sissymaidlola
Posts: 518
Joined: 3/27/2004
Status: offline
|
Hmmm, so what is it about the " " symbol that plainly identified sissy's post as satire that You didn't understand, Lady Angelika ?
To completely deconstruct a light-hearted humorous post point by point like You have done, Miss, is, to say the least, more than a little anally retentive. sissy Is not going to respond in like kind, Miss, first because he doesn't have the time or energy, but more importantly, because Your response to his post was really quite inappropriate, and to respond in like kind would only mean that sissy validates such a riposte. However some kind of acknowledging response by sissy to Your post is called for, Lady Angelika. Overall, Miss, You appear to have completely misunderstood the simply humorous, entirely entertainment motivated intent of sissy's post. Furthermore, You seem to have incorrectly construed somewhat flippant comments against "women in general" to have been, for some reason, directed against You personally, Miss, when it is clear to any reader with half a brain (some of whom have posted responses to sissy's post on Your thread) that that is not the case. Most of your reply post was restrained and relatively polite, Lady Angelika, even if a little over-analytical and self-indulgent given the clearly humorous context of sissy's post, but near the end of Your post You do appear to have thrown away any civil restraint, and resorted to uncalled for accusations against, and personal attacks on, sissy.
In so personalizing matters, Lady Angelika, You have unfortunately created a lose-lose situation ... even if sissy addresses the obvious inaccuracy and absurdity of Your unsubstantiated comments, the overall impression left of Your thread on the reader will still be a very negative one. In the domain of internet posting, writing responses to unjust lies and ad hominem attacks such as Yours, even when they lucidly re-address the balance, still seem to have the lasting effect of doubling the negativity rather than nullifying it. It is this basic paradox that trolls feed off ... nothing gives them greater pleasure than to see someone try to reason rationally with a bigot.
You do not know sissy at all, Lady Angelika, and therefore have no basis whatsoever to make comments such as "Again, your pent up anger is unleashed on me. The thing is, it almost makes me feel sorry for you, to see that you have to act out in such a defensive way." You appear to misintepret self-deprecation and humor for defensiveness. Anyone reading sissy's post and then that absurd comment can see where the anger really lies. Definitely, anyone that has ever taken the trouble to read sissy's posts on this message board (as well as on other boards) or to read his profile and journal over on the other side of CollarMe, will know how preposterous such a comment is. And sissy can say for certain that anyone that has ever corresponded with him, or knows him in real life - either the alpha male side or the projected "sissy lola" side - is right now rolling on the floor with snot flying out their noses at such a stupid and unsubstantial accusation.
So for this go-around sissy will simply request that You self-censure Yourself, Lady Angelika. Please review Your post and remove anything in it that You have written that is personal, hateful or unprovable. sissy Isn't going to tell You which comments those are because that would have the same effect as him writing rebuttals to all of them ... it would merely double their presence in cyberspace and other readers' minds, thereby reinforcing them rather than nullifying them. You are a mature, intelligent person, Miss, with a heart, brain and a soul ... please use them responsibly. Finally, just a few friendly words of advice. If You don't like something that someone posts on Your thread, as Your first recourse, try PMing them and asking them to modify or remove it. If you had requested sissy in such a manner to delete his post he would happily have done so, Miss, and he is still willing to do so now. But You need to communicate, Lady Angelika, not rant. If that person is unreasonably stubborn and refuses to oblige a reasonable request, then that is the time to start posting tirades and rebuttals, not before. Whatever it was in his post that hit a nerve of Yours, Miss, by quoting from the post and then rebutting it, all You have achieved is a doubling or tripling of the presence of whatever it is that You didn't want to see or hear in the first place.
For the record, sissy's post was merely a tongue-in-cheek satirical rant that was entirely on-topic for Your thread and designed to both amuse You (its primary goal) as well as bring a little light and happiness into the lives of the other readers of Your thread. To have reacted the way that You did to it was the equivalent of a mother flying into a rage at the gift from Her child. The post advocated, albeit satirically, viewpoints that are basically "anti-Feminist-agenda" and "pro-male-submission-and-service" ... two concepts that You Yourself would appear to support both in Your posted writings in this thread as well as elsewhere. So it was hardly attacking You or Your core values, nor making false accusations about them, but quite the opposite, it was providing a humorous support for them.
Nor did sissy's post "change the name of Your thread" or even suggest doing that, Lady Angelika. sissy Is assuming that that is a reference to the title of his post: "Emasculated pink men." However, that title is a direct quote from Your own post, and it was the words sissy quoted from your post at the head of his own that were the ultimate incentive for sissy deciding to make a contribution to Your thread. Giving one's post a unique title that provides a short pithy summary of its content for the reader is standard message board (mb) etiquette ... but most mb posters are simply too lazy, or too ignorant, to use that feature, and instead just use the default "RE:" option as a title, whether their post is regarding the subject matter of the previous post or not. To accuse sissy of "changing the name of Your thread" when he was, in fact, merely following proper mb protocol, only reflects Your own ignorance WRT standard message board conventions, not to mention a reflection of Your own paranoia in attempting to manipulate a completely innocent action into something devious and cunning on the part of sissy.
You started Your post with the old "making an ASS out of U and ME" saw ... but as things stand, despite Your attempt to spin it to the contrary, it is obvious to anyone reading both posts that sissy has no need to try and make an ass out of You, Miss ... because You are doing a really swell job of it all by Yourself. Please lighten up a little and enjoy life, and do not take Yourself and Your BDSM interests so seriously. You might also want to take a read of the "Is humor attractive ?" thread.
Sincerely Yours,
sissy maid lola
_____________________________
If i don't seem submissive to You, it may be because i'm NOT submissive to You.
|
RE: forced masculinity - 
Profile
A response for the comically challenged - 
RE: thanks for the giggles - 
Hi quietkitten, 
New Messages
No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages
Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages
Locked w/o New Messages
Post New Thread