RE: hard to find a (no fees) dominant female

RE: hard to find a (no fees) dominant female (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Ask a Mistress

Message

undergroundsea -> RE: hard to find a (no fees) dominant female (11/1/2006 6:18:50 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: MisPandora Sea, she wasn't going after you.....it was ME she was telling off. I know her comment to lighten up was addressed to you. My thoughts were similar to yours and I responded. And then, in line with my tendency to talk to myself, I responded to myself ;-) Cheers, Sea

draba -> RE: hard to find a (no fees) dominant female (11/1/2006 9:10:57 AM)
Hate to tell you. Sperm is no lnger needed to fertilize an egge in women. It can be induced in the lab. Learned this in biology in grad school

nicklovepanties -> RE: hard to find a (no fees) dominant female (11/1/2006 3:25:14 PM)
wish i could find one......

MistressDolly -> RE: hard to find a (no fees) dominant female (11/1/2006 4:42:45 PM)
I feel we are superior in more than one area, not just in the procreation dept. But again, I didnt say that makes you less of a human, or less deserving of love and happpiness, peace and harmony, etc. In response to your question. You're a better onehanded shuffler. Terrific and good for you. Does that make you a better person - no but it does make you superior in that area. Oh and fret not, you didnt burst Any bubble.

MistressDolly -> RE: hard to find a (no fees) dominant female (11/1/2006 4:46:46 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: MisPandora quote: ORIGINAL: undergroundsea quote: ORIGINAL: MistressDolly Did I write It is the attribute of "all" Mistresses?No. Here's My point of note to you: lighten yourself up. you jumped the gun. In that event, I owe you an apology for I similarly jumped the gun. quote: ORIGINAL: MistressDolly My question to you is if you hate women supremacists, why are you here then seeking a dominant woman? snipped stuff Sea, she wasn't going after you.....it was ME she was telling off. did i write: "you don't belong here?" No. If you expand your narrow mode of attention just a teeny tiny bit and take into account the entirety of my post - you would understand what I was really trying to say to this member. You missed the entire point of my thread. you're focusing on a fragment of the post and taking it out of context. First you erroneously accuse me of saying 'All' (which I did not), then u come back a second time to accuse me of saying he shouldn't be here (which I did not). You missed the entire gist of the post. I guess that's what happens when the cup is always half empty. Depending on how you choose to view the world, you will find exactly what you're looking for. I've always felt it's not so much the facts that matter most - it's ones perception of the facts that matter more. To some my thread was a condemnation, to others it was a sincere effort to help. Anyway, in the end it really doesn't matter. The world's going to keep on spinning. psI wasn't telling you off. Don't flatter yourself - you reply didn't move me all that much my friend.

MistressDolly -> RE: hard to find a (no fees) dominant female (11/1/2006 4:53:59 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: undergroundsea quote: ORIGINAL: undergroundsea quote: ORIGINAL: MistressDolly My question to you is if you hate women supremacists, why are you here then seeking a dominant woman? <snip> Clearly I have missed something. And so if you would clarify what you did mean when you asked that question (why a man who hates female supremacists seeks dominant women), it would help anyone who misunderstood you to understand what you truly meant. I appreciate that your post in which you asked the question quoted above was intended to be positive and helpful and feel I responded with a spirit not consistent with yours, for which I apologize. The point that Fm does not necessarily equate to female supremacy has been stated and from my perspective the discussion can continue. I think the note about the clarification I mention above is unnecessary for the discussion at hand and I retract it. Cheers, Sea Don't apologize Sea, it's quite alright. But I thank you none-the-less. Glad you picked up on what my intent was.

nicklovepanties -> RE: hard to find a (no fees) dominant female (11/2/2006 10:53:11 AM)
what arrogance! maybe the one hand shuffle is better than putting up with this BS

kittencurious -> RE: hard to find a (no fees) dominant female (11/2/2006 12:32:30 PM)
i just wish that "professional" was a search option so the professionals would not show up in my searches.

MisPandora -> RE: hard to find a (no fees) dominant female (11/3/2006 7:04:39 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: nicklovepanties what arrogance! maybe the one hand shuffle is better than putting up with this BS Sad, isn't it..... At least you guys know that it's not just ya'll that put up with the dismissive attitudes!

jimbo747 -> RE: hard to find a (no fees) dominant female (11/3/2006 8:20:03 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: MistressDolly quote: ORIGINAL: MisPandora quote: ORIGINAL: undergroundsea quote: ORIGINAL: MistressDolly Did I write It is the attribute of "all" Mistresses?No. Here's My point of note to you: lighten yourself up. you jumped the gun. In that event, I owe you an apology for I similarly jumped the gun. quote: ORIGINAL: MistressDolly My question to you is if you hate women supremacists, why are you here then seeking a dominant woman? snipped stuff Sea, she wasn't going after you.....it was ME she was telling off. did i write: "you don't belong here?" No. If you expand your narrow mode of attention just a teeny tiny bit and take into account the entirety of my post - you would understand what I was really trying to say to this member. You missed the entire point of my thread. you're focusing on a fragment of the post and taking it out of context. First you erroneously accuse me of saying 'All' (which I did not), then u come back a second time to accuse me of saying he shouldn't be here (which I did not). You missed the entire gist of the post. I guess that's what happens when the cup is always half empty. Depending on how you choose to view the world, you will find exactly what you're looking for. I've always felt it's not so much the facts that matter most - it's ones perception of the facts that matter more. To some my thread was a condemnation, to others it was a sincere effort to help. Anyway, in the end it really doesn't matter. The world's going to keep on spinning. psI wasn't telling you off. Don't flatter yourself - you reply didn't move me all that much my friend. I get your point and consider it unfortunate its ultimate meaning was lost with him and some. You meant well. *applause

gooddogbenji -> RE: hard to find a (no fees) dominant female (11/3/2006 3:10:12 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: MistressDolly I feel we are superior in more than one area, not just in the procreation dept. But again, I didnt say that makes you less of a human, or less deserving of love and happpiness, peace and harmony, etc. In response to your question. You're a better onehanded shuffler. Terrific and good for you. Does that make you a better person - no but it does make you superior in that area. Oh and fret not, you didnt burst Any bubble. I would argue that for each area where you are superiour, I could come up with an area where we are superiour, but I neither have the time, nor patience to deal with that. At the end of the day, you may be breastier, but I can still punch your lights out when you annoy me. To address this: quote: As to female supremacists: If we take supremacy to mean: quote: 1 : highest in rank or authority; supreme authority or power per the dictionary, than a female dominant is acting in the role of a female supremacist, but I could always be wrong. M I would argue that female supremacy has less to do with the individual and more with the gender. A female supremacist would normally refer to people who believe that females are inherently superiour, rather than, "Yer mine cuz I wantcha." Female supremacy means supreme power of females, not of individuals. Yours, benji

Mikal -> RE: hard to find a (no fees) dominant female (11/3/2006 4:07:01 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: gooddogbenji At the end of the day, you may be breastier, but I can still punch your lights out when you annoy me. Tsk tsk benji... be nice. Not everyone has lights on... [:D]... and the offer of violence is not needed [>:]. Disagree as you like, but please be less... hmmm... physical in your arguments... It's offensive & I really don't see the need for it. Ok?

Argentopal -> RE: hard to find a (no fees) dominant female (11/3/2006 4:25:21 PM)
Tsk tsk benji... be nice. Not everyone has lights on... [:D]... and heck, sometimes the lights are on, and nobody's home![sm=biggrin.gif]

gooddogbenji -> RE: hard to find a (no fees) dominant female (11/3/2006 4:29:58 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Mikal quote: ORIGINAL: gooddogbenji At the end of the day, you may be breastier, but I can still punch your lights out when you annoy me. Tsk tsk benji... be nice. Not everyone has lights on... [:D]... and the offer of violence is not needed [>:]. Disagree as you like, but please be less... hmmm... physical in your arguments... It's offensive & I really don't see the need for it. Ok? It was simply an (allegedly) humourous attempt to show that women have their areas of superiourity, just as men do. Yours, benji

BossySSBBW -> RE: hard to find a (no fees) dominant female (11/4/2006 12:21:48 PM)
I am a "no fee" Domme, it just seems a large number of sub/slaves do not want a woman my size which is super sized and I make no excuses for it. It is clearly stated in my profile, I don't hide things. Maybe one day a nice sub/slave will want an old, fat Domme...lol. Until then I pay all my bills myself and my debt base is $1,000.00 or less. Perhaps if you present yourself with the positive things you can add to a Domme's life, one will be more willing to interact with you. Ms. Judith

Mikal -> RE: hard to find a (no fees) dominant female (11/4/2006 4:45:53 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: BossySSBBW ... Maybe one day a nice sub/slave will want an old, fat Domme... Ms. Judith, you are simply pleasantly plump, with gorgeous hair, experience (can never have too much of that!), and lot's of love to give.

LTRsubNW -> RE: hard to find a (no fees) dominant female (11/4/2006 4:48:34 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: slavebarry please can anyone help as to why it is so difficult to meet a dominant female for a (no fees) relationship, it seems like after writing to nearly every dominant female on this site there is still very little to show for my efforts,whats wrong with females on here dont they want a slave. Bud...get used to it; you're going to pay, whether it's before the fact or after....it's your job to pay. (Really).

jimbo747 -> RE: hard to find a (no fees) dominant female (11/5/2006 7:38:56 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: gooddogbenji I would argue that for each area where you are superiour, I could come up with an area where we are superiour, but I neither have the time, nor patience to deal with that. At the end of the day, you may be breastier, but I can still punch your lights out when you annoy me. Guys who brag about being able to phyically punch out a girl annoy me as you did in your touch guy quote. Tell you what, when you get done as you say "punching her lights out" come try that on a real man - we'll see whose lights get punched ou then. you should know a 5 ft 80pound girl could take down a 6 foot man with good fighting and defense skills. go to your local karate school and just watch. your pathetic.

Page: << < prev 2 3 4 5 [6]

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

0.03125