WhiteRadiance
Posts: 247
Joined: 9/8/2005 Status: offline
|
Hey Rover I wonder what threads you read. While I do not think that everyone loves their subs, I would hope that the majority of dom/mes have at least some affection for them. I think though, that sex and sexuality-to some- has become a thing that is detached from the person. It seems to me that many acts are done to produce personal sexual satisfaction, and the method by which it comes is not important. If the method is the use of a person who becomes and object, and there are no emotions involved, it is still rewarding on the basic carnal level. Apparently it is rewarding to both parties, if they agree upon the activity. There are those who want to have more than that which is on the carnal level, but not everyone does. Of course love is compatible with ownership. I love my slave. I have a couple of others whom I respect and think highly of, and there are those whom I use for my amusement. I like them all, and the circumstance of the relationship, the chemistry that is there, as well as the needs we have- are addressed in each instance. In order for certain people to be fulfilled they need love. Others do not. Both types exist. quote:
ORIGINAL: Rover In reading some of the various active threads, I sense an inability or aversion on the part of some people to demonstrate (at least publicly) that they have actual "feelings" (love, perhaps?) for their property. As if doing so somehow negates their status as property. Is this just whistling past the graveyard, pretending feelings don't exist? Does the acceptance of feelings detract from the enjoyment of your ownership, or service? Is it online posturing? Is it genuine? Is "love" incompatible with ownership? Or is it something else? Looking forward to your comments. John
< Message edited by WhiteRadiance -- 10/13/2006 7:09:57 AM >
_____________________________
Staci The drop of rain makes a hole in a stone not by violence, but by often falling.
|