|
FirmhandKY -> RE: Need advice on size of Master's --beeeep-- (9/23/2006 11:29:01 PM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: KnightofMists
quote:
ORIGINAL: FirmhandKY
We might not talk about it much, but we are hyper-aware of any supposed "difficiencies" in that department.
I disagree... this so called Hyper-awareness isn't usually based on any actual knowledge of facts for comparison. The fear of being defficient maybe real or it maybe just an illusion. The problem is..... what is really the average size. Do you only talk of length or are we talking about girth as well and lets not forget the actual hardness of the erection as well. The ways to consider size has a few variables that are put into the perception. At the end of it thou... a great majority of men have never seen anyones erection but their own. So ... do we listen to the urban myth of what is a large cock... do we listen to urban myth to what is an average.
I know personally for alot of years I considered myself at best to be average and even on the small size. It was not until I became involved with alot of other individuals that my perspective of my size has changed. Within my lifestyle, I have lost count of the male erections that i have seen in my activities. With the exception of one individual.. I was on par or larger than all of them. This of course was reinforced by females that I have been rather um blunt with regards to my size.
An interesting note to add..... the size of an erection can't be measured by looking at the unerected penis. For men, this is the most likely state that they see another man's penis. I suspect alot of men gain a misperception because of they equate size of the unerect with that of the erected.
lastly.. just wish to compliment and agree with Emperor's comments with regards to the hypocrisy of some posts
KoM,
Perhaps "hyper-aware" was a poor choice of words.
My meaning would be more accurately stated as "sensitive to" in the sense that while growing up, sexual identification insults and insults about the size of a males organ are common ("needle dick", "pencil dick", "teeny weeny","she needed tweezers" etc). They are especially effective and insulting when coming from a woman, are they not?
Perhaps it is just my "hillbilly" southern roots showing, and not a culture that all men grew up in, but I am writing from my perspective.
However, even your own words show that you were, for many years, under the impression that you were "at best average and even on the small size". Where did this initial impression come from? Does it not mean you considered your size at some point? Don't (most) all men?
Which is my point.
If you, who is "on par or larger" than average, thought you were below average, what then do you think the most plausible thoughts are of a man who is definitely "below par"?
Personally, I've never been particularly hung up about my size [:D] either, and understand that I'm at least "average". But I'd also be lying if I said that if a woman told me that I was "smaller than average" in any context other than one of open honest communications, it wouldn't have an impact (even if I never let the impact show).
It has nothing to do with the physical facts, and everything to do with the emotional context.
I find it difficult to credit the man (or any man) who is under discussion with total obliviousness on this subject, which is the argument that you, Emperor and LaM and LA all seem to now be making.
FHky
|
|
|
|
