Collarchat.com

Join Our Community
Collarchat.com

Home  Login  Search 

RE: BDSM Definitions?


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion >> RE: BDSM Definitions? Page: <<   < prev  3 4 [5] 6 7   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: BDSM Definitions? - 9/27/2006 8:27:26 AM   
happypervert


Posts: 2203
Joined: 5/11/2004
From: Scranton, PA
Status: offline
I still don't understand the difference between a submissive and a slave. I think I'll go start another thread on that so we can develop some twue definitions.

(in reply to juliaoceania)
Profile   Post #: 81
RE: BDSM Definitions? - 9/27/2006 8:28:13 AM   
justheather


Posts: 1532
Joined: 10/4/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: juliaoceania

When Websters defines my life as a "slave" I will adopt that title.


Oh, julia, please at least hold out for the OED.

_____________________________

I want the scissors to be sharp
And the table perfectly level
When you cut me out of my life
And paste me in that book you always carry.
-Billy Collins

(in reply to juliaoceania)
Profile   Post #: 82
RE: BDSM Definitions? - 9/27/2006 8:38:10 AM   
juliaoceania


Posts: 21383
Joined: 4/19/2006
From: Somewhere Over the Rainbow
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: justheather


quote:

ORIGINAL: juliaoceania

When Websters defines my life as a "slave" I will adopt that title.


Oh, julia, please at least hold out for the OED.


You know I can understand people defining their dynamic as an M/s one. I know of several posters on this site that have either similar relationship goals to ours, or they are already living it.

We are working up to a collar one day, which is a lifelong relationship to us, and I remember other Daddy doms that have the same type of dynamic... the collar being a symbol of ownership and lifelong commitment within the lifestyle for many of us.

I understand that people think that owning means "slave", to them it does. If we were going to go back in history, men owned all their female folk, daughters, wives, and mothers... but especially wives. There can be different types of ownership besides slave/master is my point.

I recognize that there are differences between myself and bitatruble and ownedgirlie.. I respect those differences greatly and their dynamics... but I know we are different. It is hard to explain that difference based upon words we are using here.

I think it is like pornography and art.. it is hard to define the difference... but there is a difference...lol. It has been a bane for those who try to define it to do so.


_____________________________

Once you label me, you negate me ~ Soren Kierkegaard

Reality has a well known Liberal Bias ~ Stephen Colbert

Great minds discuss ideas; Average minds discuss events; Small minds discuss people. Eleanor Roosevelt

(in reply to justheather)
Profile   Post #: 83
RE: BDSM Definitions? - 9/27/2006 8:41:27 AM   
justheather


Posts: 1532
Joined: 10/4/2005
Status: offline
I said that there is no purpose served by creating definitions that a small group of people would agree to and then expecting the rest of the world to conform.

I then said that if you want to go ahead and make your own definitions, feel free, but when others post on the boards they arent to be expected to go by your definition.

And I did not skip the part where you had a conversation with the person you told they would be a slave by your family's definition. I read it and comprehended it. What you do not seem to get is that Im saying that if you and a small group of people come up with a definition, it is just that: a definition that you and your family and a small group of people agree on.

It is not my intention to be unclear. I honestly do not see how it is that you find these statements to be contradictory.

So here you would have a small group within a group holding to some definitions that they hope will be accepted as universal for the sake of discussion so that things will be simpler for the newbies and those who are confused, only they wont be simpler because these definitions wont be accepted by everyone here and there will still be a need (if not more of a need: "What definition are you using? House of Hussey? House of Bear? House of Frick and Frack? House of Style?") to clarify and define as we go along etc etc etc.

And no, I dont think it is appropriate for one self-appointed person to survey a small group and then purport to speak for the masses regarding what "we" define as XYZ, even if it is supposed to be "for the sake of understanding".

Understanding can be achieved through dialogue between the people involved in the conversation. Slapping lables on things and then having to go back and say well, I mean X but we are more Y-ish because blah blah blah, makes things no less clear and understanding no more easily attained than it was before, but does serve to arm those who insist on having everyone live up to their standard of "NON-FAKENESS" which, frankly, there is already way more than enough of around here.


_____________________________

I want the scissors to be sharp
And the table perfectly level
When you cut me out of my life
And paste me in that book you always carry.
-Billy Collins

(in reply to twicehappy)
Profile   Post #: 84
RE: BDSM Definitions? - 9/27/2006 8:48:11 AM   
NINASHARP


Posts: 295
Joined: 4/23/2006
From: NJ/NYC
Status: offline
 

quote:

ORIGINAL: adaddysgirl

The first 'dom' i ever met labelled himself a Master.  He referred to me as 'slave'.  Since i had no idea at all about D/s, i freely accepted those labels.  In a nutshell, he really was not a Master.  He dominated in the bedroom only; he ended up wanting to switch; and then admitted he was a crossdresser and bisexual.


Wow, that happened to me too.

quote:

ORIGINAL: adaddysgirl

But what bothers me is when people misrepresent themselves on personals sites such as CM.  If you put the word 'Master' in the search box, you will come up with a thousand hits....and i would bet most of them are self proclaimed Masters....those that have never been trained as such nor owned a slave, or whatever.  Or how about the dom who met a sub in chat, collared her a month later without ever meeting her, then calls himself a Master?  What a joke!  i would much rather see a dom say he is dominant but has an interest in being a Master...that i can understand.  But for someone to randomly label themselves as a Master and present that to others is just misrepresentation to me. 
 
i say the same for females who label themselves slaves.  Have they lived as a slave in RL?  It's a lot different than reading about it or doing it online, that's for sure.  But perhaps they identify with that role.  Again, that is fine....but make that clear in your profile. 
 
There is a big difference between what we have tried and know we are (or are not) than what we aspire to be.  i just thinks it's fair to clarify that when trying to meet a suitable partner.
 
Just my 2 cents, anyway.
 
Daddysgirl
 
 


You make some great points in your post, I will be following the responses to this, because I think maybe what you pointed out is one of the reasons why this thread was started. Not to defend a personal choice or offend anyone else's choice.

(in reply to adaddysgirl)
Profile   Post #: 85
RE: BDSM Definitions? - 9/27/2006 8:50:56 AM   
juliaoceania


Posts: 21383
Joined: 4/19/2006
From: Somewhere Over the Rainbow
Status: offline
quote:

Understanding can be achieved through dialogue between the people involved in the conversation. Slapping lables on things and then having to go back and say well, I mean X but we are more Y-ish because blah blah blah, makes things no less clear and understanding no more easily attained than it was before, but does serve to arm those who insist on having everyone live up to their standard of "NON-FAKENESS" which, frankly, there is already way more than enough of around here

 
You bring up and important point. When in different classes we have had common words redefined in the context of what we were studying. For example, in biology a culture can refer to a sample of bacteria that one is growing, in anthropology it refers to a group of people living a certain lifeway, it can further be dissected in other anthropology classes by different professors. In fact no two textbooks I have used defined "culture" the same way. If you are communicating with a group of people about something such as this, we can come up with a working definition, but that is really only good for that interaction at that point in time.

< Message edited by juliaoceania -- 9/27/2006 8:51:52 AM >


_____________________________

Once you label me, you negate me ~ Soren Kierkegaard

Reality has a well known Liberal Bias ~ Stephen Colbert

Great minds discuss ideas; Average minds discuss events; Small minds discuss people. Eleanor Roosevelt

(in reply to justheather)
Profile   Post #: 86
RE: BDSM Definitions? - 9/27/2006 8:54:25 AM   
OhReallyNow


Posts: 249
Joined: 9/11/2006
Status: offline
quote:

If you are communicating with a group of people about something such as this, we can come up with a working definition, but that is really only good for that interaction at that point in time.

this is what sticks out in my mind
 
definitions are wonderful for a basic understanding, but the interpertation will differ from group to group and person to person

_____________________________

~ When anger rises, think of the consequences
CONFUCIUS
~

(in reply to juliaoceania)
Profile   Post #: 87
RE: BDSM Definitions? - 9/27/2006 10:20:49 AM   
BitaTruble


Posts: 9779
Joined: 1/12/2006
From: Texas
Status: offline
quote:


 
So in the interest of finding out if we can agree on definitions i am asking everyone who cares to add to this to give their definition of certain terms.

 
::chuckles:: I've read through the thread, and all I can say is that getting such a diverse group to agree on anything is a massive undertaking and I just don't see how it's at all possible. However, I'm all for effort!

 
quote:

After a week or so i will add up the ones that are similar and see how it came out then post the ones who were the most repeated or agreed with.

 
If the purpose is to get a consensus, then at best the those who think outside the box or are a lone voice will not be heard. At worst, mob mentality will form (think Tooey from The Fountainhead) and the dissenters will be stoned or something. ::laughs::

 
quote:

If your vote is "labels or definitions are what they mean to you " this will be counted as a non vote. This is an experiment to see what the general consensus is.

 
It seems to me that such should be absolutely counted otherwise you skew the results. If the vast majority agree that labels are as individual as the people who wear them and that it is only through enhanced communication that you can define yourself anyway, then what we have in place (the dictionary) is already a very general basis with which to start. The rest is subtle flavoring based on individual taste buds.

 
 
quote:

Bottom,

 
What I sit on when I'm at my computer.
 
quote:

top,

 
Something I wear to cover my upper torso. (Yes, I'm being bad.. but I get better later. :) )
 
quote:

sadist,

 
The dictionary suffices quite nicely for this definition for me and by that dictionary definition, I am not a sadist. I inflict pain for the adreneline rush it gives me or the artistic value of creating something I deem beautiful on a human canvas. I don't get off, get wet or want to jump the bones of my partner and fuck their brains out. ::chuckles::
 
quote:

 masochist,

 
Dictionary works again here for me, but sometimes when I'm on the receiving end, I DO want to jump the bones of my partner and fuck their brains out. ::laughs::
 
quote:

 Dom/Domme,

 
I don't even accept these are real words. ;)
 
quote:

Master/

 
Someone who has attained knowledge and experience in a certain area such they are deemed to be expert OR one who owns property - gender doesn't matter to me here.
 
quote:

Mistress,

 
The other woman. :)
 
quote:

 switch,

 
Used to turn objects off and on.
 
quote:

submissive,

 
Subserviant
 
quote:

slave,

 
Property who does not have the ability to consent to a bottom/top relationship because their power has been taken from them to be used at the discretion of another. They have neither the desire nor the will power to change this predictament.  

quote:

Here are my definitions of these words.

 
Top; one who controls the scene for play only.

 
I think a Top can control things well outside the aspects of any given scene and that play has little to do with that orientation.

 
quote:

Sadist
; one who enjoys inflicting pain

 
Now, I do fit your definition of sadist (to a point since I also create art which happens to cause pain to the canvas and it's the art I enjoy, not the pain I enjoy in those cases), but not the dictionary definition of sadist.

 
quote:

Masochist
; one who enjoys receiving pain

 
I fit this pretty much as well, with the cavaet that when I'm a canvas for artwork, I enjoy that as well.. and to me what is painful may not be painful to someone else. I don't think having 100 needles pushed through my skin is painful .. I do think getting paddled with wood is sick, evil, twisted and yes, painful!
 
quote:

Dom/Domme
; the one who dominates, the one who is in control of, is responsible for, gives orders and direction to the sub/slave. This is something they are, a personality type, not just something they do only in the bedroom. A Dom/Domme is what they are whether or not they currently own a sub or slave.

 
Again, I don't even consider those words. Dominant, I would be happy to define - and again, the dictionary works just fine for me on this one and I don't think it has anything to do with BDSM in particular. One can be very dominant and also very much missionary in lifestyle.

 
 
quote:

Switch
; one who can either top or bottom during play or a scene.

 
Ok, so mostly my post is TIC, but this is far too simple a definition. For one thing, a switch may never, ever scene or play. One can hold the power of another and also give up their power to a third party without ever bringing anything but power into the dynamic. In other words, you can own a slave and in turn also be an owned slave and never have S/m as part of the dynamic in your relationships. No play, no scene, just life.
 
I can't define switches .. there are far too many choices, a myriad of fractuals that can't be so easily boxed. I would never, ever accept this definition however. So, I suppose that my vote for this one will be one of those 'not counted'. I don't believe any definition will fit and therefore it falls firmly into the category of "each has to define what it means to them as individuals".

 
I wanted to touch on one thing which Julia said as well.. (hoping I'm getting phrasing close enough)
 
something along the line of she's not like Ownedgirlie or myself .. she knows there's a difference between us.
 
I think the fact that Ownedgirlie and I are both concidered slaves by our respective Masters and Julia is considered (and considers herself) a submissive to her Daddy doesn't put us into a different category or on some sort of ladder or ranking (That 9 levels of submission thing still pisses me off, but whatever) .. I don't think you attain a rank as you grow in the BDSM. I do think, given enough time, you recognize your own truths and end up defining what you are as it fits in with your particular life. I think that takes time and effort as well.
 
Being confused, unsure, overwhelmed etc when you first jump into the leather vats is normal. If you stay in them for any amount of time, you will discover new things about yourself .. somethings you'll embrace, somethings you won't like so well and will either try to change them or come to accept your own little flaws on things but what should never be forgotten is that we come in as fully formed adults with a few years of living already under our belts, a few ideas of what we want, need and desire .. and a yearning to see something different and more than what we've been exposed to previously. I think, too, we do a bit of a disservice to those who come in seeking fast thrills and quick fixes. How many can honestly say that they don't see at least a small part of themselves in that attitude, at least when they first, first started? I know I did, but I've changed and grown and if all the doors had been slammed when I first jumped in, I might have stayed in that place and never had the chance to grow.
 
Just something to think about when wankers assault you. ;)
 
I think that may be the one universal thing that drives each of us .. well, each of us who is in it for the long haul at any rate. We want that dollop of frosting on the cake of life and a scoop of our choice of ice cream to go with it and we don't want anyone telling us that pickles, peanut butter and marachino cherries can't go on mint chocolate chip ice cream if that's what we want.
 
(can you tell I've got a major sweet tooth thing going on? It's the hormones.)
 
Celeste
 
yadda, yadda.. YMMV - and I really hope to god it does otherwise things will be boring as hell.

_____________________________

"Oh, so it's just like
Rock, paper, scissors."

He laughed. "You are the wisest woman I know."


(in reply to twicehappy)
Profile   Post #: 88
RE: BDSM Definitions? - 9/27/2006 10:50:33 AM   
twicehappy


Posts: 2706
Joined: 2/5/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: juliaoceania

When Websters defines my life as a "slave" I will adopt that title.


 I are not seeking definitions of any individuals life. I am seeking a GENERAL definition that would inform within REASONABLE PARAMETERS what role or type the individual was as a starting point or a way to give a BASIC description to the vanilla public or to those in the lifestyle who were unfamiliar with  us.
 
Websters already defines within reasonable parameters what a slave is;
 
Main Entry: slave
1 : a person held in servitude as the chattel of another
2 : one that is completely subservient to a dominating influence

quote:

ORIGINAL: justheather

Oh, julia, please at least hold out for the OED.



From Oxford English Dictionary;

slave
noun 1 a person who is the legal property of another and is forced to obey them. 2 a person who is excessively dependent upon or controlled by something or someone.


_____________________________

Infinite Diversity in Infinite Combinations.

The human heart is not a finite container but an ever expanding universe with all the stars contained there in.

(in reply to juliaoceania)
Profile   Post #: 89
RE: BDSM Definitions? - 9/27/2006 10:52:21 AM   
mistoferin


Posts: 8284
Joined: 10/27/2004
Status: offline
I apologize twicehappy, I haven't read the entire thread. I haven't because since I have come to collarme, I have read enough of them to have a fairly good idea how it goes here. Prior to collarme I had never experienced this type of discussion with the fervor it seems to get here, as in the real time, real life BDSM world I think there is a fairly general consensus on what the definitions of the terms are. I know all in your household have a good understanding of what my views of these terms are...and I don't think we are far apart from each other.

So that said....I have come to tire of this endless discussion here because I have simply come to understand that no matter what anyone chooses to call themselves....in the real life world..... in MY real life world....if their self appointed label does not match their demeanor of life station....then it simply does not make it so. "Jezabel" or "Slutty Sue" can come walking into any munch or event and proclaim themself "slave", but the moment that they tell of how they "serve" their "Master" on their once monthly real time meeting....MOST people in the group, including myself, have an understanding that what is being professed is NOT slavery. So all of the declarations after that point fall upon deaf ears....very simple.

Now I know that is just going to piss a whole bunch of people off....but that is simply how it IS. As I have said many times here before....if you want to be eccentric and tell everyone your dog is actually a cat...so be it. But when you don that collar and leash and take a stroll through town....most people are going to understand that you are walking a dog. And if you want to insist that your dog is a cat....MOST people are just going to think your elevator doesn't quite reach the top.

_____________________________

Peace and light,
~erin~

There are no victims here...only volunteers.

When you make a habit of playing on the tracks, you thereby forfeit the right to bitch when you get hit by a train.

"I did it! I admit it and I'm gonna do it again!"

(in reply to twicehappy)
Profile   Post #: 90
RE: BDSM Definitions? - 9/27/2006 10:58:44 AM   
CreoleCook


Posts: 321
Joined: 10/9/2005
Status: offline
First, allow me to say this post is going to take a while for me to type, as I have a broken finger, on my left hand, and am on pain killers...

quote:

ORIGINAL: twicehappy
 
Top; one who controls the scene for play only.


Top: one who takes the lead in a fetish type encounter, whether involving play, sex, or both.
 
quote:


Bottom; one who submits during the scene only
 


Bottom: one who wishes to be lead through a fetish type encounter, be it play, sex, or both.
 
quote:


Sadist; one who enjoys inflicting pain
 


Sadist: one who enjoys mentally dominating as well as physically supporting said domination.

quote:

 
Masochist; one who enjoys receiving pain


Masochist: one who enjoys being mentally dominated, as well as enjoys the physical attributes associated with said domination.

quote:


Dom/Domme; the one who dominates, the one who is in control of, is responsible for, gives orders and direction to the sub/slave. 


Dominant (Dom/Domme): A natural born leader, or one who has learned to lead through practice.  the Dominant has the ability to offer choices, and can also give direction to a submissive type.

quote:

 
Master/Mistress, is one who is dom/domme and currently owns a submissive or a slave.


Master/Mistress: A Dominant type who has specialized in a specific area of fetish play, as well as has a commanding presence to those around him/her.  A Master/Mistress may or may not have a submissive/slave to call their own, but has both experience and wisdom to contribute.

quote:


It is a title bestowed on them by virtue of such ownership.  


(Highly disagree with this statement) 

The Title of Master/Mistress is bestowed upon said individual for their actions.

quote:


Switch; one who can either top or bottom during play or a scene.


Switch: one who realizes as with any forms within a relationship, be it intimacy, dynamics, or otherwise; there is a time to dominate, and a time to submit.  A Switch can enjoy both sides of "the fence," so to speak.  A Switch can also be defined as a Hedonist.

quote:

 
Submissive; one who yields power or control to the dominant on a limited basis both during day to day life and during scening or playing. Or one whose nature is submissive, one may be a submissive whether or not they currently are submitting to a dominant, it is what they naturally are.


Submissive: one who is willing to submit to the needs of another. A submissive will usually expect a certain amount of his/her desires filled through the actions of a Dominant type, although this is never gauranteed. 

quote:


Slave; one who yields control of all aspects of their existence to the dominant within the limits agreed upon prior to being collared (these are generally agreed upon moral limits, not to be confused with" I get it my way or I leave or Sam type behaviors). One who is considered to be owned by another as their sole property. One whose submission to their owner/s is total, 24 hours a day, 7 days a week in and out of any scenes or play..


Slave: one who prefers to submit, entirely.  This is not to say he/she has no voice, but would rather prefer the Dominant type to make all the decisions.

Toy/pet: a submissive type who is strictly used for the purposes of scenario/ fetish play.

Dominatrix: a profession where services are rendered for payment, usually involving forms of fetish play.

Creole



_____________________________

"If I owned Texas, and Hell, I would rent out Texas, and live in Hell." ~Gen. John Sheridan, 1855

"I was thinking of the immortal words of socrates, who said, 'I drank what?'" ~Chris Knight, Real Genius

(in reply to twicehappy)
Profile   Post #: 91
RE: BDSM Definitions? - 9/27/2006 12:36:15 PM   
BrutalAntipathy


Posts: 412
Joined: 7/8/2005
Status: offline
I get the feeling that people are intimidated by mutually agreed upon definitions, but I have trouble understanding why. It seems that most of those opposed to it feel that to define this aspect is to box them in. I can't understand where they are coming from with that. Is it boxing a woman in to label her a woman? Is it boxing an attorney in to label her an attorney? A teacher to label him a teacher? This is the way that language works. We label, define, and compartmentalize by way of comprehension. It is not a way for one defined group to feel superior to another, but a way in which multiple people can comprehend what everyone else is talking about. The whole " Let everyone write their own definition " idea is counterproductive. Definitions don't constrain, they clarify.

(in reply to ShiftedJewel)
Profile   Post #: 92
RE: BDSM Definitions? - 9/27/2006 12:42:36 PM   
ShiftedJewel


Posts: 2492
Joined: 12/2/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: BrutalAntipathy

I get the feeling that people are intimidated by mutually agreed upon definitions, but I have trouble understanding why. It seems that most of those opposed to it feel that to define this aspect is to box them in. I can't understand where they are coming from with that. Is it boxing a woman in to label her a woman? Is it boxing an attorney in to label her an attorney? A teacher to label him a teacher? This is the way that language works. We label, define, and compartmentalize by way of comprehension. It is not a way for one defined group to feel superior to another, but a way in which multiple people can comprehend what everyone else is talking about. The whole " Let everyone write their own definition " idea is counterproductive. Definitions don't constrain, they clarify.


Wow... extremely well said and a great question. Unfortunately it isn't one I have an answer for... .
 
Jewel

_____________________________

Don't ask, trust me, you won't like the answer... no one ever does.

(in reply to BrutalAntipathy)
Profile   Post #: 93
RE: BDSM Definitions? - 9/27/2006 12:42:46 PM   
juliaoceania


Posts: 21383
Joined: 4/19/2006
From: Somewhere Over the Rainbow
Status: offline
Well a teacher is a nice blanket term... but what kind of teacher? I am a mother, I have heard we are the ultimate teachers...


What kind of attorney?

If you are a hermaphodite then you may not want to be called a woman even though that definition would fit

If you are in the process of becoming a woman the label will not fit

If you do not want to be a woman, but a man and are having a sex change in a couple of years, are you a woman?

Is a transexual with an XY chromosome a woman?

Boxes do not always fit the reality of a person's life, even on the most basic levels.



_____________________________

Once you label me, you negate me ~ Soren Kierkegaard

Reality has a well known Liberal Bias ~ Stephen Colbert

Great minds discuss ideas; Average minds discuss events; Small minds discuss people. Eleanor Roosevelt

(in reply to BrutalAntipathy)
Profile   Post #: 94
RE: BDSM Definitions? - 9/27/2006 12:49:39 PM   
justheather


Posts: 1532
Joined: 10/4/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: BrutalAntipathy

I get the feeling that people are intimidated by mutually agreed upon definitions, but I have trouble understanding why. It seems that most of those opposed to it feel that to define this aspect is to box them in.




The problem I have is with boxing people out.

And, what julia said.



_____________________________

I want the scissors to be sharp
And the table perfectly level
When you cut me out of my life
And paste me in that book you always carry.
-Billy Collins

(in reply to BrutalAntipathy)
Profile   Post #: 95
RE: BDSM Definitions? - 9/27/2006 1:05:32 PM   
BrutalAntipathy


Posts: 412
Joined: 7/8/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: juliaoceania

Well a teacher is a nice blanket term... but what kind of teacher? I am a mother, I have heard we are the ultimate teachers...


What kind of attorney?

If you are a hermaphodite then you may not want to be called a woman even though that definition would fit

If you are in the process of becoming a woman the label will not fit

If you do not want to be a woman, but a man and are having a sex change in a couple of years, are you a woman?

Is a transexual with an XY chromosome a woman?

Boxes do not always fit the reality of a person's life, even on the most basic levels.




Not all mothers are good teachers, but all teachers are teachers.
 
All attorneys are likewise attorneys. Calling them attorneys narrows the field of definition in order to allow one to tell the difference between them and a CPA. You may narrow the field even further with personal injury attorney, but the core definition still applies.
 
A hermorphadite is a hermorphadite, again, the definition applies correctly. They could loosely be called both male and female without confusing the person you were discussing them with.
 
Sex changes, even those complete with hormone therapy, are largely surface changes, and do not change the man into a woman on a chromosomal level. The XY trannie is still male, but one with cosmetic changes.
 
Definitions actually do fit the basic levels of life, otherwise language would be impossible. Suggesting otherwise is like suggesting math without numbers. Ok, spam + lighter fluid = tennis shoe, everyone agree? Only when people agree upon definitions in language or math is any communication possible.

(in reply to juliaoceania)
Profile   Post #: 96
RE: BDSM Definitions? - 9/27/2006 1:08:00 PM   
Frank01


Posts: 270
Joined: 9/7/2006
Status: offline
I can choose to call a dog a cat. It's still a dog.

No matter how much I would like to have the fantasy of it being one.

(in reply to BrutalAntipathy)
Profile   Post #: 97
RE: BDSM Definitions? - 9/27/2006 1:10:11 PM   
justheather


Posts: 1532
Joined: 10/4/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: BrutalAntipathy
Definitions actually do fit the basic levels of life, otherwise language would be impossible. Suggesting otherwise is like suggesting math without numbers. Ok, spam + lighter fluid = tennis shoe, everyone agree? Only when people agree upon definitions in language or math is any communication possible.


Right, and the terms being discussed already have definitions, which is how we are able to discuss them right now.

_____________________________

I want the scissors to be sharp
And the table perfectly level
When you cut me out of my life
And paste me in that book you always carry.
-Billy Collins

(in reply to BrutalAntipathy)
Profile   Post #: 98
RE: BDSM Definitions? - 9/27/2006 1:13:42 PM   
spankmepink11


Posts: 1310
Joined: 9/28/2005
Status: offline
I'm not big on labels myself. I think twice' definitions are pretty general and all of these terms can be found on the BDSM dictionary site, with definitions that closely resemble those listed.here.  As i've said, i consider these terms as they are, in the most general forms. These generalities when applied to individulas result in the many different "flavors" available to us.  Ice cream is still ice cream, whether it's  butter pecan, rocky road, or fudge swirl.  I identify as  submissive,  due to my feelings...desires compulsions and the definition of such (the definition is the starting point) . As to the "flavor" of my submission, i know that i'm a masochistic, service oriented, submissive woman. My individual "flavor" will surely differ from others who  also identify with the core definition of "submissive"
I hope that makes sense, i'm so tired and operating on about 1/2  a brain cell.

(in reply to BrutalAntipathy)
Profile   Post #: 99
RE: BDSM Definitions? - 9/27/2006 1:37:44 PM   
twicehappy


Posts: 2706
Joined: 2/5/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: justheather

And no, I dont think it is appropriate for one self-appointed person to survey a small group and then purport to speak for the masses regarding what "we" define as XYZ, even if it is supposed to be "for the sake of understanding".


Great minded people throughout history made the decision to speak for themselves and to exchange thoughts with others until that one person's idea gathered momentum thus becoming the force of change.
 
As for speaking for the masses it is to the masses i went asking for their definitions.
 
At what point did i claim to be speaking for anybody but myself? I stated after a week or so i would tally the definitions that were most agreed on and post the results.
 
As to the appropriateness of my behavior, that is not for you to question. I have the full support of both my owners, the only approval i need for my actions.
 
Instead of coming back with your varied an oft contradictory responses, why not, if you do not care for the definitions presented thus far, take the time to write out your definitions?
 
It is very easy to condemn an idea; it is much more difficult to come up with an alternative of your own.
 
Before you come back with a retort to the fact that you would find it useless or a waste of time let me remind you of the time you have already wasted in argument that produced nothing positive thus far.
  
 
 

_____________________________

Infinite Diversity in Infinite Combinations.

The human heart is not a finite container but an ever expanding universe with all the stars contained there in.

(in reply to justheather)
Profile   Post #: 100
Page:   <<   < prev  3 4 [5] 6 7   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion >> RE: BDSM Definitions? Page: <<   < prev  3 4 [5] 6 7   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2024
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.101