Zionist.

_____________________________

On the level and looking for a square deal.

(in reply to MercTech)
Profile   Post #: 73
RE: 128 repudiate Trump's 9 against 35 abstain - 12/27/2017 11:30:02 AM   
DesideriScuri


Posts: 12225
Joined: 1/18/2012
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: MercTech
A> Israel considers its capitol city to be Jerusalem.
B> The usual location of an Embassy is in the city that hosts a country's government.
C> So, the UN censures the U.S. for recognizing the reality that Israel is being governed from Jerusalem.
Got it, Trump needs a reality check for acknowledging what is actually going on in Israel and, moving our ambassador closer to the government officials he needs to do business, following through on legislation passed in 1995,.


Amended your post in bold and blue.

_____________________________

What I support:

  • A Conservative interpretation of the US Constitution
  • Personal Responsibility
  • Help for the truly needy
  • Limited Government
  • Consumption Tax (non-profit charities and food exempt)

(in reply to MercTech)
Profile   Post #: 74
RE: 128 repudiate Trump's 9 against 35 abstain - 12/28/2017 2:44:12 AM   
tweakabelle


Posts: 7522
Joined: 10/16/2007
From: Sydney Australia
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: MercTech

A> Israel considers its capitol city to be Jerusalem.

B> The usual location of an Embassy is in the city that hosts a country's government.

C> So, the UN censures the U.S. for recognizing the reality that Israel is being governed from Jerusalem.

Got it, Trump needs a reality check for acknowledging what is actually going on in Israel and moving our ambassador closer to the government officials he needs to do business.

Are you really suggesting that the three factors you listed are the only factors that count in this situation?

Among the factors omitted are:
* Israel's annexation of East Jerusalem has been repeatedly rejected as "null and void" by the UNSC;
* Israel's annexation of land acquired by military force is a blatant violation of the Geneva Conventions, which explicitly and specifically prohibit the annexation of land acquired by military force;
* Recognition of Israeli claims over Jerusalem (which is implicit in establishing an embassy there) is therefore approval of brazen violations of international law and war crimes;
* There are other parties with legitimate claims over East Jerusalem;
* The Palestinian claim to East Jerusalem is recognised by over 130 States (ie 2/3 of the world's States);
* Trump's move is guaranteed to further alienate and anger the entire Arab and Muslim worlds;
* Any viable version of the Two State Solution has East Jerusalem as the capital of a Palestinian State. Any move strengthening Israel's position on the status of Jerusalem has the automatic effect of correspondingly diminishing the viability of this solution to the conflict: and
* The Two State Solution has been the goal of US policy for decades. Trump's move has the effect of rendering US policy goals more difficult to achieve - a mystifying step for a US President to take. It has had the immediate effect of disqualifying the US from any peace broking role in the conflict.

There are numerous other relevant factors none of which were mentioned in your post. For instance, the existence of Palestine, the reality of its occupation and Palestinians doesn't even get a mention in your "reality check". Are you seriously claiming that Palestinians are irrelevant to the future of Jerusalem?

The situation is far more complex than the simplified picture presented , and the consequences are far deeper and more damaging than that simplified picture is capable of conveying. If you want people to do a "reality check" on this situation, it is surely more helpful and illuminating to present the whole reality, not a partisan, selective and very misleading version.

_____________________________



(in reply to MercTech)
Profile   Post #: 75
RE: 128 repudiate Trump's 9 against 35 abstain - 12/28/2017 4:25:54 AM   
ThatDizzyChick


Posts: 5490
Status: offline
quote:

This is about American Sovereignty

What the fuck does the location of an embassy have to do with American sovereignty?

_____________________________

Not your average bimbo.

(in reply to LTE)
Profile   Post #: 76
RE: 128 repudiate Trump's 9 against 35 abstain - 12/28/2017 4:31:16 AM   
heavyblinker


Posts: 3623
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: ThatDizzyChick

quote:

This is about American Sovereignty

What the fuck does the location of an embassy have to do with American sovereignty?


Well, he's an idiot, so you have to think like idiots do.
I'd be willing to bet that he means that whenever America does what everyone else does, it means America is not free.
Therefore, America has to do incredibly stupid things that no other country wants to do in order to be free.

(in reply to ThatDizzyChick)
Profile   Post #: 77
RE: 128 repudiate Trump's 9 against 35 abstain - 12/28/2017 7:06:35 AM   
jlf1961


Posts: 14840
Joined: 6/10/2008
From: Somewhere Texas
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: tweakabelle

Are you really suggesting that the three factors you listed are the only factors that count in this situation?

Among the factors omitted are:
* Israel's annexation of East Jerusalem has been repeatedly rejected as "null and void" by the UNSC;
* Israel's annexation of land acquired by military force is a blatant violation of the Geneva Conventions, which explicitly and specifically prohibit the annexation of land acquired by military force;
* Recognition of Israeli claims over Jerusalem (which is implicit in establishing an embassy there) is therefore approval of brazen violations of international law and war crimes;
* There are other parties with legitimate claims over East Jerusalem;
* The Palestinian claim to East Jerusalem is recognised by over 130 States (ie 2/3 of the world's States);
* Trump's move is guaranteed to further alienate and anger the entire Arab and Muslim worlds;
* Any viable version of the Two State Solution has East Jerusalem as the capital of a Palestinian State. Any move strengthening Israel's position on the status of Jerusalem has the automatic effect of correspondingly diminishing the viability of this solution to the conflict: and
* The Two State Solution has been the goal of US policy for decades. Trump's move has the effect of rendering US policy goals more difficult to achieve - a mystifying step for a US President to take. It has had the immediate effect of disqualifying the US from any peace broking role in the conflict.

There are numerous other relevant factors none of which were mentioned in your post. For instance, the existence of Palestine, the reality of its occupation and Palestinians doesn't even get a mention in your "reality check". Are you seriously claiming that Palestinians are irrelevant to the future of Jerusalem?

The situation is far more complex than the simplified picture presented , and the consequences are far deeper and more damaging than that simplified picture is capable of conveying. If you want people to do a "reality check" on this situation, it is surely more helpful and illuminating to present the whole reality, not a partisan, selective and very misleading version.



The 'two state solution' was part of the UN resolution that created Israel in the first place, along with the plan that Jerusalem be an open city governed by an international regime due to its unique nature of being the center of 3 religions.

So, in a very real sense, congress supported the violation of both the Geneva accords and the violation of the original resolution creating the State of Israel when they voted to recognize the city as the capital of Israel.

However, the creation of Israel and the Palestinian state with the UN resolution was done like every other nation created in the Middle east since world war one while under French and British control, without a thought given to the history of the region, the ongoing ethnic and religious conflicts, or anything else for that matter.



_____________________________

Boy, it sure would be nice if we had some grenades, don't you think?

You cannot control who comes into your life, but you can control which airlock you throw them out of.

Paranoid Paramilitary Gun Loving Conspiracy Theorist AND EQUAL OPPORTUNI

(in reply to tweakabelle)
Profile   Post #: 78
RE: 128 repudiate Trump's 9 against 35 abstain - 12/28/2017 2:18:18 PM   
MrRodgers


Posts: 10540
Joined: 7/30/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: jlf1961


quote:

ORIGINAL: tweakabelle

Are you really suggesting that the three factors you listed are the only factors that count in this situation?

Among the factors omitted are:
* Israel's annexation of East Jerusalem has been repeatedly rejected as "null and void" by the UNSC;
* Israel's annexation of land acquired by military force is a blatant violation of the Geneva Conventions, which explicitly and specifically prohibit the annexation of land acquired by military force;
* Recognition of Israeli claims over Jerusalem (which is implicit in establishing an embassy there) is therefore approval of brazen violations of international law and war crimes;
* There are other parties with legitimate claims over East Jerusalem;
* The Palestinian claim to East Jerusalem is recognised by over 130 States (ie 2/3 of the world's States);
* Trump's move is guaranteed to further alienate and anger the entire Arab and Muslim worlds;
* Any viable version of the Two State Solution has East Jerusalem as the capital of a Palestinian State. Any move strengthening Israel's position on the status of Jerusalem has the automatic effect of correspondingly diminishing the viability of this solution to the conflict: and
* The Two State Solution has been the goal of US policy for decades. Trump's move has the effect of rendering US policy goals more difficult to achieve - a mystifying step for a US President to take. It has had the immediate effect of disqualifying the US from any peace broking role in the conflict.

There are numerous other relevant factors none of which were mentioned in your post. For instance, the existence of Palestine, the reality of its occupation and Palestinians doesn't even get a mention in your "reality check". Are you seriously claiming that Palestinians are irrelevant to the future of Jerusalem?

The situation is far more complex than the simplified picture presented , and the consequences are far deeper and more damaging than that simplified picture is capable of conveying. If you want people to do a "reality check" on this situation, it is surely more helpful and illuminating to present the whole reality, not a partisan, selective and very misleading version.



The 'two state solution' was part of the UN resolution that created Israel in the first place, along with the plan that Jerusalem be an open city governed by an international regime due to its unique nature of being the center of 3 religions.

So, in a very real sense, congress supported the violation of both the Geneva accords and the violation of the original resolution creating the State of Israel when they voted to recognize the city as the capital of Israel.

However, the creation of Israel and the Palestinian state with the UN resolution was done like every other nation created in the Middle east since world war one while under French and British control, without a thought given to the history of the region, the ongoing ethnic and religious conflicts, or anything else for that matter.



Well again, yes and no. The drawing of borders in the ME by the French and British was done arbitrarily and in their interest and enforced by gunpowder. (see Churchill)

The redrawing of Palestine into two states by a new world body, was to codify it in international law. Truman proved to be the wimp and after not before recognizing Israel...failed to protect that codification.

The British, once under attack...flew the coop. Didn't care about that desert dirt, there was no oil.

_____________________________

You can be a murderous tyrant and the world will remember you fondly but fuck one horse and you will be a horse fucker for all eternity. Catherine the Great

Under capitalism, man exploits man. Under communism, it's just the opposite.
J K Galbraith

(in reply to jlf1961)
Profile   Post #: 79
Page:   <<   < prev  1 2 3 [4]
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: 128 repudiate Trump's 9 against 35 abstain Page: <<   < prev  1 2 3 [4]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2024
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.199