no hands

no hands (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion

Message

Homestead -> no hands (9/2/2006 10:17:30 AM)
Imagine you as a sub, are kept in locking bondage mittens for a day. Thickly padded totally losing the use of your fingers and thumb. The Top would be around- how do you think it would play out? You cannot do anything by yourself, even open a closed door.

mstrjx -> RE: no hands (9/2/2006 10:19:17 AM)
Something akin to having a trained seal about, I should think. Jeff

Level -> RE: no hands (9/2/2006 10:19:24 AM)
What if they had to take a poop?

Homestead -> RE: no hands (9/2/2006 10:20:32 AM)
The Top does the maintanence work. (this is obviously not for the faint of heart, or easily squicked)

mistoferin -> RE: no hands (9/2/2006 10:21:01 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Level What if they had to take a poop? ROFLMAO Even with your hands tied your ass still works....but I guess that means to finish the job you might just have to lend them a hand...lol.

Homestead -> RE: no hands (9/2/2006 10:22:53 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: mistoferin quote: ORIGINAL: Level What if they had to take a poop? ROFLMAO Even with your hands tied your ass still works....but I guess that means to finish the job you might just have to lend them a hand...lol. This excercise is very much about the responsibility that goes along with extremes of control. There are always some sacrifices to be made. On both sides, not unilaterally.

Level -> RE: no hands (9/2/2006 10:24:40 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: mistoferin quote: ORIGINAL: Level What if they had to take a poop? ROFLMAO Even with your hands tied your ass still works....but I guess that means to finish the job you might just have to lend them a hand...lol. lol.......[;)].......... yes, the "end game" was what I had in mind. Homestead, fair enough answer, and no, I did not find it too squicky. [:D]

Homestead -> RE: no hands (9/2/2006 10:25:32 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Level quote: ORIGINAL: mistoferin quote: ORIGINAL: Level What if they had to take a poop? ROFLMAO Even with your hands tied your ass still works....but I guess that means to finish the job you might just have to lend them a hand...lol. lol.......[;)].......... yes, the "end game" was what I had in mind. Homestead, fair enough answer, and no, I did not find it too squicky. [:D] Do you grok the purpose of the excercise?

Level -> RE: no hands (9/2/2006 10:27:22 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Homestead quote: ORIGINAL: Level quote: ORIGINAL: mistoferin quote: ORIGINAL: Level What if they had to take a poop? ROFLMAO Even with your hands tied your ass still works....but I guess that means to finish the job you might just have to lend them a hand...lol. lol.......[;)].......... yes, the "end game" was what I had in mind. Homestead, fair enough answer, and no, I did not find it too squicky. [:D] Do you grok the purpose of the excercise? I'm grokking like a mofo here lol........ kidding aside, to me it could work well as a way of asserting control. What you had in mind?

Homestead -> RE: no hands (9/2/2006 10:28:48 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Level quote: ORIGINAL: Homestead quote: ORIGINAL: Level quote: ORIGINAL: mistoferin quote: ORIGINAL: Level What if they had to take a poop? ROFLMAO Even with your hands tied your ass still works....but I guess that means to finish the job you might just have to lend them a hand...lol. lol.......[;)].......... yes, the "end game" was what I had in mind. Homestead, fair enough answer, and no, I did not find it too squicky. [:D] Do you grok the purpose of the excercise? I'm grokking like a mofo here lol........ kidding aside, to me it could work well as a way of asserting control. What you had in mind? Control, and..........?

Level -> RE: no hands (9/2/2006 10:29:49 AM)
Hmm, a dependence of sorts..... a need. Yes? [:D]

SusanofO -> RE: no hands (9/2/2006 10:37:27 AM)
I think I'd be tempted to just ask if I could nap for awhile, since there would be do much I could not do. I realize my Dominant might have other things in mind, in which case, I'd have to comply, but it would be very limiting, as I am a hands-on type - if you know what I mean...hehe. [:D] - Susan

deltadawn -> RE: no hands (9/2/2006 10:37:51 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Homestead quote: ORIGINAL: Level quote: ORIGINAL: Homestead quote: ORIGINAL: Level quote: ORIGINAL: mistoferin quote: ORIGINAL: Level What if they had to take a poop? ROFLMAO Even with your hands tied your ass still works....but I guess that means to finish the job you might just have to lend them a hand...lol. lol.......[;)].......... yes, the "end game" was what I had in mind. Homestead, fair enough answer, and no, I did not find it too squicky. [:D] Do you grok the purpose of the excercise? I'm grokking like a mofo here lol........ kidding aside, to me it could work well as a way of asserting control. What you had in mind? Control, and..........? vulnerability?

Level -> RE: no hands (9/2/2006 10:39:40 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: SusanofO I think I'd be tempted to just ask if I could nap for awhile, since there would be do much I could not do. I realize my Dominant might have other things in mind, in which case, I'd have to comply, but it would be very limiting, as I am a hands-on type - if you know what I mean...hehe. [:D] - Susan One can only hope to find out [8\|]

Homestead -> RE: no hands (9/2/2006 10:40:43 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: deltadawn quote: ORIGINAL: Homestead quote: ORIGINAL: Level quote: ORIGINAL: Homestead quote: ORIGINAL: Level quote: ORIGINAL: mistoferin quote: ORIGINAL: Level What if they had to take a poop? ROFLMAO Even with your hands tied your ass still works....but I guess that means to finish the job you might just have to lend them a hand...lol. lol.......[;)].......... yes, the "end game" was what I had in mind. Homestead, fair enough answer, and no, I did not find it too squicky. [:D] Do you grok the purpose of the excercise? I'm grokking like a mofo here lol........ kidding aside, to me it could work well as a way of asserting control. What you had in mind? Control, and..........? vulnerability? One purpose of this was to throttle back control freak submissives. Objectification. That on occasion, simply to be was all the service required.

sublizzie -> RE: no hands (9/2/2006 10:41:45 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Homestead Control, and..........? Trust. It would also force me to see myself as more than my service, which would be very difficult for me. I tend to see my value in my service rather than just my being.

Littlepita -> RE: no hands (9/2/2006 10:42:32 AM)
Unless we were playing or I was sleeping like Susan suggested I would see this as punishment and would hate it. I have the smallest bladder in the universe and having him help me pee every five minutes would suck. Not to mention not able to type on the computer, push the remote control buttons, or turn a page in a book. I would not be a happy Pita that is for sure. [&:]

SusanofO -> RE: no hands (9/2/2006 10:42:57 AM)
Well if they're going to literally "tie your hands" (with Mitts) for an entire day - then there will be thing they might not get to enjoy that you'd otherwise be doing for them. But if they want to do it anyway, then they've probably considered that. I am not sure I'd like doing this, but that may be the point (I am not sure). - Susan

Level -> RE: no hands (9/2/2006 10:45:29 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: SusanofO Well if they're going to literally "tie your hands" (with Mitts) for an entire day - then there will be thing they might not get to enjoy that you'd otherwise be doing for them. But if they want to do it anyway, then they've probably considered that. - Susan Yes, I'd hope there would be a reason, and as Homestead said, getting a submissive to pull back and just be... to perhaps refocus on their service, and the dominant's desire, would certainly be a good one.

angelic -> RE: no hands (9/2/2006 10:47:28 AM)
imma thinkin' if you are going to have my hands essentially immobile all day... you better damn well be prepared for the consequences! [;)].... sort of like 'you reap what you sow' [8D]

Page: [1] 2 3 4 5 next > >>

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

0.03125