Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: Loving Your Property


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion >> RE: Loving Your Property Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Loving Your Property - 10/13/2006 8:00:12 AM   
KatyLied


Posts: 13029
Joined: 2/24/2005
From: Pennsylvania
Status: offline
quote:

it invawiably comes down to twue, don't it?


Why, yes of course, in this place, it's all about:

real
twue
spiritual



_____________________________

“If you want to live a happy life, tie it to a goal, not to people or things.”
- Albert Einstein

(in reply to mnottertail)
Profile   Post #: 21
RE: Loving Your Property - 10/13/2006 8:01:26 AM   
ShiftedJewel


Posts: 2492
Joined: 12/2/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: KatyLied

quote:

I do understand why others, especially those who don't require love in order to submit/dominate another, have difficulty understanding people who do need a caring, loving, committed relationship prior to submitting.


Here's the part that confuses me.  During courtship, before you are "in love", are you expected to demonstrate submission?  Or do you not enter into any D/s until after love is there?  Is the submission you demonstrate at that point lesser than the submission you demonstrate when you are in love?  Is it less fulfilling or less worthy?  Or do you fall in love at first sight?


I don't know how the rest of the world works, but for me... no, it isn't love at first sight... but there is something... a connection of sorts. It could be something as simple as knowing in your heart and mind that if nothing else there will be a friendship. I've met enough people that just didn't "click" to know that I couldn't commit to a relationship with them. But then again, I don't expect anyone to demonstrate their submission when we first meet just as I won't demonstrate my dominance to them. I want to know them as a person first.
 
Jewel

_____________________________

Don't ask, trust me, you won't like the answer... no one ever does.

(in reply to KatyLied)
Profile   Post #: 22
RE: Loving Your Property - 10/13/2006 8:03:21 AM   
WindOWillow


Posts: 18
Joined: 8/12/2006
Status: offline
Hi KatyLied.

In both relationships where I felt desire to submit to the gentlemen, we we're friends first. When I married my ex-husband, D/s didn't come into play for about a year into our marriage. In the second relationship, we we're also friends for while prior to my submitting to him. He understood my need to wait until I felt secure in the relationship.

No. I don't fall in love easily. If anything, I have difficulty with the issue of love.

Like I've stated, I'm not naturally submissive in everyday existing. This is not a great need for me to fulfill myself as a person. But for some reason, in a loving relationship, I do tend to naturally wish to submit to the individual man in the context of that relationship.

(in reply to KatyLied)
Profile   Post #: 23
RE: Loving Your Property - 10/13/2006 8:04:15 AM   
KatyLied


Posts: 13029
Joined: 2/24/2005
From: Pennsylvania
Status: offline
Yes, I agree with the "click", there needs to be some sort of chemistry going on.  For me it doesn't have to be love.  I can submit without it, although I've not had a lot of experience submitting in my life.  So I don't know if it comes easily to me or if the circumstances are just there somehow.

_____________________________

“If you want to live a happy life, tie it to a goal, not to people or things.”
- Albert Einstein

(in reply to ShiftedJewel)
Profile   Post #: 24
RE: Loving Your Property - 10/13/2006 8:11:28 AM   
SlaveAkasha


Posts: 726
Joined: 9/30/2006
From: Indiana
Status: offline
I have submitted without loving someone, and also had someone Dom me that didn't love me.  There has always except for once, been affection there though.
 
My Master is very open about his feelings for me.  He tells me, "Yes, you are my property, but you are also a person."  I am also told that I am loved on a daily basis. 
 
I can see how it could go both ways, I mean, you might feel more like an object without the love, but I can see how it could become very empty just being used ALL the time.
 
I think we have a good balance of affection, and "Mastering" time.  Sure you can have either or and work out fine, but it's a lot more fun to have the whole package.
 
Masters Akasha

_____________________________

Look, if you want to torture me, spank me, lick me, do it. But if this poetry shit continues just shoot me now please.
~ Tank Girl

www.peta.org
www.goveg.com

(in reply to Rover)
Profile   Post #: 25
RE: Loving Your Property - 10/13/2006 8:19:01 AM   
darkinshadows


Posts: 4145
Joined: 6/2/2004
From: UK
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: KatyLied

quote:

it invawiably comes down to twue, don't it?


Why, yes of course, in this place, it's all about:

real
twue
spiritual


 
Hey Katy - you forgot the 'new' one I keep seeing now....
 
'genuine'
 
Peace and Rapture


_____________________________


.dark.




...i surrender to gravity and the unknown...

(in reply to KatyLied)
Profile   Post #: 26
RE: Loving Your Property - 10/13/2006 8:21:15 AM   
KatyLied


Posts: 13029
Joined: 2/24/2005
From: Pennsylvania
Status: offline
quote:

'genuine'


good one!


_____________________________

“If you want to live a happy life, tie it to a goal, not to people or things.”
- Albert Einstein

(in reply to darkinshadows)
Profile   Post #: 27
RE: Loving Your Property - 10/13/2006 8:57:43 AM   
Bearlee


Posts: 2311
Joined: 10/25/2004
From: South Central CO
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Rover

In reading some of the various active threads, I sense an inability or aversion on the part of some people to demonstrate (at least publicly) that they have actual "feelings" (love, perhaps?) for their property.  As if doing so somehow negates their status as property....


Personally, I believe some think doing so somehow negates their status as property OWNERS!  Seems a shame to me; and personally I think it says leagues about their self esteem...but that's just me.
 
Even with a dog, while one is not 'in love' with it...generally one delights in playing with it, training, petting & caring for it...  Seems to me there is some level of affection there; for most people, anyway.
 
beverly

(in reply to Rover)
Profile   Post #: 28
RE: Loving Your Property - 10/13/2006 9:06:31 AM   
demistress


Posts: 391
Joined: 4/24/2006
From: Dela-where?
Status: offline
I am very loving, I think it makes me a better domme, not a lesser one.  Period.  I would never 'act' as though I didn't love someone if I did, nor would I act as if I loved someone I did not love.


_____________________________

Mistress Heather
www.niteflirt.com/MizzSpice

Wether you think you can, or you think you can't, you're right!

(in reply to Bearlee)
Profile   Post #: 29
RE: Loving Your Property - 10/13/2006 9:54:39 AM   
juliaoceania


Posts: 21383
Joined: 4/19/2006
From: Somewhere Over the Rainbow
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: justheather


quote:

ORIGINAL: KatyLied
It's Friday the 13th!


Is that the one with Jason or Michael?
It's Jason, right?
Ok, so we stay away from campgrounds and awkward sex with people in their late twenties pretending to be teen camp counselors and we are safe.



I bet Freddy would be really good at sensation play, although Jason could give him a run for his money...

_____________________________

Once you label me, you negate me ~ Soren Kierkegaard

Reality has a well known Liberal Bias ~ Stephen Colbert

Great minds discuss ideas; Average minds discuss events; Small minds discuss people. Eleanor Roosevelt

(in reply to justheather)
Profile   Post #: 30
RE: Loving Your Property - 10/13/2006 9:57:20 AM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
this is not genuine moo goo gai pan!!!???!!!

Ress brocorri,  prease!

WRon

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to darkinshadows)
Profile   Post #: 31
RE: Loving Your Property - 10/13/2006 10:00:30 AM   
juliaoceania


Posts: 21383
Joined: 4/19/2006
From: Somewhere Over the Rainbow
Status: offline
I will take a stab at the OP

I would not involve myself with a dominant I felt was incapable of giving me love one day. It is a need of mine to be loved and I seek a lifelong commitment to the one that I submit myself to. If that is not a possibility, like LA said, I might as well be vanilla... I would rather be loved than dominated.. but I think I can have it all!

Others have different needs, no skin off my nose.



_____________________________

Once you label me, you negate me ~ Soren Kierkegaard

Reality has a well known Liberal Bias ~ Stephen Colbert

Great minds discuss ideas; Average minds discuss events; Small minds discuss people. Eleanor Roosevelt

(in reply to Rover)
Profile   Post #: 32
RE: Loving Your Property - 10/13/2006 12:04:49 PM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
quote:

  The Jster
I will take a stab at the OP


I'm thinkin' snuffin' the OP is against TOS, kiddo!

Ron the Ripper 

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to juliaoceania)
Profile   Post #: 33
RE: Loving Your Property - 10/13/2006 12:09:52 PM   
cuddleheart50


Posts: 9718
Joined: 2/20/2006
From: Kentucky
Status: offline
I could not be in a relationship without love.

_____________________________

Dance like no one is watching,
Sing like no one is listening.
Love like you've never been hurt
and live like it's heaven on Earth.


(in reply to mnottertail)
Profile   Post #: 34
RE: Loving Your Property - 10/13/2006 12:14:46 PM   
juliaoceania


Posts: 21383
Joined: 4/19/2006
From: Somewhere Over the Rainbow
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

quote:

  The Jster
I will take a stab at the OP


I'm thinkin' snuffin' the OP is against TOS, kiddo!

Ron the Ripper 


Only if it is nonconsensual

_____________________________

Once you label me, you negate me ~ Soren Kierkegaard

Reality has a well known Liberal Bias ~ Stephen Colbert

Great minds discuss ideas; Average minds discuss events; Small minds discuss people. Eleanor Roosevelt

(in reply to mnottertail)
Profile   Post #: 35
RE: Loving Your Property - 10/13/2006 12:39:53 PM   
CreativeDominant


Posts: 11032
Joined: 3/11/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: WindOWillow

Creative,

I do understand why others, especially those who don't require love in order to submit/dominate another, have difficulty understanding people who do need a caring, loving, committed relationship prior to submitting.

It's cool. It's okay to have different ways of navigating this realm.


Ah but you see, you missed a very important part in my first post...I stated that I don't quite understand those that will not submit without being in love while at the same time stating that they have a need to submit.  I need food, I need water, I need warmth, but I do not need to dominate.
I understand those who submit without being in love but having a loving connection with their dominant.  I much prefer that to casual play.  But...loving someone is not the same as being in love with them.

quote:

My personal internal make-up just doesn't allow me to become physically/emotionally intimate with a man unless there is mutual love. {/quote]

And as I said, I prefer that there be mutual love also.  That does not equate to being in love.

quote:

Now, as far as having difficulty finding the "One". I don't think that submissives are holding out stubbornly sseeking some sort of fantasy, Fabio, romance book Dominant. Some people are more sensitive than others when it comes to who they wish to be vulnerable and open with. For me, that's the crux of submission. Being vulnerable. Trust. Giving of myself. {/quote]

Yes...and that kind of trust and vulnerability can, though not always, involve loving someone.  That makes sense.  I prefer it.  But having been involved with a married submissive whose husband was well aware of our relationship and who had a submissive of his own, I can honestly say that she loved me...deeply (as I did her)...but did not and would not allow herself to fall IN love with me.
And I agree that not all submissives who hold out are being stubborn while waiting for Fabio or some other romantic ideal dominant.  But there are some who are tying the submission to the feeling of being in love.  There are dominants out there who want that also but many see it as "you don't get this unless you give me that" which tends to lead to some of the complaints of some of those waiting.  

quote:

Personally, I'm more content not actualizing my submission rather than being with someone who is unable to love me and vice versa. It's the ultimate in unfulfillment.


That I understand.  I think where the quibble comes in...if there is one...is a misconception between us as to whether or not loving someone and being loved by them is the same as being in love. 

(in reply to WindOWillow)
Profile   Post #: 36
RE: Loving Your Property - 10/13/2006 1:12:21 PM   
fckmeimirish


Posts: 27
Joined: 5/11/2006
Status: offline
A slave brings their master so much pleasure.  A slave takes up so much of thier Master's thoughts.  A slave requires a good deal of effort from their master through training and discipline.  With all of these things siad ... how can a Dom/Master not feel some sort of affection for their slaves/subbies?  Seeing it as a defect or weakness in a D/s relationship is throwing the baby out with the bathwater, so to speak.  Feeling too much affection, for some, may stay their hand when punishment is necessary ... and that would be a defect or a weakness.  I think that some have taken this view to an extreme and have just decided that they cannot care about thier property and still treat it the way that their role dictates.  For some, real romantic love may exist as the backbone of the Master/slave relationship ... for others the affection one would feel towards a loyal pet ... but I cried like a child when my dog died so I'd still call that love ... and I suppose for a small part of the world ... a slave is pleased and thier being resonates with beingin a very cold and indifferent situation.  A fool's errand is the search for black and white in an endless sea of greys.

(in reply to CreativeDominant)
Profile   Post #: 37
RE: Loving Your Property - 10/13/2006 1:22:29 PM   
Littlepita


Posts: 1430
Joined: 10/6/2005
Status: offline
We were lying in bed cuddling after I received a delicious spanking and I said, "I love you Master" and he said, "Is it alright if the Master is in love with His slave?" I of course said yes.

_____________________________

“I, with a deeper instinct, choose a man who compels my strength, who makes enormous demands on me, who does not doubt my courage or my toughness, who does not believe me naive or innocent, who has the courage to treat me like a woman.” – Anais Nin

(in reply to fckmeimirish)
Profile   Post #: 38
RE: Loving Your Property - 10/13/2006 1:23:30 PM   
thetammyjo


Posts: 6322
Joined: 9/8/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Rover

In reading some of the various active threads, I sense an inability or aversion on the part of some people to demonstrate (at least publicly) that they have actual "feelings" (love, perhaps?) for their property. As if doing so somehow negates their status as property.

Is this just whistling past the graveyard, pretending feelings don't exist?
Does the acceptance of feelings detract from the enjoyment of your ownership, or service?
Is it online posturing?
Is it genuine?
Is "love" incompatible with ownership?
Or is it something else?

Looking forward to your comments.

John


*blink*

I certainly think that my love for Fox comes out pretty clearly in everything I write on here. For our anniversary (#7 we just celebrated all this past weekend) I got him a t-shirt that says "Owned & Loved" on it.

He got both ears pierced for me.

However I am quite capable and have had in the past Ds relationships and even ownership where I did not romantically love my property or trainee. I feel deep friendship and respect for him/her but I didn't love them in any romantic or sexual way.

_____________________________

Love, Peace, Hugs, Kisses, Whips & Chains,

TammyJo

Check out my website at http://www.thetammyjo.com Or www.tammyjoeckhart.com

And my LJ where I post fiction in progress if you "friend" me at http://thetammyjo.livejournal.com/

(in reply to Rover)
Profile   Post #: 39
RE: Loving Your Property - 10/13/2006 1:35:35 PM   
LuckyAlbatross


Posts: 19224
Joined: 10/25/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: thetammyjo
I got him a t-shirt that says "Owned & Loved" on it.

He got both ears pierced for me.

However I am quite capable and have had in the past Ds relationships and even ownership where I did not romantically love my property or trainee. I feel deep friendship and respect for him/her but I didn't love them in any romantic or sexual way.


Awww happy anniversary!!!!  I can't wait to get to 7!

_____________________________

Find stable partners, not a stable of partners.

"Sometimes my whore logic gets all fuzzy"- Californication

(in reply to thetammyjo)
Profile   Post #: 40
Page:   <<   < prev  1 [2] 3   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion >> RE: Loving Your Property Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.094