Joseph6
Posts: 2
Joined: 1/31/2005 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: GddssBella G'morning fellow freaks & deviants Personally, in the main, I agree w/ Angelika. I don't know that I'd describe masculinity as a fetish, but it certainly is my preference when dealing with male subs. C/d's, t/v's, sissies, adult babies, etc. have no appeal to me. Males in these roles generally just want to either prance around & look cute, being totally useless or else they wish to be taken care of. Blech. Men however, have a distinct appeal. Their very virility, strength, dignity being bent low in surrender to me is like a drug. Once savored, addiction has set in. A man of chivalry, wit, & charm so secure in himself that submission to me is a natural progression of his affections. I do enjoy having a man be a domestic. I feel the traditional role reversal strengthens the power dynamic. The fact that my apartment is cleaned is simply a bonus. Physical manifestation of a woman's powers during corporal play re-enforces her dominion over men. Being a sadist, I am heavy handed in my endeavors. When a man can persevere, allowing his mind to overcome the pain, it shows a strength of character that is attractive to me. Channeling it, absorbing it, returning the energy back to me. In return, I nuture his feelings, letting him know my pleasure with him. I've found that truly submissive individuals seek out the happiness of their dominant. It's integral to their own. When they are the vessel of such happiness, it multiplies their own. Submission, by definition, denotes humility. Hence why I don't understand how the needy, me-me mentality comes into being. It is indicative of a bottom, certainly not a submissive. *hops off her lil pulpit & to all* Stay safe, play nice, share your toys with others.... Bella Brava Bella, Well said indeed! Joseph
|